New winners and losers in North Waziristan: Understanding tensions between top-down projects and local knowledge in the post-conflict setting (2015–2019)

References

• Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26(3), 413–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, A. S. (1980). Pukhtun economy and society: Traditional structure and economic development in a tribal society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A. S. (1991). Resistance and control in Pakistan. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Dawsari, N. (2012). Tribal governance and stability in Yemen. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. B. (1999). Do no harm: How aid can support peace–or war. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Antweiler, C. (1998). Local knowledge and local knowing. An anthropological analysis of contested” cultural products’ in the context of development. Anthropos, 93(4/6), 469–494. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40464844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bangash, A. M. (2004). Jirga; speedy justice of elders. Khyber.org. Retrieved June 21, 2020, from http://www.khyber.org
   Google Scholar
• Barakat, S., & Milton, S. (2020). Localisation Across the Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 15(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620922805
   Google Scholar
• Barakat, S., & Zyck, S. A. (2009). The evolution of post-conflict recovery. Third World Quarterly, 30(6), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590903037333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, H. (2011). Negotiations with the tribes of Waziristan 1849–1914—The British experience. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 39(4), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2011.615597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, G. (2011). Post conflict reconstruction in Africa: Lessons from Sierra Leone. Insight on Africa, 3(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087814411133
   Google Scholar
• Boonzaaijer, C. M. S., & Apusigah, A. A. (2008). Reasons for supporting endogenous development. In D. Millar, A. A. Apusigah, & C. Boonzaaijer (Eds.), Endogenous development in Africa towards a systematisation of experiences (pp. 8–22). Barneveld.
   Google Scholar
• Bräuchler, B. (2015). The cultural dimension of peace: Decentralization and reconciliation in Indonesia. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. A. (2005). The importance of incorporating local culture into community development. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, J. (2005). The use of indigenous knowledge in development: Problems and challenges. Progress in Development Studies, 5(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993405ps105oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caroe, O. (1958). The Pathan, 550BC – Ad 1957. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cernea, M. M. (1985). Putting people first: Sociological variables in rural development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1994). Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development. Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate technology publications.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, N., & Dempsey, J. (2010). Informal dispute resolution in Afghanistan. US Institute for Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Colletta, N. J., & Cullen, M. L. (2000). The nexus between violent conflict, social capital and social cohesion: Case studies from Cambodia and Rwanda. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cuny, F. C. (1994). Disasters and development. Intertect Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawar, A. I. (2015). Un-ending conflict on Pashtun borderland: implications for Pashtun social organisation and state-society relationship in FATA, Pakistan. [ MS Thesis]. Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Dawar, A. I. (2019). Transnational ideologies, violent conflict, and Pashtun Social Identity. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2(2), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.02.02.69
   Google Scholar
• Dawar, A. I. (2020a). Are you a spy? On the inconveniences of conventional methodology in terror wrap ethnography. Qualitative Research Journal, 21(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-11-2019-0091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawar, A. I. (2020b). Geopolitics, identity, and discourse analysis of conflict in Pakistan’s tribal areas. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(56), 122–145. http://journal.iag.ir/article_97971.html?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Dawar, A. I., & Ferreira, M. F. (2021). ‘State-Security First’ and the militarization of development: Local perceptions on post-conflict reconstruction policies in Pakistan’s Tribal Areas (2015–2019). Forum for Development Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2021.1893808
   Google Scholar
• DAWN. (2016). Tribals oppose reconstruction of markets by govt in North Waziristan. DAWN, Islamabad, Pakistan. Retrieved June 13, 2020, from https://www.dawn.com/news/1299369
   Google Scholar
• DAWN. (2020). Land dispute claims two lives in Waziristan. Islamabad, Pakistan. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://www.dawn.com/news/1556474/land-dispute-claims-two-lives-in-waziristan
   Google Scholar
• De Juan, A. (2017). “Traditional” resolution of land conflicts: The survival of precolonial dispute settlement in Burundi. Comparative Political Studies, 50(13), 1835–1868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016688006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (2004). Traditional culture—Let’s hear no more about it. In M. V. W. Rao (Ed.), Culture and public action (pp. 85–109). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, R. (2002). Reinvention and progress in applying local knowledge to development. In A. Bicker, J. Pottier, & P. Sillitoe (Eds.), Participating in development: Approaches to indigenous knowledge (pp. 235–258). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ep, A. A., & Sebastian, A. (2016). Development and cultural distortion: Assessing the impacts of development programmes and policies on medicinal practice of Baiga community of Chhattisgarh. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 8(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X16628612
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FATA Secretariat. (2015). FATA sustainable return and rehabilitation strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Willys, Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2008). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise. In D. H. Barry (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 516–525). SAGE Publication Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Glatzer, B. (2002). The Pashtun tribal system. In G. Pfeffer & D. K. Behera (eds.), Concept of Tribal Society (pp. 265–282). New Delhi: Concept Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhand, J., Hulme, D., & Lewer, N. (2000). Social capital and the political economy of violence: A case study of Sri Lanka. Disasters, 24(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grix, J. (2002). Introducing students to the generic terminology of social research. Politics, 22(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00173
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilhorst, D. (2007). Saving lives or saving societies? Realities of relief and reconstruction. Wageningen Universiteit. Retrieved July 17, 2019, from https://edepot.wur.nl/231139
   Google Scholar
• Hobart, M. (1993). Introduction: The growth of ignorance? In M. Hobart (Ed.), Introduction to an Anthropological critique of development: The growth of ignorance? (pp. 1–30). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Höglund, K., & Orjuela, C. (2011). Winning the peace: Conflict prevention after a victor’s peace in Sri Lanka. Contemporary Social Science, 6(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450144.2010.534491
   Google Scholar
• Hoppers, O. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the integration of knowledge systems. In O. H. Catherine (Ed.), Indigenous knowledge and the integration of knowledge systems. Towards a philosophy of articulation (pp. 2–22). Cape Town New Africa Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. (2014). Ensuring a political space for conflict by applying Chantal Mouffe to post-war reconstruction and development. Progress in Development Studies, 14(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414521331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakar, P. (2007). Tribal law of Pashtunwali and women’s legislative authority. Harvard Islamic Legal Studies Program. Retrieved May 14, 2017, from http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/ilsp/research/kakar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kihl, T. (2015). The effect of globalisation on community development practice in remote indigenous communities in Australia. In S. A. Wilson (Ed.), Identity, culture and the politics of community development (pp. 10–17). Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, U. (2001). Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny (pp. 139–152). Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kovats-Bernat, J. C. (2002). Negotiating dangerous fields: Pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist, 104(1), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.1.208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Kukla, A. (2000). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leino, H., & Peltomaa, J. (2012). Situated knowledge–situated legitimacy: Consequences of citizen participation in local environmental governance. Policy and Society, 31(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and-driven development: A critical review. The World Bank Research Observer, 19(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkh012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work? World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Marthaler, E., & Gabriel, S. (2013). Manual: 3 steps for working in fragile and conflict-affected situations. HELVETAS Swiss Intercooperation and swisspeace.
   Google Scholar
• Mazurana, D., Jacobsen, K., & Gale, L. A. (2013). Research methods in conflict settings: A view from below. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, G., & Stokke, K. (2000). Participatory development and empowerment: The dangers of localism. Third World Quarterly, 21(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590050004346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Nation. (2017). Industrial estate to be established at Waziristan Agency. The Nation Newspaper. Retrieved August 13, 2020, from https://nation.com.pk/17-Jun-2017/industrial-estate-to-be-established-at-waziristan-agency
   Google Scholar
• Shakirullah, Nawab, B., & Elahi, N. (2019). Violent conflict in North Waziristan, Pakistan: The distortion and re-emergence of social structure. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 13(3), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1963). Rapid growth as a destabilizing force. Journal of Economic History, 23(4), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700109210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röling, N. (1996). Towards an interactive agricultural science. European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2(4), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892249685300061
   Google Scholar
• Schirch, L. (2013). Conflict assessment and peacebuilding planning: Toward a participatory approach to human security. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, M. (2015). Obstacles to the use of indigenous knowledge. Development in Practice, 25(6), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2015.1064861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, Q. A., & Shahbaz, B. (2015). Perceptions of post-conflict livelihood interventions in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan: Targeting, access and relevance. Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved January 15, 2018, from https://securelivelihoods.org/wp-content/uploads/Perceptions-of-post-conflict-livelihood-interventions-in-Pakistan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shahbaz, B., Shah, Q. A., Suleri, A. Q., Commins, S., & Malik, A. A. (2012). Livelihoods, basic services and social protection in north-western Pakistan. Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved January 13, 2018, from https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/livelihoods-basic-services-and-social-protection-north-western-pakista
   Google Scholar
• Shakirullah. (2020). 21 injured as rival groups clash over land dispute in North Waziristan. Tribal News Network. Retrieved November 20, 2020, from https://www.tnn.com.pk/21-injured-as-rival-groups-clash-over-land-dispute-in-north-waziristan
   Google Scholar
• Sillitoe, P. (1998). What, know natives? Local knowledge in development. Social Anthropology, 6(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.1998.tb00356.x
   Google Scholar
• Sillitoe, P. (2006). Indigenous knowledge in development. Anthropology in Action, 13(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2006.130302
   Google Scholar
• Sluka, J. A. (1995). Reflection on managing danger in fieldwork: Dangerous anthropology in belfast. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spychała-Kij, M. (2020). Civil military cooperation in post conflict development: A case of North Waziristan. NUST Journal of International Peace and Stability, III(1), 102–107. https://njips.nust.edu.pk/index.php/njips/article/download/42/48.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, F. (2009). Policies towards horizontal inequalities in post-conflict reconstruction. In A. Tony & B. Tilman (Eds.), Making peace work (pp. 136–174). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Trencher, S. R. (2019). Tribalism. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeost051.pub2
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2009). Community security and social cohesion: Towards a UNDP approach. United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2009). State of the world’s indigenous peoples. Department of Social and Economic Affair, United Nations, New York. Retrieved October 23, 2019, from www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/SOWIP_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNOCHA. (2014). Pakistan: North Waziristan displacements.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, J. D. (2003). Land tenure and legal pluralism in the peace process. Peace & Change, 28(3), 352–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0130.00267
   Google Scholar
• Uvin, P. (1998). Aiding violence: The development enterprise in Rwanda. Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P. (2020). Capitalising on ‘local knowledge’: The labour practices behind successful aid projects–the case of Jordan. Current Sociology, 001139212090534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120905342
   Google Scholar
• Warren, D. M. (1991). Using indigenous knowledge in agricultural development. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, D. M., Slikkerveer, L. J., Brokensha, D., & Dechering, W. H. (1995). The cultural dimension of development: Indigenous knowledge systems. Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. (2006). Beyond the technocrat? The professional expert in development practice. Development and Change, 37(3), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2006.00488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S.-A. (2015). Identity, culture and the politics of community development. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1998). Indigenous knowledge for development: A framework for development.” Knowledge and learning centre, Africa Region. Retrieved March 17, 2020, from www.worldbank.org/afr/ik/ikrept.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2005). Empowering people by transforming institutions: Social development in World Bank operations. Retrieved April 17, 2019, from https://docplayer.net/143352058-Empowering-people-by-transforming-institutions-social-development-in-world-bank-operations.html
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2015). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Routledge.
   Google Scholar