3,647
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY

Psychometric assessment of an instrument evaluating the effects of affective variables on students’ WTC in face-to-face and digital environment

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1823617 | Received 19 Jul 2020, Accepted 07 Sep 2020, Published online: 23 Sep 2020

References

  • Amiryousefi, M. (2018). Willingness to communicate, interest, motives to communicate with the instructor, and L2 speaking: A focus on the role of age and gender. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 221–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1170838
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  • Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer.
  • Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.016
  • Cao, Y. (2010). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.016
  • Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
  • Chan, M., & Subramaniam, R. (2020). Validation of a science concept inventory by Rasch Analysis. In M. Khine (Ed.), Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research (pp. 159–178). Springer.
  • Chang, K.-C., Wang, J.-D., Tang, H.-P., Cheng, C.-M., & Lin, C.-Y. (2014). Psychometric evaluation, using Rasch analysis, of the WHOQOL-BREF in heroin-dependent people undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: Further item validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0148-6
  • Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102
  • de Sinatra, P. V., Tanucci, M., Monacis, G., Bitonto, L., Di, P., Roselli, T., & Rossano, V. (2012). How cognitive styles affect the E-learning process. In 2012 IEEE 12th international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 359–363). Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2012.79
  • DiStefano, C., & Jiang, N. (2020). Applying the Rasch rating scale method to questionnaire data. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research (pp. 31–46). Springer.
  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
  • Huang, F., Huang, L., & Oon, P.-T. (2020). Constructs evaluation of student attitudes towards science - A Rasch analysis. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research (pp. 139–158). Springer.
  • Khany, R., & Nejad, A. M. (2017). L2 willingness to communicate, openness to experience, extraversion, and L2 unwillingness to communicate: The Iranian EFL context. RELC Journal, 48(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216645416
  • Lee, J. S. (2019). EFL students’ views of willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 692–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509
  • Lee, J. S. (2020). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319
  • Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2019). Affective variables and informal digital learning of English: Keys to willingness to communicate in a second language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5177
  • Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.002
  • Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2019). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831408
  • Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt74m.htm
  • Linacre, J. M. (2010). When to stop removing items and persons in Rasch misfit analysis? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 23(4), 1241. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt234g.htm
  • Linacre, J. M. (2018). A user’s guide to Winsteps Ministep Rasch-model computer programs (version 4.3.1). Institute for Objective Measurement, Inc. Retrieved March 19, 2019), from https://www.winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-Manual.pdf
  • Ling Lee, W., Chinna, K., & Sumintono, B. (2020). Psychometrics assessment of HeartQoL questionnaire: A Rasch analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 204748732090232. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487320902322
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562
  • Maclntyre, P. D., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003035
  • Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological science, 25(8), 1608–1618 doi:10.1177/0956797614535810
  • Mulyono, H., & Saskia, R. (2020). Dataset on the effects of self-confidence, motivation and anxiety on Indonesian students’ willingness to communicate in face-to-face and digital settings. Data in Brief, 31, 105774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105774
  • Ningrum, E., Evans, S., & Soh, S.-E. (2019). Validation of the Indonesian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: A Rasch analysis. PloS One, 14(4), e0215128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215128
  • Ningsih, S. K., Narahara, S., & Mulyono, H. (2018). An exploration of factors contributing to students’ unwillingness to communicate in a foreign language across Indonesian secondary schools. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 811–824. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11451a
  • Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2014). Can I say something? The effects of digital game play on willingness to communicate. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 101–123. https://hdl.handle.net/10652/2962
  • Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226
  • Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (2nd ed.). Trim Komunikata.
  • Van Zile-Tamsen, C. (2017). Using Rasch analysis to inform rating scale development. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 922–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9448-0
  • Waldeck, J., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. (2001). Teacher e-mail message strategies and students’ willingness to communicate online. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880128099
  • Wright, B.D. (1992). The international objective measurement workshops: Past and future. In M. Wilson (Ed), Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 1, pp. 9–28). Ablex Publishing.
  • Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136
  • Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816657851
  • Yu, H. C. (2020). Objective measurement: How Rasch modeling can simply and enhanc your assessment. In M. Khine (Ed.), Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research (pp. 47–73). Springer.
  • Zanon, C., Hutz, C. S., Yoo, H. (Henry), & Hambleton, R. K. (2016). An application of item response theory to psychological test development. Psicologia: Reflexão E Crítica, 29(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0040-x