Tr(R²) control charts based on kernel density estimation for monitoring multivariate variability process

References

• Abbasi, S. A., & Miller, A. (2012). On proper choice of variability control chart for normal and non-normal processes. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28(3), 279–37. doi:10.1002/qre.1244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu‐Shawiesh, M. O. A., Kibria, G., & George, F. (2014). A robust bivariate control chart alternative to the Hotelling’s T2 Control Chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30(1), 25–35. doi:10.1002/qre.1474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahsan, M., Mashuri, M., & Khusna, H. (2017). Evaluation of Laney p’ Chart Performance. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(24), 14208–14217.
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan, M., Mashuri, M., Kuswanto, H., Prastyo, D. D., & Khusna, H. (2018a). Multivariate control chart based on PCA mix for variable and attribute quality characteristics. Production & Manufacturing Research, 6(1), 364–384. doi:10.1080/21693277.2018.1517055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahsan, M., Mashuri, M., Kuswanto, H., Prastyo, D. D., & Khusna, H. (2018b). T2 control chart based on successive difference covariance matrix for intrusion detection system. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Makassar, Indonesia (Vol. 1028, p. 12220). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Alfaro, J. L., & Ortega, J. F. (2009). A comparison of robust alternatives to Hotelling’s T2 control chart. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36(12), 1385–1396. doi:10.1080/02664760902810813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, H., Syed Yahaya, S. S., & Omar, Z. (2013). Robust hotelling T2 control chart with consistent minimum vector variance. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1–7. doi:10.1155/2013/401350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkindi, M., & Prastyo, D. D. (2016). T2 hotelling fuzzy and W2 control chart with application to wheat flour production process. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (Vol. 1746). Doi:10.1063/1.4953977
   Google Scholar
• Alt, F. B., & Smith, N. D. (1988). Multivariate process control. Handbook of Statistics, 7, 333–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amdouni, A., Castagliola, P., Taleb, H., & Celano, G. (2015). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart in short production runs. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81(1), 1–14. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7084-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amdouni, A., Castagliola, P., Taleb, H., & Celano, G. (2017). A variable sampling interval Shewhart control chart for monitoring the coefficient of variation in short production runs. International Journal of Production Research, 55(19), 5521–5536. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1285076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparisi, F., Jabaioyes, J., & Carrion, A. (1999). Statistical properties of the lsi multivariate control chart. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 28(11), 2671–2686. doi:10.1080/03610929908832445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparisi, F., Jabaloyes, J., & Carrión, A. (2001). GENERALIZED VARIANCE CHART DESIGN WITH ADAPTIVE SAMPLE SIZES. THE BIVARIATE CASE. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 30(4), 931–948. doi:10.1081/SAC-100107789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkat, J., Niaki, S. T. A., & Abbasi, B. (2007). Artificial neural networks in applying MCUSUM residuals charts for AR(1) processes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 189(2), 1889–1901. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.12.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden, R. L., & Faires, J. D. (2011). Numerical analysis. Cengage learning. USA. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, M. E., & Scariano, S. M. (2013). A synthetic control chart for the coefficient of variation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83(5), 853–867. doi:10.1080/00949655.2011.639772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., Achouri, A., Taleb, H., Celano, G., & Psarakis, S. (2015). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80(9), 1561–1576. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-6985-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., Celano, G., & Psarakis, S. (2011). Monitoring the Coefficient of Variation Using EWMA Charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 43(3), 249–265. doi:10.1080/00224065.2011.11917861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., & Hadi, A. S. (2009). Sensitivity analysis in linear regression (Vol. 327). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., CHENG, S. W., & Xie, H. (2005). A new multivariate control chart for monitoring both location and dispersion. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation®, 34(1), 203–217. doi:10.1081/SAC-200047087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, Y.-M., Mason, R., & Young, J. (2001). The control chart for individual observations from a multivariate non-normal distribution. Communications in Statistics: Theory & Methods, 30(8/9), 1937. doi:10.1081/STA-100105706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. F. B., & Machado, M. A. G. (2009). A new chart based on sample variances for monitoring the covariance matrix of multivariate processes. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41(7), 770–779. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1502-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. F. B., & Machado, M. A. G. (2011). A control chart based on sample ranges for monitoring the covariance matrix of the multivariate processes. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(2), 233–245. doi:10.1080/02664760903406413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croux, C., & Haesbroeck, G. (1999). Influence function and efficiency of the minimum covariance determinant scatter matrix estimator. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 71(2), 161–190. doi:10.1006/jmva.1999.1839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djauhari, A. M. (2005a). Improved monitoring of multivariate process variability. Journal of Quality Technology, 37(1), 32–39. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=773835061&Fmt=7&clientId=3740&RQT=309&VName=PQD
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djauhari, M. A. (2005b). Outlier detection: Some challenging problem for future research. Proceedings of the Eighth Islamic Countries Conference on Statistical Sciences, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Lahore.
   Google Scholar
• Djauhari, M. A. (2010). A multivariate process variability monitoring based on individual observations. Modern Applied Science, 4(10), 91. doi:10.5539/mas.v4n10p91
   Google Scholar
• Doǧu, E., & Kocakoç, İ. D. (2011). Estimation of change point in generalized variance control chart. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 40(3), 345–363. doi:10.1080/03610918.2010.542844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadre, M. P., & Kakade, V. C. (2018). Two group inspection-based control charts for dispersion matrix. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 47(6), 1652–1669. doi:10.1080/03610918.2017.1321120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grambow, S. C., & Stromberg, A. J. (1998). Combining the EID and FSA for computing the minimum volume ellipsoid. Deptartment of Stats., University of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoryan, A., & He, D. (2005). Multivariate double sampling |S| Charts for controlling process variability. International Journal of Production Research, 43(4), 715–730. doi:10.1080/00207540410001716525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed, M. S. (2014). Generalized variance chart for multivariate quality control process procedure with application. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 8(163), 8137–8151. doi:10.12988/ams.2014.49734
   Google Scholar
• Härdle, W., & Linton, O. (1994). Applied nonparametric methods. Handbook of Econometrics, 4(26), 2295–2339. doi:10.1016/S1573-4412(05)80007-8
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, D. S., & Mergen, A. E. (1993). Improving the performance of the T2 control chart. Quality Engineering, 5(4), 619–625. doi:10.1080/08982119308919004
   Google Scholar
• Huwang, L., Yeh, A. B., & Wu, C.-W. (2007). Monitoring multivariate process variability for individual observations. Journal of Quality Technology, 39(3), 258–278. doi:10.1080/00224065.2007.11917692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issam, B. K., & Mohamed, L. (2008). Support vector regression based residual MCUSUM control chart for autocorrelated process. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 201(1–2), 565–574. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2007.12.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, C. W., Lee, M. S., Seong, Y. J., & Hawkins, D. M. (2007). A control chart for the coefficient of variation. Journal of Quality Technology, 39(2), 151–158. doi:10.1080/00224065.2007.11917682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatun, M., Khoo, M. B. C., Lee, M. H., & Castagliola, P. (2018). One-sided control charts for monitoring the multivariate coefficient of variation in short production runs. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 0142331218789481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaw, K. W., Khoo, M. B. C., Yeong, W. C., & Wu, Z. (2017). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size and sampling interval control chart. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 46(7), 5772–5794. doi:10.1080/03610918.2016.1177074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khusna, H., Mashuri, M., Ahsan, M., Suhartono, S., & Prastyo, D. D. (2018). Bootstrap based maximum multivariate CUSUM control chart. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 1–23. doi:10.1080/16843703.2018.1535765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khusna, H., Mashuri, M., Suhartono, P. D., & Ahsan, M. (2018). Multioutput least square SVR based multivariate EWMA control chart. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 12221. Retrieved from http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/1028/i=1/a=012221
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. H., & Khoo, M. B. C. (2017). Optimal designs of multivariate synthetic |S| Control chart based on median run length. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 46(6), 3034–3053. doi:10.1080/03610926.2015.1048884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. H., & Khoo, M. B. C. (2018). Double sampling |S| Control chart with variable sample size and variable sampling interval. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 47(2), 615–628. doi:10.1080/03610918.2017.1288246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., & Tsung, F. (2019). A control scheme for monitoring process covariance matrices with more variables than observations. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 35(1), 351–367. doi:10.1002/qre.2403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, A. J. X., Khoo, M. B. C., Teoh, W. L., & Haq, A. (2017). Run sum chart for monitoring multivariate coefficient of variation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109, 84–95. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maboudou-Tchao, E. M., & Diawara, N. (2013). A LASSO chart for monitoring the covariance matrix. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 10(1), 95–114. doi:10.1080/16843703.2013.11673310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, M. A. G., Costa, A. F. B., & Rahim, M. A. (2009). The synthetic control chart based on two sample variances for monitoring the covariance matrix. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 25(5), 595–606. doi:10.1002/qre.992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashuri, M., Haryono, P., Wibawati, A. D. F., Khusna, H., & Ahsan, M. (2016). Trace R2 control chart for monitoring variability. In International Conference on Theoretical and Applied Statistics-Conference Proceedings, Surabaya, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. (2009). Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20010316)40:6<9823::AID-ANIE9823>3.3.CO;2-C
   Google Scholar
• Noorossana, R., & Vaghefi, S. J. M. (2006). Effect of autocorrelation on performance of the MCUSUM control chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22(2), 191–197. doi:10.1002/qre.695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E. S. (1961). Cumulative sum charts. Technometrics, 3(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/00401706.1961.10489922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parzen, E. (1962). On estimation of a probability density function and mode. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(3), 1065–1076. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704472
   Google Scholar
• Peña, D., & Rodrı́guez, J. (2003). Descriptive measures of multivariate scatter and linear dependence. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 85(2), 361–374. doi:10.1016/S0047-259X(02)00061-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phaladiganon, P., Kim, S. B., Chen, V. C. P., Baek, J.-G., & Park, S.-K. (2011). Bootstrap-Based T 2 multivariate control charts. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 40(5), 645–662. doi:10.1080/03610918.2010.549989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phaladiganon, P., Kim, S. B., Chen, V. C. P., & Jiang, W. (2013). Principal component analysis-based control charts for multivariate nonnormal distributions. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(8), 3044–3054. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirhooshyaran, M., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2015). A double-max MEWMA scheme for simultaneous monitoring and fault isolation of multivariate multistage auto-correlated processes based on novel reduced-dimension statistics. Journal of Process Control, 29, 11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz, M. (2008). A dispersion control chart. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 37(6), 1239–1261. doi:10.1080/03610910802049623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz, M., & Does, R. J. M. M. (2008). An alternative to the bivariate control chart for process dispersion. Quality Engineering, 21(1), 63–71. doi:10.1080/08982110802445579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. W. (1959). Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics, 1(3), 239–250. doi:10.1080/00401706.1959.10489860
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, M. (1956). Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Volume, 27, 832–837. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728190
   Google Scholar
• Shewhart, W. A. (1924). Some applications of statistical methods to the analysis of physical and engineering data. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 3(1), 43–87. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1924.tb01347.x
   Google Scholar
• Sindelar, M. F. (2007). Multivariate statistical process control for correlation matrices. University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Suwanda, & Djauhari, A. M. (2003). A new concept in monitoring multivariate process variability. Data Analysis Research Group, 2(2), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, P. F., & Barnett, N. S. (1996). Dispersion control for multivariate processes. Australian Journal of Statistics, 38(3), 235–251. doi:10.1111/anzs.1996.38.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Wibawati, M., Purhadi, M., & Ahsan, M. (2018). Perfomance fuzzy multinomial control chart. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 12120. Retrieved from http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/1028/i=1/a=012120
   Google Scholar
• Wibawati, M., Purhadi, M., & Irhamah. (2016). Fuzzy multinomial control chart and its application. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Surabaya, Indonesia (Vol. 1718). doi:10.1063/1.4943351
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, A. B., Huwang, L., & Wu, C.-W. (2005). A multivariate EWMA control chart for monitoring process variability with individual observations. IIE Transactions, 37(11), 1023–1035. doi:10.1080/07408170500232263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong, W. C., Khoo, M. B. C., Teoh, W. L., & Castagliola, P. (2016). A control chart for the multivariate coefficient of variation. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(3), 1213–1225. doi:10.1002/qre.1828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong, W. C., Khoo, M. B. C., Tham, L. K., Teoh, W. L., & Rahim, M. A. (2017). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sampling interval EWMA chart. Journal of Quality Technology, 49(4), 380–401. doi:10.1080/00224065.2017.11918004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar