Materiality, stakeholder engagement disclosure, and corporate governance: Critical elements for the quality of sustainability reporting

References

• Adel, C., Hussain, M. M., Mohamed, E. K. A., & Basuony, M. A. K. (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies? International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(2), 301–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-10-2017-0118
   Google Scholar
• Adhariani, D., & du Toit, E. (2020). Readability of sustainability reports: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-10-2019-0194
   Google Scholar
• Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (csr) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1410
   Google Scholar
• Alipour, M., Ghanbari, M., Jamshidinavid, B., & Taherabadi, A. (2019). Does board Independence moderate the relationship between environmental disclosure quality and performance? Evidence from static and dynamic panel data. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 19(3), 580–610. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2018-0196
   Google Scholar
• Alshbili, I., Elamer, A. A., & Beddewela, E. (2020). Ownership types, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Empirical evidence from a developing country. Accounting Research Journal, 33(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-03-2018-0060
   Google Scholar
• Anugerah, E. G., Saraswati, E., & Andayani, W. (2018). Quality of disclosure and corporate social responsibility reporting practices in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 22(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v22i3.392
   Google Scholar
• Anwar, R., & Malik, J. A. (2020). When does corporate social responsibility disclosure affect investment efficiency? A new answer to an old question. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931121
   Google Scholar
• Ardiana, P. A. (2021). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting by fortune global 500 companies: A call for embeddedness. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0666
   Google Scholar
• Azapagic, A. (2003). Systems approach to corporate sustainability. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81(5), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1205/095758203770224342
   Google Scholar
• Baalouch, F., Ayadi, S. D., & Hussainey, K. (2019). A study of the determinants of environmental disclosure quality: Evidence from French listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(4), 939–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09474-0
   Google Scholar
• Bae, S. M., Masud, M. A. K., & Kim, J. D. (2018). A cross-country investigation of corporate governance and corporate sustainability disclosure: A signaling theory perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082611
   Google Scholar
• Beske, F., Haustein, E., & Lorson, P. (2020). Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016, May 10). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W. F., Amran, A., Iranmanesh, M., & Foroughi, B. (2019). Drivers of sustainability reporting quality: Financial institution perspective. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(4), 632–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-01-2019-0006
   Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.2308/apin-10249
   Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Correa-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Benau, M. A., & Garcia-Meca, E. (2020). Corporate governance and its implications for sustainability reporting quality in Latin American business groups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121142
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
   Google Scholar
• Diouf, D., & Boiral, O. (2017). The quality of sustainability reports and impression management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 643–667. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2044
   Google Scholar
• Farooq, M. B., Zaman, R., Sarraj, D., & Khalid, F. (2021). Examining the extent of and drivers for materiality assessment disclosures in sustainability reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(5), 965–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2020-0113
   Google Scholar
• Fasan, M., & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality disclosure in integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1917
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149–178. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290485216
   Google Scholar
• Formisano, V., Fedele, M., & Calabrese, M. (2018). The strategic priorities in the materiality matrix of the banking enterprise. TQM Journal, 30(5), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2017-0134
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 409–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180
   Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2016). (2016). Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 2016. Sustainability Reporting Standards. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
   Google Scholar
• Guix, M., Bonilla-Priego, M. J., & Font, X. (2018). The process of sustainability reporting in international hotel groups: An analysis of stakeholder inclusiveness, materiality and responsiveness. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1063–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1410164
   Google Scholar
• Guix, M., Font, X., & Bonilla-Priego, M. J. (2019). Materiality: Stakeholder accountability choices in hotels’ sustainability reports. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(6), 2321–2338. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2018-0366
   Google Scholar
• Handajani, L., Subroto, B., Sutrisno, T., & Saraswati, E. (2014). Does board diversity matter on corporate social disclosure? An Indonesian evidence. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(12), 8–16. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEDS/article/view/13207
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. S. (1998). The association between competition and managers' business segment reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491323
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, A., & Ibrahim, E. (2012). Corporate environmental information disclosure: factors influencing companies’ success in attaining environmental awards. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.278
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. G. (2009). Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M., & Loh, L. (2018). Board governance and sustainability disclosure: A cross-sectional study of Singapore-listed companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072578
   Google Scholar
• Junior, R. M., Best, P. J., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1637-y
   Google Scholar
• Khan, I., Khan, I., & Senturk, I. (2019). Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 19(6), 1187–1203. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2018-0371
   Google Scholar
• Komara, A., Ghozali, I., & Januarti, I. (2020). Sustainability Report Analysis: Content and Quality GRI-G4. Pertanika Jurnal Social Science & Humanities, 28(S1), 103–119. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/special-issue?decade=2020&year=2020&journal=JSSH-28-S1
   Google Scholar
• Konadu, R., Ahinful, G. S., & Owusu-Agyei, S. (2021). Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: Does stakeholder engagement matter? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(3), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00115-3
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2020). The Time Has Come: The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2020/11/the-time-has-come-survey-of-sustainability-reporting.html
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kurniawan, P. S., Sujana, A., Banu, D. I. G. P., & Kusuma, L. G. (2019, January). An Analysis of Information Materiality on Corporate Sustainability Report: A Comprehensive Study from Mining Industry in Indonesia. In International Conference on Tourism, Economics, Accounting, Management, and Social Science (TEAMS 2018) (pp. 91–97). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/teams-18.2019.17
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., Bens, D., Grammig, J., Guay, W., Holthausen, R., van Lent, L., Pope, P., Rendtel, U., Schrand, C., Theissen, E., Verrecchia, R., & Wysocki, P. (2004). Proprietary versus Non-Proprietary Disclosures: Evidence from Germany *. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinger, M., Frei, J., & Greiling, D. (2019). Assessing the materiality of university G4-sustainability reports. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 31(3), 364–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2018-0117
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, Z., Kouser, R., Ali, W., Ahmad, Z., & Salman, T. (2018). Does corporate governance affect sustainability disclosure? A mixed methods study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010207
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M., Weerakkody, V., & Chen, W. (2019). The influence of transformed government on citizen trust: Insights from Bahrain. Information Technology for Development, 25(2), 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1451980
   Google Scholar
• Manetti, G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.255
   Google Scholar
• Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Michelon, G., Trojanowski, G., & Sealy, R. (2021). Narrative reporting: State of the art and future challenges. Accounting in Europe. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2021.1900582
   Google Scholar
• Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum, 30(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad Nasution, R., & Adhariani, D. (2016). SIMBOLIS ATAU SUBSTANTIF? ANALISIS PRAKTIK PELAPORAN CSR DAN KUALITAS PENGUNGKAPAN (Symbolic or Substantive? Analysis of CSR Reporting Practices and the Quality of Disclosure). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13, 1. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2016.02
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Torres, M. J., Fernandez-Izquierdo, M. A., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., León Soriano, R., Escrig-Olmedo, E., & Ferrero-Ferrero, I. (2013). Materiality analysis for CSR reporting in Spanish SMEs. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 20(2), 231–250. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=191287
   Google Scholar
• Ngu, S. B., & Amran, A. (2019). The impact of sustainable board capital on sustainability reporting. Strategic Direction, 35(12), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-05-2019-0098
   Google Scholar
• Ngu, S. B., & Amran, A. (2021). Materiality disclosure in sustainability reporting: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 14(1), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol14no1.9
   Google Scholar
• Permatasari, P., Gunawan, J., & El-Bannany, M. (2020). A comprehensive measurement for sustainability reporting quality: Principles-based approach. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 4(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v4i2.282
   Google Scholar
• Puroila, J., & Mäkelä, H. (2019). Matter of opinion: Exploring the socio-political nature of materiality disclosures in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(4), 1043–1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2016-2788
   Google Scholar
• Rudyanto, A. (2017). State ownership, family ownership, and sustainability report quality: The moderating role of board effectiveness. Accounting and Finance Review, 2(2), 15–25. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3000149
   Google Scholar
• Rudyanto, A., & Siregar, S. V. (2018). The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2017-0071
   Google Scholar
• Safari, M., & Areeb, A. (2020). A qualitative analysis of GRI principles for defining sustainability report quality: An Australian case from the preparers’ perspective. Accounting Forum, 44(4), 344–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2020.1736759
   Google Scholar
• Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2020). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1813
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(82)90025-3
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. R., Shao, C., & Chen, J. (2018). Approaches on the screening methods for materiality in sustainability reporting. Sustainability, 10(9), 3233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093233
   Google Scholar
• Zaid, M. A. A., Wang, M., & Abuhijleh, S. T. F. (2019). The effect of corporate governance practices on corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Palestine. Journal of Global Responsibility, 10(2), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-10-2018-0053
   Google Scholar