Logical-linguistic model for multilingual Open Information Extraction

References

• Akbik, A., & Loser, A. (2012). KrakeN: N-ary facts in open information extraction. AKBC-WEKEX’12: Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Automatic Knowledge Base Construction and Web-scale Knowledge Extraction (pp.52-66). Association for Computational Linguistics, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, G., Premkumar, M. J., & Manning., D. (2015). Leveraging linguistic structure for open domain information extraction. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 344–16. Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Bondarenko, M., & Shabanov-Kushnarenko, J. (2007). The intelligence theory (pp. 576). Kharkiv: “SMIT”.
   Google Scholar
• Duc-Thuan, V., & Bagheri, E. (2016). Open information extraction. Encyclopedia with Semantic Computing and Robotic Intelligence, 1(1), 1630003.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, O., Banko, M., Soderland, S., & Weld, D. (2008). Open information extraction from the web. Communications of the ACM, 51(12), 68–74. doi:10.1145/1409360.1409378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fader, A., Soderland, S., & Etzioni, O. (2011). Identifying relations for open information extraction. Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 1535–1545. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gamallo, P., & Garcia, M. (2015). Multilingual Open Information Extraction. In Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 711–722. Coimbra, Portugal. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23485-4_72.
   Google Scholar
• Gamallo, P., Garcia, M., & Fernandez-Lanza, S. (2012). Dependency-based open information extraction. Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Learning in NLP, 10–18. Avignon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Gashteovski, K., Gemulla, R., & Del Corro, L. (2017). MinIE: Minimizing Facts in Open Information Extraction. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2630–2640. Copenhagen, Denmark. doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1278.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, C., Zhila, F., Gelbukh, F., Kern, R., & Lex, E. (2013). Using factual density to measure informativeness of web documents. Proceedings of the 19th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics, (NODALIDA 2013); Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Khairova, N., Lewoniewski, W., & Wecel, K. (2017). Estimating the quality of articles in Russian wikipedia using the logical-linguistic model of fact extraction. Poznan, Poland. Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 288), Springer, Cham 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Khairova, N., Lewoniewski, W., Węcel, K., Mamyrbayev, О., & Mukhsina, K. (2018). Comparative analysis of the informativeness and encyclopedic style of the popular web information sources. In W. Abramowicz & A. Paschke Eds., Business information systems. BIS 2018. Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 320, pp. 333–344). Berlin: Springer doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_24.
   Google Scholar
• Khairova, N. F., Petrasova, S., & Gautam, A. P. (2016). The logical-linguistic model of fact extraction from English texts. In Information and software technologies. Volume 639 of the series communications in computer and information science. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46254-7_51.
   Google Scholar
• Lex, E., Voelske, M., Errecalde, M., Ferretti, E., Cagnina, L., Horn, C., … Granitzer, M. (2012). Measuring the quality of web content using information. Proceedings of the 2nd joint WICOW/AIRWeb workshop on web quality, Lyon, France. 7–10. doi:10.1007/0-387-27727-7_15.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Ren, X., Zhu, Q., Zhi, S., Gui, H., Ji, H., & Han, J. (2017). Heterogeneous Supervision for Relation Extraction: A Representation Learning Approach. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 46–56. doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1005.
   Google Scholar
• Nivre, J. (2016). Universal dependencies v1: A multilingual treebank collection. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), Portorož, Slovenia, 1659–1666.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, M., Bart, R., Soderland, S., & Etzioni, O. (2012). Open language learning for information extraction. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, Jeju Island, Korea. 523–534.
   Google Scholar
• Shinzato, K., & Sekine, S. (2013). Unsupervised extraction of attributes and their values from product description. Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP 2013, Nagoya, Japan. 1339–1347.
   Google Scholar
• Starostin, A. S., Bocharov, V. V., & Alexeeva, S. V. (2016). FactRuEval 2016: Evaluation of named entity recognition and fact extraction systems for Russian. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialogue 2016”, Moscow, Russia. 702–720.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y.-H., Lee, L.-H., Lin, S.-Y., Liao, B. S., Liu, M.-J., Chen, H.-H., … Fader, A. (2014). Chinese open relation extraction for knowledge acquisition. Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Gothenburg, Sweden. volume 2: Short Papers, 12–16. doi:10.3115/v1/e14-4003.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2018). A survey of truth discovery in information extraction. Paper presented in ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., Qian, L., & Fan, J. (2010). Tree kernel-based semantic relation extraction with rich syntactic and semantic information. Information Sciences, 180, 1313–1325. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar