Use of Q-methodology in a study of older community dwellers facing the largest urban redevelopment and renewal project in Hong Kong

References

• Akhtar-Danesh, N., Baumann, A., & Cordingley, L. (2008). Q-methodology in nursing research: A promise method for the study of subjectivity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 30(6), 759–773. doi:10.1177/0193945907312979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, Z. (2000). Q methodology – A journey into the subjectivity of human mind. Singapore Medical Journal, 41(8), 410–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandenburg, A.M. & Carroll, M.S. (1995). Your place or mine? The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society and Natural Resources, 8(5), 381–398.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (2002). Q technique and questionnaires. Operant Subjectivity, 25(2), 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (2009). Q technique, method, and methodology: Comments on Stentor Danielson’s article. Field Methods, 21(3), 238–241. doi:10.1177/1525822X09332080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Census and Statistics Department. (2013). Hong Kong 2011 population census thematic report: Older persons. The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Census and Statistics Department. (2018). Hong Kong in figures (latest figures) – population density by area. The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Retrieved March 22 2018 from www.statistics.gov.hk/hk_in_figures/popu/popu5e.xls.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Home Care Policy and Research. (2012). The AdvantAge initiative: Helping communities develop strategies for aging in place. Visiting Nurse Service of New York (VNSNY), NY, US.
   Google Scholar
• Constance, B., & Barry, L. H. (2007). ‘What about feelings?’: A study of emotion and tension in social work field education. Social Work Education, 26(4), 399–413. doi:10.1080/02615470601081712
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cuppen, E., Bosch-Rekveldt, M. G. C., Pikaara, E., & Mehos, D. C. (2016). Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1347–1359. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, K. L., Girdler, S. J., Falkmer, T., Richmond, J. E., Wagman, P., Millsteed, J., & Falkmer, M. (2017). Viewpoints of working sandwich generation women and occupational therapists on role balance strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 24(5), 366–382. doi:10.1080/11038128.2016.1250814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel, D. (2016). Q-methodology: An alternative design for undergraduate nursing honors research. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(11), 659–662. doi:10.3928/01484834-20161011-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, G. W. K. (2017). Examining perceptions and attitudes: A review of Likert-type scales versus Q-methodology. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 39(5), 674–689. doi:10.1177/0193945916661302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsen, K., & Jehn, K. A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: an International Journal, 4(2), 123–150. doi:10.1108/17465640910978391
   Google Scholar
• Killam, L., Timmermans, K. E., & Raymond, J. M. (2013). The barriers to and benefits of conducting Q-sorts in the classroom. Nurse Researcher, 21(2), 24–29. doi:10.7748/nr2013.11.21.2.24.e1210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May, T. (2002). Social research: Issues, methods and process (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (2013). Q methodology (2nd ed. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, M., Hinks, M., Stowell-Smith, M., Mercer, D., & Forster, J. M. (1999). Q methodology, risk training and quality management. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 12(6), 254–266. doi:10.1108/09526869910291823
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. E., & Newman, I. (2011). Q methodology and its position in the mixed-methods continuum. Operant Subjectivity, 34(4), 172–191.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, J., Cowell, N., & Gersch, I. (2018). How school staff understand the relationship between problem behaviours and language difficulties. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(1), 1–25. doi:10.1080/02667363.2017.1367647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J. (2009). Urban planning and real estate development. Abingdon. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shemmings, D. (2006). ‘Quantifying’ qualitative data: An illustrative example of the use of Q methodology in psychosocial research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006(3), 147–165. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp060oa
   Google Scholar
• Shinebourne, P., & Adams, M. (2007). Q-Methodology as a phenomenological research method. Existential Analysis, 18(1), 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton Rogers, R. (1995). Q-methodology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre´, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 179–195). London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1935). Technique of factor analysis. Nature, 136, 297. doi:10.1038/136297b0
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q Technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., Delprato, D. J., & Knapp, J. R. (1994). Q-methodology in the study of child phenomenology. The Psychological Record, 44(2), 171–183. doi:10.1007/BF03395126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban Renewal Authority. (2018). Webpage of the urban renewal authority. Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://www.ura.org.hk/en
   Google Scholar
• van Staalduinen, W., Bond, R., Dantas, C., & Jegundo, A. L. (2018). Smart age-friendly cities | age-friendly smart cities! Retrieved in European Commission webpage Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/library/smart-age-friendly-cities-age-friendly-smart- cities_en
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 67–91. doi:10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, C. (2012). Exploring emotion in the higher education workplace. Higher Education, 64, 891–909. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9535-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Geneva, Switzerland. ISBN 9789241547307.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2015). Measuring the age-friendliness of cities: A guide to using core indicators. Kobe, Japan: WHO Centre for Health Development. ISBN 9789241509695
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2016). Multisectoral action for a life course approach to healthy ageing: Draft global strategy and plan of action on ageing and health. Sixty-ninth World Health Assembly A69/17-Provisional agenda item 13.4.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2017). Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland. ISBN 978-92-4-151350-0.
   Google Scholar