The octopus-like power of Pesantren dynasty in the dynamics of local politics

References

• Agustino, L., & Yusof, M. A. (2010). Local politics Di Indonesia: Dari otokratik ke reformasi politics. Jurnal Ilmu Politics, Edisi, 21. http://www.aipi-politik.org/attachments/article/54/3
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, I. G., & Jaeger, M. M. (2015). Cultural capital in context: Heterogeneous returns to cultural capital across schooling environments. Social Science Research, 50, 177–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asslaand, A., & Lyska, O. (2015). Local democracy in Ukrainian cities: Civic participation and responsiveness of local authorities. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1037072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astuti, P. (2015). Pesantren traditional, Demokratisasi Pendidikan and Pengembangan Masyarakat: Lembaran Masyarakat. Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 1(1), 69–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.32678/lbrmasy.v1i1.560
   Google Scholar
• Azizah, N. (2013). From mullah to regent: The study of leadership alteration from islamic boarding school to the secular leadership lecturer of sociology. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_10_Special_Issue_May_2013/25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baland, J. M., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). The political value of land: Political reform and land prices in chile. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R. (1993). London School of Economics . Wiley. http://www.jstor.org/stable/591245
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (1991). Max Weber and the Legitimacy of the Modern State. Analyse & Kritik, 131, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1991-0102
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., & Lord, C. (1998). Legitimacy and the EU. In Political dynamics of the EU series. Longman. (Book).
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., & Lord, C. (2014). Legitimacy and the european union. In Legitimacy and the European Union. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840949
   Google Scholar
• Boonlue, N. (2015). Local Politics and Democracy in Thailand. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 846–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00531-6
   Google Scholar
• Botchway, T. P. (2015). Civil society and the consolidation of democracy in ghana’s fourth republic. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1452840. (journal)
   Google Scholar
• Djati, W. R. (2015). Revivalisme Kekuatan Familisme dalam Demokrasi: Dinasti Politik di Aras Lokal. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v18i2.3726
   Google Scholar
• Dumais, S. A. (2015). Cultural Capital and Education. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 5. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0–08–097086–8.10433–7
   Google Scholar
• Erel, U. (2010). Migrating cultural capital: Bourdieu in migration studies. Sociology, 44(4), 642–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510369363
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, B. D. (2010). The dynasty advantage: Family ties in congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 571–598. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298010793322366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendzwill, A., & Swianiewicz, P. (2016). Does local democracy perform better in smaller jurisdictions?: Survey evidence from Poland. Lex Localis, 14(4), 759. https://doi.org/10.4335/14.4.759-782(2016)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B. (2017). Political dynasties, electoral institutions and politicians’ human capital. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F474–F494. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, M., Aasland, A., & Aasen, B. (2019). Attitudes towards women’s participation in local politics in South Asia. In Forum for development studies (pp. 1–21). Routledge Taylor & Francis group
   Google Scholar
• Henelt, H. (2012). Local democracy and citizenship. Oxford Handbooks Online.
   Google Scholar
• Hidayat, A. (2012). Karakter orang madura and falsafah local politics: KARSA. Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v15i1.109
   Google Scholar
• el-Husseini, R. (2016). Is gender the barrier to democracy? Women, Islamism, and the “Arab spring.” Contemporary Islam. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-015-0324–4
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2015). NGOs and social protection in East Asia: Korea, Thailand and Indonesia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2014.988277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, V. S. (2012). The making and unmaking of local democracy in an Indian village. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 642(1), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212438207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landé, C. H. (1983). Political clientelism in political studies: Retrospectand prospects. International Political Science Review, 4(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218300400403
   Google Scholar
• Ledyaev, V., Chirickova, A., A., & Selster, D. (2014). Who governs?: Power in the local Russian community. Journal of Political Power, 7 (2),211–231.
   Google Scholar
• Liddle, R. W. (1992). The politics of development policy. Word Development, 20(6), 793–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90052-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., & Beetham, D. (2001). Legitimizing the EU: Is there a “post-parliamentary basis” for its legitimation? Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(3), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468–5965.00298
   Google Scholar
• Lukens-Bull, R. (2007). Lost in a sea of subjectivity: The subject position of the researcher in the anthropology of Islam. Contemporary Islam. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-007-0014–y
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, A. (2013). Political decentralization and the strengthening of consensual, participatory local democracy in the Republic of Macedonia. Democratization, 22(1), 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, J. A. (2011). “Real politic” or “ethically based”: Sport, globalization, migration and nation-state policies. Sport in Society, 14(7–8), 1040–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2011.603557
   Google Scholar
• Mbah, P. O., Chikodiri, N., Sam, C., & Simons, G. (2019). Contentious elections, political conclusion, and challenges of national integration in Nigeria. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1565615. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1565615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcwilliam, A. (2011). Marginal governance in the time of Pemekaran: Case studies from sulawesi and West Papua. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(2), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853111X565869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meitzner, M. (2009). Autonomy, democracy and internal Conflict: The 2006 Gubernatorial elections in Papua. Deepening democracy in Indonesia? Direct Elections for Local Leaders [Local election bulletin]. Istitute of Southeast Asian Studies Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2016). Political dynasties and poverty: Measurement and evidence of linkages in the Philippines. Oxford Development Studies, 44(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1169264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third Edition ed.). The Sage Handbook Of Applied Social Research Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Muraoka, T. (2017). Political dynasties and particularistic campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917745163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyamori, R. O., Lawrence, S. R., & Perera, H. B. (2012). Revitalising local democracy: A social capital analysis in the context of a New Zealand local authority. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(7–8), 572–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Purdey, J., & Purdey, J. (2016). Narratives to power. South East Asia Research, 24(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X16659728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohim, Z. T. A. (2015). Pesantren and politics (Sinergi Pendidikan Pesantren and Kepemimpinan Dalam Pandangan KH. M. Hasyim Asy’ari). UIN Sunan Ampel Journal of Islamic Education, 3(2), 323–345. doi: 10.15642/pai.2015.3.2.323-345
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, M. A. (2017). Self-perpetuation of political power. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F455–F473. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud, A. E., & Nielsen, K. B. (2018). Political dynastycism: Networks, trust, risk. In Studies in Indian Politics (pp. 232102301879740). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shahsiah, A. (2017). Evolution of the Traditional Power System. In The Power Grid: Smart, Secure, Green and Reliable. United States: Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805321-8.00001-X (Book)
   Google Scholar
• Susanti, M. H. (2018). Political dynasty dalam Local election di Indonesia. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 1(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v1i2.440
   Google Scholar
• Sutisna, A. (2017). Gejala proliferasi political dynasty di Banten Era kepemimpinan gubernur ratu atut chosiyah: Politics Indonesia. Indonesian Political Science Review, 2(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v2i2.9329
   Google Scholar
• Sweeting, D., & Copus, C. (2012). Whatever happened to local democracy? Policy and Politics, 40(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557310X550123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. Y., & Liu, D. (2017). What is the influence of cultural capital on student reading achievement in confucian as compared to non-confucian heritage societies?: Compare. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(6), 896–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1369392.
   Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & Mccann, E. (2012). The local politics of policy mobility: Learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix. Environment & Planning A, 44(6), 1389–1406. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throsby, D. (1999). Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(1/2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007543313370
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2011). Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811411462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahya, I. (2016). Democracy Pesantren: Menebar format politics yang damai. At-Taqaddum, 6(2), 187–205. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/attaqaddum/article/viewFile/713/629
   Google Scholar