Academic research into marketing: Many publications, but little impact?

References

• Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense & nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 72–95. doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankers, P., & Brennan, R. (2002). Managerial relevance in academic research: An exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 20(1), 15–21. doi:10.1108/02634500210414729
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J., & Erdogan, B. Z. (2000). Who we are & what we do. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(7), 679–696. doi:10.1362/026725700784672935
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., & Holt, S. (2004). Making marketers accountable: A failure of marketing education? Market Intelligence & Planning, 22(5), 557–567. doi:10.1108/02634500410551932
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J., & Rynes, S. (2014). Academics & practitioners are alike & unlike: The paradoxes of academic-practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 50(5), 1181–1201. doi:10.1177/0149206314529160
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. T. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review.May, 83, 96–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research & how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 64(2), 217–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, R. J. (2017). Enhancing theory development in the domain of relationship marketing: How to avoid the danger of getting stuck in the middle. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(1), 20–23. doi:10.1108/JSM-05-2016-0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswill, C., & Wensley, R. (2007). Doors & boundaries: A recent history of the relationship between research & practice in UK organisational & management research. Business History, 49(3), 293–320. doi:10.1080/00076790701294964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosier, K. (2004). How effectively do marketing journals transfer useful learning from scholars to practitioners. Market Intelligence & Planning, 22(5), 540–556. doi:10.1108/02634500410551923
   Google Scholar
• Dalglish, A. (2016), High performance B2B Marketing 2017–17 Benchmarking Report, London: B2B marketing
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, C. (2011). State of the art in assessing research impact: Introduction to a special issue. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 175–179. doi:10.3152/095820211X13118583635918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling Review of Business-University Collaborations (2015). (Retrieved 8 18, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/440927/bis_15_352_The_Dowling_review_of_business-university_rearch_collaborations_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed.). Boston, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. J., Ottesan, G. G., & Matear, S. (2005). Disseminating academic research information to marketing practitioners. The receiver’s perspective. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(2), 124–135. doi:10.1108/02634500510589895
   Google Scholar
• Harrigan, P., & Hulbert, B. (2011). How can marketing academics serve marketing practice? The new marketing DNA as a model for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(3), 253–272. doi:10.1177/0273475311420234
   Google Scholar
• Huff, A. S. (2000). 1999 presidential address: Changes in organizational knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 288–293. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3312916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., & Kitson, M. (2012). Pathways to impact & the strategic role of universities: New evidence on the breadth & depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK & the factors constraining its development. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3), 723–750. doi:10.1093/cje/bes017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., Bence, D., Grisoni, L., O’Regan, N., & Wornham, D. (2012). Marketing as an applied science: Lessons from other business disciplines. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1–2), 92–111. doi:10.1108/03090561211189257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., & Vafeas, M. (2014). Agencies & clients: Co-creation in a key B2B relationship, 22nd International Colloquium on Relationship Marketing, Newcastle, September.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., & Vafeas, M. (2015). Co-creation of impact in marketing management: Agency & client research, BAM annual conference, Portsmouth, September.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., & Vafeas, M. (2017). Marketing agency/client resource integration in an age of digital transformation, Academy of Marketing, B2B SIG, Bournemouth University, 6th October.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., Vafeas, M., & Hilton, T. (2018). Resource integration for co-creation between marketing agencies & clients. European Journal of Marketing. doi:10.1108/EJM-10-2015-0725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., Webber, D., & O’Regan. (2017). Achieving wider impact in business & management: Analysing the case studies from REF 2014. Studies in Higher Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1393059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2002). Marketing as a profession: On closing stakeholder gaps. European Journal of Marketing, 36(3), 305–312. doi:10.1108/03090560210417138
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., Mohrman, S., & Scherer, G. (2010). Organization studies as applied science. Organization Studies, 31(9), 1189–1207. doi:10.1177/0170840610374394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. (2011). On managerial relevance. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 211–224. doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.4.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, K. L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2–3), 139–155. doi:10.1080/13527260902757530
   Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., Mccarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King’s College, London (2015), The nature, scale & beneficiaries of research impact, policy institute, king’s college & digital science. Retrieved 3 29, 2018, from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute/publications/Analysis-of-REF-impact.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D., & Scarborough, H. (2010). In search of relevance: Perspectives on the contribution of academic-practitioner networks. Organization Studies, 31(9 and10), 1287–1309. doi:10.1177/0170840610374398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LERU – League of European Research Universities (2012). Research universities & research assessment. Retrieved 1 22, 2015, from http://www.leru.org/files/general/LERU_PP_2012_May_Research_Assesment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lilien, G. L. (2016). The B2B knowledge gap. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 543–556. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. (2011). The research excellence framework & the ‘impact agenda’: Are we creating a frankenstein monster? Research Evaluation, 20(3), 247–254. doi:10.3152/095820211X13118583635693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, K., Kjellberg, H., & Hagberg, J. (2015). Exploring the performativity of marketing: Theories, practices & devices. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(1–2), 1–15. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2014.982932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. (2003). Marketing died in the last decade. Interactive Marketing, 5(2), 144–159. doi:10.1057/palgrave.im.4340229
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. (2009). The future of marketing: Brightest star in the firmament, or a fading meteor? Some hypotheses & a research agenda. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(5–6), 431–450. doi:10.1362/026725709X461786
   Google Scholar
• Mentzer, J. T., & Schumann, D. W. (2006). The theoretical & practical implications of marketing scholarship. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 14(3), 179–190. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679140301
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., Klokgieters, K., Brankovic, A., & Duppen, F. (2012). Innovation leadership study. London: Cap Gemini.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., & Gosling, J. (2002). Managing beyond borders. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 64–76. doi:10.5465/amle.2002.7373654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnell, B., Stone, M., Stott, R., Aravopoulou, & Timms, L. (2017). Business model innovation, strategic information & the role of analyst firms. The Bottom Line, 30(2), 151–162. doi:10.1108/BL-06-2017-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy & a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 78–95. doi:10.5465/amle.2002.7373679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidd, M., & Broadbent, J. (2015). Business & management studies in the 2014 research excellence framework. British Journal of Management, 26, 569–581. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piercy, N. F. (2002). Research in marketing: Teasing with trivia or risking relevance? European Journal of Marketing, 36(3), 350–363. doi:10.1108/03090560210417165
   Google Scholar
• REF (2014a) Impact case studies database. Retrieved 11 28, 2017, from http://impact.ref.ac.uk/CaseStudies/
   Google Scholar
• REF (2014b) Assessment criteria & level definitions. Retrieved 1 22, 2015, from http://www.ref.ac.uk/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/
   Google Scholar
• Reibstein, D. J., Day, G., & Wind, J. (2009). Guest editorial: Is marketing academia losing its way? Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 1–3. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.4.1
   Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. (2007). Editor’s afterword. let’s create a tipping point: What academics & practitioners can do, alone & together. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1046–1054. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27156169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seggie, S. H., & Griffith, D. A. (2009). What does it take to get promoted in marketing academia? Understanding exceptional publication productivity in the leading marketing journals. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 122–132. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.1.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (1999). Revisiting marketing’s lawlike generalizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 71–87. doi:10.1177/0092070399271006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. (2003). Innovation as an objective of knowledge management. Part 1: The landscape of management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(2), 113–119. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500014
   Google Scholar
• Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12(Special Issue), 3–26. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2009). Staying customer-focused & trusted: Web 2.0 & customer 2.0 in financial services. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 16(2), 101–131. doi:10.1057/dbm.2009.13
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2011a). Complaints management – A literature review. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 18(2), 108–122. doi:10.1057/dbm.2011.16
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2011b). The death of personal service: Why retailers make consumers responsible for their own customer experience. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 18(4), 233–239. doi:10.1057/dbm.2011.29
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2012). The death of personal service: Will financial services customers who serve themselves do better than if they are served? Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 19(2), 107–110. doi:10.1057/dbm.2012.8
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2013). Co-operation between academics & practitioners - hope for the future? Journal of Direct, Data & Digital Marketing Practice, 15(2), 105–107. doi:10.1057/dddmp.2013.54
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2014). The new (and ever-evolving) direct & digital marketing ecosystem. Journal of Direct, Data & Digital Marketing Practice, 16(2), 71–74. doi:10.1057/dddmp.2014.58
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2016). Business to business competitive marketing: Practice & literature. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 15(1), 3–14. doi:10.1362/147539216X14594362873370
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M., Gamble, P., Woodcock, N., & Foss, B. (2006). Up close & personal (3rd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M., & Laughlin, P. (2016). How interactive marketing is changing in consumer financial services. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(4), 256–338. doi:10.1108/JRIM-01-2016-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M., Laughlin, P., Aravopoulou, E., Gerardi, G., Todeva, E., & Weinzierl, L. (2017a). How platforms are transforming customer information management. The Bottom Line, 30(3), 216–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M., Spero, I., & Aravopoulou, E. (2017b). Multiple helices as agents of change? The case of the neighbourhoods of the future project & the development of direction for policy & practice on health, happiness & wellbeing for the next generation of older adults. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), 97–117. doi:10.25019/MDKE/5.1.06
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M., & Woodcock, N. (2013). Social intelligence in customer engagement. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21(5), 394–401. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2013.801613
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M., & Woodcock, N. (2014). Interactive, direct & digital marketing – A future that depends on better use of business intelligence. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8(1), 4–17. doi:10.1108/JRIM-07-2013-0046
   Google Scholar
• Storbacka, K. (2014). Does publish or perish lead to stylish rubbish? Journal of Business Market Management, 7(1), 289–295.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, R., Stone, M., & Fae, J. (2016). Business models in the business to business & business to consumer worlds – What can each world learn from the other. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(8), 943–954. doi:10.1108/JBIM-10-2016-267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeas, M., & Hughes, T. (2016). An examination of the dimensions & antecedents of institutionalized creativity. Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 59–69. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeas, M., Hughes, T., & Hilton, T. (2016). Antecedents to value diminution: A dyadic perspective. Marketing Theory, 16(4), 469–491. doi:10.1177/1470593116652005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valos, M., Fatemeh, H., Casidy, R., Driesener, C. B., & Maplestone, V. L. (2016). Exploring the integration of social media within integrated marketing communication frameworks: Perspectives of services marketers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(1), 19–40. doi:10.1108/MIP-09-2014-0169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. (2014a). Impact in the REF: Issues & obstacles. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.915303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. (2014b). Issues in the articulation of ‘impact’: The responses of UK academics to ‘impact’ as a new measure of research assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 359–377. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Hollister, R., Stroud, S. E., & Babcock, E. (2011). The engaged university: International perspectives on civic engagement. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, F. E., Malter, A. J., & Ganesan, S. (2003). Can marketing regain its seat at the table? MSI Report No. 03–113. Cambridge MA: Marketing Science Institute, 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, F. E., Malter, A. J., & Ganesan, S. (2005). The decline & dispersion of marketing competence. MIT Sloan Management Review, Summer, 35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. (2012). A review of business-university collaboration. Retrieved 5 22, 2014, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2012/name,69548,en.html
   Google Scholar
• Witty, A. (2013). Sir Andrew Witty’s independent review of universities & growth, preliminary findings. Department for Business Innovation & Skills. Retrieved 5 22, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249720/bis-13-1241-encouraging-a-british-invention-revolution-andrew-witty-review-R1.pdf
   Google Scholar