1,275
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The impact of image format and normative variables on episodic memory

, & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1328869 | Received 27 Jan 2017, Accepted 27 Apr 2017, Published online: 29 May 2017

References

  • Adlington, R. L., Laws, K. R., & Gale, T. M. (2009). The hatfield image test (HIT): A new picture test and norms for experimental and clinical use. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31, 731–753. doi:10.1080/13803390802488103
  • Alario, F. X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 140–155. doi:10.3758/BF03195559
  • Anglin, G. J., & Levie, W. H. (1985). Role of visual richness in picture recognition memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1303–1306. doi:10.2466/pms.1985.61.3 f.1303
  • Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory: The interface between memory and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 281–288. doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4
  • Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50, 560–585. doi:10.1080/783663595
  • Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., & Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory and Cognition, 12, 219–228. doi:10.3758/BF03197669
  • Berry, L. H. (1977). The effects of colour realism on pictorial recognition memory. Proceedings of Selected Research Presentations at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1–22.
  • Berry, L. H. (1990). Effects of hemispheric laterality on color-information processing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 987–993. doi:10.2466/pms.1990.71.3.987
  • Berry, L. H. (1991a). Visual complexity and pictorial memory: A fifteen year research perspective. Proceedings of Selected Research Presentations at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1–12.
  • Berry, L. H. (1991b). The interaction of colour realism and pictorial recall memory. Proceedings of Selected Research Presentations at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1–9.
  • Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38–64. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90024-2
  • Bonin, P., Perret, C., Méot, A., Ferrand, L., & Mermillod, M. (2008). Psycholinguistic norms and face naming times for photographs of celebrities in French. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 137–146. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.1.137
  • Borges, M. A., Stepnowsky, M. A., & Holt, L. H. (1977). Recall and recognition of words and pictures by adults and children. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 113–114. doi:10.3758/BF03336946
  • Bousfield, W. A., Esterson, J., & Whitmarsh, G. A. (1957). The effects of concomitant colored and uncolored pictorial representations on the learning of stimulus words. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 165–168. doi:10.1037/h0047473
  • Bramão, I., Inácio, F., Faísca, L., Reis, A., & Petersson, K. M. (2010). The influence of color information on the recognition of color diagnostic and noncolor diagnostic objects. The Journal of General Psychology, 138, 49–65. doi:10.1080/00221309.2010.533718
  • Bramão, I., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2011). The role of color information on object recognition: A review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 138, 244–253. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.010
  • Bramão, I., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2016). Knowing that strawberries are red and seeing red strawberries: the interaction between surface colour and colour knowledge information. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 641–657. doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1182171
  • Brandt, K. R., Cooper, L. M., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2005). Expertise and recollective experience: Recognition memory for familiar and unfamiliar academic subjects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1113–1125. doi:10.1002/acp.1163
  • Brodeur, M. B., Chauret, M., Dion-Lessard, G., & Lepage, M. (2011). Symmetry brings an impression of familiarity but does not improve recognition memory. Acta Psychologica, 137, 359–370. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.04.005
  • Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PLoS ONE, 5, e10773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010773
  • Brodeur, M. B., Guérard, K., & Bouras, M. (2014). Bank of standardized stimuli (BOSS) phase II: 930 new normative photos. PLoS ONE, 9, e106953. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106953
  • Brodie, E. E., Wallace, A. M., & Sharrat, B. (1991). Effect of surface characteristics and style of production on naming and verification of pictorial stimuli. The American Journal of Psychology, 104, 517–545. doi:10.2307/1422939
  • Bülthoff, I., & Newell, F. N. (2006). The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects. Progress in Brain Research, 154, 315–325. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54017-8
  • Cave, C. B., Bost, P. R., & Cobb, R. E. (1996). Effects of colour and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 639–653. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.639
  • Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478–484. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
  • Cheng, X., Schafer, G., & Akyürek, E. G. (2010). Name agreement in picture naming: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.03.003
  • Cohen, M. E., & Carr, W. J. (1975). Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 383–384. doi:10.3758/BF03333209
  • Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33, 497–505. doi:10.1080/14640748108400805
  • Coulter, R. G., Coulter, M. L., & Glover, J. A. (1984). Details and picture recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 327–329. doi:10.3758/BF03333833
  • Cuetos, F., Ellis, A. W., & Alvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 650–658. doi:10.3758/BF03200741
  • Davidoff, J., Walsh, V., & Wagemans, J. (1997). Higher-level cortical processing of colour. Acta Psychologica, 97, 1–6. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00020-6
  • Davies, G., Ellis, H. D., & Shepherd, J. (1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 180–187. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.2.180
  • Davis, C. J. (2005). N-watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65–70. doi:10.3758/BF03192738
  • Del Castillo, D. M., & Gumenik, W. E. (1972). Sequential memory for familiar and unfamiliar forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 90–96. doi:10.1037/h0033281
  • Dell’acqua, R., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 588–615. doi:10.3758/BF03200832
  • Denis, M. (1976). Test of the incidental-cues hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 175–178. doi:10.2466/pms.1976.43.1.175
  • Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2002). Aging and strategic retrieval processes: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychology and Aging, 17, 405–415. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.17.3.405
  • Dodson, C. S., & Hege, A. C. (2005). Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: Evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 726–731. doi:10.3758/BF03196764
  • Dzulkifli, M. A., & Mustafar, M. F. (2013). The influence of colour on memory performance: A review. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 20, 3–9.
  • Ellis, A. W., & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 515–523. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.515
  • Engelkamp, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1991). Current issues in memory of action events. Psychological Research, 53, 175–182. doi:10.1007/BF00941384
  • Federico, P. A., & Montague, W. E. (1975). Recognition memory as a function of encoding strategy & stimulus codability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 680–688. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.1.6.680
  • Feyereisen, N., Demaeght, D., & Samson, P. (1998). Why do picture naming latencies increase with age: General slowing, greater sensitivity to interference, or task-specific deficits? Experimental Aging Research, 24, 21–51. doi:10.1080/036107398244346
  • Filliter, J. H., McMullen, P. A., & Westwood, D. (2005). Manipulability and living/non-living category effects on object identification. Brain and Cognition, 57, 61–65. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.022
  • Franks, J. J., & Bransford, J. D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 65–74. doi:10.1037/h0031349
  • Fu, Q., Liu, Y. J., Dienes, Z., Wu, J., Chen, W., & Fu, X. (2016). The role of edge-based and surface-based information in natural scene categorization: Evidence from behavior and event-related potentials. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 152–166. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.06.008
  • Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1
  • Going, M., & Read, J. D. (1974). Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 109–110. doi:10.2466/pms.1974.39.1.109
  • Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1971). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 237–241. doi:10.3758/BF03212641
  • Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25–38. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.25
  • Helstrup, T. (2004). The enactment effect is due to more than guesses and beliefs. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 259–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00403.x
  • Heuer, S. (2016). The influence of image characteristics on image recognition: A comparison of photographs and line drawings. Aphasiology, 30, 943–961. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1081138
  • Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113–136. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.1.113
  • Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 761–768. doi:10.3758/BF03196215
  • Homa, D., & Viera, C. (1988). Long-term memory for pictures under conditions of thematically related foils. Memory and Cognition, 16, 411–421. doi:10.3758/BF03214221
  • Humphrey, G. K., Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Servos, P. (1994). The role of surface information in object recognition: Studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception, 23, 1457–1481. doi:10.1068/p231457
  • Jackson, M. C., Linden, D. E., Roberts, M. V., Kriegeskorte, N., & Haenschel, C. (2015). Similarity, not complexity, determines visual working memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1884–1892. doi:10.1037/xlm0000125
  • Jackson, M. C., & Raymond, J. E. (2008). Familiarity enhances visual working memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 556–568. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.556
  • Jesky, R. R., & Berry, L. H. (1991). The effects of pictorial complexity and cognitive style on visual recall memory. Proceedings of Selected Research Presentations at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1–9.
  • Johnson, W., & Kieras, D. (1983). Representation-saving effects of prior knowledge in memory for simple technical prose. Memory and Cognition, 11, 456–466. doi:10.3758/BF03196982
  • Kalenine, S., & Bonthoux, F. (2008). Object manipulability affects children’s and adults’conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 667–672. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.667
  • Kan, I. P., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2004). Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 43–57. doi:10.3758/CABN.4.1.43
  • Katzman, N., & Nyenhuis, J. (1972). Colour vs. black-and-white effects on learning, opinion, and attention. Educational Technology Research and Development, 20, 16–28. doi:10.1007/BF02768385
  • Kishiyama, M. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2003). Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 31, 1045–1051. doi:10.3758/BF03196125
  • Klaver, P., Fell, J., Dietl, T., Schür, S., Schaller, C., Elger, C. E., & Fernández, G. (2005). Word imageability affects the hippocampus in recognition memory. Hippocampus, 15, 704–712.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-1063
  • Knopf, M. (1991). Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory of unfamiliar subject-performed actions. Psychological Research, 53, 203–211. doi:10.1007/BF00941388
  • Lachman, R., & Lachman, J. L. (1980). Picture naming: Retrieval and activation of long-term memory. In L. W. Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, D. Greenberg, & L. W. Thompson (Eds.), New directions in memory and aging (pp. 313–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lachman, R., Shaffer, J. P., & Hennrikus, D. (1974). Language and cognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 613–625. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80049-6
  • Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 212–228. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.212
  • Loftus, G. R., & Bell, S. M. (1975). Two types of information in picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 103–113. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.1.2.103
  • Madan, C. R., & Singhal, A. (2012a). Using actions to enhance memory: effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, e507. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00507
  • Madan, C. R., & Singhal, A. (2012b). Encoding the world around us: Motor-related processing influences verbal memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1563–1570. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.006
  • Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In John C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory and cognition (pp. 65–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Madigan, S., & Lawrence, V. (1980). Factors affecting item recovery and hypermnesia in free recall. The American Journal of Psychology, 93, 489–504. doi:10.2307/1422726
  • Magnié, M. N., Besson, M., Poncet, M., & Dolisi, C. (2003). The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: Norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), 25, 521–560. doi:10.1076/jcen.25.4.521.13873
  • Mecklinger, A., Gruenewald, C., Besson, M., Magnié, M. N., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1115–1123. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.11.1115
  • Melcher, D., & Kowler, E. (2001). Visual scene memory and the guidance of saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 41, 3597–3611. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00203-6
  • Moreno-Martínez, F. J., Montoro, P. R., & Laws, K. R. (2011). A set of high quality colour images with Spanish norms for seven relevant psycholinguistic variables: The Nombela naming test. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 18, 293–327. doi:10.1080/13825585.2010.540849
  • Moreno-Martínez, F. J., & Rodríguez-Rojo, I. C. (2015). On colour, category effects, and Alzheimer’s disease: A critical review of studies and further longitudinal evidence. Behavioural Neurology, 960725, doi:10.1155/2015/960725
  • Nagai, J. I., & Yokosawa, K. (2003). What regulates the surface colour effect in object recognition: Colour diagnosticity or category. Technical Report on Attention and Cognition, 28, 1–4.
  • Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Cogdill, M., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Adaptive memory. Psychological Science, 24, 2099–2105. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0
  • Naor-Raz, G., Tarr, M. J., & Kersten, D. (2003). Is colour an intrinsic property of object representation? Perception, 32, 667–680. doi:10.1068/p5050
  • Nelson, T. O., Metzler, J., & Reed, D. A. (1974). Role of details in the long-term recognition of pictures and verbal descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 184–186. doi:10.1037/h0035700
  • Nishimoto, T., Ueda, T., Miyawaki, K., Une, Y., & Takahashi, M. (2012). The role of imagery-related properties in picture naming: A newly standardized set of 360 pictures for Japanese. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 934–945. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0176-7
  • O’Sullivan, M., Lepage, M., Bouras, M., Montreuil, T., & Brodeur, M. B. (2012). North-American norms for name disagreement: Pictorial stimuli naming discrepancies. PLoS ONE, e47802. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047802
  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176–206. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90032-7
  • Paivio, A., Rogers, T. B., & Smythe, P. C. (1968). Why are pictures easier to recall than words? Psychonomic Science, 11, 137–138. doi:10.3758/BF03331011
  • Peeck, J., & Van Dam, G. (1978). Recall of complex and simple pictures in mixed and unmixed lists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 570. doi:10.2466/pms.1978.46.2.570
  • Peeck, J., Van Dam, G., & Uhlenbeck, R. W. F. (1977). Incidental cues and picture/word differences in recall. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 1211–1215. doi:10.2466/pms.1977.45.3 f.1211
  • Pezdek, K., & Chen, H. C. (1982). Developmental differences in the role of detail in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 207–215. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(82)90016-9
  • Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 41, 797–828. doi:10.1080/14640748908402394
  • Reder, L. M., Victoria, L. W., Manelis, A., Oates, J. M., Dutcher, J. M., Bates, J. T., … Gyulai, F. (2013). Why it’s easier to remember seeing a face we already know than one we don’t. Psychological Science, 24, 363–372. doi:10.1177/0956797612457396
  • Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473–497. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90016-8
  • Ritchey, G. H. (1982). Pictorial detail and recall in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 139–141. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.8.2.139
  • Ritchey, G. H., & Beal, C. R. (1980). Image detail and recall: Evidence for within-item elaboration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 66–76.
  • Rock, I., Halper, F., & Clayton, T. (1972). The perception and recognition of complex figures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 655–673. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90025-4
  • Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236. doi:10.1068/p5117
  • Salmon, J. P., Matheson, H. E., & McMullen, P. A. (2014). Slow categorization but fast naming for photographs of manipulable objects. Visual Cognition, 22, 141–172. doi:10.1080/13506285.2014.887042
  • Severin, W. (1967). Another look at cue summation. AV Communication Review, 15, 233–245. doi:10.1007/BF02768608
  • Shao, Z., & Stiegert, J. (2016). Predictors of photo naming: Dutch norms for 327 photos. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 577–584. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0613-0
  • Smith, D. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1981). Memory for actions in scripted activities as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task. Memory and Cognition, 9, 550–559. doi:10.3758/BF03202349
  • Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674866270
  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
  • Snodgrass, J. G., & McClure, P. (1975). Storage and retrieval properties of dual codes for pictures and words in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 521–529. doi:10.1016/S0096-1515(07)60069-3
  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 516–536. doi:10.3758/BF03200540
  • Spence, I., Wong, P., Rusan, M., & Rastegar, N. (2006). how colour enhances visual memory for natural scenes. Psychological Science, 17, 1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01656.x
  • Stewart, F., Parkin, A. J., & Hunkin, N. M. (1992). Naming impairments following recovery from herpes simplex encephalitis: Category-specific? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44, 261–284. doi:10.1080/02724989243000037
  • Suzuki, K., & Takahashi, R. (1997). Effectiveness of colour in picture recognition memory. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 25–32. doi:10.1111/1468-5884.00033
  • Tanaka, J., Weiskopf, D., & Williams, P. (2001). The role of colour in high-level vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 211–215. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01626-0
  • Tanaka, J. W., & Presnell, L. M. (1999). Color diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1140–1153. doi:10.3758/BF03207619
  • Tatler, B. W., & Melcher, D. (2007). Pictures in mind: Initial encoding of object properties varies with the realism of the scene stimulus. Perception, 36, 1715–1729. doi:10.1068/p5592
  • Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). The role of colour diagnosticity in object recognition and representation. Cognitive Processing, 10, 335–342. doi:10.1007/s10339-0
  • Tversky, B., & Baratz, D. (1985). Memory for faces: Are caricatures better than photographs? Memory & Cognition, 13, 45–49. doi:10.3758/BF03198442
  • Uttl, B., Graf, P., & Santacruz, P. (2006). Object colour affects identification and repetition priming. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 313–325. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00532.x
  • Viggiano, M. P., Vannucci, M., & Righi, S. (2004). A new standardized set of ecological pictures for experimental and clinical research on visual object processing. Cortex, 40, 491–509. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70142-4
  • Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrrell, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48, 822–848. doi:10.1080/14640749508401419
  • Waggoner, T. L. (2005). Pseudoisochromatic plates ishihara compatible (PIPIC): Colour vision test (24 plate ed.). Daytona Beach, FL: Waggoner.
  • Weekes, B. S., Shu, H., Hao, M., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2007). Predictors of timed picture naming in Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 335–342. doi:10.3758/BF03193165
  • Wichmann, F. A., Sharpe, L. T., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2002). The contributions of colour to recognition memory for natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 509–520. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.509
  • Wiseman, S., & Neisser, U. (1974). Perceptual organization as a determinant of visual recognition memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 87, 675–681. doi:10.2307/1421974
  • Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Colour improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 899–911. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.899
  • Xie, W., & Zhang, W. (2016). Familiarity increases the number of remembered Pokémon in visual short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 1–13, doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0679-7
  • Zaki, S. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old–new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1022–1041. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.1022