Agency theory, corporate governance and corruption: an integrative literature review approach

References

• Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. (2007). Do U.S. firms have the best corporate governance? A cross-country examination of the relation between corporate governance and shareholder wealth. Working Paper 12819. The National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2020). History of the AICPA. http://www.aicpa.org/about/missionandhistory/pages/history%20of%20the%20aicpa.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Alazraki, M. (2010). Paid off for layoffs: CEOs at pink slip leaders earned 42% more in 2009. Investor Center. https://www.aol.com/2010/09/01/paid-off-for-layoffs-ceos-at-pink-slip-leaders-earned-42-more/
   Google Scholar
• Alchian, A. A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/256940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alina, M.-P., & Till, H. (2019). Corruption and development: A reappraisal. In Oxford research encyclopedia of economics and finance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Faryan, M. A. S., & Shil, N. C. (2023). Governance as an interplay between corruption and polity: Conceptualizing from a national perspective. Economies, 11(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11020065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2020). Corporate governance in Saudi Arabia: An overview of its evolution and recent trends. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 10(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv10i1p2
   Google Scholar
• Al-Faryan, M. A. S., & Dockery, E. (2017). Ownership structure and corporate governance: What does the data reveal about Saudi listed firms? Corporate Ownership and Control, 14(4), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c2art7
   Google Scholar
• AlQadasi, A., & Abidin, S. (2018). The effectiveness of internal corporate governance and audit quality: The role of ownership concentration – Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2017-0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqudah, H., Amran, N. A., Hassan, H., Lutfi, A., Alessa, N., Alrawad, M., & Almaiah, M. A. (2023). Examining the critical factors of internal audit effectiveness from internal auditors’ perspective: Moderating role of extrinsic rewards. Heliyon, 9(10), e20497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaf, N. (2016). Economic value added or earnings: What explains market value in Indian firms? Future Business Journal, 2(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2016.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Collins, C., Pizzigati, S., & Shih, K. (2010). Executive excess 2010: CEO pay and the Great Recession. Institute for Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan, M., & Alqatan, A. (2020). Role of institutions in shaping corporate governance system: evidence from emerging economy. Heliyon, 6(3), e03520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badua, F. (2015). Laying down the law on Lockheed: How an aviation and defence giant inspired the promulgation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977? Accounting Historians Journal, 42(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.2308/0148-4184.42.1.105
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, L. F. (1907). Unbound old Atlantics. The Atlantic Monthly, 679–684.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., & Trento, S. (1997). State ownership and the evolution of Italian corporate governance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(3), 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/6.3.533
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, M., Holderness, C., & Sheehan, D. (2007). Private placements and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(4), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, A. N. F., Rodrigues, R. N., & Panhoca, L. (2019). Information on the fight against corruption and corporate governance practices: Evidence of organized hypocrisy. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 16(2–3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00060-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. (1959). Business behavior, value and growth. MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Belkhir, M. (2009). Board structure, ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from banking. Applied Financial Economics, 19(19), 1581–1593. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100902967561
   Google Scholar
• Benston, G. J. (1985). The self-serving management hypothesis: Some evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglöf, E., & Claessens, S. (2004). Corporate governance and enforcement. Working Paper No. 3409, World Bank Policy Research. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1968). The modern corporation and private property. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasin, M. L. (2013). Corporate accounting fraud: A case study Of Satyam Computers Limited. Open Journal of Accounting, 2(2), 26–38.
   Google Scholar
• Black, B., Kraakman, R., & Tarassova, A. (2000). Russian privatization and corporate governance: What went wrong? Stanford Law Review, 52(6), 1731–1808. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, M., & Stout, L. (1999). A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1995). Privatizing Russia. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. H., Gomis, P., Kwak, S., & Smith, B. D. (2000). A user’s guide to banking crises. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997). Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 693–728. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. A., & Melcher, R. A. (1996a, 5 November). The best and worst boards: Our new report card on corporate governance. Business Week. http://www.businessweek.com/1996/48/b35031.htm
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. A., & Melcher, R. A. (1996b, 25 November). What the best boards do. Business Week. http://www.businessweek.com/1996/48/b35033.htm
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, G. G., & Manello, A. (2021). Board diversity and performance in a masculine, aged and glocal supply chain: New empirical evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(7), 1440–1459. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2020-0417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlborg, P., Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2014). The evolution of service innovation research: a critical review and synthesis. The Service Industries Journal, 34(5), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2013.780044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouaibi, S., & Affes, H. (2021). The effect of social and ethical practices on environmental disclosure: Evidence from an international ESG data. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(7), 1293–1317. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2020-0087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, D. (2004). Incentives, control and development: Governance in private and public sector with special reference to Bangladesh. Viswavidyalay Prakashana Samstha.
   Google Scholar
• Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). (2012). The World FactBook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/download/download-2012/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. (1998). Who control East Asian corporations? World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626876
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, P. L., Wood, R. A., & Jones, T. B. (1985). The composition of boards of directors and incidence of golden parachutes. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 664–671. https://doi.org/10.2307/256121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core, E., Holthausen, R., & Larcker, D. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corey, L. (1930). The House of Morgan. G. Howard Watt.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, A. T., & Schmidt, R. M. (1985). Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90027-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driel, H. V. (2019). Financial fraud, scandals, and regulation: A conceptual framework and literature review. Business History, 61(8), 1259–1299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daryaei, A. A., & Fattahi, Y. (2020). The asymmetric impact of institutional ownership on firm performance: panel smooth transition regression model. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1086/467041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockery, E., Tsegba, IN., & Herbert, W. E. (2012). Does ownership structure influence firm performance? Empirical insights from an emerging market. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 1(4), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v1_i4_c1_p4
   Google Scholar
• Donadelli, M., Fasan, M., & Magnanelli, B. S. (2014). The agency problem, financial performance and corruption: country, industry and firm level perspectives. European Management Review, 11(3-4), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drago, R., & Garvey, G. T. (1998). Incentives for helping on the job: Theory and evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/209880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1981). What is “business ethics”? The Public Interest, 63, 18–36.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. G. (2004). DDT: A case study in scientific fraud. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, 9(3), 83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElKelish, W. W. (2018). Corporate governance risk and the agency problem. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2017-0195
   Google Scholar
• Eun, C., Resnick, B., & Brean, D. (2004). International financial management (3rd ed.). The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, M., Noor, A., & Ali, S. (2022). Corporate governance and firm performance: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(1), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2020-0286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenn, G., & Liang, N. (2001). Corporate pay-out policy and managerial stock incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00039-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Temprano, M. A., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2020). Types of director, board diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernie, S., & Metcalf, D. (1999). It’s not what you pay it’s the way that you pay it and that’s what gets results: Jockeys’ pay and performance. LABOUR, 13(2), 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00100
   Google Scholar
• Flood Museum, J. (2013). An overview of the 1889 tragedy. https://www.jaha.org/attractions/johnstown-flood-museum/flood-history/
   Google Scholar
• Folsom, B.Jr. (2008). New deal or raw deal?: How FDR’s economic legacy has damaged America. Threshold Editions, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine. http://www.francodebenedetti.it/http://www.francodebenedetti.it/wp-content/uploads/Friedman-The-Social-Responsibility-of-Business-is-to-Increase-its-Profits.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. K. (1977). The age of uncertainty: A history of economic ideas and their consequences. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• García-Meca, E., & Sánchez-Ballesta, J. (2009). Corporate governance and earnings management: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 594–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). ( 2013). Facts about GASB. http://www.gasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobnocache=true&blobwhere=1175827287722&blobheader=application/pdf&blobheadername2=ContentLength&blobheadername1= Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue2=744409&blobheadervalue1=filename%3DFacts_ about_GASB_%282013-2014%29.pdf&blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs
   Google Scholar
• Gates, B. (1996). The road ahead. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Gedajlovic, E., & Shapiro, D. M. (2002). Ownership structure and firm profitability in Japan. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. M. (1996). Fat and mean: The corporate squeeze of working Americans and the myth of managerial downsizing. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government UK. (2013). Whistleblowing. https://www.gov.uk/whistleblowing/dismissals-and-whistleblowing
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1086/261404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, S., & Hart, O. (1983). An analysis of the principal–agent problem. Econometrica, 51(1), 7–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guizani, M., & Abdalkrim, G. (2021). Ownership structure and audit quality: the mediating effect of board independence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(5), 754–774. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2019-0369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guluma, T. F. (2021). The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: the influences of managerial overconfidence. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00093-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. J., & Liebman, J. B. (1998). Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 653–691. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanazaki, M., & Horiuchi, A. (2003). A review of Japan’s bank crisis from the governance perspective. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-538X(03)00026-X
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, J., & Starks, L. (2003). Institutional investors and executive compensation. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2351–2374. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holderness, C. G., & Sheehan, D. P. (1988). The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1-2), 317–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90049-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holderness, C. G., Kroszner, R. S., & Sheehan, D. P. (1999). Were the good old days that good? Changes in managerial stock ownership since the Great Depression. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 435–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S., Lin, S.-W., Chen, W.-P., & Huang, J.-W. (2021). CEO duality, information costs, and firm performance. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 55, 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.101011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iga, M., & Auerbach, M. (1977). Political corruption and social structure in Japan. Asian Survey, 17(6), 556–564. https://doi.org/10.2307/2643156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa, A., Yousef, H., Bakry, A., Hanaysha, J. R., & Sahyouni, A. (2021). Does the board diversity impact bank performance in the MENA countries? A multilevel study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(5), 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, D. R., & Soref, M. (1981). Profit constraints on managerial autonomy: Managerial theory and the unmaking of the corporation president. American Sociological Review, 46(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/261677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X., Xu, L., Xin, Y., & Adhikari, A. (2022). Political governance in China’s state-owned enterprises. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15Issue(2), 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A., & Friedman, E. (2000). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 141–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00069-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. R. (2019). The fiduciary obligations of public officials. St. Mary’s Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics, 9(2), 298–340.
   Google Scholar
• Jovanova, M. (2014). Internal audit as a service of management for improvement of economic efficiency of the enterprises in Republic of Macedonia [MA thesis]. Faculty of Economics, Prilep, Macedonia.
   Google Scholar
• Kamerschen, D. R. (1968). The influence of ownership and control on profit rates. American Economic Review, 58(3), 432–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J.-K., & Shivdasani, A. (1995). Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00807-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1994a). Top executive rewards and firm performance: A comparison of Japan and the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 102(3), 510–546. https://doi.org/10.1086/261944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1994b). Top executives, turnover, and firm performance in Germany. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 10(1), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/10.1.142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, D., Zhu, L., & Wang, X. (2022). Anti-corruption and CEO compensation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Economic Modelling, 106, 105697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosnik, R. D. (1987). Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (2009). The return of depression economics and the crisis of 2008. W.W. Norton Company Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R., Dominquez, K. M., & Rogoff, K. (1998). It’s Baaack: Japan’s slump and the return of the liquidity trap. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1998(2), 137–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534694
   Google Scholar
• Lan, L. L., & Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking agency theory: The view from law. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.48463335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Corporate ownership around the world. NBER Working Paper Series No. 6625. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, J, The. (1970). Morality and the ideal of rationality in formal organizations. Monist, 54(4), 488–516. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197054433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcker, D., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, R. J. (1970). Management control and the large corporation. Dunellen.
   Google Scholar
• Leland, H. (1998). Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure. The Journal of Finance, 53(4), 1213–1243. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leicht, K. T., & Brady, D. (2012). Testing the fat and mean thesis: Managerial intensity and earnings inequality in affluent democracies. Research in the Sociology of Work, 22, 141–168.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2020). A review of the relationship between agency cost and corporate investment efficiency. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10(04), 734–748. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2020.104050
   Google Scholar
• Lim, E. W. K. (2021). Concentrated ownership, state-owned enterprises and corporate governance. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(3), 663–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomborg, B. (2001). The skeptical environmentalist: Measuring the real state of the world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mabrey, D. (2007). Lockheed bribery scandal. In J. Gerber & E. L. Jensen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of white-collar crime (pp. 175–177). Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, M. (1965). The president and corporate planning. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, M. (1977). Strengthening the functions of internal auditors. Harvard Business Review, 55, 46–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, M. (1972). The president and the board of directors. Harvard Business Review, 50(12), 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Main, B. G. M., Bruce, A., & Buck, T. (1996). Total board remuneration and company performance. The Economic Journal, 106(439), 1627–1644. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2004). Ethics in engineering. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1974). Kapital. Edited by Frederick Engels; translated from the 3rd German ed. by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. D. Van Nostrand Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew, S., Ibrahim, S., & Archbold, S. (2020). Corporate governance and firm risk. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2017-0024
   Google Scholar
• Masulis, R., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2009). Agency problems at dual-class companies. The Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1697–1727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01477.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Snyder, H., Elg, M., Witell, L., Helkkula, A., Hogan, S. J., & Anderson, L. (2017). The changing role of the health care customer: Review, synthesis and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 28(1), 2–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-01-2016-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, B. (2001, March 5). Is Enron overpriced? Fortune Magazine. http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/13/news/companies/enronoriginal_fortune/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• McLean, B., & Elkind, P. (2004). The smartest guys in the room: The amazing rise and scandalous fall of Enron. Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood, R., Hunjra, A. I., & Chani, M. I. (2019). The impact of corporate diversification and financial structure on firm performance: Evidence from South Asian countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12010049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. S. (2004). Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large U.S. corporations. Theory and Society, 33(5), 579–617. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000045757.93910.ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen, R. J., Chiu, J. S., & Cooley, D. E. (1968). The effect of separation of ownership and control on the performance of the large firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1–2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo, D. (2010). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is another way for Africa. Penguin, Harmondsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Munisi, G., Hermes, N., & Randøy, T. (2014). Corporate boards and ownership structure: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. International Business Review, 23(4), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. J. (1985). Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndofor, H. A., Wesley, C., & Priem, R. L. (2015). Providing CEOs with opportunities to cheat: The effects of complexity-based information asymmetries on financial reporting fraud. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1774–1797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A. H., Doan, D. T., & Nguyen, L. H. (2020). Corporate governance and agency cost: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(5), 103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. P., Jr., Priem, R. L., Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2006). Do CEO stock options prevent or promote fraudulent financial reporting? Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Corporate Governance Factbook 2019. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ogabo, B., Ogar, G., & Nuipoko, T. (2021). Ownership structure and firm performance: The role of managerial and institutional ownership-evidence from the UK. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 11(07), 859–886. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2021.117053
   Google Scholar
• Orbach, B., & Campbell Rebling, G. E. (2012, May 17). The antitrust curse of bigness. 85 Southern California Law Review 605; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 11–23. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1856553
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998). Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 27–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.25448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. (1973). The profit-performance effects of the separation of ownership from control in large U.S. Industrial corporations. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003151
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, K. D., & Sahu, T. N. (2021). Ownership concentration and agency crises in Indian manufacturing firms. Business Perspectives and Research, 9(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533720910842
   Google Scholar
• Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467
   Google Scholar
• Pathan, S. (2009). Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(7), 1340–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, D. L., Rechner, P. L., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2000). Board composition and financial performance: A meta-analysis of the influence of outside directors. Journal of Managerial Issues, 12(1), 76–91.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlinson, M., Toms, S., & Wilson, J. (2006). Legitimacy and the capitalist corporation: Cross-cutting perspectives on ownership and control. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(5), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Schwarcz, S. L. (2008). Markets, systemic risk, and the subprime mortgage crisis. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 61(2), 209–217.
   Google Scholar
• Selarka, E. (2005). Ownership concentration and firm value: A study from the Indian corporate sector. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(6), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2005.11052627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). (2013). What we do. http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Sehrawat, N. K., Kumar, A., Lohia, N., Bansal, S., & Agarwal, T. (2019). Impact of corporate governance on earnings management: Large sample evidence from India. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(12), 1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.912.1335.1345
   Google Scholar
• Shakir, R. (2008). Effect of block ownership on performance of Malaysian property companies. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 14(4), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2008.11104263
   Google Scholar
• Shil, N. C., & Chowdhury, A. (2024). Pathways to consolidate corporate governance by incorporating gaps in management accounting practices: An integrative literature review research approach. IIMS Journal of Management Science, 15(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976030X231226018
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1086/261385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikka, P., & Stittle, J. (2019). Debunking the myth of shareholder ownership of companies: Some implications for corporate governance and financial reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 63, 101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simkovic, M. (2013). Competition and crisis in mortgage securitization. Indiana Law Journal, 88(1), 213–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. (2003). Competition, corporate governance and selection in emerging markets. The Economic Journal, 113(491), F443–F464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.00164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, H., Witell, L., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2401–2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(1), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Google Scholar
• Steyn, B., & Stainbank, L. (2013). Separation of ownership and control in South-African Listed Companies. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 16(3), 316–345. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v16i3.418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1958). The economies of scale. The Journal of Law & Economics, 1(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/466541
   Google Scholar
• Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, H. T. (2021). The link between independent directors and firm’s performance: the moderating role of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(5), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2020-0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, N. H., & Le, C. D. (2020). Ownership concentration, corporate risk-taking and performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1732640. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1732640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2012a). Transparency in corporate reporting: Assessing the world’s largest companies. http://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/pub/transparency_in_corporate_reporting_assessing_the_worlds_largest_companies
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2012b). Corruption and the financial sector. http://www.transparency.org/news/feature/scandals_show_urgent_need_for_bank_reform
   Google Scholar
• Tullock, G. (1997). Where is the rectangle? Public Choice, 91(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004984432682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, I., Fang, H., & Jebran, K. (2019). Do gender diversity and CEO gender enhance firm’s value? Evidence from an emerging economy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. (1995). Occidental to pay $129 million in Love Canal settlement. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/Pre_96/December95/638.txt.html
   Google Scholar
• Vadasi, C., Bekiaris, M., & Andrikopoulos, A. (2019). Corporate governance and internal audit: an institutional theory perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2019-0215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vairavan, A., & Zhang, G. P. (2020). Does a diverse board matter? A mediation analysis of board racial diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1223–1241. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2020-0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlegh, P. W. J., & Steenkamp, J.-B. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. (1993). Hard drive: Bill Gates and the making of the Microsoft empire. Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Wawrosz, P. (2022). How corruption is and should be investigated by economic theory. Economies, 10(12), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesley, C. L., & Ndofor, H. A. (2013). The great escape: The unaddressed ethical issue of investor responsibility for corporate malfeasance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201323328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2008). Corporate finance. The McGraw – Hill Companies, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, R. C. (2008). The subprime crisis—cause, effect and consequences. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 17(3), 219–235.
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1995). But is it true? A citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witell, L., Snyder, H., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Defining service innovation: a review and synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2863–2872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormser, I. M. (1933). Review of Adolf A. Berle, Jr. and Gardiner C. Means “The modern corporation and private property”. American Bar Association Journal, 113, 514–516.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X. (2005). Corporate governance and corruption: A cross-country analysis. Governance, 18(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00271.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulandari, T. R., & Setiawan, D. (2021). Ownership concentration, foreign ownership and tunneling in Indonesia. Rajagiri Management Journal, 17(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-12-2020-0068
   Google Scholar
• Yamamura, K. (1977). Success illgotten? The role of Meiji militarism in Japan’s technological progress. The Journal of Economic History, 37(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700096777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., Zhang, P., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Corporate governance, political connections, and intra-industry effects: Evidence from corporate Scandals in China. Financial Management, 44(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusof, N. Z. M. (2016). Context matters: A critique of agency theory in corporate governance research in emerging countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(S7), 154–158.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf, F., Yousaf, A., & Saeed, A. (2018). Rethinking agency theory in developing countries: A case study of Pakistan. Accounting Forum, 42(4), 281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingales, L. (1994). The value of the voting right: A study of the Milan Stock Exchange experience. Review of Financial Studies, 7(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/7.1.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar