Which technology diversification index should be selected?: Insights for diversification perspectives

References

• Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(4), 433–18. doi:10.1002/wics.101
   Google Scholar
• Argyres, N. (1996). Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management Journal, 17(5), 395–410. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bas, C. L., & Patel, P. (2005). Does Internationalisation of Technology Determine Technological Diversification in Large Firms? An Empirical Study. Revue d’économie Industrielle Does, 110, 157–174. doi:10.3406/rei.2005.3077.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C. H. (1971). Corporate growth and diversification. The Journal of Law & Economics, 14(2), 371–383. doi:10.1086/466714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87. Retrieved from doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Y. S., & Wu, C. J. (2017). Principal component-based weighted indices and a framework to evaluate indices: Results from the medical expenditure panel survey 1996 to 2011. PLoS ONE, 12(9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y.-C., Lai, H.-C., Lee, T.-Y., & Liaw, Y.-C. (2008). Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(6), 875–892. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohendet, P., Llerena, P., & Sorge, A. (1992). Technological diversity and cohérence in Europe : An analytical overview. Revue d’économie Industrielle, 59(1), 9–26. doi:10.3406/rei.1992.1399.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, F., Li, B., & Yang, Y. (2017). Study of the impact of TMT characteristics on the technology diversification and performance relationship of high-tech enterprise. GSIS 2017. IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (pp. 393–399). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/GSIS.2017.8077738
   Google Scholar
• Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data-or tears: An application to educational enrollments in States of India. Demography, 38(1), 115. doi:10.2307/3088292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambardella, A., & Torrisi, S. (1998). Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27(5), 445–463. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00062-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 230–246. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S., & Olsen, D. M. (2000). Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 51–80. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<51::AID-SMJ77>3.0.CO;2-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godshalk, E. B., & Timothy, D. H. (1988). Factor and principal component analyses as alternatives to index selection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76(3), 352–360. doi:10.1007/BF00265334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. E. (1971). Entropy and other measures of concentration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (general), 134(1), 73–85. doi:10.2307/2343975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Jerome, F. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heino, J., Mykrä, H., & Kotanen, J. (2008). Weak relationships between landscape characteristics and multiple facets of stream macroinvertebrate biodiversity in a boreal drainage basin. Landscape Ecology, 23(4), 417–426. doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9199-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Characterizing the “Technological Position” of firms, with application to quantitative technological opportunity and research spillovers. Research Policy, 18(1), 984–1001. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(89)90007-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. A. (1992). Self-organization and selection in evolution. In Series on directions in condensed matter physics: origins of order (Vol. 6, pp. 61–100). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Lim, H., & Park, Y. (2009). How should firms carry out technological diversification to improve their performance? An analysis of patenting of Korean firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(8), 757–770. doi:10.1080/10438590902793315.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Lee, C. Y., & Cho, Y. (2016). Technological diversification, core-technology competence, and firm growth. Research Policy, 45(1), 113–124. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Jung, S., & Hwang, J. (2018). Technology convergence capability and firm innovation in the manufacturing sector: An approach based on patent network analysis. R&D Management, 1–12. doi:10.1111/radm.12350.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Jung, S., Hwang, J., & Hong, A. (2018). A dynamic framework for analyzing technology standardisation using network analysis and game theory. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(5), 540–555. doi:10.1080/09537325.2017.1340639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. R. (2013). Characteristics of ICT-Based converging technologies. ETRI Journal, 35(6), 1134–1143. doi:10.4218/etrij.13.0113.0043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kook, S. H., Kim, K. H., & Lee, C. (2017). Dynamic technological diversification and its impact on firms’ performance An empirical analysis of Korean IT firms. Sustainability, 9(7). doi:10.3390/su9071239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29(2), 115–129. doi:10.1007/BF02289694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. U., & Kang, J. (2015). Technological diversification through corporate venture capital investments: Creating various options to strengthen dynamic capabilities. Industry and Innovation, 22(5), 349–374. doi:10.1080/13662716.2015.1054128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 567–579. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00272.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., & Chang, C. C. (2015). The effect of technological diversification on organizational performance: An empirical study of S&P 500 manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90(PB), 575–586. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macarthur, R. A. (1965). Patterns of species diversity. Biology Reviews, 40, 510–533. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1965.tb00815.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marfels, C. (1971). Absolute and relative measures of concentration reconsidered. Kyklos, 24(4), 753–766. doi:10.1111/kykl.1971.24.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, E. K., Caruso, T., Buscot, F., Fischer, M., Hancock, C., Maier, T. S., … Rillig, M. C. (2014). Choosing and using diversity indices: Insights for ecological applications from the German biodiversity exploratories. Ecology and Evolution, 4(18), 3514–3524. doi:10.1002/ece3.1155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendra, H. (2002). Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Applied Geography, 22(2), 175–186. doi:10.1016/S0143-6228(02)00002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1988). Uses and Abuses of Patent Statistics. In A. F. J. B. T.-H. of Q. S. of S. and T. VAN RAAN (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology (pp. 509–536). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-70537-2.50021-0
   Google Scholar
• Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3), 492–507. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, J., & Wiersema, M. (1995). Multibusiness Firm: Empirical analysis of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 277–299. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, J., & Wiersema, M. (2003). The measurement of corporate portfolio strategy: Analysis of the content validity of related diversification indexes. Strategic Management Journal, 24(1), 39–59. doi:10.1002/smj.282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambharya, R. B. (1995). The Combined Effect of International Diversification and Product Diversification Strategies on the Performance of U.S.-Based Multinational Corporations. MIR: Management International Review, 35(3), 197–218. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40228273
   Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P., & Mani, G. S. (1995). Competition, variety and technological evolution: A replicator dynamics model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 5(4), 369–392. doi:10.1007/BF01194367
   Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. (1999). Patent Indicators. Research Evaluation, 8(2), 119–131. doi:10.3152/147154499781777540
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(April 1924), 623–656. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
   Google Scholar
• Singh, D. A., Gaur, A. S., & Schmid, F. P. (2010). Corporate diversification, TMT experience, and performance: Evidence from German SMEs. Management International Review, 50(1), 35–56. doi:10.1007/s11575-009-0025-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, A., Polasky, S., & Broadus, J. (1993). On the Measurement of Biological Diversity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. doi:10.1016/S0003-9861(71)80064-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, M. (2002). An analysis of the relationship between product diversification, geographical diversification, and technological diversification. Discussion Paper on International Management and Innovation, No. 02-02. Stuttgart: Hohenheim University.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (1998). On the economics and analysis of diversity. Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), Electronic Working Papers Series, 141.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719. doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.0213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, G., & Wilsey, B. (2001). Empirical Relationships between Species Richness, Evenness, and Proportional Diversity. The American Naturalist, 158(3), 286–299. doi:10.1086/321317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 21(6), 459–468. doi:10.1093/heapol/czl029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Ning, L., & Prevezer, M. (2015). Technological diversification in China from 1986 to 2011: Evidence from patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 54–66. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, R. H. (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21(2), 213–251. doi:10.2307/1218190
   Google Scholar
• Wilsey, B. J., Chalcraft, D. R., Bowles, C. M., & Willig, M. R. (2005). Relationships among indices suggest that richness is an incomplete surrogate for grassland biodiversity. Ecology, 86(5), 1178–1184. doi:10.1890/04-0394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woerheide, W., & Persson, D. (1992). An index of portfolio diversification. Financial Services Review, 2(2), 73–85. doi:10.1016/1057-0810(92)90003-U
   Google Scholar