Reinforcing, negotiating and resisting gender norms among reunited couples in Mexico: An intersectional critical ethnography

References

• Andrews, A. L. (2023). Banished men: How migrants endure the violence of deportation. Univof California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastia, T. (2011). Migration as protest? Negotiating gender, class, and ethnicity in urban Bolivia. Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 43(7), 1514–20. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiola, C., Docherty, S. L., Relf, M., & Barroso, J. (2014). Using an intersectional approach to study the impact of social determinants of health for African American mothers living with HIV. Advances in Nursing Science, 37(4), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J. P. (2004). Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrantsrevisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies (IJMS), 6(2), 253–279. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1730637
   Google Scholar
• Christou, A. (2006). Deciphering diaspora–translating transnationalism: Family dynamics, identity constructions and the legacy of ‘home’in second-generation Greek American return migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29(6), 1040–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870600960297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2006). Some groups matter: Intersectionality, situated standpoints, and black feminist thought. In T. L. Lott & J. P. Pittman (Eds.), A companion to African-American philosophy (pp. 205–229). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470751640.ch12
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltrane, S. (2004). Elite careers and family commitment: It’s (still) about gender. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596(1), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204268776
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. E. (2012). Critical ethnography. In L. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 142–144). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n56
   Google Scholar
• Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1385–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• De Bree, J., Davids, T., & De Haas, H. (2010). Post-return experiences and transnational belonging of return migrants: A Dutch—Moroccan case study. Global Networks, 10(4), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhamoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political ResearchQuarterly, 64(1), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910379227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa-Márquez, A., & González-Ramírez, M. (2016). The social adaptation of return migrants from the town of Atencingo, Puebla, Mexico. Ciencia UAT, 11(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.29059/cienciauat.v11i1.673
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sánchez, H., Salma, J., Márquez-Vargas, P. M., & Salami, B. (2020). Left-behind women in the context of international migration: A scoping review. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 31(6), 606–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659620935962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sánchez, H., & Withers, M. H. (2020). Transnational migration and Mexican women who remain behind: An intersectional approach. PloS One, 15(9), e0238525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sánchez, H., Guerrero-Castañeda, R. F., & González-Soto, C. E. (2022). Academic activism as a necessity in community health research. Acc Cietna, 9(1), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.35383/cietna.v9i1.702
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sánchez, H., Vásquez-Ventura, I. S., Rivera-Ramírez, P. I., & Zahoui, Z. (2022). Return migration in Latin America and the Caribbean: A scoping review. Migraciones Internacionales, 13. https://doi.org/10.33679/rmi.v1i1.2431
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sánchez, H. (2023). Intersectional Principles of Community Partnership and Social Justice in qualitative research in migration. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sánchez, H., Salma, J., Dorow, S., & Salami, B. (2023). A multi-scalar critical análisis of return migration policies in Mexico. International Migration, 00, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13157
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D., & Valenzuela, A. (2008). Critical ethnography: The politics of collaboration. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 287–310). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Girma, H. (2017). The salience of gender in return migration. Sociology Compass, 11(5). Article e12481. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Mexico. (2022). Basic Stats Map: Migration Statistics, January-December 2022. http://portales.segob.gob.mx/es/PoliticaMigratoria/Mapa_estadisticas/?Mapa=2022
   Google Scholar
• Haas, H., & Rooij, A. (2010). Migration as emancipation? The Impact of Internal and International migration on the position of women left behind in rural Morocco. Oxford Development Studies, 38(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810903551603
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, J. M., & Wassink, J. T. (2020). Return migration around the world: An integrated agenda for future research. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-120319-015855
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. (2008). Circumcising migration: Gendering return migration among somalilanders. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 34(7), 1109–1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802230422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía e Informática [INEGI]. (2020). Migration. https://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/poblacion/migracion.aspx?tema=P
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration [IOM]. (2020). Understanding the Migration & Mobility Implications of COVID-19. COVID-19 Analytical Snapshot #24: Technology to Support Analysis and Responses. https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/documents/covid-19_analytical_snapshot_24_-_technology_to_support_analysis_and_response.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration [IOM]. (2022). Return Counseling Toolkit. https://publications.iom.int/books/return-counselling-toolkit
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S., & Yeomans, D. (1995). Critical ethnography: Problems in contemporary theory and practice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569950160307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R., & Lulle, A. (2022). Chapter 4: Gendering return migration. In Handbook of return migration (pp. 53–69). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781839100048/9781839100048.000
   Google Scholar
• Konzett-Smoliner, S. (2016). Return migration as a ‘family project’: Exploring the relationship between family life and the readjustment experiences of highly skilled Austrians. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), 1094–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1138853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., & Nagoshi, J. L. (2010). Gender roles, externalizing behaviors, and substance use among Mexican-American adolescents. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 10(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2010.497033
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunuroglu, F., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Yağmur, K. (2021). Stigmatization of Turkish return migrants in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 22(1), 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2020.1719360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. (2020). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878965
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J, 9(3), 3351–33514. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
   Google Scholar
• May, S. (1997). Critical ethnography. In N. Hornberger (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Language and education (1st ed.,Vol. 8, pp. 197–206). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4535-0_19.
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez, A., González, P., Talavera, G. A., Sanchez-Johnsen, L., Roesch, S. C., Davis, S. M., Arguelles, W., Womack, V. Y., Ostrovsky, N. W., Ojeda, L., Penedo, F. J., & Gallo, L. C. (2016). Machismo, Marianismo, and negative cognitive-emotional factors: Findings from the hispanic community health study/study of latinos sociocultural ancillary study. Journal of Latina/O Psychology, 4(4), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nwozor, A., Oshewolo, S., Olanrewaju, J. S., Bosede Ake, M., & Okidu, O. (2022). Return migration and the challenges of diasporic reintegration in Nigeria. Third World Quarterly, 43(2), 432–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2026216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pueblos de México. (n.d.). Agua Dulce (Papantla, Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave). https://mexico.pueblosamerica.com/i/agua-dulce-47/
   Google Scholar
• Rosete, D. H. (2012). Male honor and the ruralization of HIV/AIDS in Michoacán. A case of indigenous return migration in Mexico. International Migration, 50(5), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00642.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruben, R., Van Houte, M., & Davids, T. (2009). What determines the embeddedness of forced-return migrants? Rethinking the role of pre-and post-return assistance. International Migration Review, 43(4), 908–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00789.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saguin, K. (2020). Returning broke and broken? Return migration, reintegration, and transnational social protection in the Philippines. Migration and Development, 9(3), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2020.1787100
   Google Scholar
• Salem, S. (2018). Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816643999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samari, G. (2021). Coming back and moving backwards: Return migration and gender norms in Egypt. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(5), 1103–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2019.1669437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schembri, N., & Jahić Jašić, A. (2022). Ethical issues in multilingual research situations: A focus on interview-based research. Research Ethics, 18(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221085857
   Google Scholar
• Speziale, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2007). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (4th ed.). Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. (2022). Percentage of the population in a state of poverty in Mexico in 2020, by state. https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/1273283/pobreza-en-mexico-por-entidad-federativa/
   Google Scholar
• Suárez Sarmiento, A. I. (2021). … todo se volvió loco: cambios y continuidades en los roles de género y autonomía de mujeres pareja de migrantes retornados. Frontera Norte, 33, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.33679/rfn.v1i1.1970
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ullah, A. A. (2017). Male migration and ‘left–behind’ women. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 8(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425316683862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlase, I. (2013). ‘My husband is a patriot!’: Gender and Romanian family return migration fromItaly. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(5), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.756661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanki, P., Derluyn, I., & Lietaert, I. (2023). The geopolitics of the family: Negotiating returnand its impact on the reintegration of Cameroonian returnees. Journal of InternationalMigration and Integration, 24(Suppl 2), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-022-00957-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon, S. L. (2008). Intersectionality. Politics, gender, and concepts: Theory and methodology. Politics & Gender, 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, Z. R. (2012). Ethnography: The method. In P. L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (pp. 285–338). Jones & Bartlett.
   Google Scholar