There’s a lid for every pot! The relationship between performance measurement and administrative activities in Italian ministries

References

• Abma, T. A., & Noordegraaf, M. (2003). Public managers amidst ambiguity: towards a typology of evaluative practices in public management. Evaluation, 9(3), 285–306. doi:10.1177/13563890030093004
   Google Scholar
• Angiola, N., & Bianchi, P. (2015). Management pubblico. Una visione performance-based. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/faam.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbato, G., & Turri, M. (2017). Understanding public performance measurement through theoretical pluralism. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(1), 15–30. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-11-2015-0202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84(3), 517–538. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankart, C. B. (1987). Limits to Privatization. European Economic Review, 31(1–2), 346–351. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(87)90050-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohte, J., & Meier, K. J. (2000). Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating. Public Administration Review, 60(2), 173–182. doi:10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonini Baraldi, S. (2014). Evaluating results of public sector reforms in Rechtsstaat countries: The role of context and processes in the reform of the Italian and French cultural heritage system. International Public Management Journal, 17(3), 411–432. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.935248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘New Public sector’. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281–306. doi:10.1006/mare.2000.0136
   Google Scholar
• Bruijn, H. D. (2002). Performance measurement in the public sector: Strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(6–7), 578–594. doi:10.1108/09513550210448607
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, S., & Ratto, M. (2003). The role of incentives in the public sector: Issues and evidence. Leverhulme Centre for Market and Public Organisation. University of Bristol. Working Paper No. 03/071. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2): 1-29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caglio, A., & Ditillo, A. (2008). A review and discussion of management control in inter‐firm relationships: Achievements and future directions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7/8), 865–898. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G. (2003). Administrative tradition and policy change: When policy paradigms matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform during the 1990s Public Administration, 81(4), 781–801. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting Organizations and Society, 29(314), 243–267. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerase, F. P. (2017). La «performance» e l’efficienza del settore pubblico in chiave comparata. Amministrare, 1, 95–138. doi:10.1442/86993
   Google Scholar
• Chevauchez, B. (2014). The use of performance information in resource allocation. In S. Lanau, A. Tuladhar, B. Chevauchez, G. Esposito, N. Jassaud, & S. Segal (Eds.), Italy: Selected issues paper, Country report no. 14/284 (pp. 61–70). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Corte dei Conti. (2012). Indagine sulla Riorganizzazione dei Controlli Interni ai Sensi del d.lgs. 150/2009: Ritardi Applicativi e Difficoltà Operative. Rome: Sezione Centrale di Controllo sulla Gestione delle Amministrazioni dello Stato.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P. (2013). The constitutive effects of performance indicators: Getting beyond unintended consequences. Journal of Public Management Review, 16(7), 969–986. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.770058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. S., & Stazyk Edmund, C. (2015). Developing and testing a new goal taxonomy: Accounting for the complexity of ambiguity and political support. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 751–775. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 650–665. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Public Administration. (2009). Riforma Brunetta. Cosa Abbiamo Imparato dagli altri Paesi, Retervied May 29, 2017 from, https://www.ansa.it/documents/1258368806214_altri_paesi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, T. (2009). New public management in public sector organisations: The dark sides of managerialistic ‘Enlightenment’. Public Administration, 87(4), 892–899. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditillo, A., Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Control patterns in contracting‐out relationships: It matters what you do. Not Who You are Public Administration, 93(1), 212–229. doi:10.1111/padm.12126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31(2), 134–149. doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. doi:10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattore, G., Iacovone, D., & Steccolini, I. (2018). Managing successful change in the public sector’: A view from the consultants’ world. Public Management Review, 20(4), 587–606. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1340504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington D.C., WA: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, M., & Bourne, M. (2003). Factors that play a role in ‘managing through measures’. Management Decision, 41(8), 698–710. doi:10.1108/00251740310496215
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., Homberg, F., & Osterloh, M. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organizational Studies, 34(7), 949–972. doi:10.1177/0170840613483655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, K., Antony, J., & Ogden, S. (2009). Performance management in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(6), 478–498. doi:10.1108/09513550910982850
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hinna, L., Meneguzzo, M., Mussari, R., & Decastri, M. (2006). Economia delle Aziende Pubbliche. Milano: McGraw–Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ingraham, P. W. (2005). Performance: Promises to keep and miles to go. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 390–395. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, S., & Friedman, J. N. (2009). Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: An empirical examination of distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English national health service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 917–946. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M. (2015). The politics and consequences of performance measurement. Policy and Society, 34(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, C. P., Burton, R. M., & Cardinal, L. B. (2002). Three controls are better than one: A computational model of complex control systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 8(3), 197–220. doi:10.1023/A:1020767513183
   Google Scholar
• Mari, L. (2003). Epistemology of measurement. Measurement, 34(1), 17–30. doi:10.1016/S0263-2241(03)00016-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (2017). The ambiguities of performance-based governance reforms in Italy: Reviving the fortunes of evaluation and performance measurement. Evaluation and Program Planning 2018 August, 69, 173–182. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas, R. C. (1996). Searching for efficiency in the public sector: Interim evaluation of performance budgeting in New Zealand. Public Budgeting & Finance, 16(3), 13–27. doi:10.1111/1540-5850.01074
   Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. W., & Gupta, V. (1994). The performance paradox. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 309–369.
   Google Scholar
• Micheli, P., & Mari, L. (2014). The theory and practice of performance measurement. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli, P., & Neely, A. (2010). Performance measurement in the English public sector: Searching for the golden thread. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 591–600. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minelli, E., Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2008). The risk of failure of controls and levers of change: An examination of two Italian public sectors. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 4(1), 5–26. doi:10.1108/18325910810855761
   Google Scholar
• Nasi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2008). Implementation of accounting reforms: An empirical investigation into Italian local governments. Public Management Review, 10(2), 173–194. doi:10.1080/14719030801928573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newberry, S., & Pallot, J. (2004). Freedom or coercion? NPM incentives in New Zealand central government departments. Management Accounting Research, 15(3), 247–266. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2004.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M., & Abma, T. A. (2003). Management by measurement? Public management practices amidst ambiguity. Public Administration, 81(4), 853–871. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2006). The dynamics of devolution processes in legalistic countries: Organizational change in the Italian public sector. Public Administration, 84(3), 737–770. doi:10.1111/J.1467-9299.2006.00610.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E., & Valotti, G. (2008). Public management reform in Italy: Explaining the implementation gap international. Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 174–204. doi:10.1108/09513550810855654
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848. doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., Engbers, T. A., & Jun, S. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 39–51. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01939_2.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., Pasha, O. Q., & Hamilton Edwards, L. (2013). Does performance management lead to better outcomes? Evidence from the U.S. Public transit industry. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 625–636. doi:10.1111/puar.12076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember: Post-bureaucratic organizations forget? Public Administration, 87(2), 198–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01738.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rebora, G. (1999). La valutazione dei risultati delle amministrazioni pubbliche: Proposte operative e di metodo. Milano, IT: Guerini e Associati.
   Google Scholar
• Rebora, G., Ruffini, R., & Turri, M. (2017). A serious game: Performance management in Italian Ministries international. Journal of Public Administration, 40(9), 770–779. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1201103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. (1995). On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18(2–3), 277–310. doi:10.1080/01900699508525011
   Google Scholar
• Sofyani, H., Akbar, R., & Ferrer, R. C. (2018). 20 years of Performance Measurement System (PMS) implementation in Indonesian local governments: Why is their performance still poor?. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 11(1), 151–184. doi:10.22452/ajba
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131–146. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., & Walsh, K. (1994). Performance measurement: When performance can never be finally defined. Public Money & Management, 14(2), 45–49. doi:10.1080/09540969409387815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suppa, A., & Webb N. J. (2016). What factors contribute to success in performance management in the public sector? An international comparative study of two large Defense Organizations. International Public Management Review, 17(2): 1-35.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. J., Van Helden, G. J., & Van Der Kolk, B. (2015). Challenging the NPM ideas about performance management: Selectivity and differentiation in outcome‐oriented performance budgeting. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(3), 287–315. doi:10.1111/faam.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turri, M. (2007). I Fattori di Crisi dei Controlli nel Caso dei Ministeri. In G. Rebora (Ed.), La Crisi dei Controlli: Imprese e Istituzioni a Confronto (pp. 377–413). Milan, Italy: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vakkuri, J. (2010). Struggling with ambiguity: Public managers as users of NPM‐oriented management instruments. Public Administration, 88(4), 999–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01856.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kolk, B., & Kaufmann, W. (2018). Performance measurement, cognitive dissonance and coping strategies: Exploring individual responses to NPM-inspired output control. Journal of Management Control, 29(2), 93–113. doi:10.1007/s00187-018-0265-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W. (2005). What makes organisations measure? Hypotheses on the causes and conditions for performance measurement. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(3), 363–383. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2005.00225.x
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. doi:10.2307/3381236
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkely and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar