4,211
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

An extent analysis of 3PL provider selection criteria: A case on Turkey cement sector

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 1469183 | Received 04 Jan 2018, Accepted 22 Apr 2018, Published online: 02 Jun 2018

References

  • Aczel, J., & Saaty, T. L. (1983). Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27, 93–17.
  • Aghazadeh, S. M. (2003). How to choose an effective third party logistics provider. Management Research News, 26(7), 50–58. doi:10.1108/01409170310783583
  • Aguezzoul, A. (2014). Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods. Omega, 49, 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.05.009
  • Aguezzoul, A., Rabenasolo, B., & Jolly-Desodt, A. M. (2006), Multi-criteria decision aid tool for third-party logistics providers’ selection. International Conference Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), Troyes, France (pp. 1–5), IEEE, France.
  • Akman, G., & Baynal, K. (2014). Logistics service provider selection through an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 794918, 1–17. doi:10.1155/2014/794918
  • Alkhatib, S. F., Darlington, R., & Nguyen, T. T. (2015a). Logistics service providers (LSPs) evaluation and selection. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 8(1), 102–134. doi:10.1108/SO-12-2014-0028
  • Alkhatib, S. F., Darlington, R., Yang, Z., & Nguyen, T. T. (2015b). A novel technique for evaluating and selecting logistics service providers based on the logistics resource view. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 6976–6989. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.010
  • ATIG. (2015). Cement sector report. Retrieved June 29, 2016, from https://www.atig.com.tr/arastirma/raporlar/tr/cimento_01_201519012015132902.pdf
  • Awasthi, A., & Balezentis, T. (2017). A hybrid approach based on BOCR and fuzzy MULTIMOORA for logistics service provider selection. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 27(3), 261–282. doi:10.1504/IJLSM.2017.084466
  • Banomyong, R., & Supatn, N. (2011). Selecting logistics providers in Thailand: A shippers’ perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 45(3), 419–437. doi:10.1108/03090561111107258
  • Bansal, A., Kumar, P., & Issar, S. (2013). 3PL selection: A multi-criteria decision making approach. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management International Conference, Bangkok, Thailand (pp. 981–985), IEEE, Thailand.
  • Bhatti, R. S., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2010). Analytical modeling of third party service provider selection in lead logistics provider environments. Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(3), 275–286. doi:10.1108/17465661011092641
  • Bianchini, A. (2018). 3PL provider selection by AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 235–252. doi:10.1108/BIJ-08-2016-0125
  • Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 294–308. doi:10.1108/13598540610671743
  • Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
  • Cevik, B. (2016). Cement sector (in Turkish). Retrieved December 30, 2016, from https://ekonomi.isbank.com.tr/UserFiles/pdf/sr201604_CimentoSektoru.pdf
  • Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  • Coltman, T. R., Devinney, T. M., & Keating, B. W. (2011). Best-worst scaling approach to predict customer choice for 3PL services. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(2), 139–152. doi:10.1111/jbl.2011.32.issue-2
  • Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. (2016). CSCMP’s definition of logistics management. Retrieved June 15, 2016, from https://cscmp.org/supply-chain-management-definitions
  • Csutora, R., & Buckley, J. J. (2001). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: The lamda-max method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 120, 181–195. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00155-4
  • Daim, T. U., Udbye, A., & Balasubramanian, A. (2012). Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for selection of 3PL providers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), 28–51. doi:10.1108/17410381311287472
  • Dias, A., Jr., & Ioannou, P. G. (1996). Company and project evaluation model for privately promoted infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 122(1), 71–82. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:1(71)
  • Dickson, G.W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5-17.
  • Ding, Y., Yuan, Z., & Li, Y. (2008). Performance evaluation model for transportation corridor based on Fuzzy-AHP approach. Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery proceedings in California (pp. 608–612), IEEE Computer Society, USA.
  • Falsini, D., Fondi, F., & Schiraldi, M. M. (2012). A logistics provider evaluation and selection methodology based on AHP, DEA and linear programming integration. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4822–4829. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.657969
  • Gol, H., & Catay, B. (2007). Third-party logistics provider selection: Insights from a Turkish automotive company. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(6), 379–384. doi:10.1108/13598540710826290
  • Gupta, R., Sachdeva, A., & Bhardwaj, A. (2012). Selection of logistic service provider using fuzzy PROMETHEE for a cement industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(7), 899–921. doi:10.1108/17410381211267727
  • Hertz, S., & Alfredsson, M. (2003). Strategic development of third party logistics providers. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 139–149. doi:10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00228-6
  • Ho, W., He, T., Lee, C. K. M., & Emrouznejad, A. (2012). Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10841–10850. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.009
  • Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
  • Hsiao, H. I., Kemp, R. G. M., Van Der Vorst, J. G. A. J., & Omta, S. W. F. (2010). A classification of logistic outsourcing levels and their impact on service performance: Evidence from the food processing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 124, 75–86. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.09.010
  • Hwang, B. N., Chen, T. T., & Lin, J. T. (2016). 3PL selection criteria in integrated circuit manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(1), 103–124. doi:10.1108/SCM-03-2014-0089
  • Isiklar, G., Alptekin, E., & Buyukozkan, G. (2007). Application of a hybrid intelligent decision support model in logistics outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research, 34, 3701–3714. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.011
  • Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2007). Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, 35, 274–289. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005
  • Jothimani, D., & Sarmah, S. P. (2014). Supply chain performance measurement for third party logistics. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(6), 944–963. doi:10.1108/BIJ-09-2012-0064
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 171–184. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00099-9
  • Kahraman, C., Onar, S. C., & Oztaysi, B. (2015). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: A literature review. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8(4), 637–666. doi:10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325
  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives, preferences and value tradeoffs. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Kreng, V. B., & Wu, C. Y. (2007). Evaluation of knowledge portal development tools using a fuzzy AHP approach: The case of Taiwanese stone industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 1795–1810. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.052
  • Kumar, P., & Singh, R. K. (2012). A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(3), 287–303. doi:10.1108/17465661211283287
  • Kumar, R., Singh, H., & Dureja, J. S. (2012). An approach to analyze logistic outsourcing problem in medium-scale organization by CFPR and VIKOR. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(7), 885–898. doi:10.1108/17410381211267718
  • Langley, J., & Capgemini, (2016). 2016 Third-party logistics study: The state of logistics outsourcing, results and findings of the 20th annual study. Retrieved June 14, 2016, from http://www.3plstudy.com/media/downloads/2015/09/3pl_report-final_reduced_size.pdf
  • Li, F., Li, L., Jin, C., Wang, R., Wang, H., & Yan, L. (2012). 3PL supplier selection model based on fuzzy sets. Computers & Operations Research, 39, 1879–1884. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.022
  • Liou, J. J. H., Wang, H. S., Hsu, C. C., & Yin, S. L. (2011). A hybrid model for selection of an outsourcing provider. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35, 5121–5133. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.04.020
  • Liu, F. H. F., & Hai, H. L. (2005). The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 97(3), 308–317. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.005
  • Liu, H. T., & Wang, W. K. (2009). An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4387–4398. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.030
  • Maloni, M. J., & Carter, C. R. (2006). Opportunities for research in third party logistics. Transportational Journal, 45(2), 23–38.
  • Marasco, A. (2008). Third-party logistics: A literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 127–147. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.05.017
  • Meixner, O. (2009). Fuzzy AHP group decision analysis and its application for the evaluation of energy sources. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process, Pittsburtgh/PA.
  • Ministry of Economy, Turkish Republic. (2016). Cement sector report (in Turkish). Retrieved August 13, 2016, from https://www.ekonomi.gov.tr/portal/content/conn/UCM/uuid/dDocName:EK221758;jsessionid=b0My_nzEijhBIMTUeh-xnUoltuHwIjiaRXSzaPABgzRYEWYh2a2_!1837375366
  • Percin, S. (2009). Evaluation of third-party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(5), 588–604. doi:10.1108/14635770910987823
  • Percin, S., & Min, H. (2013). A hybrid quality function deployment and fuzzy decision-making methodology for the optimal selection of third-party logistics service providers. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 16(5), 380–397. doi:10.1080/13675567.2013.815696
  • Raut, R., Kharat, M., Kamble, S., & Kumar, C. S. (2018). Sustainable evaluation and selection of potential third-party logistics (3PL) providers: An integrated MCDM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 76–97. doi:10.1108/BIJ-05-2016-0065
  • Razzaque, M. A., & Sheng, C. C. (1998). Outsourcing of logistics functions: A literature survey. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 28(2), 89–107. doi:10.1108/09600039810221667
  • Selviaridis, K., & Spring, M. (2007). Third party logistics: A literature review and research agenda. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(1), 125–150. doi:10.1108/09574090710748207
  • Soh, S. (2010). A decision model for evaluating third-party logistics providers using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. African Journal of Business Management, 4(3), 339–349.
  • Turkish Yatirim. (2014). Cement sector evaluation for 2015. Retrieved December, 15, 2014, from http://www.turkborsa.net/belgeler/raporlar/cimentosektorudegerlendirmemiz2015.pdf
  • Uygun, O., Kacamak, H., & Kahraman, U. A. (2015). An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 86, 137–146. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.014
  • Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229–241. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
  • Vijayvargiya, A., & Dey, A. K. (2010). An analytical approach for selection of a logistics provider. Management Decision, 48(3), 403–418. doi:10.1108/00251741011037774
  • Wang, M., Elhag, T. M. S., & Hua, Z. (2006). A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 3055–3071. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2006.08.010
  • Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy ahp and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 735–747.
  • Wong, C. Y., & Karia, N. (2010). Explaining the competitive advantage of logistics service providers: A resource-based view approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 128, 51–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.026
  • Zacharia, Z., Sanders, N. R., & Nix, N. W. (2011). The emerging role of the third-party logistics provider (3PL) as an orchestrator. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(1), 40–54. doi:10.1111/jbl.2011.32.issue-1