Working towards an engagement turn to agricultural research in the Tonle Sap Biosphere, Cambodia

References

• [AAS] CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic. Agricultural Systems. (2011). CGIAR research program aquatic agricultural systems: Program proposal.
   Google Scholar
• [AAS] CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems. (2013). Learning from implementation of community selection in Zambia, Solomon Islands, and Bangladesh AAS hubs. Evaluation and Learning Series Paper: AAS-2013-24. Penang: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Apgar, J. M., Allen, W., Albert, J., Douthwaite, B., Paz Ybarnegaray, R., & Lunda, J. (2016). Getting beneath the surface in program planning, monitoring and evaluation: Learning from use of participatory action research and theory of change in the CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems. Action Research, 15, 15–34. doi:10.1177/1476750316673879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apgar, J. M., Cohen, P., Ratner, B., de Silva, S., Buisson, M. C., Longley, C., & Mapedza, E. (2017). Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research. Ecology and Society, 22(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apgar, J. M., & Douthwaite, B. (2013). Participatory action research in the CGIAR research program on aquatic agricultural systems. CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems program brief No. AAS-2013-27.
   Google Scholar
• Arieli, D., Friedman, V. J., & Agbaria, K. (2009). The paradox of participation in action research. Action Research, 7, 263–290.10.1177/1476750309336718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attwood, S. J., Park, S. E., Loos, J., Phillips, M., Mills, D., & McDougall, C. (2017). Does sustainable intensification offer a pathway to improved food security for aquatic agricultural system-dependent communities? In Ingrid Ӧborn, Bernard Vanlauwe, Michael Phillips, Richard Thomas, & Kwesi Atta-Krah (Eds.), Sustainable intensification in smallholder agriculture: An integrated systems research approach (pp. 71–87). Earthscan: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Béné, C., & Teoh, S. J. (2014). Estimating the numbers of poor living in aquatic agricultural systems (Unpublished Modelling Report).
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, J. W. (1994). Facts, fantasies, and failures of farmer participatory research. Agriculture and Human Values, 11, 140–150.10.1007/BF01530454
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. (2000). Transformative learning as ideology critique. In J. Mezirow and Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 125–148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, D. (2007). Systemic action research: A strategy for whole system change. Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S. (2003). Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology, 37, 13–34.10.1177/0038038503037001384
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22, 1253–1268.10.1016/0305-750X(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2005). Doing action research in your own organization. New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Colfer, C. J. P., Andriamampandry, E., Asaha, S., Basuki, I., Boucard, A., Feintrenie, L., … Urech, Z. L. (2011). Minefields in collaborative governance. In C. J. P. Colfer & J.-L. Pfund (Eds.), Collaborative governance of tropical landscapes (pp. 233–270). Oxon: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2003). Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World Development, 31, 1325–1342.10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00086-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douthwaite, B., Apgar, J. M., & Crissman, C. (2014). Monitoring and evaluations strategy brief. Penang: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Douthwaite, B., Apgar, J. M., Schwarz, A., McDougall, C., Attwood, S., Senaratna Sellamuttu, S., & Clayton, Terry (2017). A new professionalism for agricultural research for development. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15, 238–252. doi:10.1080/14735903.2017.1314754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douthwaite, B., Apgar, J. M., Schwarz, A., McDougall, C., Attwood, S., Senaratna Sellamuttu, S., & Clayton, T. (Eds.). (2015). Research in development: Learning from the CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems (Working Paper: AAS-2015-16). Penang: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Fals Borda, O. (1999). The origins and challenges of participatory action research. Amherst: Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• German, L., & Stroud, A. (2007). A framework for the integration of diverse learning approaches: operationalizing agricultural research and development (R&D) linkages in Eastern Africa. World Development, 35, 792–814.10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluck, S. B., & Patai, D. (Eds.). (2013). Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. (2001). I wish this were a poem of practices of participatory research. Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, 171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., Heemskerk, W., Booth, R., Daane, J., Maatman, A., & Adekunle, A. A. (2009). Integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D). In A Concept Paper for the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA) Sub-Saharan Africa Challenge Programme (SSA CP). Accra: FARA.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, S., Rosas, J. C., Gómez, M., Jiménez, J., Sierra, F., Gallardo, O., … Barahona, M. (2015). Synergies at the interface of farmer–scientist partnerships: Agricultural innovation through participatory research and plant breeding in Honduras. Agriculture & Food Security, 4, 2139.10.1186/s40066-015-0046-0
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., & Wilson, G. (2009). Learning and mutuality in municipal partnerships and beyond: A focus on northern partners. Habitat International, 33, 210–217.10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, V., & Nurick, R. (2003). Developing coding systems to analyse difference. PLA notes, 47, 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435–464.10.1111/dech.1999.30.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor, P., & Apgar, M. (2013). Transformative change in the CGIAR research program on aquatic agricultural systems. Program Brief: AAS-2013-25. Penang: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems. Retrieved from https://www.worldfishcenter.org/content/transformative-change-cgiar-research-program-aquatic-agricultural-systems
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. (2000). Capacity building: Shifting the paradigms of practice. Development in Practice, 10, 517–526.10.1080/09614520050116677
   Google Scholar
• Keskinen, M. (2006). The lake with floating villages: Socio-economic analysis of the Tonle Sap Lake. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22, 463–480.10.1080/07900620500482568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinen, M., Chinvanno, S., Kummu, M., Nuorteva, P., Snidvongs, A., Varis, O., & Västilä, K. (2010). Climate change and water resources in the Lower Mekong River Basin: Putting adaptation into the context. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1, 103–117.10.2166/wcc.2010.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinen, M., & Varis, O. (2012). Institutional cooperation at a basin level: For what, by whom? Lessons learned from Cambodia’s Tonle Sap Lake. Natural Resources Forum, 36, 50–60.10.1111/narf.2012.36.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2012). Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions. In Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 457–483). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2004). An analysis of two models of reflection and their implications for educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9, 29–49.10.1080/1360144042000296044
   Google Scholar
• Kristjanson, P., Robin, S. R., Nancy, D., Clark, W. C., Romney, D., Puskur, R., … Grace, D. (2009). Linking international agricultural research knowledge with action for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5047–5052.10.1073/pnas.0807414106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummu, M., Sarkkula, J., Koponen, J., & Nikula, J. (2006). Ecosystem management of the Tonle Sap Lake: Integrated modeling approach. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22, 497–519.10.1080/07900620500482915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummu, M., Tes, S., Yin, S., Adamson, P., Jozsa, J., Koponen, J., … Sarkkula, J. (2014). Water balance analysis for the Tonle Sap Lake–floodplain system. Hydrological Processes, 28, 1722–1733.10.1002/hyp.9718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberts, D. (2006). The Tonle Sap Lake as a productive ecosystem. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22, 481–495.10.1080/07900620500482592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, C., Mandondo, A., & Moriarty, P. (2003). The question of scale in integrated natural resource management. Integrated Natural Resources Management: Linking Productivity, the Environment and Development, 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, T., & Morley, A. (Eds.). (2014). Sustainable food systems: Building a new paradigm. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCashen, W. (2005). The Strengths approach. Bendigo: St Luke’s Innovative Resources.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, C. L., Leeuwis, C., Bhattarai, T., Maharjan, M. R., & Jiggins, J. (2013). Engaging women and the poor: Adaptive collaborative governance of community forests in Nepal. Agriculture and Human Values, 30, 569–585.10.1007/s10460-013-9434-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20, 405–416.10.1080/02601370120490
   Google Scholar
• Natter, W. (2000). Hyphenated practices: What put the hyphen in geopolitics? Political Geography, 19, 353–360.10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00067-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neef, A., & Neubert, D. (2011). Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: A conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 179–194.10.1007/s10460-010-9272-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. J. (2002). Participating or just sitting in? The dynamics of gender and caste in community forestry. Journal of forest and livelihood, 2(2002), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Nuorteva, P., Keskinen, M., & Varis, O. (2010). Water, livelihoods and climate change adaptation in the Tonle Sap Lake area, Cambodia: Learning from the past to understand the future. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1, 87–101.10.2166/wcc.2010.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurick, R., & Apgar, J. M. (2014). CGIAR research program on aquatic agricultural systems (Manual: AAS-2014-46). Penang. Retrieved from https://aas.cgiar.org/publications/participatory-action-research-guide-facilitators#sthash.U9uF7fzR.dpuf
   Google Scholar
• Ojha, H. R., Hall, A., & Sulaiman, R. V. (2013). Adaptive collaborative approaches in natural resource governance. Oxon: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M., & Meas, N. (2001). Learning for transformation: A study of the relationship between culture, values, experience and development practice in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: Krom Akphiwat Phum.
   Google Scholar
• Park, P. (2001). Knowledge and participatory research. Handbook of Action Research, 2, 47–70.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R., & Hase, S. (2002). Complexity and action research: Exploring the theoretical and methodological connection. Educational Action Research, 10, 507–524.
   Google Scholar
• Popplewell, R., & Hayman, R. (2012). Where, how and why are action research approaches used by international development non-governmental organizations. INTRAC-International NGO Training and Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Pound, B., Snapp, S., McDougall, C., & Braun, A. (Eds.). (2003). Managing natural resources for sustainable livelihoods: Uniting science and participation. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., & Chambers, R. (1993). Towards a learning paradigm: New professionalism and institutions for agriculture. Sussex, UK: University of Sussex Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, B. D., Cohen, P., Barman, B., Mam, K., Nagoli, J., & Allison, E. H. (2013). Governance of aquatic agricultural systems: Analysing representation, power, and accountability. Ecology and Society, 18, 59–85. Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art59/10.5751/ES-06043-180459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P. (2006). Choice and quality in action research practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 187–203.10.1177/1056492606288074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781848607934
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G., & Dick, B. (2003). Emancipatory design choices for action research practitioners. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 486–495.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkkula, J., Baran, E., Chheng, P., Keskinen, M., Koponen, J., & Kummu, M. (2004). Tonle Sap pulsing system and fisheries productivity. In Contribution to the XXIX^e International Congress of Limnology (SIL 2004) 8–14 August 2004. Lahti.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Thompson, J., & Chambers, R. (2009). Farmer first revisited. Rugby: Practical Action.10.3362/9781780440156
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, F., & Torbert, W. R. (2000). Transforming social inquiry, transforming social action. South Holland: Wolters Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4615-4403-6
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., Bratini, L., Chambers, D. A., Jensen, R. V., & Romero, L. (2010). Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research. Action Research, 8, 407–425.10.1177/1476750310366043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varis, O., Kummu, M., Keskinen, M., Sarkkula, J., Koponen, J., Heinonen, U., & Makkonen, K. (2006). Integrated water resources management on the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 6, 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Västilä, K., Kummu, M., Sangmanee, C., & Chinvanno, S. (2010). Modelling climate change impacts on the flood pulse in the Lower Mekong floodplains. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1, 67–86.10.2166/wcc.2010.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Braun, J., Byerlee, D., Chartres, C., Lumpkin, T., Olembo, N., & Waage, J. (2009). Towards a strategy and results framework for the CGIAR. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, P. G., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating action research. Action Research, 7, 243–262.10.1177/1476750309336715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar