Examining the relationship between green innovation dynamics and firm performance: a comparative study of BRICS and G7 countries

References

• Aitken, A. C. (1936). A further note on multivariate selection. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 5, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Akintande, O. J., Olubusoye, O. E., Adenikinju, A. F., & Olanrewaju, B. T. (2020). Modeling the determinants of renewable energy consumption: Evidence from the five most populous nations in Africa. Energy, 206, 117992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldieri, L., Makkonen, T., & Vinci, C. (2020). Environmental knowledge spillovers and productivity: A patent analysis for large international firms in the energy, water and land resources fields. Resources Policy, 69(c), 101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101877
   Google Scholar
• Amores-Salvadó, J., Martín-de Castro, G., & Navas-López, J. E. (2015). The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: A firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 288–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., & Sarvan, F. (2013). The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 226–235.
   Google Scholar
• Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berchicci, L., & King, A. (2007). 11 Postcards from the edge: a review of the business and environment literature. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 513–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, M., Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Paramati, S. R. (2017). The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renewable Energy, 111, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: Testing the structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitencourt, C. C., de Oliveira Santini, F., Zanandrea, G., Froehlich, C., & Ladeira, W. J. (2020). Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Economics, 87(1), 115–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bocken, N. M. P., Farracho, M., Bosworth, R., & Kemp, R. (2014). The front-end of eco-innovation for eco-innovative small and medium sized companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 31, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossle, M. B., Dutra de Barcellos, M., Vieira, L. M., & Sauvée, L. (2016). The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. UN-Dokument A/42/427. http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-ov.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cai, W. G., & Zhou, X. L. (2014). On the drivers of eco-innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, W., & Li, G. (2018). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. C., Yang, C., & Sheu, C. (2014). The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarvesio, M., Marchi, V. D., & Maria, E. D. (2015). Environmental innovations and internationalization: Theory and practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 790–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). Commercializing technological innovation: Learning from failures in high-tech markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00818.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, T.-Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalhammar, C. (2015). Industry attitudes towards ecodesign standards for improved resource efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 490–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidescu, A. A., Paul, A. M. V., Gogonea, R.-M., & Zaharia, M. (2015). Evaluating Romanian eco-innovation performances in European context. Sustainability, 7(9), 12723–12757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jesús Pacheco, D. A., ten Caten, C. S., Jung, C. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Navas, H. V. G., & CruzMachado, V. A. (2016). Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2277–2287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.049
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira Brasil, M. V., Sá de Abreu, M. C., da Silva Filho, J. C. L., & Leocádio, A. L. (2016). Relationship between eco-innovations and the impact on business performance: An empirical survey research on the Brazilian textile industry. Revista de Administração, 51(3), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.06.003
   Google Scholar
• De Pascale, G., Sardaro, R., Faccilongo, N., & Contò, F. (2020). What is the influence of FDI and international people flows on environment and growth in OECD countries? A panel study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 84, 106434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2015). Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innovation, 17(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergun, K., Aydoğmuş, M., & Gülay, G. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119–S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, U., Al-Gamrh, B., & Dai, J. (2024). Green drives greenbacks: The impact of sustainable innovation on corporate cash holdings in BRICS nations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, 140533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini, S., & Pansera, M. (2015). Beyond unsustainable eco-innovation: The role of narratives in the evolution of the lighting sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosch, R. A. (1994). Industrial ecology: Minimizing the impact of industrial waste. Physics Today, 47(11), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Granero, E. M., Piedra-Muñoz, L., & Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2018). Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 0304–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.215
   Google Scholar
• García-Granero, E. M., Piedra-Muñoz, L., & Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2020). Measuring eco-innovation dimensions: The role of environmental corporate culture and commercial orientation. Research Policy, 49(8), 104028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonenc, H., & Scholtens, B. (2017). Environmental and financial performance of fossil fuel firms: A closer inspection of their interaction. Ecological Economics, 132, 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2018). Econometric analysis (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Grund, C., & Westergaard-Nielsen, N. (2008). Age structure of the workforce and firm performance. International Journal of Manpower, 29(5), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720810888553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyedu, S., Heng, T., Ntarmah, A. H., He, Y., & Frimppong, E. (2021). The impact of innovation on economic growth among G7 and BRICS countries: A GMM style panel vector autoregressive approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(2021), 121169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121169
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, T. (2007). Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: The structure of eco-innovation concepts. Sustainable Development, 15(3), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, K. S., & Xiang, J. (2022). Channeled through trade: How foreign environmental regulations induce domestic renewable energy innovation. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojnik, J., & Ruzzier, M. (2016). What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Pouris, A. (2013). The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application. Scientometrics, 95(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0817-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivascu, L. (2020). Measuring the implications of sustainable manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0. Processes, 8(5), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbour, C. J. C., Saturnino Neto, A., Gobbo, J. A.Jr., Ribeiro, M. S., & Jabbour, A. B. L. S. (2015). Eco-innovations in more sustainable supply chains for a low-carbon economy: A multiple case study of human critical success factors in Brazilian leading companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johl, S. K., & Toha, M. A. (2021). The nexus between proactive eco-innovation and firm financial performance: A circular economy perspective. Sustainability, 13(11), 6253. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13116253
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., & Popp, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(1), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, C. N., & Zeriti, A. (2016). Eco-friendly product development strategy: Antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(6), 660–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0470-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Oltra, V. (2011). Research insights and challenges on eco-innovation dynamics. Industry & Innovation, 18(3), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.562399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation (Vol. 10). UM Merit.
   Google Scholar
• Kijek, T. (2015). Modelling of eco-innovation diffusion: The EU eco-label. Comparative Economic Research, 18(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2015-0004
   Google Scholar
• Klewitz, J., Zeyen, A., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Intermediaries driving eco-innovation in SMEs: A qualitative investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272376
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, T.-C., & Smith, S. (2018). A systematic review of technologies involving eco-innovation for enterprises moving towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larbi-Siaw, O., Xuhua, H., Owusu, E., Owusu-Agyeman, A., Fulgence, B. E., & Frimpong, S. A. (2022). Eco-innovation, sustainable business performance and market turbulence moderation in emerging economies. Technology in Society, 68, 101899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, T.-H., & Nguyen, C. P. (2019). Is energy security a driver for economic growth? Evidence from a global sample. Energy Policy, 129, 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., Lindgaard-Jørgensen, P., Nilsson, A., Skenhall, S. A., & Assimacopoulos, D. (2016). Process eco-innovation: Assessing meso-level eco-efficiency in industrial water-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 110, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., Qi, G. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2014). Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, F. J. D., & Montalvo, C. (2015). A comprehensive review of the evolving and cumulative nature of eco-innovation in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcon, A., de Medeiros, J. F., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2017). Innovation and environmentally sustainable economy: Identifying the best practices developed by multinationals in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, F. (2020). Circular economy and eco-innovation in Italian industrial clusters. Best practices from Prato textile cluster. Insights into Regional Development, 2, 661–676.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, G., & Bromiley, P. (1999). Risk and return in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/256923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S., & Startz, R. (2018). Feasible generalized least squares using machine learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2966194
   Google Scholar
• Misani, N., & Pogutz, S. (2015). Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: A non-linear approach. Ecological Economics, 109, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondejar-Jim Enez, J., Segarra-Oña, M., Peiró-Signes, A., Pay A-Martínez, A. M., S., & Aez-Martínez, F. J. (2015). Segmentation of the Spanish automotive industry with respect to the environmental orientation of firms: Towards an ad-hoc vertical policy to promote eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moratis, L., & Melissen, F. (2019). How do the sustainable development goals question rather than inform corporate sustainability? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 253–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munodawafa, R. T., & Johl, S. K. (2019). A systematic review of eco-innovation and performance from the resource-based and stakeholder perspectives. Sustainability, 11(21), 6067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murshed, M. (2020). An empirical analysis of the non-linear impacts of ICT-trade openness on renewable energy transition, energy efficiency, clean cooking fuel access and environmental sustainability in South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(29), 36254–36281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09497-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, V. (2009). Wind energy: renewable energy and the environment. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishitani, K., Jannah, N., Kaneko, & S. Hardinsyah. (2017). Does corporate environmental performance enhance financial performance? An empirical study of Indonesian firms. Environmental Development, 23, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obiora, S. C., Bamisile, O., Opoku-Mensah, E., & Kofi Frimpong, A. N. (2020). Impact of banking and financial systems on environmental sustainability: An overarching study of developing, emerging, and developed economies. Sustainability, 12(19), 8074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2005a). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (Vol. 46). Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2005b). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Statistical Office of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattern, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosure in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note to legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organization and Society, 17(5), 471–475.
   Google Scholar
• Pattern, D. M. (2002). The relationship between environmental performance and environmental disclosure. A research note. Accounting, Organization and Society, 28(8), 763–773.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przychodzen, J., & Przychodzen, W. (2013). Corporate sustainability and shareholder wealth. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(4), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.685927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przychodzen, J., & Przychodzen, W. (2015). Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance—Evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pure Strategies Report (2017). Reaching the new corporate frontier. Pure Insight.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Khan, M. (2022). Corporate sustainability practices: A new perspective of linking board with firm performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(7-8), 929–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1908826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassier, D. G., & Earnhart, D. (2010). The effect of clean water regulation on profitability: Testing the Porter hypothesis. Land Economics, 86, 329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation-eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. A., & Wiengarten, F. (2017). The role of process innovativeness in the development of environmental innovativeness capability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2423–2434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, D. F. L., Lima, M. M., Basso, L. F. C., Kimura, H., & Sobreiro, V. A. (2017). Eco-innovation and financial performance at companies established in Brazil. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 9(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEM.2017.080783
   Google Scholar
• Saygili, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segarra-Oña, M.-d-V., Peiró-Signes, A., & Cervelló-Royo, R. (2015). A framework to move forward on the path to eco-innovation in the construction industry: Implications to improve firms’ sustainable orientation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(6), 1469–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9620-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senadheera, S. S., Withana, P. A., Dissanayake, P. D., Sarkar, B., Chopra, S. S., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2021). Scoring environment pillar in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) assessment. Sustainable Environment, 7(1), 1960097. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2021.1960097
   Google Scholar
• Sesay, B., Yulin, Z., & Wang, F. (2018). Does the national innovation system spur economic growth in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa economies? Evidence from panel data. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., Zhao, C., & Zeng, J. (2017). Can environmental management improve financial performance: An empirical study of A-shares listed companies in China? Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1051–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankevičienė, J., & Nikanorova, M. (2020). Eco-innovation as a pillar for sustainable development of circular economy. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.12963
   Google Scholar
• Stiglingh, A. (2015). Financial development and economic growth in BRICS and G-7 countries: A comparative analysis (Doctoral dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2011). The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: The case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2136–2144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M.-L., & Bui, T.-D. (2017). Identifying eco-innovation in industrial symbiosis under linguistic preferences: A novel hierarchical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1376–1389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsireme, A., Nikolaou, E. I., Georgantzis, N., & Tsagarakis, K. (2012). The influence of environmental policy on the decisions of managers to adopt G-SCM practices. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 14, 953–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivanco, D. F., Kemp, R., & Voet, E. V. D. (2015). The relativity of eco-innovation: environmental rebound effects from past transport innovations in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553–1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Reader in Business and the Environment 36.81, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Walz, R., Pfaff, M., Marscheider-Weidemann, F., & Glöser-Chahoud, S. (2017). Innovations for reaching the green sustainable development goals–Where will they come from? International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(3), 449–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0386-2
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica, 50(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, G., Zhou, P., & Wen, W. (2021). Feed-in tariffs, knowledge stocks and renewable energy technology innovation: The role of local government intervention. Energy Policy, 156, 112453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar