10,908
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

If Foucault were an urban planner: An epistemology of power in planning theories

ORCID Icon & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1592065 | Received 23 Aug 2018, Accepted 03 Mar 2019, Published online: 28 Mar 2019

References

  • Beveridge, W. (2000). Social insurance and allied services. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 847–17.
  • Bluestone, B., & Harrison, B. (2000). Growing prosperity. New Yor+: Houghton mifflin.
  • Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power.
  • Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31, 331–338. doi:10.1080/01944366508978187
  • Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault.
  • Della Porta, D. (2006). Social movements, political violence, and the state: A comparative analysis of Italy and Germany.
  • Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. (1982). The subject and power. Michel Foucault: beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (2014). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dryzek, J. S. (1994). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edwards, M. (2002). Public sector governance—Future issues for Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61, 51–61. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2002.61.issue-2
  • Faludi, A. (2013). A reader in planning theory (Volume 5). Toronto: Elsevier.
  • Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Forester, J. (1988). Planning in the face of power. California: Univ of California Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume I. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
  • Foucault, M. (1982). The body of the condemned. New York, NY: Arbor House.
  • Foucault, M. (1985). Freiheit und Selbstsorge: Interview 1984 und Vorlesung 1982. Paris: Materialis-Verlag.
  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M. (2002). The birth of the clinic. London: Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. (2012a). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Foucault, M. (2012b). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Foucault, M. (2012c). The history of sexuality, vol. 2: The use of pleasure. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Foucault, M., & Ewald, F. (2003). “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. London: Macmillan.
  • Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America; A theory of transactive planning. Massachusetts: Anchor Press.
  • Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. London: Blackwell.
  • Friedmann, J. (1994). Planning education for the late twentieth century: An initial inquiry. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, 55–64. doi:10.1177/0739456X9401400106
  • Gariépy, M. (1991). Toward a dual-influence system: Assessing the effects of public participation in environmental impact assessment for Hydro-Quebec projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11, 353–374. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(91)90006-6
  • Gaventa, J. (1982). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. California: Univ of California Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (2013). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Gough, J. (2002). Neoliberalism and socialisation in the contemporary city: Opposites, complements and instabilities. Antipode, 34, 405–426. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
  • Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon.
  • Hall, P. (1983). The Anglo-American connection: Rival rationalities in planning theory and practice, 1955–1980. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 10, 41–46. doi:10.1068/b100041
  • Hall, P. (2014). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design since 1880. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, 72, 81.
  • Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63, 143. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
  • Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23, 217–234. doi:10.1068/b230217
  • Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1531–1546. doi:10.1068/a301531
  • Heller, K. J. (1996). Power, subjectification and resistance in Foucault. SubStance, 25, 78–110. doi:10.2307/3685230
  • Hillier, J. (1993). To boldly go where no planners have ever…. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, 89–113. doi:10.1068/d110089
  • Hillier, J. (1995). The unwritten law of planning theory: Common sense. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, 292–296. doi:10.1177/0739456X9501400406
  • Hillier, J. (2002). Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land-use planning. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Hudson, B. M., Galloway, T. D., & Kaufman, J. L. (1979). Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, 387–398. doi:10.1080/01944367908976980
  • Jones, M., & Ward, K. (2002). Excavating the logic of British urban policy: Neoliberalism as the “crisis of crisis–Management”. Antipode, 34, 473–494. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
  • Keil, R. (2002). “Common–Sense” neoliberalism: Progressive conservative urbanism in Toronto, Canada. Antipode, 34, 578–601. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
  • Kiernan, M. J. (1983). Ideology, politics, and planning: Reflections on the theory and practice of urban planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 10, 71–87. doi:10.1068/b100071
  • Knights, D., & Vurdubakis, T. (1994). Foucault, power, resistance and all that. London: Routledge.
  • Lash, S. (1991). Foucault/Deleuze/Nietzsche. The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory, 7, 256.
  • Lemke, T. (2007). An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 8, 43–64. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946
  • Lemke, T. (2015). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. London: Routledge.
  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of ”muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677
  • Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 1: 38.
  • Mann, M. (1988). States, war and capitalism: Studies in political sociology. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
  • Martin, R. L. (1999). Money and the space economy. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Matamoros, C. A., & Graham, D. (2018). Yellow Vests’: 1,400 arrests and 126 injuries in France as clashes continue. Retrieved from https://www.euronews.com/2018/12/08/paris-is-on-lockdown-as-france-braces-for-a-fourth-week-of-yellow-vest-protests
  • Mazziotti, D. F. (1974). The underlying assumptions of advocacy planning: Pluralism and reform. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 40, 38–47. doi:10.1080/01944367408977445
  • McDonald, G. T. (1989). Rural land use planning decisions by bargaining. Journal of Rural Studies, 5, 325–335. doi:10.1016/0743-0167(89)90059-4
  • McLoughlin, J. B. (1969). Urban & regional planning: A systems approach. London: Faber and Faber.
  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2017). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. In Foucault and law (pp. 191–224). London: Routledge.
  • Njoh, A. J. (2009). Urban planning as a tool of power and social control in colonial Africa. Planning Perspectives, 24, 301–317. doi:10.1080/02665430902933960
  • Paul, T. V., Ikenberry, G. J., & Hall, J. A. (2003). The nation-state in question. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Reddel, T. (2002). Beyond participation, hierarchies, management and markets:‘New’governance and place policies. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61, 50–63. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2002.61.issue-1
  • Ritzer, G. (1988). Sociological metatheory: A defense of a subfield by a delineation of its parameters. Sociological Theory, 6, 187–200. doi:10.2307/202115
  • Rose, N. (2000). Community, citizenship, and the third way. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 1395–1411. doi:10.1177/00027640021955955
  • Taylor, N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, E. H. (2002). Partnership arrangements: Governmental rhetoric or governance scheme? Public Administration Review, 62, 197–205. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00170
  • Ure, M., & Testa, F. (2018). Foucault and Nietzsche. In Foucault and Nietzsche: A critical encounter (pp. 127). London: Bloomsbury Academic
  • Walzer, M. (1986). The politics of Michel Foucault. New York, NY: Blackwell.
  • Weber, R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode, 34, 519–540. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
  • Winslow, E. M. (1948). The pattern of imperialism: A study in the theories of power. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Yeoh, B. S. (1998). Contesting space: Power relations and the urban built environment in colonial Singapore. Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (pp. 71-80). Singapore: Singapore University Press.