A comparison of parameter covariance estimation methods for item response models in an expectation-maximization framework

References

• Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryer, J. (2012). PISA: Programme for International Student Assessment. R package version 1.0. Retrieved from http://jason.bryer.org/pisa
   Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2008). SEM of another flavour: Two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 309–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2010a). High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm. Psychometrika, 75, 33–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2010b). A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications. Psychometrika, 75, 581–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Yang, J. S., & Hansen, M. (2011). Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 221–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P., & Varadhan, R. (2012). numDeriv: Accurate numerical derivatives. R package version. (pp. 1)http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=numDeriv
   Google Scholar
• Jamshidian, M., & Jennrich, R. I. (2000). Standard errors for EM estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B (Statistical Methodology), 62, 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, T. A. (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B (Methodological), 44, 226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luenberger, D. G., & Ye, Y. (2008). Linear and nonlinear programming. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X. L., & Rubin, D. B. (1991). Using EM to obtain asymptotic variance-covariance matrices: The SEM algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 899–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J. (1984). Estimating latent distributions. Psychometrika, 49, 359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, D. (1999). Direct calculation of the information matrix via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B (Statistical Methodology), 61, 479–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orchard, T., & Woodbury, M. A. (1972). A missing information principle: Theory and applications. In Proceedings of the 6th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 697–715.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). http://www.pisa.oecd.org/
   Google Scholar
• Paek, I., & Cai, L. (2014). A comparison of item parameter standard error estimation procedures for unidimensional and multidimensional item response theory modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 58–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pek, J., & Wu, H. (2015). Profile likelihood-based confidence intervals and regions for structural equation models. Psychometrika, 80, 1123–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritikin, J. N. (2015). rpf: Response probability functions. R package version 0.51. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpf
   Google Scholar
• Pritikin, J. N. (2016). A computational note on the application of the Supplemented EM algorithm to item response models. arXiv preprint arXiv:160500860.
   Google Scholar
• Pritikin, J. N., Hunter, M. D., & Boker, S. M. (2015). Modular open-source software for Item Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 458–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritikin, J. N., & Schmidt, K. M. (2016). Model builder for Item Factor Analysis with OpenMx. R Journal, 8(1), 182–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. F. (1911). The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 210, 307–357.
   Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34(1), 1–97. doi:10.1007/BF03372160
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., Cai, L., & Bock, R. D. (2010). The nominal categories item response model (pp. 43–75). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, W., Cai, L., Thissen, D., & Xin, T. (2013). Numerical differentiation methods for computing error covariance matrices in Item Response Theory modeling: An evaluation and a new proposal. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 412–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varadhan, R., & Roland, C. (2008). Simple and globally convergent methods for accelerating the convergence of any em algorithm. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 35, 335–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., Cheng, Y., & Patton, J. (2013). Information matrices and standard errors for MLEs of item parameters in IRT. Psychometrika, 79, 232–254. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9334-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar