What memory representation is acquired during nonword speech production learning? The influence of stimulus features and training modality on nonword encoding

References

• Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 88(1), 148–159. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00296-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1990). Guidelines for screening hearing impairment and middle-ear disorders. ASHA, 32(2), 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Anson, J. G. (1982). Memory drum theory: Alternative tests and explanations for the complexity effects on simple reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14(3), 228–246. doi:10.1080/00222895.1982.10735276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austermann-Hula, S. N., Robin, D. A., Maas, E., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Effects of feedback frequency and timing on acquisition and retention of speech skills in acquired apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1088–1113. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/06-0042)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., Maas, E., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Treating control of voicing in apraxia of speech with variable practice. Aphasiology, 21(12), 1195–1217. doi:10.1080/02687030601047858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2013). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5. 3.53). Retrieved from www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6(2), 201–251. doi:10.1017/S0952675700001019
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3–4), 155–180. doi:10.1159/000261913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Miozzo, M. (2012). Phonological and motor errors in individuals with acquired sound production impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1573–S1586. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0200)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, C. J., & Magill, R. A. (1992). A note on schema and exemplar approaches to motor skill representation in memory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24(2), 221–224. doi:10.1080/00222895.1992.9941617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., & Levelt, W. J. (2009). Effects of syllable preparation and syllable frequency in speech production: Further evidence for syllabic units at a post-lexical level. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 662–684. doi:10.1080/01690960802348852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. M., & Robin, D. A. (1998). Generalized motor programme and parameterization accuracy in apraxia of speech and conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(7/8), 699–713. doi:10.1080/02687039808249567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G. (2002). Frequency of stress patterns in English: A computational analysis. Indiana University Linguistics Community Working Papers, 2–2, 1–9. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01)
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G. (1950). The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika, 37(3–4), 256–266. doi:10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C. (1998). Models, theories and heuristics in apraxia of speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12(1), 47–65. doi:10.3109/02699209808985212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C., & Logan, G. D. (2010). Episodic contributions to sequential control: Learning from a typist’s touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 662–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, C. E., Rao, V. Y., & D’Esposito, M. (2004). Maintenance of spatial and motor codes during oculomotor delayed response tasks. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(16), 3944–3952. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0553-04.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deger, K., & Ziegler, W. (2002). Speech motor programming in apraxia of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 30(3), 321–335. doi:10.1006/jpho.2001.0163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D., & Berry, D. C. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogil, G., & Mayer, J. (1998). Selective phonological impairment: A case of apraxia of speech. Phonology, 15(2), 143–188. doi:10.1017/S095267579800356X
   Google Scholar
• Dollaghan, C. (1998). Spoken word recognition in children with and without specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(2), 193–207. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doody, S. G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (1988). Rule formation in a rapid-timing task: A test of schema theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59(1), 21–28. doi:10.1080/02701367.1988.10605469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopkins, S., & Gleason, T. (1997). Comparing exemplar and prototype models of categorization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 212–230. doi:10.1037/1196-1961.51.3.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing-Doucet, F., & Guérard, K. (2014). A motor similarity effect in object memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 1033–1040. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0570-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. R. (2013). Motor Speech disorders-E-Book: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. doi:10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guion, S. G., Clark, J. J., Harada, T., & Wayland, R. P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for english nonwords include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech, 46(4), 403–426. doi:10.1177/00238309030460040301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic inquiry 13(2), 227–276.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A. F., & Wohldmann, E. L. (2012). Specificity and transfer of learning. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 227–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, H. (1982). Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence. Acta Psychologica, 50(1), 35–47. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(82)90049-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, W., & Van Galen, G. P. (1983). Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 54(1), 23–49. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(83)90021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, E. E., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2002). What information underlies correct rejections in short-term recognition memory? Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 46–59. doi:10.3758/BF03195264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, E. E., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2003). The effect of feature frequency on short-term recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 31(2), 285–296. doi:10.3758/BF03194387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, D., McNeil, M. R., Shaiman, S., & Pratt, S. (2005). Phonetic encoding of infrequent articulatory phonetic transitions. Aphasiology, 19(1), 39–52. doi:10.1080/02687030444000606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, 21(5), 1015–1027. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1996). Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Motor learning and control (pp. 13–36). Champagne, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (2003). Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(2), 135–150. doi:10.1080/00222890309602129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2005). Syllable frequency effect in speech production: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18(3), 221–235. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2008). Is there a syllable frequency effect in aphasia or in apraxia of speech or both? Aphasiology, 22(11), 1191–1200. doi:10.1080/02687030701820469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D. (1988). Transfer-appropriate processing: A framework for conceptualizing practice effects. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behaviour: The motor-action controversy (pp. 201–215). North Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Barlow, J., Robin, D., & Shapiro, L. (2002). Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity. Aphasiology, 16(4–6), 609–622. doi:10.1080/02687030244000266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann-Hula, S. N., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277–298. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/016)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9(3–5), 241–289. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. (1995). A representational account for apraxia of speech. Universität Stuttgart, Fakultät Philosophie.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Pratt, S. R., Szuminsky, N., Sung, J. E., Fossett, T. R. D., Fassbinder, W., & Lim, K. Y. (2015). Reliability and validity of the computerized revised token test: Comparison of reading and listening versions in persons with and without aphasia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58(2), 311. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Robin, D., & Schmidt, R. (2009). Apraxia of speech: Definition, and differential diagnosis. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders, 1, 311–344.
   Google Scholar
• Meigh, K. M. (2014, September 10). Rule- versus instance-based learning in speech-like behavior: An evaluation of transfer and motor class effects [University of Pittsburgh ETD]. Retrieved April 2, 2015, from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/22244/
   Google Scholar
• Meigh, K. M. (2017). A novel investigation of GMP theory: Syllable stress as a motor class variable. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 60(6S), 1685–1694. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0247
   Google Scholar
• Meulenbroek, R. G., Thomassen, A., Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., & Vaughan, J. (1996). Adaptation of a reaching model to handwriting: How different effectors can produce the same written output, and other results. Psychological Research, 59(1), 64–74. doi:10.1007/BF00419834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewhort, D. J. K., & Johns, E. E. (2003). Sharpening the echo: An iterative-resonance model for short-term recognition memory. Memory, 13(3–4), 300–307. doi:10.1080/09658210344000242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 3–26. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Locus of the effect of the number of alternative responses: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1215–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, A., & Hesketh, B. (1997). Episodic knowledge and implicit learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(1), 24–37. doi:10.3758/BF03210770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 25–53. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., Little, D. R., Donkin, C., & Fific, M. (2011). Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. Psychological Review, 118(2), 280–315. doi:10.1037/a0022494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention in abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304–308. doi:10.1037/h0028558
   Google Scholar
• Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 227–244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Buchwald, A., & Goldrick, M. (2014). Integrating accounts of speech production: The devil is in the representational details. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1), 24–27. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.848991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet-Capellan, A., Richer, L., & Ostry, D. J. (2012). Nonhomogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(6), 1711–1717. doi:10.1152/jn.00773.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. A., & Storkel, H. L. (1999). Planning speech one syllable at a time: The reduced buffer capacity hypothesis in apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 13(9–11), 793–805. doi:10.1080/026870399401885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(4), 444–474. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.4.444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A. (1990). On choosing between movement sequences: Comments on Rose (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 439–444. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102(1), 28–67. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. J., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108(4), 709–734. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, P., & Chiat, S. (2004). A prosodically controlled word and nonword repetition task for 2-to 4-year-olds: Evidence from typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47(1), 223. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/019)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225–260. doi:10.1037/h0076770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphsis (2nd ed.). Champagne, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (2003). Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(4), 366–375. doi:10.1080/02701367.2003.10609106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champagne, IL: Human Kinematics.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. (2004). Motor learning and performance: A problem-based learning approach (3rd ed.). Champagne, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). Eprime User’s Guide (Version 2.0). Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Secord, W. (1981). Test of minimal articulation competence. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Sevald, C. A., Dell, G. S., & Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 807–820. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R., & Berry, C. J. (2012). Are there multiple memory systems? Tests of models of implicit and explicit memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(8), 1449–1474. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.691887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaway, B., Sekiya, H., & Fairweather, M. (1995). Movement variability as a function of accuracy demand in programmed serial aiming responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27(1), 67–76. doi:10.1080/00222895.1995.9941700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Staiger, A., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in the spontaneous speech production of patients with apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22(11), 1201–1215. doi:10.1080/02687030701820584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, M. W., & Brown, S. M. (1970). Note on the Cochran Q test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(329), 155–160. doi:10.1080/01621459.1970.10481069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman, T. W., & Carhart, R. (1966). An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words: Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. DTIC Document. Retrieved from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0639638
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., Houle, G., & Ostry, D. J. (2008). Specificity of speech motor learning. The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 28(10), 2426–2434. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4196-07.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Merwe, A. (1997). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (Vol. 2, pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Merwe, A. (2011). A speech motor learning approach to treating apraxia of speech: Rationale and effects of intervention with an adult with acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 25(10), 1174–1206. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.582246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 328–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Rogers, M. A. (2006). Treatment guidelines for acquired aproaxia of speech: Treatment descriptions and recommendations. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 14, 35–66.
   Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., & Rogers, M. A. (2006). Treatment guidelines for acquired apraxia of speech: A synthesis and evaluation of the evidence. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 14, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, S. P., & Varley, R. A. (1998). A reconceptualisation of apraxia of speech: A synthesis of evidence. Cortex, 34(2), 221–231. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70749-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wifall, T., McMurray, B., & Hazeltine, E. (2014). Perceptual similarity affects the learning curve (but not necessarily learning). Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(1), 312–331. doi:10.1037/a0030865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, C. A., & Ging, C. A. (1991). The role of interference and task similarity on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of simple motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62(1), 18–26. doi:10.1080/02701367.1991.10607514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Variability in practice: Facilitation in retention and transfer through schema formation or context effects? Journal of Motor Behavior, 20(2), 133–149. doi:10.1080/00222895.1988.10735438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441–517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar