Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the experiences in close relationships – relationship structures questionnaire (ECR-RS global nine-item version)

References

• Arriaga, X. B., Kumashiro, M., Simpson, J. A., & Overall, N. C. (2018). Revising working models across time: Relationship situations that enhance attachment security. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 71–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317705257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axfors, C. (2014). Attachment style questionnaire (ASQ): En fortsatt utvärdering av den svenska versionen. DiVA. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:756489/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Axfors, C., Sylvén, S., Skalkidou, A., & Ramklint, M. (2017). Psychometric properties of the attachment style questionnaire in Swedish pregnant women: Short and full versions. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 35(5), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1342786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström, M., & Holmes, B. M. (2001). Measuring adult attachment: A construct validation of two self-report instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 79–86. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J. J., Finnegan, H., & Morry, M. M. (2012). Orthogonal dreams in an oblique world: A meta-analysis of the association between attachment anxiety and avoidance. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantazaro, A., & Wei, M. (2010). Adult attachment, dependence, self‐criticism, and depressive symptoms: A test of a mediational model. Journal of Personality, 78(4), 1135–1162. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00645.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donbaek, D. F., & Elklit, A. (2014). A validation of the experiences in close relationships-relationship structures scale (ECR-RS) in adolescents. Attachment & Human Development, 16(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.850103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley, R. C. (2014, August). Relationship structures (ECR-RS) questionnaire. University of Illinois. http://labs.psychology.illinois.edu/~rcfraley/measures/relstructures.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fraley, R. C. (2019). Attachment in adulthood: Recent developments, emerging debates, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The experiences in close relationships – relationship structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615–625. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galesic, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. (2009). The compassionate mind: A new approach to life’s challenges. Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, A. R., & Bachman, J. G. (1981). Effects of questionnaire length on response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(4), 549–559. http://doi.org/10.1086/268687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatas, S., & Demir, I. (2019). Attachment avoidance and anxiety in adolescence: Turkish adaptation of the experiences in close relationships-relationship structures scale. Cognition, Language, and Development, 122(4), 1372–1394. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118785562
   Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Security-based self-representations in adulthood: Contents and processes. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 159–195). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., Sapir-Lavid, Y., Yaakobi, E., Arias, K., Tal-Aloni, L., & Bor, G. (2004). Attachment theory and concern for others’ welfare: Evidence that activation of the sense of secure base promotes endorsement of self-transcendence values. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 251, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2504_4
   Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2018). Attachment orientations and emotion regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25(6), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moreira, H., Martins, T., Gouveia, M. J., & Canavarro, M. C. (2015). Assessing adult attachment across different contexts: Validation of the Portuguese version of the experiences in close relationships – relationship structures questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(1), 22–30. http://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.950377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitz, P., Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Sthankiya, B., & Lancee, W. (2010). Adult attachment measures: A 25-year review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(4), 419–432. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles, T. F., & Kane, H. S. (2013). The attachment system and physiology in adulthood: Normative processes, individual differences, and implications for health. Journal of Personality, 82(6), 515–527. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/mpr_Schermelleh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siroňová, A., Cígler, H., Ježek, S., & Lacinová, L. (2020). Psychometric characteristics of the ECR-RS, structure of the relationship between global and specific attachment – Cross-validation of the results using the Czech and original versions of the ECR-RS. Studia Psychologica, 62(4), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2020.04.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. T., Combs, J. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2011). Brief instruments and short forms. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 1, Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (pp. 395–409). American Psychological Association. http://doi.org/10.1037/13619-021
   Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14) [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, M., & Lai, M. H. C. (2018). Testing factorial invariance with unbalanced samples. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1387859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar