An optimal inventory policy under certainty distributed demand for cutting tools with stochastically distributed lifespan

References

• Arsecularatne, J. A. (2003). On prediction of tool life and tool deformation conditions in machining with restricted contact tools. Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43, 657–669.
   Google Scholar
• Axinte, D. A., Belluco, W., & De Chiffre, L. (2001). Reliable tool life measurements in turning—An application to cutting fluid efficiency evaluation. Machine Tools & Manufacture, 41, 1003–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Daya, M., & Raouf, A. (1994). Inventory models involving lead time as a decision variable. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 579–582.10.1057/jors.1994.85
   Google Scholar
• Chung, K. J., & Lin, C. N. (2001). Optimal inventory replenishment models for deteriorating items taking account of time discounting. Computers & Operations Research, 28, 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hariga, M., & Ben-Daya, M. (1999). Some stochastic inventory models with deterministic variable lead time. European Journal of Operational Research, 113, 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Hahn, K. H. (2000). An optimal procurement policy for items with an inventory level-dependent demand rate and fixed lifetime. European Journal of Operational Research, 127, 537–545.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00337-9
   Google Scholar
• Kamath, K. R., & Pakkala, T. P. M. (2002). A Bayesian approach to a dynamic inventory model under an unknown demand distribution. Computers & Operations Research, 29, 403–422.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. R., & Sarker, B. R. (2013, November). Lifespan prediction of cutting tools for high-value-added products. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 691887–1894, doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5160-1
   Google Scholar
• Moritz, F., & Roelof, K. (2003). On optimal inventory control with independent stochastic item returns. European Journal of Operational Research, 151, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mungan, D., Yu, J., & Sarker, B. R. (2010). Manufacturing lot-sizing, procurement and delivery schedules over a finite planning horizon. International Journal of Production Research, 48, 3619–3636.10.1080/00207540902878228
   Google Scholar
• Oraby, S. E., & Hayhurst, D. R. (2004). Tool life determination based on the measurement of wear and tool force ratio variation. Machine Tools & Manufacture, 44, 1261–1269.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, T., Ghosh, S. K., & Chaudhuri, K. S. (2012). An optimal inventory replenishment policy for a deteriorating item with time-quadratic demand and time-dependent partial backlogging with shortages in all cycles. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, 9147–9155.10.1016/j.amc.2012.02.072
   Google Scholar
• Serra, R., Ouahabi, A., & Rmili, W. (2012, July 22–27). An end-of-life criterion from cutting tool vibrations. In 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. C. (2005). Metal cutting principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timothy, L. U. (2005). Inventory models with inventory-level-dependent demand: A comprehensive review and unifying theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 162, 792–804.
   Google Scholar
• Toktay, L. B., & Wein, L. M. (2001). Analysis of a forecasting-production-inventory system with stationary demand. Management Science, 47, 1268–1281.10.1287/mnsc.47.9.1268.9787
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., Mungan, D., & Sarker, B. R. (2011). An integrated multi-stage supply chain inventory model under an infinite planning horizon and continuous price decrease. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61, 118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., Sarker, B. R., Duan, Q., & Wu, B. (2012). Single-manufacturer, multi-retailer consignment policy for retailers’ generalized demand distributions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63, 1708–1719.10.1057/jors.2012.13
   Google Scholar
• Zequrira, R. I., Valdes, J. E., & Berenguer, C. (2007). Optimal buffer inventory and opportunistic preventive maintenance under random production capacity availability. International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 686–696.
   Google Scholar