Integrating agency and resource dependence theories to examine the impact of corporate governance and innovation on firm performance

References

• Ahmed, A. F., & Rugami, M. (2019). Corporate governance and performance of savings and credit cooperative societies in Kilifi County, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(3), 61–22. https://www.iajournals.org/articles/iajef_v3_i3_61_79.pdf?
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed Sheikh, N., Wang, Z., & Khan, S. (2013). The impact of internal attributes of corporate governance on firm performance: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569211311301420
   Google Scholar
• Akram, F., Abrar-ul-Haq, M., & Raza, S. (2018). A role of corporate governance and firm’s environmental performance: a moderating role of institutional regulations. Ijms, 25(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms.25.2.2018.10498
   Google Scholar
• Akram, F., Ul Haq, M. A., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). Assessing the effect of managerial power on firm performance through the perceptual lens of executive remuneration. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 27(1), 293–309. https://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-2437-2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H. A., & Sulong, F. (2021). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2020-0361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ararat, M., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2020). Female directors, board committees, and firm performance: Time-series evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Review, 100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsmeier, B., Fleming, L., & Manso, G. (2015). Independent boards and innovation: Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso-Castro, C., Villegas-Periñan, M. D. M., & Casillas-Bueno, J. C. (2016). How boards’ internal and external social capital interact to affect firm performance. Strategic Organization, 14(1), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015604799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, R. R., & Bhattacharya, S. (2015). Do board characteristics impact firm performance? An agency and resource dependency theory perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 11(4), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X15602973
   Google Scholar
• Bonini, S., Deng, J., Ferrari, M., John, K., & Ross, D. G. (2022). Long‐tenured independent directors and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 43(8), 1602–1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, M., & Bhattacharjee, T. (2020). Ownership concentration, innovation and firm performance: Empirical study in Indian technology SME context. South Asian Journal of Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-10-2019-0185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-L. (2012). Board characteristics and R&D investment: Evidence from Taiwan’s electronics industry. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 2(4), 161. https://www.scienpress.com/journal_focus.asp?main_id=55&Sub_id=IV&Issue=409
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. R., Zahra, S. A., Yoshikawa, T., & Han, B. H. (2015). Family ownership and R&D investment: The role of growth opportunities and business group membership. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, W. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 833–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9180-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., Demirbag, M., & Zaim, S. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currim, I. S., Lim, J., & Kim, J. W. (2012). You get what you pay for: The effect of top executives’ compensation on advertising and R&D spending decisions and stock market return. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalziel, T., Gentry, R. J., & Bowerman, M. (2011). An integrated agency–resource dependence view of the influence of directors' human and relational capital on firms' R&D spending. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1217–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danoshana, S., & Ravivathani, T. (2019). The impact of the corporate governance on firm performance: A study on financial institutions in Sri Lanka. SAARJ Journal on Banking & Insurance Research, 8(1), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.5958/2319-1422.2019.00004.3
   Google Scholar
• Darmadi, S. (2013). Board members’ education and firm performance: Evidence from a developing economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569211311324911
   Google Scholar
• Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2011). Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Review, 89, 809. https://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37086089
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M., & Samanta, P. K. (2020). Directors’ interlock, gender diversity and firm performance: A panel data approach. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7307.2020.00001.8
   Google Scholar
• Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami, N., & Nakhaie, H. (2011). Effects of human resource management activities to improve innovation in enterprises. International proceedings of economics development and research, 12, 518–522.
   Google Scholar
• Faleye, O., Kovacs, T., & Venkateswaran, A. (2014). Do better-connected CEOs innovate more? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(5–6), 1201–1225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109014000714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauzi, F., & Locke, S. (2012). Board structure, ownership structure and firm performance: A study of New Zealand listed-firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting of Finance, 8(2), 43–67. https://ejournal.usm.my/aamjaf/article/view/aamjaf_vol8-no2-2012_3
   Google Scholar
• Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00852.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. (2016). Board Independence and firm performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30152-6
   Google Scholar
• González, M., Guzmán, A., Pombo, C., & Trujillo, M.-A. (2013). Family firms and debt: Risk aversion versus risk of losing control. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2308–2320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S., & Nowland, J. (2013). Is prior director experience valuable? Accounting & Finance, 53(3), 643–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2012.00481.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, D., Li, K., & Xu, T. (2019). Board gender diversity and corporate innovation: International evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59(1)123–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002210901900098X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronum, S., Verreynne, M. L., & Kastelle, T. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium‐sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmers, C., Patnam, M., & Rau, P. R. (2017). Do board interlocks increase innovation? Evidence from a corporate governance reform in India. Journal of Banking & Finance, 80, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Lara, A. B., & Gonzales-Bustos, J. P. (2019). The impact of interlocking directorates on innovation: The effects of business and social ties. Management Decision, 57(10), 2799–2815. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2017-1186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Lara, A. B., & Gonzales-Bustos, J. P. (2020). The influence of family businesses and women directors on innovation. Applied Economics, 52(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1638496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jann, B. (2008). NLCHECK: Stata module to check linearity assumption after model estimation. ”Statistical Software Components S456968. Boston College Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, M.-F., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance. The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2018-0144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempf, E., Manconi, A., & Spalt, O. G. (2014). Learning by doing: The value of experience and the origins of skill for mutual fund managers. SSRN 2124896. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2124896
   Google Scholar
• Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. (2006). The impact of family ownership and capital structures on productivity performance of Korean manufacturing firms: Corporate governance and the “chaebol problem”. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 20(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2005.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, H. C., Wang, L. H., & Yeh, L. J. (2018). The role of education of directors in influencing firm R&D investment. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurien, G. P., & Qureshi, M. N. (2011). Study of performance measurement practices in supply chain management. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2(4), 19–34. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Georgy-Kurien/publication/309590235_Study_of_performance_measurement_practices_in_supply_chain_management/links/5818bc1a08ae1f34d24aa481/Study-of-performance-measurement-practices-in-supply-chain-management.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lawal, B. (2012). Board dynamics and corporate performance: Review of literature, and empirical challenges. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(1), 22. https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/13669
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R., Lee, J.-H., & Garrett, T. C. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Zhao, Y., Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Rjoub, H., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Linking innovative human capital, economic growth, and CO2 emissions: An empirical study based on Chinese provincial panel data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Uman, T., & Terjesen, S. (2019). Corporate governance and innovation. In A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Innovation (pp. 134-154). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116015.00013
   Google Scholar
• Manita, R., Elommal, N., Dang, R., Saintives, C., & Houanti, L. H. (2020). Does board gender diversity affect firm performance? The mediating role of innovation on the French stock market. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 39(1–2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2020.104253
   Google Scholar
• Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823–1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2016). Gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(15), 1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G., Gözübüyük, R., & Becerra, M. (2015). Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock‐performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom—The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minavand, H., & Lorkojouri, Z. (2013). The linkage between strategic human resource management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-1128590
   Google Scholar
• Minetti, R., Murro, P., & Paiella, M. (2015). Ownership structure, governance, and innovation. European Economic Review, 80, 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, H.-J., & An, Y. (2017). The effect of interlocking directors network on firm value and performance: Evidence from Korean-Listed firms. Global Economic Review, 47(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2017.1374197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawaz Khan, S., Hussain, R. I, Ur-Rehman, S., Maqbool, M. Q., Engku Ali, E. I., & Numan, M. (2019). The mediating role of innovation between corporate governance and organizational performance: Moderating role of innovative culture in Pakistan textile sector. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1631018. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1631018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehmichen, J., Heyden, M. L., Georgakakis, D., & Volberda, H. W. (2017). Boards of directors and organizational ambidexterity in knowledge-intensive firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 15 (pp. 134–154). Nova Iorque: McGraw Hill. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116015.00013
   Google Scholar
• Pasali, S. S., & Chaudhary, A. (2020). Assessing the impact of foreign ownership on firm performance by size: Evidence from firms in developed and developing countries. Transnational Corporations Journal, 27(2). https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/journals/2076099x/27/2/11
   Google Scholar
• Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2015). Scale and skill in active management. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck-Ling, T., Nai-Chiek, A., & Chee-Seong, L. (2016). Foreign ownership, foreign directors and the profitability of Malaysian listed companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 580–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.037
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, A., & Pepper, B. (2019). Agency theory and executive pay. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pervan, M., Pervan, I., & Todoric, M. (2012). Firm ownership and performance: Evidence for Croatian listed firms. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 61(2012), 964–970. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1059942
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. In N. Craig Smith (Ed.), Managing sustainable business (pp. 323–346). Belgium: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramón-Llorens, M. C., García-Meca, E., & Pucheta-Martínez, M. C. (2019). The role of human and social board capital in driving CSR reporting. Long Range Planning, 52(6), 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, A. M., & Watson, J. (2012). Gender differences in firm performance: Evidence from new ventures in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. (2002). Firm performance and investment in R&D and intellectual property. Australia: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M., & Rogers, M. (2002). Firm performance and investment in R&D and intellectual property. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Saidu, S. (2019). CEO characteristics and firm performance: Focus on origin, education and ownership. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0153-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapra, H., Subramanian, A., & Subramanian, K. V. (2014). Corporate governance and innovation: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(4), 957–1003. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002210901400060X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarto, F., Saggese, S., Viganò, R., & Mauro, M. (2019). Human capital and innovation: Mixing apples and oranges on the board of high-tech firms. Management Decision, 58(5), 897–926. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2017-0594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyu, J. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from Taiwanese firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 7(4), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439131111166393
   Google Scholar
• Şimşek, B. (2017). Meta-analytic review of the relation between board globalization and firm performance. Financial Studies, 21(2), 31–55. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3008034
   Google Scholar
• Sutrisno, S., & Mohamad, M. (2019). Board diversity and firm performance: Cases in sharia capital market of Indonesia. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 23(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol23.iss2.art1
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2010). Technological innovation and the theory of the firm: The role of enterprise level knowledge, complementarities, and (dynamic) capabilities. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 679–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01016-6
   Google Scholar
• Ting, I. W. K., Wang, W.-K., Lu, W.-M., & Chen, Y.-J. (2019). Do female directors will have impact on corporate performance? Review of Managerial Science, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00351-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titisari, K. H., Moeljadi, K. R., & Indrawati, N. K. (2019). Mediation role of cost of debt and intellectual capital on corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from Indonesia. In SU-AFBE 2018: Proceedings of the 1st Sampoerna University-AFBE International Conference, SU-AFBE 2018, 6-7 December 2018, Jakarta Indonesia (p. 293). European Alliance for Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Tomizawa, A., Zhao, L., Bassellier, G., & Ahlstrom, D. (2020). Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09648-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., Gabaldon, P., & Kanadli, S. B. (2018). Women directors contribution to organizational innovation: A behavioral approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2020). Family ownership. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Yangfan, T. (2015). Ownership Concentration and Innovation: Empirical Examination from China. Hong Kong Baptist University Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, P., Riepe, J., Moser, K., Pull, K., & Terjesen, S. (2019). Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasser, Q. R., & Mamun, A. A. (2017). The impact of ownership concentration on firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Emerging Economy Studies, 3(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394901517696647
   Google Scholar
• Yousaf, M. U., Khurshid, M. K., Ahmed, A., & Zulfiqar, M. (2019). Empirical investigation of relationship between research and development intensity and firm performance: The role of ownership structure and board structure. International Journal of Financial Engineering, 6(2), 1950016. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424786319500166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Chen, L., & Feng, T. (2014). Mediation or Moderation? The role of R&D investment in the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from the Chinese IT industry. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(6), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(5), 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar