Metacognition in listening comprehension: Analyzing strategies and gender differences among Saudi EFL University students

References

• Abu-Snoubar, T. (2017). Gender differences in metacognitive reading strategy use among English as a foreign language students at al-Balqa Applied University. Journal of Education & Practice, 8(18), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Safa, M., & Motaghi, F. (2021). Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211021821. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211021821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Alwan, A., Asassfeh, S., & Al-Shboul, Y. (2013). EFL learners’ listening comprehension and awareness of metacognitive strategies: How are they related? International Education Studies, 6(9), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n9p31
   Google Scholar
• Alamdari, E. F., & Bozorgian, H. (2022). Gender, metacognitive intervention, and dialogic interaction: EFL multimedia listening. System, 104, 102709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfallaj, F. S. S. (2020). E-learning challenges in Saudi Arabia: Exploration of factors with special reference to EFL. TESOL International Journal, 15(3), 20–40.
   Google Scholar
• Alhaisoni, E. (2017). Metacognitive listening strategies used by Saudi EFL medical students. English Language Teaching, 10(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n2p114
   Google Scholar
• Alkhelaiwi, S. (2023). Are you listening strategically or randomly? examining listening comprehension strategies among Saudi university EFL students. World Journal of English Language, 13(5), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n5p221
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khresheh, M. (2020). The impact of cultural background on listening comprehension of Saudi EFL students. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqahtani, A. (2021). The lack of qualified EFL teachers in Saudi schools: A qualitative interview study. English Language Teaching, 14(11), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n11p24
   Google Scholar
• Alsaleem, A. A. (2019). Review of foreign language anxiety relationship with language achievement of EFL students in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(1), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n1p305
   Google Scholar
• Alseadan, M. S. (2021). Improving listening skills of Saudi EFL Learners. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04(12), 3682–3687. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i12-31
   Google Scholar
• Al-Seghayer, K. (2021). Characteristics of Saudi EFL learners’ learning styles. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p82
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shammari, H. G. (2020). The impact of strategy instruction on Iraqi EFL learners’ listening comprehension and metacognitive strategy use. MEXTESOL Journal, 44(4), n4.
   Google Scholar
• Alshammari, S. (2020). “Writing to learn or learning to write”. A critical review of “English as a foreign language” (EFL) teaching practices in writing in Saudi universities. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, 24, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.24.15867
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shehri, S. (2020). Transforming English language education in Saudi Arabia: Why does technology matter? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJet), 15(6), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.12655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altuwairesh, N. (2016). EFL Saudi undergraduate students’ use of metacognitive listening strategies. Arab World English Journal, 7(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no1.6
   Google Scholar
• Assulaimani, T. (2019). The future of teaching English in Saudi Arabia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1623–1634. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070801
   Google Scholar
• Berne, J. E. (2004). Listening comprehension strategies: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Z., & Lin, Y. (2020). A study on metacognitive strategy use in listening comprehension by vocational college students. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p127
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. L., Unin, N., & Johari, A. (2017). Metacognitive awareness strategies for listening comprehension. AJELP: The Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 5, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol5.2.2017
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dabeel, M. A. (2023). learner perceptions of Saudi Arabian EFL college classroom environments. English Language Teaching, 16(3), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n3p32
   Google Scholar
• Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2002). Off-line metacognition — a domain-specific Retardation in young children with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, G., & Man, D. (2022). Person factors and strategic processing in L2 listening comprehension: Examining the role of vocabulary size, metacognitive knowledge, self-efficacy, and strategy use. System, 107, 102801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erizandy, D. E. (2020). Students’ metacognitive awareness on listening comprehension at senior high school students. Language-Edu, 9(1). http://www.riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/LANG/article/view/5368/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeili, Z., Taki, S., & Rahimian, Y. (2017). EFL learners’ metacognitive strategy use in academic listening tasks. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Language Research, 4(3), 254–268. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/568/pdf568
   Google Scholar
• Fayyaz, W., & Kamal, A. (2014). Role of gender, age, and geographical locality in metacognitive listening skills of English as a foreign language. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 29(2), 265–276. https://www.pjprnip.edu.pk/index.php/pjpr/article/view/298/245
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbani Nejad, S., & Farvardin, M. T. (2019). Roles of general language proficiency, aural vocabulary knowledge, and metacognitive awareness in L2 learners’ listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 36(3), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2019.1572510
   Google Scholar
• Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016a). Learners’ listening comprehension difficulties in English language learning: A literature review. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p123
   Google Scholar
• Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016b). The significance of listening comprehension in English language teaching. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 6(8), 1670. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0608.22
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. English Language Teaching Journal, 51(4), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.4.361
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092184
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00004-0
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2003). Learner strategies and advanced level listening comprehension. The Language Learning Journal, 28(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730385200221
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture & Curriculum, 13(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666595
   Google Scholar
• Kök, İ. (2018). Relationship between listening comprehension strategy use and listening comprehension proficiency. International Journal of Listening, 32(3), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1276457
   Google Scholar
• Liliana, C., & Lavinia, H. (2011). Gender differences in metacognitive skills. A study of the 8th grade pupils in Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.255
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2020). Effects of metacognitive strategy training on Chinese listening comprehension. Languages, 5(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5020021
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, N., & Miri, M. (2019). Co-shaping metacognitive awareness and developing listening comprehension through process-based instruction. International Journal of Listening, 33(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1260454
   Google Scholar
• Milliner, B., & Dimoski, B. (2021). The effects of a metacognitive intervention on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ listening comprehension and listening self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211004646, 136216882110046. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004646
   Google Scholar
• Nasim, M. S., AlTameemy, F., & Alhamod. (2022). Metacognitive listening comprehension strategies of Saudi ESP students. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 16(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Summer2022/5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurhayati, N., & Eppang, E. M. (2023). The correlation between metacognitive strategies and listening comprehension. Journal on Education, 5(2), 4448–4461. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.1169
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, H. F., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(4), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9941208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otair, I., & Abd Aziz, N. H. (2017). Exploring the causes of listening comprehension anxiety from EFL Saudi learners’ perspectives: A pilot study. Advances in Language & Literary Studies, 8(4), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.4p.79
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive listening strategies awareness in learning English as a foreign language: A comparison between the university and high-school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.020
   Google Scholar
• Rahimirad, M., & Moini, M. R. (2015). The challenges of listening to academic lectures for EAP learners and the impact of metacognition on academic lecture listening comprehension. SAGE Open, 5(2), 2158244015590609. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015590609
   Google Scholar
• Robillos, R. J., & Bustos, I. G. (2022). Learners’ listening skill and metacognitive awareness through metacognitive strategy instruction with pedagogical cycle. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15322a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraswaty, D. R. (2018). Learners’ difficulties & strategies in listening comprehension. English Community Journal, 2(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.32502/ecj.v2i1.1003
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M. (2022). Metacognition. In The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 95–110). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shehzad, M. W., Albesher, K. B., Sarfraz, S., & Razzaq, S. (2021). Listening boredom, listening boredom coping strategies, and listening performance: Exploring the possible relationships in Saudi EFL context. Journal of Language and Education, 7(3), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 58(5), 1161–1167. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobhani, Z. (2015). An investigation into the relationship between gender and cognitive listening comprehension strategies. JIEB, 3(1), 47–50 . http://www.psp-globe.com/JIEB_20_3_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tabeei, S. N., Tabrizi, A. R., & Ahmadi, G. (2013). The effect of metacognitive strategies instruction on listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners: Focusing on gender. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, F. (2020). Tertiary-level students’ English writing performance and metacognitive awareness: A group metacognitive support perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., & Gadbois, S. (2007). Academic self-handicapping: The role of self-concept clarity and students’ learning strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X79644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MALQ): Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60(2), 470–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Meta-cognition, achievement goals, study strategies, and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Meta-Cognition Learning, 3(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & MacIntyre, P. (2021). Second language listening comprehension: The role of anxiety and enjoyment in listening metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(4), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Huang, Y. T. (2018). The mediating effect of listening metacognitive awareness between listening test anxiety and listening test performance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(4), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0388-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y., & Goh, C. C. (2018). A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its impact on listening achievement and metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) in second/foreign language teaching. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_47
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2013). Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning, teaching, and research: Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 396(12), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2013.12.010
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar