Visual perception of the depiction of human figures in pictorial signage of public toilets

References

• Afacan, Y., & Gurel, M. O. (2015). Public toilets: An exploratory study on the demands, needs and expectations in Turkey. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42, 242–262. doi:10.1068/b130020p
   Google Scholar
• Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(10), 457–467. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alant, E., Kolatsis, A., & Lilienfeld, M. (2010). The effect of sequential exposure of color conditions on time and accuracy of graphic symbol location. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(1), 41–47. doi:10.3109/07434610903585422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. (the new version). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. I., Olson, C. R., & Behrmann, M. (2004). Role of attention and perceptual grouping in visual statistical learning. Psychological Science, 15(7), 460–466. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00702.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bas, B., & Örs, E. (2015). A study on visual reading skills of first grade students at primary school. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 11(1), 225–244.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725. doi:10.1044/jshr.3304.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canel, N., & Yukay Yüksel, M. (2015). Evaluating the development of the visual perception levels of 5–6 year-old children in terms of school maturity and “draw a person” technique. Journal Plus Education, 12(1), 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, R. M. (2014). A semiotic model of visual perception. Semiotica, (2014(200), 1–20. doi:10.1515/sem-2014-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo, E., Fiszman, S., Lähteenmäki, L., & Varela, P. (2014). Consumers’ perception of symbols and health claims as health-related label messages: A cross-cultural study. Food Research International, 62, 653–661. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S., & Martinson, B. (2003). Cross-cultural comparison of the perception of symbols. Journal of Visual Literacy, 23(1), 69–80. doi:10.1080/23796529.2003.11674592
   Google Scholar
• Ciochetto, L. (2003). Toilet signage as effective communication. Visible Language, 37(2), 208–221.
   Google Scholar
• O'Rourke, J.S., & Collins, S.D. (2009). Module 3: Managing conflict and workplace relationship (Managerial communication) (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, J. (2009). Fashion: The key concepts. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Dobkin, A. (2010). Principles of figure drawing. Cleveland: The World Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann, C. (1994). Self-explaining icons. Intelligent Tutoring Media, 5(2), 81–85. doi:10.1080/14626269409408346
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (2007). Express yourself: The politics of dressing up. In M. Barnard (Ed.), Fashion theory: A reader (pp. 191–196). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, X. (2000). Usability engineering. Houndmills: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2002). Communication, cultural and media studies: The key concepts (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hideyuki, T., Shunji, M., & Takashi, Y. (1978). Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 8(6), 460–473. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1978.4309999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organization: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hultén, B. (2015). Sensory marketing: Theoretical and empirical grounds. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingrey, J. C. (2012). The public school washroom as analytic space for troubling gender: Investigating the spatiality of gender through students’ self-knowledge. Gender and Education, 24(7), 799–817. doi:10.1080/09540253.2012.721537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134–156). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, C. M. (2013). A corpus-based approach to Danish toilet signs. RASK – International Journal of Language and Communication, 39, 149–183.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., & Johnson, S. P. (2010). Individual differences in perceptions. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Encyclopedia of perception (Vol. 1, pp. 492–501). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1998). Reading images: A grammar of visual design. (Original work published 1996). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marissa. (2010, September 2), Go where? Sex, gender, and toilet [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/09/02/guest-post-go-where-sex-gender-and-toilets/.
   Google Scholar
• Motel, L. (2016). Sex symbols: A pilot study examining the effects of a content analysis of gendered visual imagery in cross cultural road signs. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 41.
   Google Scholar
• Motel, L., & Peck, B. (2018). SexIER symbols: Examining the effects of a content analysis of gendered visual imagery in cross cultural road signs. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 47.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A. W. Y., Siu, K. W. M., & Chan, C. C. H. (2012). The effects of user factors and symbol referents on public symbol design using the stereotype production method. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 230–238. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrofsky, J., Kozbelt, A., & Kurylo, D. D. (2013). Perceptual grouping in artists and non-artists: A psychophysical comparison. Empirical Studies on the Arts, 31(2), 131–143. doi:10.2190/EM.31.2.b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romera, M. (2015). The transmission of gender stereotypes in the discourse of public educational spaces. Discourse & Society, 26(2), 205–229. doi:10.1177/0957926514556203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarantakos, S. (2004). Social research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Seok-Seo, H., Arshamian, A., Schemmer, K., Scheer, I., Sander, T., Ritter, G., & Hummel, T. (2010). Cross-modal integration between odors and abstract symbols. Neuroscience Letters, 478(3), 175–178. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, S. T., Woolley, M., & Prior, S. (2006). Towards culture-centered design. Interacting with Computers, 18(4), 820–852. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shomstein, S., & Johnson, J. (2013). Shaping attention with reward effects of reward on space-and object-based selection. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2369–2378. doi:10.1177/0956797613490743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, L. (2016). Inclusive symbols for people living with dementia: Feasibility research. Edinburgh: StudioLR.
   Google Scholar
• Trisnawati, S. (2012). An integrated communications approach to user multimedia interactions. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scale in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing and Health, 13, 227–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P., Lickorish, A., & Hull, A. (1990). The importance of iterative procedures in the design of location maps for the built environment. Information Design Journal, 6(1), 67–78. doi:10.1075/idj.6.1.04wri
   Google Scholar