1,106
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A material footprint model for green information systems – using statistical learning to identify the predictors of natural resource use

, , , & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1616655 | Received 14 Dec 2018, Accepted 06 May 2019, Published online: 24 May 2019

References

  • Bringezu, S., Schütz, H., Saurat, M., Moll, S., Acosta-Fernández, J., & Steger, S. (2009). Europe’s resource use. basic trends, global and sectoral patterns and environmental and socioeconomic impacts. In S. Bringezu & R. Bleischwitz (Eds.), Sustainable resource management. global trends, visions and policies (pp. 52–14). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
  • Buhl, J., Liedtke, C., & Bienge, K. (2017b). How much environment do humans need? Evidence from an integrated online user application linking natural resource use and subjective well-being in Germany. Resources, 6(4), 67. doi:10.3390/resources6040067
  • Buhl, J., Liedtke, C., Teubler, J., Bienge, K., & Schmidt, N. (2018). Measure or management?—Resource use indicators for policymakers based on microdata by households. Sustainability, 10(12), 4467. doi:10.3390/su10124467
  • Buhl, J., Teubler, J., Liedtke, C., & Stadler, K. (2017a). The resource use of private households in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum Sustain. Management Forum, 25, 255–264.
  • Cape, P. (2010). Questionnaire length, fatigue effects and response quality revisited. Survey Sampling International, 111.
  • Galesic, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 349–360. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp031
  • German Federal Government. (2016). Die Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie 2016 – Der Weg in eine enkelgerechte Zukunft. Germany: Frankfurt am Main.
  • German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU). (2017). Nationales Programm für nachhaltigen Konsum. Gesellschaftlicher Wandel durch einen nachhaltigen Lebensstil. Retrieved from http://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Pools/Broschueren/nachhaltiger_konsum_broschuere_bf.pdf
  • Greiff, K., Teubler, J., Baedeker, C., Liedtke, C., & Rohn, H. (2017). Material and carbon footprint of household activities. In D. V. Keyson, O. Guerra-Santin, & D. Lockton (Eds.), Living labs: Design and assessment of sustainable living (pp. 259–275). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2008). The elements of statistical learning. New York, NY: Springer series in statistics.
  • IRP. (2017). Assessing global resource use: A systems approach to resource efficiency and pollution reduction. Bringezu, S., Ramaswami, A., Schandl, H., O’Brien, M., Pelton, R., Acquatella, J., Ayuk, E., Chiu, A., Flanegin, R., Fry, J., Giljum, S., Hashimoto, S., Hellweg, S., Hosking, K., Hu, Y., Lenzen, M., Lieber, M., Lutter, S., Miatto, A., Singh Nagpure, A., Obersteiner, M., van Oers, L., Pfister, S., Pichler, P., Russell, A., Spini, L., Tanikawa, H., van der Voet, E., Weisz, H., West, J., Wiijkman, A., Zhu, B., Zivy, R. Nairobi, Kenya: A Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme.
  • Lettenmeier, M. (2018). A sustainable level of material footprint — Benchmark for designing one-planet lifestyles. Materiaalijalanjäljen kestävä taso –mittapuu yhden planeetan elämäntapojen toteuttamiseen Aalto University, Helsinki.
  • Lettenmeier, M., Liedtke, C., & Rohn, H. (2014). Eight tons of material footprint – suggestion for a resource cap for household consumption in Finland. Resources, 3, 488–515. doi:10.3390/resources3030488
  • Lettenmeier, M., Rohn, H., Liedtke, C., & Schmidt-Bleek, F. (2009). Resource productivity in 7 steps; Wuppertal Spezial 41. Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. Retrieved from http://epub.wupperinst.org/files/3384/WS41.pdf
  • Liedtke, C., Bienge, K., Wiesen, K., Teubler, J., Greiff, K., Lettenmeier, M., & Rohn, H. (2014). Resource use in the production and consumption system—The MIPS approach. Resources, 3, 544–574. doi:10.3390/resources3030544
  • Lin, S. M. (2017). Identify predictors of university students’ continuance intention to use online carbon footprint calculator. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(3), 294–311. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2016.1232751
  • Mahdizadeh, M., & Zamanzade, E. (2016). Kernel-based estimation of P(X > Y) in ranked set sampling. SORT-Statistics and Operations Research Transactions, 1(2), 243–266.
  • Rathod, S., & LaBruna, A. (2005). Questionnaire length and fatigue effects-does size really matter? In ESOMAR, Conference on Panel Research, Budapest.
  • Revilla, M., & Ochoa, C. (2017). Ideal and maximum length for a web survey. International Journal of Market Research, 59(5), 557–565.
  • Schmidt-Bleek, F. (2009). The Earth: Natural resources and human intervention. London: Haus Publishing.
  • Teubler, J., Buhl, J., Lettenmeier, M., Greiff, K., & Liedtke, C. (2018). A household’s burden–The embodied resource use of household equipment in Germany. Ecological Economics, 146, 96–105. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.004
  • UN (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development, 2015. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
  • UN (2017, July 6). General assembly resolution 71/313, work of the statistical commission pertaining to the 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/71/313). Retrieved from http://undocs.org/A/RES/71/313.
  • Wiesen, K., Saurat, M., & Lettenmeier, M. (2014). Calculating the material input per service unit using the ecoinvent database. The International Journal of Performance Engineering, 10, 357–366.
  • Zamanzade, E., & Vock, M. (2015). Variance estimation in ranked set sampling using a concomitant variable. Statistics and Probability Letter, 105, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2015.04.034