The effects of the leader–member exchange relationship on rater accountability: A conceptual approach

References

• Bernardin, H. J., & Villanova, P. (1986). Performance appraisal. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 43–62). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Breaux, D. M., Munyon, T. P., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2009). Politics as a moderator of the accountability – job satisfaction relationship: Evidence across three studies. Journal of Management, 35, 307–326. doi:10.1177/0149206308318621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, S. C., & Lo, H. H. (2003). Taiwanese employees’ justice perceptions of co-workers’ punitive events. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 27–42.10.1080/00224540309598429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colella, A., & Varma, A. (2001). The impact of subordinate disability on leader-member exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 304–315. doi:10.2307/3069457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634. doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4306242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715–1759. doi:10.1177/0149206311415280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006). The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process. Journal of Management, 32, 531–551. doi:10.1177/0149206306286622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., & Buckley, M. R. (2009). Relationships at work: Toward a multidimensional conceptualization of dyadic work relationships. Journal of Management, 35, 1379–1403. doi:10.1177/0149206309344741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33, 290–320. doi:10.1177/0149206307300813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Advancing accountability theory and practice: Introduction to the human resource management review special edition. Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, V. L., Bowler, W. M., & Whittington, J. L. (2009). A social network perspective on LMX relationships: Accounting for the instrumental value of leader and follower networks. Journal of Management, 35, 954–980. doi:10.1177/0149206308321555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Cashman, J. E. (1975). A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143–165). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press
   Google Scholar
• Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader – member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 109–131. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(82)90236-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123–136. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A., Frink, D., Ferris, G., Hochwarter, W., Kacmar, C., & Bowen, M. (2003). Accountability in human resources management. In C. Schriesheim & L. Neider (Eds.), New directions in human resource management (pp. 29–63). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. T., Royle, M. T., Brymer, R. A., Perrewé, P. L., Ferris, G. R., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2006). Relationships between felt accountability as a stressor and strain reactions: The neutralizing role of autonomy across two studies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), 87–99. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. (1994). Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 20, 737–756. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 89–106. doi:10.1002/job.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1988). Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 528–542. doi:10.2307/2392642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R., & Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45(2), 194–208. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90011-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V. R. (2004). Impact of transformational leadership on followers’ influence strategies. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(1), 58–72. doi:10.1108/01437730410512778
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W., Huang, X., & Snape, E. (2007). Feedback-seeking behavior and leader-member exchange: Do supervisor-attributed motives matter? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 348–363. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255–275. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881–905. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. The Academy of Management Review, 13, 572–585. doi:10.2307/258376
   Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662–674. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.78.4.662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 87–128). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mero, N. P., Guidice, R. M., & Brownlee, A. L. (2007). Accountability in a performance appraisal context: The effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 223–252. doi:10.1177/0149206306297633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mero, N. P., Guidice, R. M., & Werner, S. (2014). A field study of the antecedents and performance consequences of perceived accountability. Journal of Management, 40, 1627–1652. doi:10.1177/0149206312441208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mero, N. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1995). Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and the favorability of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 517–524. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.80.4.517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mero, N. P., Motowidlo, S. J., & Anna, A. L. (2003). Effects of accountability on rating behavior and rater accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2493–2514. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02777.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2014). Motivation of public managers as raters in performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 43, 387–414. doi:10.1177/0091026014530675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2016). Measuring accountability in the performance appraisal context: Rater status and organization culture as determinants of rater accountability. Current Psychology, Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9499-y
   Google Scholar
• Roch, S. G., Woehr, D. J., Mishra, V., & Kieszczynska, U. (2012). Rater training revisited: An updated meta-analytic review of frame-of-reference training. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 370–395. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, C. C., Harris, K. J., & Kacmar, K. M. (2011). LMX, context perceptions, and performance: An uncertainty management perspective. Journal of Management, 37, 819–838. doi:10.1177/0149206310365727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, C. C., Kacmar, K. M., Harris, K. J., Gavin, M. B., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2017). Workplace politics and performance appraisal: A two-study, multilevel field investigation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(1), 20–38. doi:10.1177/1548051816661480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Yammarino, F. J. (2000). Investigating contingencies: An examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness on leader-member exchange using traditional and multivariate within- and between-entities analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 659–677. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.5.659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, T. H., & Tashchian, A. (2002). Accountability forces in performance appraisal: Effects of self-appraisal information, normative information, and task performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 261–274. doi:10.1023/A:1019689616654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, J. R., & Keeping, L. (2011). Conscious rating distortion in performance appraisal: A review, commentary, and proposed framework for research. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. J., Uhl-Bien, M., Kohut, G. F., Rogelberg, S. G., Lockhart, D. E., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Subordinates’ resistance and managers’ evaluations of subordinates' performance. Journal of Management, 32(2), 185–209. doi:10.1177/0149206305277801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1998). Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resource management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 16, pp. 1–51). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 132–140. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar