Beyond the innovator’s Dilemma: The process and effect of fintech regulatory environment

References

• Alam, I., & Perry, C. (2002). A customer-oriented new service development process. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 515–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210443391
   Google Scholar
• Antorini, Y. M., & Schultz, M. (2007). Brand Revitalization through User-Innovation: The Adult Fan of LEGO Community. 11th International Conference on Reputation Brand Identity Competitiveness, BI Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Norway, 31 June 2003, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Barako, D., & Gatere, P. (2008). Outsourcing practices of the Kenyan banking sector. African Journal of Accounting, Economics, Finance and Banking Research, 2(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1534158
   Google Scholar
• Benghozi, P. J., Gille, L., & Vallée, A. (2009). Innovation and regulation in the digital age: A call for new perspectives. Contributions to Economics, 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2082-9_28
   Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S., & Jindra, B. (2018). Product innovation and decision-making autonomy in subsidiaries of multinational companies. Journal of World Business, 53(4), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, W., & Uebernickel, F. (2016). Design thinking for innovation: Research and practice. In Design Thinking for Innovation. Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92, 141. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816698875.003.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchner, T. W. (2007). Performance management theory: A look from the performer’s perspective with implications for HRD. Human Resource Development International, 10(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860601170294
   Google Scholar
• Buljevich, E., & Park, Y.-S. (1999). Project financing and the international financial markets. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Buluma, F. C. O., & Mungai, F. N. (2017). Effect of Sasra Regulations on Financial Performance of Nyandarua County ’ S Deposit Taking Saccos in Kenya. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, V(7), 614–636.
   Google Scholar
• Burcharth, A., Præst Knudsen, M., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2017). The role of employee autonomy for open innovation performance. Business Process Management Journal, 23(6), 1245–1269. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2016-0209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, J. E., & Glen Mick, D. (2004). Exploring antecedents and consequences of consumer creativity in a problem-solving context. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1086/422118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAK. (2021). What We Do - Communications Authority of Kenya - Communications Authority of Kenya. https://www.ca.go.ke/about-us/who-we-are/what-we-do/
   Google Scholar
• CBK. (2006). Banking Supervision Report 2005.
   Google Scholar
• CBK. (2015). The Central Bank of Kenya Act. 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterji, A., Fabrizio, K., Mitchell, W., & Schulman, K. A. (2008). The impact of users on technological development: The role of physician innovation in the medical device industry. Fuqua School of Business Working, 27(6), 1532–1543. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1532
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. (2017). Towards new and multiple perspectives on innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1440.101001
   Google Scholar
• Chepkoech, F., & Rotich, G. (2017). Effect of risk management process on motor insurance fraud in Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences and Information Technology, 53(14), 1934–1951. https://www.ijssit.com/main/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Effect-Of-Risk-Management-Process-On-Motor-Insurance-Fraud-In-Kenya.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. (1997). Innovator’s Dilemma:When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215519.82
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018). Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claudy, M. C., Garcia, R., & O’Driscoll, A. (2015). Consumer resistance to innovation—a behavioral reasoning perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0399-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conradie, P. D., De Marez, L., & Saldien, J. (2015). Blind evaluation: Student’s experience of the empathic lead user method. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 01-03-Jul. https://doi.org/10.1145/2788412.2788419
   Google Scholar
• Cortez, N. (2014). Regulating disruptive innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2436065
   Google Scholar
• Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2020). What is design thinking and why is It so popular? Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular
   Google Scholar
• Danneels, E. (2004). Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(4), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. P. (2016). The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships: Collaborating with multiple partners in innovation ecosystems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4), 621–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216649350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro, D. (2017). Thinking and acting like a designer: How design thinking supports innovation in K-12 education. World Innovation Summit for Education, 118. https://hfli.org/app/uploads/2017/11/Thinking-and-Acting-Like-A-Designer-–-DT-in-K-12-education-–-IDEO-WISE-1.pdf%0Ahttps://www.wise-qatar.org/sites/default/files/rr.1.2017_-_ideo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2007). Innovation and employment effects in services: A review of the literature and an agenda for research. The Service Industries Journal, 27(3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060701206959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.school. (2021). Design Thinking Bootleg — Stanford d.school. https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., Leten, B., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 828–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (2016). Handbook of innovation policy impact. Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711856
   Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.791066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerben, V. D. P., Cees, V. B., & Alfred, K. (2003). Success and Failure of Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000830
   Google Scholar
• Green, R., Agarwal, R., & Logue, D. (2015). Innovation. In Second Edition International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 145–151). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73087-X
   Google Scholar
• Hamdi-Kidar, L., & Vellera, C. (2012, May 23). What drives lead users to become user entrepreneurs? An exploratory study of motivations. R&D Management Conference, Toulouse Business School, Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Why innovations fail — the case of passive and active innovation resistance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(05), 1350021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613500217
   Google Scholar
• Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a “low-tech” field. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(92)90031-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2011). Exploring how peer communities enable lead user innovations to become standard equipment in the industry: Community pull effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00869.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2017). Perspective: Understanding the nature and measurement of the lead user construct. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hienerth, C., Poetz, M., & von Hippel, E. (2007). Exploring key characteristics of lead user workshop participants: Who contributes best to the generation of truly novel solutions. Proc. of the DRUID Summer Conference 2007 on Appropriability, Proximity, Routines and Innovation, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, June 18 - 20, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Holzmann, T., Sailer, K., Galbraith, B., & Katzy, B. R. (2014). Matchmaking for open innovation – theoretical perspectives based on interaction, rather than transaction. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26(6), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.913344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, C., Kaminski, J., & Piller, F. (2019). Accentuating lead user entrepreneur characteristics in crowdfunding campaigns – the role of personal affection and the capitalization of positive events. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11(July), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00106
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaulartz, S., & von Hippel, E. A. (2018). AI Method for Discovering Need-Solution Pairs. Geoscientist, 28(8), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1144/geosci-28-8
   Google Scholar
• Laeven, L., Levine, R., & Michalopoulos, S. (2015). Financial innovation and endogenous growth. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 24(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, S., Bowles, L., & Baird, R. (2013). Bridging the pioneer gap_the role of accelarators. Innovations - Quarterly Journal by MIT Press, 8(3), 105–137. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00191
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilien, G. L., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & Von Hippel, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042–1059. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfqvist, L. (2010). Product and process novelty in small companies’ design processes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00579.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Expectancy theory of motivation: Motivating by altering expectations. International Journal of Business Administration, 15(1), 1–6. http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Luneneburg,%20Fred%20C%20Expectancy%20Theory%20%20Altering%20Expectations%20IJMBA%20V15%20N1%202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C. (2004). The lead user method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R and D Management, 34(5), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. (2005). User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34(6), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzouki, R., & Belkahla, W. (2019). The impact of lead users on innovation success. Innovation & Management Review, 17(1), 86–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-12-2018-0093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthing, J., Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2006). Developing successful technology-based services: The issue of identifying and involving innovative users. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(5), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610679909
   Google Scholar
• Mazzarol, T., & Reboud, S. (2006). The strategic decision making of entrepreneurs within small high innovator firms. International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal, 2(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-8688-9
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinel, M., Eismann, T. T., Baccarella, C. V., Fixson, S. K., & Voigt, K. I. (2020). Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study. European Management Journal, 38(4), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2012). Design thinking research. In Design thinking research: Studying co-creation in practice (pp. 1–10).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_1
   Google Scholar
• Misati, R. N., Lucas, N., Anne, K., & Shem, O. (2010). Financial innovation and monetary policy transmission in kenya. International Research Journal of Finance & Economics, 50(1), 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Moghissi, A. A., Straja, S. R., Love, B. R., Bride, D. K., & Stough, R. R. (2014). Innovation in regulatory science: Evolution of a new scientific discipline. Technology & Innovation, 16(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.3727/194982414x14096821477027
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Reider, M. H., & Campion, M. A. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 583–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & Von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46(12), 1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1513.12076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakata, C., & Hwang, J. (2020). Design thinking for innovation: Composition, consequence, and contingency. Journal of Business Research, 118(June), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.038
   Google Scholar
• Okioga, C. K. (2013). The capital market authority effectiveness in the regulation of financial markets perspectives from the financial sector actors. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 2(11), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20120211A02
   Google Scholar
• Oo, P. P., Allison, T. H., Sahaym, A., & Juasrikul, S. (2019). User entrepreneurs’ multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: Effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orstavik, F., Dainty, A., & Abbott, C. (2015). Construction Innovation. In Construction Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118655689
   Google Scholar
• Parijat, P., & Bagga, S. (2014). Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory of motivation - An evaluation. International Research Journal of Business and Management, 7(9), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y.-S. (2009). The role of financial innovations in the current global financial crisis. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22(2), 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of educational research. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1962). How research can improve practice: A case study. Theory into Practice, 1(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405846209541785
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. In (Fourth). Elements of Diffusion.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, I., & Martínez-Román, J. A. (2012). Self-employment and innovation. Exploring the determinants of innovative behavior in small businesses. Research Policy, 41(1), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosted, J. (2005). User-driven innovation: Results and recommendations. Design, 106. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000279
   Google Scholar
• Schaarschmidt, M., & Kilian, T. (2014). Impediments to customer integration into the innovation process: A case study in the telecommunications industry. European Management Journal, 32(2), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaner, S. (2017). The cost of convenience? Transaction costs, bargaining power, and savings account use in Kenya. Journal of Human Resources, 52(4), 919–945. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.4.0815-7350R1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M., & Prügl, R. (2008). Extending lead-user theory: Antecedents and consequences of consumers’ lead userness. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. (2012). Structuring user involvement in panel-based living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview606
   Google Scholar
• Schweisfurth, T. G., & Raasch, C. (2015). Embedded lead users - the benefits of employing users for corporate innovation. Research Policy, 44(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somoza Sánchez, V. V., Giacalone, D., & Goduscheit, R. C. (2018). Digital anthropology as method for lead user identification from unstructured big data. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, J., Chen, X., Zhang, F., Zhang, N., & Li, F. (2021). An intelligent method for lead user identification in customer collaborative product innovation. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1571–1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, G. M. P. (2017). A welcome revolution in innovation. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 24(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2017.1279862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2006). Reflections on “Profiting from Innovation”. Research Policy, 35(8), 1131–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totolo, E. (2018). Kenya’s digital credit revolution five years on | CGAP. CGAP.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, E., Van Trijp, H. C. M., & Luning, P. (2005). Functional foods: Health claim-food product compatibility and the impact of health claim framing on consumer evaluation. Appetite, 44(3), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivarelli, M. (2015). Innovation and employment. Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, (May), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(81)90112-6
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2005). State of the art artikel democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal Fur Betriebswirtschaft, 55(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2017). Free Innovation. In Free Innovation Vol. 1, Issue 1 The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035217.003.0002
   Google Scholar
• von Thienen, J., & Meinel, C. (2014). A design thinking process to tackle individual life problems (created for use in behaviour psychotherapy). February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Motivation: A point of view. In Work and motivation. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Waiganjo, M., Wanyoike, S., & Koitaba, E. (2016). Effect of compliance to Sacco Regulatory Authority (SASRA) Regulations on financial performance of deposit taking Savings and Credit Co-Operatives (SACCO) Kenya. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjemt/2016/20159
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (2011). Customer co-creation in innovations: A protocol for innovating with end users. In Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences - Innovation, Technology. Entrepreneurship & Marketing.
   Google Scholar
• Yokana, L. (2016). Design Thinking develops empathy. Education Week.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, K., Dong, S., Xu, S. X., & Kraemer, K. L. (2006). Innovation diffusion in global contexts: Determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar