Hate speech and the harm in Indonesian judicial decisions

References

• 121/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Bla, District Court of Blora. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 121/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Plk, District Court of Palangka Raya. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 1226/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Mks, District Court of Makassar. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 1234/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Utr., District Court of North Jakarta. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 126/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Msb, District Court of Masamba. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 135/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Pbl, District Court of Probolinggo. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 1520/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Mks, District Court of Makassar. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 1527/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sby, District Court of Surabaya. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 154/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sdw, District Court of Kutai Barat. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 155/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Pmk, District Court of Pamekasan. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 181/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Stg, District Court of Sintang. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 205/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Pbu, District Court of Pangkalan Bun. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 206/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Tim, District Court of Timika. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 223/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tte, District Court of Ternate. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 240/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Cbn, District Court of Cirebon. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 293/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Rgt, District Court of Rengat. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 3478/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Mdn, District Court of Medan. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 372/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sim, District Court of Simalungun. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 39/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Skh, District Court of Sukoharjo. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 40/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Bna, District Court of Banda Aceh. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 422/Pid.Sus/2020/Pn.Bks, District Court of Bekasi. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 61/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Lbo, District Court of Limboto. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 690/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Mtr, District Court of Mataram. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 886/Pid.B/2020/PN.JKT. TIM, District Court of Jakarta Timur. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 90/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Mtw, District Court of Muara Tewe. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• 910/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Bdg, District Court of Bandung. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Abrams v. U.S., No. 250 US 616, 630. (1919).
   Google Scholar
• Aditya, Z., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Indonesian Constitutional Rights: Expressing and Purposing opinions on the Internet. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(9), 1395–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1826450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akayesu, P. V., lCTR Trial Chamber, Judgment, ICTR T. Ch. I 2.9. (1998) para 513. (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Badar, M., & Florijančič, P. (2020). Assessing incitement to hatred as a Crime against Humanity of Persecution. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(5), 656–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1671356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendt, E. (2019). What is the harm of hate speech? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22(3), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengoetxea, J. (2013). Ultima Ratio and the judicial Application of Law. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 3(1), 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Blasi, V. (1977). The Checking Value in first Amendment Theory. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 2(3), 521–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1977.tb01008.x
   Google Scholar
• Blasi, V. (2020). Holmes’s Understanding of his Clear-and-Present-Danger Test: Why Exactly did he Require Imminence? Seton Hall Law Review, 51, 175–204. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2956?utm_source=scholarship.law.columbia.edu%2Ffaculty_scholarship%2F2956&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2017). What is hate speech part 1: The Myth of hate. Law and Philosophy, 36(4), 419–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9297-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budiman, A. A., Maya, G. A. K. S., Rahmawati, M., &Abidin, Z. (2021). Mengatur Ulang Kebijakan Pidana Di Ruang Siber. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ICJR_Mengatur-Ulang-Kebijakan-Pidana-di-Ruang-Siber.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Butt, S. (2019). Judicial reasoning and Review in the Indonesian Supreme Court. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 6(1), 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2018.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Almagor, R. (2013). Freedom of expression v. Social Responsibility: Holocaust Denial in Canada. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2012.746119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constitutional Court. Constitutional Court Decision No. 6/PUU-V/2007. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Constitutional Court. Constitutional Court Decision No. 76/PUU-XV/2017. (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Danisworo, M. R., & Budi Prasetya, A. “Implementing Prohibition of hate speech under Article 28(2) of Indonesian Electronic Information and Transaction Law.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2021. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211112.020.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J. (1984). The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to others (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelber, K., & McNamara, L. (2016). Evidencing the Harms of hate speech. Social Identities, 22(3), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2015.1128810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. (2009). Acts of will and Responsibility. In H. L. A. Hart, & J. Gardner (Eds.), Punishment and responsibility essays in the Philosophy of Law (pp. 90–112). Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, E. (2016). Hate speech and Democratic Citizenship. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. W. (2019). Free speech and hate speech. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051517-012343
   Google Scholar
• Husak, D. (2000). Retribution in Criminal Theory. San Diego Law Review, 37(4), 962–963.
   Google Scholar
• Husak, D. (2004). The Criminal Law as Last Resort. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24(2), 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/24.2.207
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, I. (2020,). Polda Metro Jaya Tangani 480 Kasus Ujaran Kebencian Dan Hoaks Selama Pandemi Corona. Tribunnews. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2020/06/01/polda-metro-jaya-tangani-480-kasus-ujaran-kebencian-dan-hoaks-selama-pandemi-corona
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. B., & Potter, K. (1998). Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and identity Politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jareborg, N. (2005). Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima Ratio). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2(2), 521–534. http://hdl.handle.net/1811/72899
   Google Scholar
• Krotoszynski, J., & Ronald, J. (2019). The Clear and Present Dangers of the Clear and Present Danger Test: Schenck and Abrams Revisited. SMU Law Review, 72(3), 415–440. https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol72/iss3/6?utm_source=scholar.smu.edu%2Fsmulr%2Fvol72%2Fiss3%2F6&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
   Google Scholar
• Maitra, I., & McGowan, M. K. (Eds.). (2012). Speech and harm: Controversies over Free speech. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGonagle, T. (2013). The Council of Europe against online hate speech: Conundrums and challenges, MCM, 2013(005). Ministry of Culture and Information, Belgrade: Republic of Serbia.
   Google Scholar
• Medistiara, Y. (2017,). Selama 2017 Polri Tangani 3.325 Kasus Ujaran Kebencian. Detik News. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3790973/selama-2017-polri-tangani-3-325-kasus-ujaran-kebencian
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for Communication and Information, General Attorney, and Chief of the Police Force. Joint Decree between the Ministry for Communication and Information, the General Attorney, and the Chief of the Police Force, No. 229 of 2021, No. 154 of 2021, and No. KB/2/VI/2021 concerning the Implementing Guideline for Certain Articles in Law No. 11 o (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (2011). Causation in the Criminal Law. In J. Deigh & D. Dolinko (Eds.), The oxford handbook of philosophy of criminal law (pp. 1–28). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noorloos van, M. (2014). Criminalising defamation of religion and Belief. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 22(4), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-22042054
   Google Scholar
• Packer, H. L. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal sanction. Standord University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, B. (2012). Is there a case for Banning hate speech? In M. Herz & P. Molnar (Eds.), The content and context of hate speech: Rethinking Regulation and responses (pp. 37–56). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peršak, N. (2007). Criminalising harmful Conducts: The harm principle, its Limits and Continental Counterparts. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Phiri, C. (2021). Criminal defamation Put to the Test: A Law and Economics Perspective. University of Baltimore Journal of Media Law & Ethics, 9(1), 49–63. http://law.ubalt.edu/academics/publications/medialaw/JMLEissues.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Post, R. (2009). Hate Speech. In Hare, I., & J. Weinstein (Eds.), Extreme speech and democracy (pp. 123–138). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prahassacitta, V., & Harkrisnowo, H. (2021). Criminal Disinformation in Relation to the freedom of expression in Indonesia: A Critical study. Comparative Law Review, 27, 135–165. https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2021.005
   Google Scholar
• Rohmawati. (2021). Legal Reasonings of religious Court judges in deciding the origin of Children: A study on the protection of Biological Children’s Civil Rights. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i1.1-20
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, K. W. (2017). Free expression and Democracy: A Comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schabas, W. (2001). The Crime of genocide in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. In Fischer, H., Kress, C., & Lüder, S. R. (Eds.), International and National Prosecution of Crimes under international Law (pp. 447–473). Berlin Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schenck, V. United States, No. 249 US 47. (1919).
   Google Scholar
• Stavros, A., Baider, F. H., & Millar, S. (2017). Online hate speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Springer Briefs in Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, L. W. (2011). Criminalizing expression: Hate speech and Obscenity. In J. Deigh & D. Dolinko (Eds.), The oxford handbook of philosophy of criminal law (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. ((18 December. 1992)). Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or ethnic, religious and Linguistic Minorities A/RES/47/135,92nd plenary meeting.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. “Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Expert Workshops on the Prohibition of incitement to National, racial or religious hatred,” 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2012). The harm in hate speech. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar