Business intelligence systems and bank performance in Ghana: The balanced scorecard approach

References

• Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, M., & Venkatesan, T. V. P. (2014). A survey on recent research in business intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27, 831–866.10.1108/JEIM-06-2013-0029
   Google Scholar
• Azvine, B., Cui, Z., & Nauck, D. D. (2005). Towards real-time business intelligence. BT Technology Journal, 23, 214–225.10.1007/s10550-005-0043-0
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1989). On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 271–284.10.2307/3172900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36, 66–77.10.1145/163298.163309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1993). Is information systems spending productive? New evidence and new results (pp. 47–64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42, 541–558.10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the nature of organizational effectiveness. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness, 13, 55.
   Google Scholar
• Curko, K., Bach, M. P., & Radonic, G. (2007, June). Business intelligence and business process management in banking operations. In Information Technology Interfaces, 2007. ITI 2007. 29th International Conference on (pp. 57–62). IEEE.10.1109/ITI.2007.4283744
   Google Scholar
• Dallal, G. E., & Wilkinson, L. (1986). An analytic approximation to the distribution of Lilliefors's test statistic for normality. The American Statistician, 40, 294–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. (2006). Competing on analytics. Harvard Business Review, 84, 98–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davern, M. J., & Kauffman, R. J. (2000). Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 121–143.10.1080/07421222.2000.11518268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, L., & Van Belle, J.-P. (2013). Critical success factors for business intelligence in the South African financial services sector. SA Journal of Information Management, 15(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Elbashir, M. Z., Collier, P. A., & Davern, M. J. (2008). Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9, 135–153.10.1016/j.accinf.2008.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Fang, M.-Y., & Lin, F. (2006). Measuring the performance of ERP System—From the balanced scorecard perspectives. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10, 256–263.
   Google Scholar
• Fedouaki, F., Okar, C., & Alami, S. El. (2013). A maturity model for business intelligence system project in small and medium-sized enterprises: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 10, 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 382–388.10.2307/3150980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression & structural equation modelling. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner. (2017). Gartner says worldwide business intelligence and analytics market to reach $18.3 billion in 2017. Gartner, Inc. Retrieved March 5, 2017, from https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3612617
   Google Scholar
• Gavrea, C., Ilies, L., & Stegerean, R. (2011). Determinants of organizational performance: The case of Romania. Management & Marketing, 6, 285–300.
   Google Scholar
• Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61, 101–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgopoulos, B. S., & Tannenbaum, A. S. (1957). A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 22, 534–540.10.2307/2089477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghana Banking Survey. (2014). The future of banking in Ghana. What’s next? Pricewater House Coopers. Retrieved March 15, 2015 from https://www.pwc.com/gh/en/assets/pdf/gh-banking-survey-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–152.10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.10.1080/03637750903310360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24, 1918–1927.10.1177/0956797613480187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly, 121–142.10.2307/249475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, B., & Jaklic, J. (2010). Assessing benefits of business intelligence systems—A case study. Management, 15, 87–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, C. K. (2015). Using the balanced scorecard in assessing the impact of BI system usage on organizational performance: An empirical study of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Information Development, 32, 1545–1569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howson, C. (2007). Successful business intelligence. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hribar Rajterič, I. (2010). Overview of business intelligence maturity models. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 15, 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hunton, J. E., Lippincott, B., & Reck, J. L. (2003). Enterprise resource planning systems: Comparing firm performance of adopters and nonadopters. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4, 165–184.10.1016/S1467-0895(03)00008-3
   Google Scholar
• Ifinedo, P. (2011). An empirical analysis of factors influencing internet/E-business technologies adoption by Smes in Canada. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 10, 731–766.10.1142/S0219622011004543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, Z., & Love, P. E. (2000). The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I, 15, 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). The strategy map: Guide to aligning intangible assets. Strategy & Leadership, 32, 10–17.10.1108/10878570410699825
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., & Devaraj, S. (2003). Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Information Systems Research, 14, 127–145.10.1287/isre.14.2.127.16019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebas, M. J., & Euske, K. (2006). A conceptual and operational delineation of performance. Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice, 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Park, S. B., & Lim, G. G. (2013). Using balanced scorecards for the evaluation of “Software-as-a-service”. Information & Management, 50, 553–561.10.1016/j.im.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H.-Y., Hsu, P.-Y., & Ting, P.-H. (2006). ERP systems success: An integration of IS success model and balanced scorecard. Practice, 38, 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Lonnqvist, A., & Pirttimaki, V. (2006). The measurement of business intelligence. Information Systems Management, 23, 32–40.10.1201/1078.10580530/45769.23.1.20061201/91770.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusthaus, C., & Adrien, M. H. (1998). Organizational assessment: A review of experience. Universalia Occasional Paper, 31.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83.10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsons, M., Davison, R., & Tse, D. (1999). The balanced scorecard: A foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems, 25, 71–88.10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00086-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matei, G. (2010). A collaborative approach of business intelligence systems. Journal of Applied Collaborative Systems, 2, 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, L. T., & Atre, S. (2003). Business intelligence roadmap: The complete project lifecycle for decision-support applications. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Negash, S. (2004). Business intelligence (BI). Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 177–195.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, A. I. (2004). Firm performance effects in relation to the implementation and use of enterprise resource planning systems. Journal of Information Systems, 18, 79–105.10.2308/jis.2004.18.2.79
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14, 110–121.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & Management, 51, 497–510.10.1016/j.im.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszak, C. M., & Ziemba, E. (2012). Critical success factors for implementing business intelligence systems in small and medium enterprises on the example of Upper Silesia, Poland. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge & Management, 7, 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• Osei-Bryson, K. M., & Ko, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance using regression splines analysis. Information & Management, 42(1), 1–13.10.1016/j.im.2003.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owusu, A., Agbemabiese, G. C., Abdurrahaman, D. T., & Soladoye, B. A. (2017). Determinants of business intelligence systems adoption in developing countries: An empirical analysis from Ghanaian Banks. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y.-J., & Rim, M.-H. (2011). The relationship analysis of RFID adoption and organizational performance. In ICSNC 2011, The Sixth International Conference on Systems and Networks Communications, (c) (pp. 76–82).
   Google Scholar
• Poston, R., & Grabski, S. (2001). Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2, 271–294.10.1016/S1467-0895(01)00024-0
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puklavec, B., Oliveira, T., & Popovic, A. (2014). Unpacking business intelligence systems adoption determinants: An exploratory study of small and medium enterprises. Economic and Business Review, 16, 185–213.
   Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy, K., Sen, A., & Sinha, A. (2008). Data warehousing infusion and organizational effectiveness. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 38, 976–994.10.1109/TSMCA.2008.923032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramayah, T. (2015). Testing mediation effect PLS 2.0 steps.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, G., Muhanna, W. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 625–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remenyi, D., Money, A. H., & Sherwood-Smith, M. (2000). The effective measurement and management of IT costs and benefits. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Ritacco, M., & Carver, A. (2007). The business value of business intelligence—A framework for measuring the benefits of business intelligence. Business Objects, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T. S. (1971). Innovative behavior and communication. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovation. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royston, J. P. (1982). Algorithm AS 181: The W test for normality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 31, 176–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seashore, S. E., & Yuchtman, E. (1967). Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 377–395.10.2307/2391311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52, 591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology, 16, 159–186.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validation and multinomial prediction. Biometrika, 61, 509–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassmann, P. A. (1990). The business value of computers: An executive’s guide. New Canaan, CT: Information Economics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stratopoulos, T., & Dehning, B. (2000). Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Information & Management, 38, 103–117.10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00058-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiesse, F., Staake, T., Schmitt, P., & Fleisch, E. (2011). The rise of the “next-generation bar code”: An international RFID adoption study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16, 328–345.10.1108/13598541111155848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, O. (2004). Business intelligence success, lessons learned. Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ubiparipović, B., & Đurković, E. (2011). Application of business intelligence in the banking industry. Management Information System, 6, 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, H. J. (2009). Tutorial: Business intelligence-past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, H. J., & Wixom, B. H. (2007). The current state of business intelligence. Computer, 40, 96–99.10.1109/MC.2007.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3, 307–333.10.1287/isre.3.4.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, I. L., & Chen, J. L. (2014). A stage-based diffusion of IT innovation and the BSC performance impact: A moderator of technology-organization-environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 76–90.10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh, W., & Koronios, A. (2010). Critical success factors for business intelligence systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50, 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh, W., Koronios, A., & Gao, J. (2008). Managing the implementation of business intelligence systems. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 4, 79–94.10.4018/IJEIS
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang, Y., & Lederer, A. L. (2003). An instrument for measuring the business benefits of e-commerce retailing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 65–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar