An integrated performance assessment method for SMEs fruit processing sustainability in Indonesia

References

• Aktaş, N., & Demirel, N. (2021). A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(10), 15591–15618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01311-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alraja, M. N., Imran, R., Khashab, B. M., & Shah, M. (2022). Technological innovation, sustainable green practices and SMEs sustainable performance in times of crisis (COVID-19 pandemic). Information Systems Frontiers: a Journal of Research and Innovation, 24(4), 1081–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10250-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antosz, K., & Ratnayake, R. M. C. (2019). Spare parts’ criticality assessment and prioritization for enhancing manufacturing systems’ availability and reliability. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arief, M., Thoyib, A., Sudiro, A., & Rohman, F. (2013). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation on the firm performance through strategic flexibility: A study on the SMEs Cluster in Malang. Journal of Management Research, 5(3), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v5i3.3339
   Google Scholar
• Badi, I., Muhammad, L. J., Abubakar, M., & Bakır, M, M. (2022). Measuring sustainability performance indicators using FUCOM-MARCOS. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta040722060b
   Google Scholar
• Badurdeen, F., Gregory, R., Luhan, G., Schroeder, M., Vincent, L., & Sekulic, D. (2012). System thinking for sustainability: Envisioning transdisciplinary transformations in STEM education. Learning, 11, 1–6. https://www.academia.edu/download/41075675/ISSST-2012-PAPER.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bhyan, P., Shrivastava, B., & Kumar, N. (2023). Allocating weightage to sustainability criteria’s for performance assessment of group housing developments: Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Building Engineering, 65, 105684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, M., Rangarajan, K., & Dutta, G. (2020). Corporate sustainability in SMEs: An Asian perspective. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(1), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-10-2017-0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, A., Sassanelli, C., Agrawal, D., Gonzalez, E. S., & D'Adamo, I. (2023). Technological innovation toward sustainability in manufacturing organizations: A circular economy perspective. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 35, 101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2023.101211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F. (2021). Sustainability assessment of existing onshore wind plants in the context of triple bottom line: A best-worst method (BWM) based MCDM framework. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(16), 19677–19693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11940-4/Published
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engida, T. G., Rao, X., Berentsen, P. B. M., & Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M. (2018). Measuring corporate sustainability performance– the case of European food and beverage companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 734–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauzi, N. S., Johari, N., Zainuddin, A., & Chuweni, N. N. (2021). The importance of sustainability implementation for business corporations. Planning Malaysia, 19(17), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i17.1002
   Google Scholar
• Gani, A., Asjad, M., & Talib, F. (2021). Prioritization and ranking of indicators of sustainable manufacturing in Indian MSMEs using fuzzy AHP approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 6631–6637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.101
   Google Scholar
• Gao, S. S., & Zhang, J. J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610710891
   Google Scholar
• Gaziulusoy, Ï., & Öztekin, E. E. (2019). Design for sustainability transitions: Origins, attitudes and future directions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13), 3601. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, S., Agarwal, S., Singh, N. S. S., Mathur, T., & Mathur, N. (2022). Analysis of hybrid MCDM methods for the performance assessment and ranking public transport Sector: A case study. Sustainability, 14(22), 15110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S. Y., Chang, C. C., & Lin, T. T. (2019). Triple bottom line model and food safety in organic food and conventional food in affecting perceived value and purchase intentions. British Food Journal, 121(2), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2017-0403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. H., Chang, A. Y., & Luo, W. (2017). Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs – integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal, J., Yu, D., Zubair, M., Rasheed, M. I., Khizar, H. M. U., & Imran, M. (2021). Health consciousness, food safety concern, and consumer purchase intentions toward organic food: The role of consumer involvement and ecological motives. SAGE Open, 11(2), 215824402110157. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211015727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivo de Carvalho, M., Relvas, S., & Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. (2022). A roadmap for sustainability performance assessment in the context of agri-food supply chain. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 34, 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayawickrama, H. M. M. M., Kulatunga, A. K., & Mathavan, S. (2017). Fuzzy AHP based plant sustainability evaluation method. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.073
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Q., Liu, Z., Liu, W., Li, T., Cong, W., Zhang, H., & Shi, J. (2018). A principal component analysis based three-dimensional sustainability assessment model to evaluate corporate sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, P., & Pitcher, T. J. (2004). Implementing microsoft excel software for rapfish: A technique for the rapid appraisal of fisheries status. Fisheries Centre Research Reports. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Klumpp, M. (2018). How to achieve supply chain sustainability efficiently? Taming the triple bottom line split business cycle. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., & Pant, S. (2023). Analytical hierarchy process for sustainable agriculture: An overview. MethodsX, 10, 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., Sharma, M., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., & Choubey, V. K. (2022). Performance assessment of circular driven sustainable agri-food supply chain towards achieving sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, 133698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Z. Y., Chu, M. T., Wang, Y. T., & Chen, K. J. (2020). Industry performance appraisal using improved MCDM for next generation of Taiwan. Sustainability, 12(13), 5290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. (2020). A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 113738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Eckert, C., Yannou-Le Bris, G., & Petit, G. (2019). A fuzzy decision tool to evaluate the sustainable performance of suppliers in an agrifood value chain. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 127, 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, C. G., Winroth, M. P., & Ribeiro da Silva, E. H. D. (2020). Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: An emerging research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1462–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1652777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malesios, C., De, D., Moursellas, A., Dey, P. K., & Evangelinos, K. (2021). Sustainability performance analysis of small and medium sized enterprises: Criteria, methods and framework. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126–4148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihelcic, J. R., Crittenden, J. C., Small, M. J., Shonnard, D. R., Hokanson, D. R., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Sorby, S. A., James, V. U., Sutherland, J. W., & Schnoor, J. L. (2003). Sustainability science and engineering: The emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(23), 5314–5324. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034605h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais, D. O. C., & Silvestre, B. S. (2018). Advancing social sustainability in supply chain management: Lessons from multiple case studies in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazim, M., Wali Mohammad, C., & Sadiq, M. (2022). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to software requirements selection. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(12), 10851–10870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pislaru, M., Herghiligiu, I. V., & Robu, I. B. (2019). Corporate sustainable performance assessment based on fuzzy logic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 998–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylaeva, I. S., Podshivalova, M. V., Alola, A. A., Podshivalov, D. V., & Demin, A. A. (2022). A new approach to identifying high-tech manufacturing SMEs with sustainable technological development: Empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 363, 132322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, I., & Dey, P. (2021). Corporate sustainability performance brenchmarking of best practicing Bangladeshi RMG companies using Analytical Network Process (ANP). Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 13, 144. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A13%3A869837/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Acrawler&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A155794890
   Google Scholar
• Ramdhani, F., & Hardjomidjojo, H. (2019). Analysis of small and medium enterprises performance index in Bogor City. Jurnal Rekayasa Dan Manajemen Agroindustri, 7(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.24843/JRMA.2019.v07.i01.p14
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, L., & St-Pierre, J. (2010). R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: An attempt at empirical clarification. Technovation, 30(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoso, I., Pranowo, D., Wijana, S., Choirun, A., & Putra, V. P. (2023). Sustainability performance evaluation of fruit chip SMEs, in. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1153(1), 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1153/1/012008
   Google Scholar
• Santoso, I., Purnomo, M., Sulianto, A. A., Choirun, A., Azizah, N., Fisdausyi, I. A., & Utama, D. M. (2023). An integrated method for sustainable performance assessment: A case study on Indonesian Coffee Agro-food Industry. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 8(1), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-023-00361-8
   Google Scholar
• Santoso, I., Rahmatin, N., Indriani, C., Rahayu, S., & Widyaningtyas, S. (2018). Integration of the fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis (Fuzzy FMEA) and the Analytical Network Process (ANP) in marketing risk analysis and mitigation. International Journal of Technology, 9(4), 809–818. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i4.2197
   Google Scholar
• Santoso, I., & Winanto, E. A. (2017). Integration Fuzzy FMEA and AHP method in risk management of shallot supply chain. Jurnal Teknologi Industri & Hasil Pertanian, 22, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sartal, A., Bellas, R., Mejías, A. M., & García-Collado, A. (2020). The sustainable manufacturing concept, evolution and opportunities within industry 4.0: A literature review. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 12(5), 168781402092523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020925232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., Joshi, S., & Govindan, K. (2023). Overcoming barriers to implement digital technologies to achieve sustainable production and consumption in the food sector: A circular economy perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 39, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Kumar, V., & Kumar, A. (2020). A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. Computers & Operations Research, 119, 104926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.104926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simola, K., Mengolini, A., & Bolado-Lavin, R. (2005). Institute for energy formal expert judgement an overview.
   Google Scholar
• Sinambela, E. A., & Djaelani, M. (2022). Cost behavior analysis and categorization. Journal of Social Science Studies (JOS3), 2(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.56348/jos3.v2i1.18
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Olugu, E. U., Musa, S. N., & Mahat, A. B. (2018). Fuzzy-based sustainability evaluation method for manufacturing SMEs using balanced scorecard framework. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1081-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surya, B., Menne, F., Sabhan, H., Suriani, S., Abubakar, H., & Idris, M. (2021). Economic growth, increasing productivity of SMEs, and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010020
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J. W., Richter, J. S., Hutchins, M. J., Dornfeld, D., Dzombak, R., Mangold, J., Robinson, S., Hauschild, M. Z., Bonou, A., Schönsleben, P., & Friemann, F. (2016). The role of manufacturing in affecting the social dimension of sustainability. CIRP Annals, 65(2), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarnakar, V., Singh, A. R., Antony, J., Jayaraman, R., Tiwari, A. K., Rathi, R., & Cudney, E. (2022). Prioritizing indicators for sustainability assessment in manufacturing process: An integrated approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6), 3264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, R. R., Aviso, K. B., Huelgas, A. P., & Promentilla, M. A. B. (2014). Fuzzy AHP approach to selection problems in process engineering involving quantitative and qualitative aspects. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(5), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneo, S. Y. M., Hadiwidjojo, D., Sunaryo, S., & Sudjatno, S. (2020). Creative destruction and knowledge creation as the mediation between innovation speed and competitiveness of food small and medium-sized enterprises in Malang, Indonesia. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 30(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2017-0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timisela, N. R., Masyhuri, M., & Darwanto, D. H. (2021). Development strategy of sago local food agroindustry using analytical Hierarchy Process method. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 7(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.18196/agraris.v7i1.9378
   Google Scholar
• Wicher, P., Zapletal, F., & Lenort, R. (2019). Sustainability performance assessment of industrial corporation using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yafetto, L., Odamtten, G. T., & Wiafe-Kwagyan, M. (2023). Valorization of agro-industrial wastes into animal feed through microbial fermentation: A review of the global and Ghanaian case. Heliyon, 9(4), e14814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zakari, A., Khan, I., Tan, D., Alvarado, R., & Dagar, V. (2022). Energy efficiency and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Energy, 239, 122365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarte, M., Pechmann, A., & Nunes, I. L. (2019). Decision support systems for sustainable manufacturing surrounding the product and production life cycle – A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Veltri, A., Calvo-Amodio, J., & Haapala, K. R. (2021). Making the business case for sustainable manufacturing in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: A systems decision making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar