3,514
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Knowledge mapping of GMO/GMF research in social sphere

, , , , ORCID Icon, , & | (Reviewing editor) show all
Article: 1602103 | Received 03 Feb 2019, Accepted 04 Mar 2019, Published online: 13 May 2019

References

  • Aerni, P., & Bernauer, T. (2006). Stakeholder attitudes toward GMOs in the Philippines, Mexico, and South Africa : The issue of public trust. World Development, 34(3), 557–25. doi:doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.08.007.
  • Bergelson, J., & Purrington, C. B. (1998). Promiscuity in transgenic plants. Nature, 395, 25–26. doi:10.1038/25626
  • Bett, C., Okuro, J., & Hugo, D. G. (2010). Perspectives of gatekeepers in the Kenyan food industry towards genetically modified food. Food Policy, 35(4), 332–340. Elsevier Ltd. doi:doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.01.003.
  • Blancke, S., Van Breusegem, F., De Jaeger, G., Braeckman, J., & Marc, V. M. (2015). Fatal attraction : The intuitive appeal of GMO opposition. Trends in Plant Science, 1–5. Elsevier Ltd. doi:doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011.
  • Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods – Results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24, 23–61. doi:10.1023/A:1010950406128
  • Budd, J. M. (1988). A bibliometric analysis of higher education literature. Research in Higher Education, 28(2), 180–190. doi:10.1007/BF00992890
  • Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T., & James, S. (2001). Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(4), 479–498. doi:10.1093/erae/28.4.479
  • Caplan, R. (2001). Genetically modified organisms in agriculture. Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture, 197–203. doi:doi:10.1016/B978-012515422-2/50022-9.
  • Carroll, M. (2015). The new agrarian double movement: Hegemony and resistance in the GMO food economy. Review of International Political Economy, 2290(December), 1–28. doi:doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1095781.
  • Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl), 5303–5310. doi:doi:10.1073/pnas.0307513100.
  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. doi:10.1002/asi.20317
  • Chen, C. 2016. CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. Nova Science Pub Inc. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=CiteSpace%3A a practical guide for mapping scientific literature&author=C. Chen&publication_year=2016
  • Chen, C., Song, I. Y., Yuan, X., & Zhang, J. (2008). The thematic and citation landscape of data and knowledge engineering (1985–2007). Data and Knowledge Engineering, 67(2), 234–259. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2008.05.004
  • Chen, D., Liu, Z., Luo, Z., Webber, M., & Chen, J. (2016). Bibliometric and visualized analysis of emergy research. Ecological Engineering, 90, 285–293. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.026
  • Chen, M.-F., & Hsiao-Lan, L. (2007). The consumer ’ s attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference, 18(40), 662–674. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.10.002
  • Christoph, I. B., Bruhn, M., & Roosen, J. (2008). Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany. Appetite, 51, 58–68. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.12.001
  • Clancy, K. A., & Clancy, B. (2016). Critical studies in media communication growing monstrous organisms: The construction of Anti-GMO visual rhetoric through digital media. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 5036(July), 0–14. doi:10.1080/15295036.2016.1193670
  • Connor, M., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Factors influencing people ’ s acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust. Science Communication, 32(4), 514–538. doi:10.1177/1075547009358919
  • Costa-Font, M., Gil, J. M., & Bruce Traill, W. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy, 33(33), 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002
  • Dalpé, R. (2002). Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology. Scientometrics, 55(2), 189–213. doi:10.1023/A:1019663607103
  • De-Marcos, L., Garciá-López, E., Garciá-Cabot, A., Medina-Merodio, J. A., Domínguez, A., Martínez-Herraíz, J. J., & Diez-Folledo, T. (2016). Social network analysis of a gamified e-learning course: Small-world phenomenon and network metrics as predictors of academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 312–321. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.052
  • Dizon, F., Costa, S., Rock, C., Harris, A., Husk, C., & Mei, J. (2016). Genetically modified (GM) foods and ethical eating. Journal of Food Science, 81(2), 287–291. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.13191
  • Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1.
  • Fairthrone, R. A. (1969). Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction. Journal of Documentation, 2(4), 319–343. doi:10.1108/eb026404
  • Feng, F., Zhang, L., Yuneng, D., & Wang, W. (2015). Visualization and quantitative study in bibliographic databases: A case in the field of university-industry cooperation. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 118–134. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.009
  • Frewer, L., Lassen, J., Kettlitz, B., Scholderer, J., Beekman, V., & Berdal, K. G. (2004). Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42, 1181–1193. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.002
  • Frewer, L. J., Gupta, N., Giles, E. L., & Coles, D. (2014). Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnologies applied to food production. Trends in Food Science & Technology. Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.06.005.
  • Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997). Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit, and ethics. Science, Technology & Human Values, 22(1), 98–124. doi:10.1177/016224399702200105
  • Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1998). The influence of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production. Agriculture and Human Values, 15, 15–30. doi:10.1023/A:1007465730039
  • Frewer, L. J., Howard, J. C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16(4), 473–486. doi:10.1111/risk.1996.16.issue-4
  • Frewer, L. J., Scholderer, J., & Bredahl, L. (2003). Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: The mediating role of trust. Risk Analysis, 23, 6.
  • Frewer, L. J., Van Der, I. A., & Reinders, M. J. (2013). Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification E A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 30(2), 142–152. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2013.01.003
  • Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Bauer, M., Durant, J., Allansdottir, A., & Bonfadelli, H., … Wagner, W. (2000). Biotechnology and the European public. Nature Biotechnology, 18(September).
  • Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., Torgersen, H., Hampel, J., & Bardes, J. (2004). GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 185–194. doi:10.1111/risk.2004.24.issue-1
  • Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Allum, N. C. (2000). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U. S . Science, 285(JULY), 1999.
  • Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Corchero, C., & Jackson, J. 2006. Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends: Final report on Eurobarometer 64.3. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Glasner, P. (2015). Genetics and society. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 975–983. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.82046-2
  • Grimsrud, K. M., Mccluskey, J. J., Loureiro, M. L., & Wahl, T. I. (2004). Consumer attitudes to genetically modified food in Norway. Journal of Agricultural Economics ? 55(1), 75–90. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2004.tb00080.x
  • Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P., Mayer, S., & Wynne, B. 1997. “Uncertain world: Genetically modified organisms, food and public attitudes. Lancaster.
  • Gu, D., Jingjing, L., Xingguo, L., & Liang, C. (2017). Visualizing the knowledge structure and evolution of big data research in healthcare informatics. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 98, 22–32. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.006
  • Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., & Peter, S. (2003). Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41, 111–121. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00079-5
  • Hood, W. I. L. L. I. A. M. W., & Wilson, C. O. N. C. E. P. C. I. Ó. N. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314. doi:10.1023/A:1017919924342
  • Huffman, W. E., Rousu, M., Shogren, J. F., & Tegene, A. (2007). The effects of prior beliefs and learning on consumers ’ acceptance of genetically modified foods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63, 193–206. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.019
  • Huffman, W. E., Shogren, J. F., Rousu, M., & Tegene, A. (2003). Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food labels in a market with diverse information: Evidence from experimental auctions. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 28(3), 481–502.
  • Irwin, A. (2013). The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 299–320. doi:10.1177/0306312706053350
  • Kaye-Blake, W. H., & Saunders, C. M. (2008). And producer returns: The impacts of productivity, preferences, and technology uptake. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4), 692–710. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.00441.x
  • Krimsky, S. (2015). An illusory consensus behind GMO health assessment. Science, Technology & Human Values, 1–32. doi:10.1177/0162243915598381
  • Levidow, L. E. S., Carr, S., & Wield, D. (2000). Genetically modified crops in the European Union : Regulatory conflicts as precautionary opportunities. Journal of Risk Research, 3(3), 189–208. doi:10.1080/13669870050043062
  • Li, X., Emily, M., & Hailin, Q. (2017). Knowledge mapping of hospitality research ? A visual analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 77–93. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.006
  • Lin, Z., Chengzhen, W., & Hong, W. (2015). Visualization analysis of ecological assets/values research by knowledge mapping. Chnaes, 35(5), 142–154. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.chnaes.2015.07.005
  • Lusk, J. L. (2003). Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness - to -pay for golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(November), 840–856. doi:10.1111/1467-8276.00492
  • Lusk, J. L., House, L. O., Jaeger, S. R., Moore, M., Morrow, J. L., & Bruce Traill, W. (2004). Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: Evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(2), 179–204. doi:10.1093/erae/31.2.179
  • Lusk, J. L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M., & Taulman, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30, 1.
  • Lusk, J. L., Roosen, J., & Bieberstein, A. (2014). Consumer acceptance of new food technologies: Causes and roots of controversies. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6, 381–405. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012735
  • Lusk, J. L., Roosen, J., & Fox, J. A. (2003). Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: A comparison of consumers in France, Germany, The United Kingdom, And The United States. American Journal of Agriculture Economy, 85(February), 16–29. doi:10.1111/1467-8276.00100
  • Madani, F., & Weber, C. (2016). The evolution of patent mining: Applying bibliometrics analysis and keyword network analysis. World Patent Information, 46, 32–48. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2016.05.008
  • Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J.-B. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004.
  • Miles, S., & Frewer, L. J. (2001). Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 47–61. doi:10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00029-X
  • Mucci, A., Hough, G., & Ziliani, C. (2004). Factors that influence purchase intent and perceptions of genetically modified foods among argentine consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 15(15), 559–567. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.02.004
  • Mustafee, N., Bessis, N., Taylor, S. J. E., & Sotiriadis, S. (2013). Exploring the E-Science knowledge base through co-citation analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 19(Ant), 586–593. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.06.078
  • Myhr, A. I., & Traavik, T. (2002). The precautionary principle: Scientific uncertainty and omitted research in the context of GMO use and release. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15, 73–86. doi:10.1023/A:1013814108502
  • Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometrics/theory, practice and problems. Evaluation Review, 18(1), 65–76. doi:10.1177/0193841X9401800107
  • Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation, Strategic Management Journal, 336, 319–336, November 2007. doi:10.1002/smj
  • Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F., & Rosellini, D. (2013). An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Critical Reviews of Biotechnology, 8551, 1–12. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595
  • Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2002). Do consumers not care about biotech foods or do they just not read the labels? Economics Letters, 75, 47–53. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00594-8
  • Noussair, C., & Ruffieux, B. (2004). DO CONSUMERS REALLY REFUSE TO BUY GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD ?*. The Economic Journal, 114, 102–120. doi:10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.00179.x
  • Pouteau, S. (2000). Beyond substantial equivalence: Ethical equivalence. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 13, 273–291. doi:10.1023/A:1009546031890
  • Qaim, M. (2009). The economics of genetically modified crops. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 665–693. doi:10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144203
  • Rafols, I., Hopkins, M. M., Hoekman, J., Siepel, J., Hare, A. O., Perianes-Rodríguez, A., & Nightingale, P. (2014). Big pharma, little science? A bibliometric perspective on big pharma â€TM S R & D decline ☆. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 81, 22–38. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.007
  • Regal, P. J. (1994). Scientific principles for ecologically based risk assessment of transgenic organisms. Molecular Ecology, 3, 5–13. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00036.x
  • Robaey, Z. (2016a). Gone with the wind: Conceiving of moral responsibility in the case of GMO contamination. Science Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9744-z
  • Robaey, Z. (2016b). Transferring moral responsibility for technological hazards: The case of GMOs in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(5), 767–786. doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9636-5
  • Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Salazar-Ordóñez, M., & Sayadi, S. (2013). Applying partial least squares to model genetically modified food purchase intentions in southern Spain consumers. Food Policy, 40, 44–53. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.02.001
  • Rousu, M. A. T. T. H. E. W., Shogren, J. A. S. O. N. F., Tegene, A. B. E. B. A. Y. E. H. U., & Huffman, W. A. L. L. A. C. E. E. (2007). Effects and value of verifiable information in a controversial market: Evidence from lab auctions of genetically modified food. Economic Inquiry, 45(3), 409–432. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00017.x
  • Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 385–403. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
  • Satter, T., Gregory, R., Klain, S., Roberts, M., & Chan, K. M. (2013). Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 117, 103–114. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.033
  • Scholderer, J., & Frewer, L. J. (2003). The biotechnology communication paradox: Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 125–157. doi:10.1023/A:1023695519981
  • Seyedghorban, Z., Matanda, M. J., & Peter, L. (2016). Advancing theory and knowledge in the business-to-business branding literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2664–2677. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.002
  • Shiau, W.-L. (2015). The intellectual core of enterprise information systems: A co-citation analysis. Enterprise Information Systems, 7575(March), 1–30. doi:10.1080/17517575.2015.1019570
  • Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20, 2. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202020
  • Siegrist, M., Cousin, M.-E., Kastenholz, H., & Wiek, A. (2007). Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust. Appetite, 49, 459–466. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.03.002
  • Sorgo, A., & Dolinsek, J. A. (2010). Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and acceptance of genetically modified organisms among prospective teachers of biology, home economics, and grade school in Slovenia. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 38(3), 141–150. doi:10.1002/bmb.20377
  • Spence, A., & Townsend, E. (2006). Examining consumer behavior toward genetically Modified (GM) food in Britain. Risk Analysis, 26(3), 657–670. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00777.x
  • Steur, H. D., Feng, S., Xiaoping, S., & Gellynck, X. (2013). Consumer preferences for micronutrient strategies in China. A comparison between folic acid supplementation and folate biofortification. Public Health Nutrition, 17(6), 1410–1420. doi:10.1017/S1368980013000682
  • Steur, H. D., Gellynck, X., Storozhenko, S., Liqun, G., Lambert, W., Van Der Straeten, D., & Viaene, J. (2010). Willingness-to-accept and purchase genetically modified rice with high folate content in Shanxi Province, China. Appetite Journal, 54, 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.09.017
  • Subrahmanyan, S., & Cheng, P. S. I. M. (2000). Perceptions and attitudes of Singaporeans toward genetically modified food. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 34(2), 269–290. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2000.tb00094.x
  • Tarkowski, S. M. (2007). Environmental health research in Europe - Bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 17(SUPPL.1), 14–18. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckm065
  • Vilella-Vila, M., & Costa-Font, J. (2008). Press media reporting effects on risk perceptions and attitudes towards Genetically Modified (GM) food. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(37), 2095–2106. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2008.04.006
  • Web of Science. 2016. The citation connection - Real facts - IP & science - Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from http://wokinfo.com/citationconnection/.
  • Wei, F., Grubesic, T. H., & Bishop, B. W. (2015, January). Exploring the GIS knowledge domain using CiteSpace. The Professional Geographer, 37–41. doi:10.1080/00330124.2014.983588
  • White, H. D., & Griffith, B. (1981). Author cocitation : A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. doi:10.1002/asi.4630320302
  • Yang, Y. T., & Chen, B. (2015, August). Governing GMOs in the USA: Science, law and public health. Perspective, doi:10.1002/jsfa.7523
  • Yu, D., & Chao, X. (2016). Mapping research on carbon emissions trading: A co-citation analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. August 2015 Elsevier, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.144
  • Zhang, W., Xiaolin, X., Ming, C., Mao, Z., Shi, J., & Xiang, Y. (2016). Surviving in the dispute : A bibliometric analysis of global GMF-Related research, 1995–2014. Scientometrics. Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1995-1