3,692
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ACCOUNTING, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & BUSINESS ETHICS

Audit committee chair effectiveness and firm performance: The mediating role of sustainability disclosure

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2181156 | Received 02 Jan 2023, Accepted 13 Feb 2023, Published online: 08 Mar 2023

References

  • Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
  • Adams, R. B., & Mehran, H. (2008). Board structure, performance and organizational structure: The case of bank holding companies. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Adedeji, B. S., San Ong, T., Uzir, M. U. H., & Hamid, A. B. A. (2020). Corporate governance and performance of medium-sized firms in Nigeria: Does sustainability initiative matter? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(3), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2019-0291
  • Al-Absy, M. S. M., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Chandren, S. (2019). Audit committee chairman characteristics and earnings management: The influence of family chairman. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 11(4), 339–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-10-2018-0188
  • Al Amosh, H. A. (2022). The Role of Governance Attributes in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices Evidence From Jordan. In I. M. Association (Ed.), Research Anthology on Developing Socially Responsible Businesses (pp. 1229–1253). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5590-6.ch061
  • Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. (2021). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: The case of Jordan. SN Business & Economics, 1(12), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00167-1
  • Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2022a). Ownership structure and environmental, social and governance performance disclosure: The moderating role of the board Independence. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 2(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-07-2021-0094
  • Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. (2022b). Websites visits and financial performance for GCC banks: The moderating role of environmental, social and governance performance. Global Business Review, 2, 09721509221109576.
  • Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. (2023). ESG performance in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-country evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (1–16). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-25050-w
  • Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F. A., & Ananzeh, H. (2022). Environmental, social and governance impact on financial performance: Evidence from the Levant countries. Corporate Governance, 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0105
  • Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance, 52(4), 971–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00447.x
  • Al Farooque, O., Buachoom, W., & Sun, L. (2020). Board, audit committee, ownership and financial performance–emerging trends from Thailand. Pacific Accounting Review, 32(1), 54–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2018-0079
  • Al Halbusi, H. (2022). Who pays attention to the moral aspects? Role of organizational justice and moral attentiveness in leveraging ethical behavior. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(3), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-09-2021-0180
  • Al Halbusi, H., Hassani, A., & Mosconi, E. (2021). Social Media Technologies’ Use for Competitive Information and Informational Trust and their Effects on Innovation in Industrial SMES. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD). IEEE.
  • Al-Matari, Y. (2022). Audit committee chairman characteristics and corporate performance: Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Accounting, 8(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.6.007
  • Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Fadzil, F. H. (2014). The effect of board of directors characteristics, audit committee characteristics and executive committee characteristics on firm performance in Oman: An empirical study. Asian Social Science, 10(11), 149–171.
  • Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., & Hashim, H. A. (2022a). Corporate governance and sustainability disclosure: Evidence from Jordan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2022-0162
  • Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H. A., & Sulong, F. (2021b). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 1, 3.
  • Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H. A., & Sulong, F. (2022). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(5), 866–896.
  • Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H. A., & Sulong, F. (2022). Investigating the mediating role of sustainability disclosure in the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance in Jordan. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2021-0182
  • Alqatamin, R. M. (2018). Audit committee effectiveness and company performance: Evidence from Jordan. Accounting and Finance Research, 7(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v7n2p48
  • Ananzeh, H., Al Shbail, M. O., Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F., & Abualoush, S. H. (2022). Political connection, ownership concentration, and corporate social responsibility disclosure quality (CSRD): Empirical evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00167-z
  • Appuhami, R., & Tashakor, S. (2017). The impact of audit committee characteristics on CSR disclosure: An analysis of Australian firms. Australian Accounting Review, 27(4), 400–420.‏.
  • Baatwah, S. R., Salleh, Z., & Stewart, J. (2019). Audit committee chair accounting expertise and audit report timeliness: The moderating effect of chair characteristics. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(2), 273–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-12-2017-0190
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Berezinets, I., Ilina, Y., & Cherkasskaya, A. (2017). Board structure, board committees and corporate performance in Russia. Managerial Finance, 43(10), 1073–1092. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2015-0308
  • Chaudhry, N. I., Roomi, M. A., & Aftab, I. (2020). Impact of expertise of audit committee chair and nomination committee chair on financial performance of firm. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(4), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2020-0017
  • Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1999). Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: Determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 14(4), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X9901400403
  • Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 343–372.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
  • Ellram, L. M., & Tate, W. L. (2016). The use of secondary data in purchasing and supply management (P/SM) research. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(4), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2016.08.005
  • Epstein, L. (2008). The US Supreme Court. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. US Supreme Court.
  • Faisal, F., Ridhasyah, R., & Haryanto, H. (2021). Political connections and firm performance in an emerging market context: The mediating effect of sustainability disclosure. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0753
  • Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2011). The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.010
  • Fariha, R., Hossain, M. M., & Ghosh, R. (2021). Board characteristics, audit committee attributes and firm performance: Empirical evidence from emerging economy. Asian Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0753
  • Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors?. The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724‏.
  • Ghafran, C., & O’Sullivan, N. (2017). The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees. The British Accounting Review, 49(6), 578–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.008
  • Ghafran, C., & Yasmin, S. (2018). Audit committee chair and financial reporting timeliness: A focus on financial, experiential and monitoring expertise. International Journal of Auditing, 22(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12101
  • Gupta, N., & Mahakud, J. (2021). Audit committee characteristics and bank performance: Evidence from India. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(6), 813–855. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2020-2622
  • Hashim, H. A., & Amrah, M. (2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and cost of debt: Evidence of family and non-family firms in Oman. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(3), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2014-1139
  • Hassan, M. S., Al Halbusi, H., Razali, A., Ariffin, R. N. R., & Williams, K. A. (2022). The Swedish gamble: Trust in the government and self-efficacy in the battle to combat COVID-19. Current Psychology, 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02947-w
  • Hassan, M. S., Raja Ariffin, R. N., Mansor, N., & Al Halbusi, H. (2021). An examination of street-level bureaucrats’ discretion and the moderating role of supervisory support: Evidence from the field. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030065
  • He, L., & Yang, R. (2014). Does industry regulation matter? New evidence on audit committees and earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2011-9
  • Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040728
  • Issaa, G., & Siamb, Y. A. (2020). Audit Committee Characteristics, Family Ownership, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Jordan. management, 14, 4. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yousef-Abu-Siam/publication/353430631_Audit_Committee_Characteristics_Family_Ownership_and_Firm_Performance_Evidence_from_Jordan/links/60fbfcf61e95fe241a847f48/Audit-Committee-Characteristics-Family-Ownership-and-Firm-Performance-Evidence-from-Jordan.pdf
  • Jaafar, A., & El-Shawa, M. (2009). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and performance: Evidence from Jordan. In M. Tsamenyi & S. Uddin (Eds.), Accounting in Emerging Economies (Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies (Vol. 9, pp. 73–95). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley.
  • Jermias, J., & Gani, L. (2014). The impact of board capital and board characteristics on firm performance. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.12.001
  • Kaawaase, T. K., Nairuba, C., Akankunda, B., & Bananuka, J. (2021). Corporate governance, internal audit quality and financial reporting quality of financial institutions. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(3), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-11-2020-0117
  • Kaur, N., & Singh, V. (2020). Empirically examining the impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from Indian steel industry. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-07-2020-0061
  • Levitt, A. (2000). Renewing the covenant with investors. In Remarks delivered at NYU Center for Law and Business. New York, NY.
  • Lin, J. W., Li, J. F., & Yang, J. S. (2006). The effect of audit committee performance on earnings quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(9), 912–933. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610705019
  • Livnat, J., Smith, G., Suslava, K., & Tarlie, M. (2021). Board tenure and firm performance. Global Finance Journal, 47, 100535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100535
  • Mansour, M., Aishah Hashim, H., Almaqtari, F. A., & Al-ahdal, W. M. (2021). A review of the influence of capital structure on the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance. International Journal of Procurement Management, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2021.10047744
  • Mansour, M., Aishah Hashim, H., Salleh, Z., Al-ahdal, W. M., Almaqtari, F. A., & Abdulsalam Qamhan, M. (2022a). Governance practices and corporate performance: Assessing the competence of principal-based guidelines. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2105570. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2105570
  • Mansour, M., Al Amosh, H., Alodat, A. Y., Khatib, S. F., & Saleh, M. W. (2022b). The relationship between corporate governance quality and firm performance: The moderating role of capital structure. Sustainability, 14(17), 10525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710525
  • Mansour, M., Hashim, H. A., & Salleh, Z. (2020). Datasets for corporate governance index of Jordanian non-financial sector firms. Data in Brief, 30, 105603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105603
  • McMullen, D. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (1996). Internal control reports and financial reporting problems. Accounting Horizons, 10(4), 67–75.
  • Nipper, M. (2021). The role of audit committee chair tenure—A German perspective. International Journal of Auditing, 25(3), 716–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12245
  • Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
  • Safari, M. (2017). Board and audit committee effectiveness in the post-ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations era. Managerial Finance, 43(10), 1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2015-0185
  • Saleh, M. W. A., Zaid, M. A. A., Shurafa, R., Maigoshi, Z. S., Mansour, M., & Zaid, A. (2021). Does board gender enhance Palestinian firm performance? The moderating role of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 21(4), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2020-0325
  • Salleh, Z., Baatwah, S. R., & Ahmad, N. (2017). Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Audit Report Lag: Malaysia Further Insight. Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 8.
  • Salleh, Z., Seno, R. O. H. A. I., Alodat, D. A., & Hashim, H. A. (2022). Does the audit committee effectiveness influence the reporting practice of GHG emissions in Malaysia? Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 17(1), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2022.01.014
  • Salleh, Z., & Stewart, J. (2012). The impact of expertise on the mediating role of the audit committee. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(4), 378–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901211217987
  • Sultana, N., Singh, H., & Van der Zahn, J. L. M. (2015). Audit committee characteristics and audit report lag. International Journal of Auditing, 19(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12033
  • Tan, S. H., Habibullah, M. S., Tan, S. K., & Choon, S. W. (2017). The impact of the dimensions of environmental performance on firm performance in travel and tourism industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.029
  • Tanyi, P. N., & Smith, D. B. (2014). Busyness, expertise, and financial reporting quality of audit committee chairs and financial experts. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), 59–89.
  • Tanyi, P. N., & Smith, D. B. (2015). Busyness, expertise, and financial reporting quality of audit committee chairs and financial experts. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50929
  • Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017). Too little or too much? Exploring U‐shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1900
  • Tumwebaze, Z., Bananuka, J., Kaawaase, T. K., Bonareri, C. T., & Mutesasira, F. (2021). Audit committee effectiveness, internal audit function and sustainability reporting practices. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-03-2021-0036
  • Vafeas, N. (2003). Length of board tenure and outside director Independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30(7‐8), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.05525
  • Vafeas, N. (2005). Audit committees, boards, and the quality of reported earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 1093–1122. https://doi.org/10.1506/1QYN-2RFQ-FKYX-XP84
  • Wahyudin, A., & Solikhah, B. (2017). Corporate governance implementation rating in Indonesia and its effects on financial performance. Corporate Governance the International Journal of Business in Society.
  • Yang, J. S., & Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committees and quarterly earnings management. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00278.x
  • Yilmaz, I. (2021). Sustainability and financial performance relationship: International evidence. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(3), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-10-2020-0133
  • Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S., & Maggina, A. (2018). Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002