Framework for examination of software quality characteristics in conflict: A security and usability exemplar

References

• Aldaajeh, S., Asghar, T., Khan, A. A., & Ullah, M. (2012). Communing different views on quality attributes relationships’ nature. European Journal of Scientific Research, 68(1), 101–22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228449235_Communing_Different_Views_on_Quality_Attributes_Relationships'_Nature
   Google Scholar
• Arteaga, J. M., Gonzalez, R. M., Martin, M. V., Vanderdonckt, J., & Rodriguez, F. A. (2009). A methodology for designing information security feedback based on user interface patterns. Advances in Engineering Software, 40(12), 1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha, R. A., Furnell, S., & Clarke, N. L. (2009). From desktop to mobile: Examining the security experience. Computers & Security, 28(3–4), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braz, C., Seffah, A., & M’Raihi, D. (2007). Designing a trade-off between usability and security: A metrics based model. In Proceeding of IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 114–126),  Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Caputo, D. D., Pfleeger, S. L., Sasse, M. A., Ammann, P., Offutt, J., & Deng, L. (2016). Barriers to usable security? Three organizational case studies. IEEE Security Privacy, 14(5), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2016.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choong, Y. Y., Greene, K., & Franklin, J. (2016). Usability and security considerations for public safety mobile authentication (NIST IR 8080). [Online]. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2016/NIST.IR.8080.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cranor, L. F., & Buchler, N. (2014). Better together: Usability and security go hand in hand. IEEE Security and Privacy, 12(6), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2014.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, M., & Lee, S. P. (2013). A consistent approach for prioritizing system quality attributes. In Proceeding of 14th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (pp. 317–322), Honolulu, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ergonomics of human-system interaction. (2010). International Organization for Standardization (ISO Standard 9241).
   Google Scholar
• Feitosa, D., Ampatzoglou, A., Avgeriou, P., & Nakagawa, E. (2015). Investigating quality trade-offs in open source critical embedded systems. “In Proceeding of 11th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures (pp. 113–122), Montréal QC Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., Rusu, C., & Roncagliolo, S. (2009). Usability and security patterns. In Proceeding of 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 301–305), Cancun, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, S., & Lipford, H. R. (2014). Usable Security, history, themes and challenges. Morgan and Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Haoues, M., Sellami, A., Abdallah, H. B., & Cheikhi, L. (2017). A guideline for software architecture selection based on ISO quality related characteristics. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering Management, 8(2), 886–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0546-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsson, K., & Wohlin, C. (2002). Understanding the relations between software quality attributes – a survey approach. In Proceeding of 12th International Conference for Software Quality (pp.1–12). Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hevener, A. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87–92. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol19/iss2/4
   Google Scholar
• IBM. (2018). Cost of data breach study: Global analysis. Ponemon Institute LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Imperva. (2010). Consumer password worst practices. Application Defense Center. [Online]. www.imperva.com/docs/WP_Consumer_Password_Worst_Practices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lew, P., Olsina, L., Becker, P., & Zhang, L. (2012). An integrated strategy to systematically understand and manage quality in use for web applications. Requirements Eng, 17(4), 299–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-011-0128-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, P., Olsina, L., & Zhang, L. (2010). Quality, quality in use, actual usability and user experience as key drivers for web application evaluation,” In Proceeding of International Conference on Web Engineering (pp. 218–232), Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Gao, X., & Wang, H. (2017). Location privacy breach: Apps are watching you in background. In Proceeding of IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (pp. 2423–2429), Atlanta, GA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, R., Ruiz-López, T., Chung, L., & Noguera, M. (2013). Selecting among alternatives using dependencies: An NFR approach. In Proceeding of 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 1292–1297), Coimbra, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Minch, R. P. (2004). Privacy issues in location aware mobile devices. In Proceeding of 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10), Big Island, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Naqvi, B., & Seffah, A. (2019). Interdependencies, conflicts and tradeoffs between security and usability: Why and how should we engineer them?. In 2019 1st International Conference HCI-CPT held as part of the 21st HCI International Conference (pp. 314–324), Orlando, FL, USA, HCII.
   Google Scholar
• Naqvi, B., Seffah, A., & Braz, C. 2018. Adding measures to task models for usability inspection of the cloud access control services In Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Human Centered Software Engineering (HCSE) (pp.133–145), Nice, France.
   Google Scholar
• Neri, H. R., & Travassos, G. H. 2018. MeasureSoft-Gram: A future vision of software product quality. In Proceeding of ACM International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (pp. 1–4), Oulu, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chaterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information System, 24(3), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rising, L. (2000). The pattern alamanac 2000. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, B., Becker, P., & Olsina, L. (2016). Quality views and strategy patterns for evaluating and improving quality: Usability and user experience case studies. Journal of Web Engineering, 15(5&6), 433–464. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3177218.3177222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasse, M. A., Smith, M., Herley, C., Lipford, H., & Vaniea, K. (2016). Debunking security–usability tradeoff myths. IEEE Security and Privacy, 14(5), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2016.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seffah, A., & Javahery, H. (2004). Multiple user inter-faces: Cross-platform applications and context-aware interfaces. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Supakkul, S., Hill, T., Chung, L., Tun, T. T., & Leite, J. C. S. (2010). An NFR pattern approach to dealing with NFRs. In Proceeding of IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (pp. 179–188), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Systems and software engineering – systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) – system and software quality models. (2011). International Organization for Standardization (ISO Standard 25010).
   Google Scholar
• Whitten, A., & Tygar, J. D. (1998). Usability of security: A case study,” School of Computing Science, Carnegie Mellon University (Technical Report CMU-CS-98-155). http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/1998/CMU-CS-98-155.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wieringa, R. J. (2014). Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yee, K. P. (2004). Aligning security and usability. IEEE Security & Privacy, 2(5), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2004.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, M. X., Luo, X. X., Chen, X. H., & Wu, D. D. (2012). A non-functional requirements tradeoff model in Trustworthy Software. Information Sciences, 191, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulzalil, H., Ghani, A. A. A., Selamat, M. H., & Mahmod, R. (2008). A case study to identify quality attributes relationships for web based applications. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8(11), 215–220. doi:10.1.1.474.4656&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar