The effect of lean and agile supply chain strategy on financial performance with mediating of strategic supplier integration & strategic customer integration: Evidence from bottled drinking-water industry in Indonesia

References

• Alzoubi, H., & Yanamandra, R. (2020). Investigating the mediating role of information sharing strategy on agile supply chain. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 273–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Antony, J., Agus, A., & Hajinoor, M. S. (2012). Lean production supply chain management as driver towards enhancing product quality and business performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management., 29(1), 92-121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711211190891
   Google Scholar
• Ardalan, A., & Diaz, R. (2012). NERJIT: Using net requirement data in Kanban‐controlled jumbled‐flow shops. Production and Operations Management, 21(3), 606–618. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01268.x
   Google Scholar
• Ariadi, G., Surachman, Sumiati, Rohman, F., Surachman, S., & Sumiati, S. (2020). The effect of strategic external integration on financial performance with mediating role of manufacturing flexibility : Evidence from bottled drinking industry in Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 10(15), 3495–3506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.045
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., & Omrani, H. (2019). A goal-oriented approach based on fuzzy axiomatic design for sustainable mobility project selection. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 6(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1435834
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Google Scholar
• Ben, N. J., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1–2), 107–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00223-0
   Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., & De Sanctis, I. (2017). Lean practices implementation and their relationships with operational responsiveness and company performance: An Italian study. International Journal of Production Research, 55(3), 769–794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1211346
   Google Scholar
• Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, D. (2013). Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1295–1318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.728011
   Google Scholar
• Bortolotti, T., Danese, P., Flynn, B. B., & Romano, P. (2015). Leveraging fitness and lean bundles to build the cumulative performance sand cone model. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 227–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.014
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A. T. L., Ngai, E. W. T., & Moon, K. K. L. (2017). The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(4), 486–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M., Fynes, B., Wiengarten, F., & Lecuna, A. (2015). Internal lean practices and performance: The role of technological turbulence. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 157–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J. K., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2000). Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Science, 46(3), 436–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.3.436.12069
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Liu, H., Wei, S., & Gu, J. (2018). Top managers' managerial ties, supply chain integration, and firm performance in China: A social capital perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 74, 205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Chaudhuri, A., & Farooq, S. (2016). Interplant coordination, supply chain integration, and operational performance of a plant in a manufacturing network: A mediation analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(5), 550–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-10-2015-0391
   Google Scholar
• Choi, T. Y., & Wu, Z. (2009). Taking the leap from dyads to triads: Buyer–supplier relationships in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 15(4), 263–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2009.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Dobrzykowski, D. D., McFadden, K. L., & Vonderembse, M. A. (2016). Examining pathways to safety and financial performance in hospitals: A study of lean in professional service operations. Journal of Operations Management, 42, 39–51. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Droge, C., Vickery, S. K., & Jacobs, M. A. (2012). Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(2), 250–262.  https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Duan, C., Deng, C., Gharaei, A., Wu, J., & Wang, B. (2018). Selective maintenance scheduling under stochastic maintenance quality with multiple maintenance actions. International Journal of Production Research, 56(23), 7160–7178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1436789
   Google Scholar
• Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Sushil, & Singh, T. (2015). Building theory of sustainable manufacturing using total interpretive structural modelling. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 2(4), 231–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2015.1025890
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015). The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: The moderating effect of product complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3028–3046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.970707
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, S. C., Henry, R. M., & Shockley, J. (2010). Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review, 75, 105–117. https://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/product/97205-PDF-ENG
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage Publications Sage CA.
   Google Scholar
• Germain, R., Claycomb, C., & Dröge, C. (2008). Supply chain variability, organizational structure, and performance: The moderating effect of demand unpredictability. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Gharaei, A., Hoseini Shekarabi, S. A., & Karimi, M. (2020a). Modelling and optimal lot-sizing of the replenishments in constrained, multi-product and bi-objective EPQ models with defective products: Generalised cross decomposition. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 7(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2019
   Google Scholar
• Gharaei, A., Hoseini Shekarabi, S. A., Karimi, M., Pourjavad, E., & Amjadian, A. (2019a). An integrated stochastic EPQ model under quality and green policies: Generalised cross decomposition under the separability approach. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2019
   Google Scholar
• Gharaei, A., Karimi, M., & Hoseini Shekarabi, S. A. (2019b). An integrated multi-product, multi-buyer supply chain under penalty, green, and quality control polices and a vendor managed inventory with consignment stock agreement: The outer approximation with equality relaxation and augmented penalty algorithm. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 69, 223–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.11.035
   Google Scholar
• Gharaei, A., Karimi, M., & Hoseini Shekarabi, S. A. (2020). Joint economic lot-sizing in multi-product multi-level integrated supply chains: Generalized benders decomposition. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 7(4), 309–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2019.1585595
   Google Scholar
• Giri, B. C., & Bardhan, S. (2014). Coordinating a supply chain with backup supplier through buyback contract under supply disruption and uncertain demand. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 1(4), 193–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2014.951714
   Google Scholar
• Giri, B. C., & Masanta, M. (2020). Developing a closed-loop supply chain model with price and quality dependent demand and learning in production in a stochastic environment. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 7(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1542042
   Google Scholar
• Gligor, D. M., Esmark, C. L., & Holcomb, M. C. (2015). Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? Journal of Operations Management, 33, 71–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.008
   Google Scholar
• Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
   Google Scholar
• Hao, Y., Helo, P., & Shamsuzzoha, A. (2018). Virtual factory system design and implementation: Integrated sustainable manufacturing. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 5(2), 116–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2016.1242819
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Keung Lai, K., Sun, H., & Chen, Y. (2014). The impact of supplier integration on customer integration and new product performance: The mediating role of manufacturing flexibility under trust theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(PART B), 260–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.044
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Google Scholar
• Hoseini Shekarabi, S. A., Gharaei, A., & Karimi, M. (2019). Modelling and optimal lot-sizing of integrated multi-level multi-wholesaler supply chains under the shortage and limited warehouse space: Generalised outer approximation. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 6(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1435835
   Google Scholar
• Huo, B., Han, Z., & Prajogo, D. (2016). Antecedents and consequences of supply chain information integration: A resource-based view. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(6), 661–677. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2015-0336
   Google Scholar
• Katayama, H., & Bennett, D. (1999). Agility, adaptability and leanness: A comparison of concepts and a study of practice. International Journal of Production Economics, 60, 43–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00129-7
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, N., Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Ghazilla, R. A. R., Shekarian, E., & Zanoni, S. (2018). Economic order quantity models for items with imperfect quality and emission considerations. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 5(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2016.1240254
   Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2007). Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 573–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., & Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and external integration for product development: The contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Sciences, 36(1), 97–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2005.00067.x
   Google Scholar
• Koufteros, X. A., Rawski, G. E., & Rupak, R. (2010). Organizational integration for product development: The effects on glitches, on-time execution of engineering change orders, and market success. Decision Sciences, 41(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00259.x
   Google Scholar
• Ku, E. C. S., Wu, W.-C., & Chen, Y. J. (2015). customer orientation, and operational performance : The effect of flexibility. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 14(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0289-0
   Google Scholar
• Lai, F., Zhang, M., Lee, D. M. S., & Zhao, X. (2012). The impact of supply chain integration on mass customization capability: An extended resource-based view. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(3), 443–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2189009
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318922
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102–113. http://www.scap.pk/article/SupplyChaindd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leuschner, R., Rogers, D. S., & Charvet, F. F. (2013). A meta-analysis of supply chain integration and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 34–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12013
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Sanchez, A., & Lahoz-Leo, F. (2018). Supply chain agility: A mediator for absorptive capacity. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(2), 264–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-10-2017-0304
   Google Scholar
• McIvor, R. (2001). Lean supply: The design and cost reduction dimensions. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(4), 227–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(01)00004-1
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk, S. A., Hanson, J. D., & Calantone, R. J. (2010). Hitting the target … but missing the point: Resolving the paradox of strategic transition. Long Range Planning, 43(4), 555–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Monczka, R. M., Callahan, T. J., & Nichols, E. L. (1995). Predictors of relationships among buying and supplying firms. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25(10), 45–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039510101799
   Google Scholar
• Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2010). On decisions for integration implementation: An examination of complementarities between product‐Process technology integration and supply chain integration. Decision Sciences, 41(2), 355–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00267.x
   Google Scholar
• Nawanir, G., Lim, K. T., & Othman, S. N. (2016). Lean manufacturing practices in Indonesian manufacturing firms: Are there business performance effects? International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2014-0013
   Google Scholar
• Nawanir, G., Teong, L. K., & Othman, S. N. (2013). Impact of lean practices on operations performance and business performance: Some evidence from Indonesian manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(7), 1019–1050. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2012-0027
   Google Scholar
• Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.167
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Franco, R., Phadnis, S., Caplice, C., & Sheffi, Y. (2016). Rethinking supply chain strategy as a conceptual system. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 384–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.012
   Google Scholar
• Prajogo, D., Oke, A., & Olhager, J. (2016). Supply chain processes: Linking supply logistics integration, supply performance, lean processes and competitive performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2014-0129
   Google Scholar
• Qi, Y., Boyer, K. K., & Zhao, X. (2009). Supply chain strategy, product characteristics, and performance impact: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Decision Sciences, 40(4), 667–695. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00246.x
   Google Scholar
• Qi, Y., Huo, B., Wang, Z., & Yan, H. (2017). The impact of operations and supply chain strategies on integration and performance. Intern. Journal of Production Economics, 185, 162–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.028
   Google Scholar
• Qi, Y., Zhao, X., & Sheu, C. (2011). The impact of competitive strategy and supply chain strategy on business performance: The role of environmental uncertainty. Decision Sciences, 42(2), 371–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2011.00315.x
   Google Scholar
• Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2013). Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness : The role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(18), 571–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2013-0015
   Google Scholar
• Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2014). Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(PART B), 340–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.018
   Google Scholar
• Rabbani, M., Foroozesh, N., Mousavi, S. M., & Farrokhi-Asl, H. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection by a new decision model based on interval-valued fuzzy sets and possibilistic statistical reference point systems under uncertainty. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 6(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2017.1376232
   Google Scholar
• Rabbani, M., Hosseini-Mokhallesun, S. A. A., Ordibazar, A. H., & Farrokhi-Asl, H. (2020). A hybrid robust possibilistic approach for a sustainable supply chain location-allocation network design. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 7(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1506061
   Google Scholar
• Ralston, P. M., Blackhurst, J., Cantor, D. E., & Crum, M. R. (2015). A structure–conduct–performance perspective of how strategic supply chain integration affects firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(2), 47–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12064
   Google Scholar
• Restuputri, D. P., Masudin, I., Sari, C. P., & Tan, A. W. K. (2020). Customers perception on logistics service quality using Kansei engineering: Empirical evidence from indonesian logistics providers. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1), 1751021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1751021
   Google Scholar
• Roh, J., Hong, P., & Min, H. (2014). Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: The case of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(PART B), 198–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.013
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, K. A., Malhotra, M. K., & Grover, V. (2011). Interorganizational system characteristics and supply chain integration: An empirical assessment. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 7–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00300.x
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S., & Giri, B. C. (2020). Stochastic supply chain model with imperfect production and controllable defective rate. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 7(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1536231
   Google Scholar
• Sayyadi, R., & Awasthi, A. (2018). A simulation-based optimisation approach for identifying key determinants for sustainable transportation planning. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 5(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2016.1244301
   Google Scholar
• Sayyadi, R., & Awasthi, A. (2020). An integrated approach based on system dynamics and ANP for evaluating sustainable transportation policies. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 7(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1554168
   Google Scholar
• Shah, N. H., Chaudhari, U., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2020). Integrating credit and replenishment policies for deteriorating items under quadratic demand in a three echelon supply chain. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 7(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1487606
   Google Scholar
• Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Singh, R. (2019). The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 212(December2017), 111–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Sim, K. L., & Curatola, A. P. (1999). Time‐based competition. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,16(7), 659-674.. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719910268215
   Google Scholar
• Stavrulaki, E., & Davis, M. (2010). Aligning products with supply chain processes and strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09574091011042214
   Google Scholar
• Subburaj, A., Sriram, V. P., & Mehrolia, S. (2020). Effects of supply chain integration on firm’s performance: A study on micro, small and medium enterprises in India. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.7.001
   Google Scholar
• Sugeng, S., Nugroho, M. N., Ibrahim, I., & Yanfitri, Y. (2010). Effects of foreign exchange supply and demand dynamics to Rupiah Exchange Rate and Economic Performance. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 12(3), 289–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v12i3.374
   Google Scholar
• Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Swink, M., Narasimhan, R., & Wang, C. (2007). Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 148–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., & Qrunfleh, S. (2017). Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: Complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. International Journal OfProduction Research, 55(4), 925–938. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1203079
   Google Scholar
• Tsao, Y. C. (2015). Design of a carbon-efficient supply-chain network under trade credits. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 2(3), 177–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2015.1024187
   Google Scholar
• Tse, Y. K., Zhang, M., Akhtar, P., & MacBryde, J. (2016). Embracing supply chain agility: An investigation in the electronics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0237
   Google Scholar
• Um, J. (2017). The impact of supply chain agility on business performance in a high level customization environment. Operations Management Research, 10(1–2), 10–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-016-0120-1
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, S. K., Droge, C., Setia, P., & Sambamurthy, V. (2010). Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: Complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7025–7042. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903348353
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. (2003). The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: An analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), 523–539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Wahyuni, D., Sudira, P., Agustini, K., & Ariadi, G. (2020). The effect of external learning on vocational high school performance with mediating role of in- structional agility and product innovation efficacy in Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 10(16), 3931–3940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.7.017
   Google Scholar
• Whitten, G. D., Green, K. W., & Zelbst, P. J. (2012). Triple‐A supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management., 32(1), 28-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211195727
   Google Scholar
• Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Gimenez, C., & McIvor, R. (2016). Risk, risk management practices, and the success of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(3), 361–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.020
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2011). The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 604–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Yin, S., Nishi, T., & Zhang, G. (2016). A game theoretic model for coordination of single manufacturer and multiple suppliers with quality variations under uncertain demands. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 3(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2015.1050079
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf, Y. Y., Gunasekaran, A., Adeleye, E. O., & Sivayoganathan, K. (2004). Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 379–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.022
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, G., Feng, T., & Wang, D. (2015). Is more supply chain integration always beneficial to financial performance?. Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 162–172.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011). The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1–2), 17–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004
   Google Scholar