What is literature for? The role of transformative reading

References

• Bal, P., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55341. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bálint, K., Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M., Doicaru, M., & Tan, E. (2017). Reconceptualizing foregrounding: Identifying response strategies to deviation in absorbing narratives. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(2), 176–16. doi:10.1075/ssol.6.2.02bal
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, A., Kalch, A., & Oliver, M. B. (2014). Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 26(3), 125–140. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000118
   Google Scholar
• Bergsma, A. (2008). Do self-help books help? Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 341–360. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9041-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, J. (1984). Effects of fifth graders’ attitudes and critical thinking/reading skills resulting from a junior great books program. PhD Dissertation. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey: New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M., Fialho, O., & Zyngier, S. (2016). Scientific approaches to literature in learning environments. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, S. (1995). Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
   Google Scholar
• Caracciolo, M., Guédon, C., Kukkonen, K., & Müller, S. (2017). The promise of an embodied narratology: Integrating cognition, representation and interpretation. In P. K. Hansen, J. Pier, P. Roussin, & W. Schmid (Eds.), Emerging vectors of narratology (pp. 435–459). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, R. J., & Johannessen., J. (2006). The book that changed my life: 71 remarkable writers celebrate the books that matter most to them. New York, NY: Gotham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. K., & Sawaf, A. (2003). Emotional intelligence in leadership. Istanbul, Turkey: Sistem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Cuijpers, P. (1997). Bibliotherapy in unipolar depression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 28, 139–147. doi:10.1016/S0005-7916(97)00005-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge & K. Paul.
   Google Scholar
• de Beaugrande, R. (1985). Poetry and the ordinary reader: A study in literary response. Empirical Studies in the Arts, 3, 1–21. doi:10.2190/V0B6-JMKL-RKK8-MFAJ
   Google Scholar
• de Man, P. (1979). Allegories of reading: Figural language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Carland, M. (2012). Genre or artistic merit: The effect of literature on personality. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(1), 25–36. doi:10.1075/ssol.2.1.02dji
   Google Scholar
• Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J. (2009). On being moved by art: How reading fiction transforms the self. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 24–29. doi:10.1080/10400410802633392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. (2008). Uses of Literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M., Weststrate, N., & Petro, A. (2013). Stories of wisdom to live by: Developing wisdom in a narrative mode. In M. N. Ferrari (Ed.), Weststrate, Scientific study of personal wisdom: From contemplative traditions to neuroscience (pp. 137–164). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O. (2002). A Influência do Professor e do Monitor no Processo de Conscientização Literária. In E. S. Zyngier & A. C. Valente (Eds.), Fatos e Ficções – Estudos Empíricos De Literatura (pp. 163–177). Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Publicações da Faculdade de Letras da UFRJ.
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O. (2007). Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Special Issue of Language & Literature, 16(2), 105–123. doi:10.1177/0963947007075979
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O., Zyngier, S., & Miall, D. S. (2012). Experiencing or interpreting literature: Wording instructions. In E. M. Burke, S. Csábi, L. Week, & J. Zerkowitz (Eds.), Pedagogical stylistics: Current trends in language, literature and ELT (pp. 58–74).London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O. (2012). Self-Modifying Experiences in Literary Reading: A Model for Reader Response. PhD Dissertation. Edmonton: University of Alberta. doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O. (2017). Transformative reading: Literary experience and the awareness of empathy in fiction and in life. Paper presented at the Conference on Literacy, Empathy and Social Sustainability. Halmstad University, Sweden, 7 September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O. (2018). Deepening readers’ perceptions of self and others: The role of enactment-imagery, resonance, and sympathy. Paper presented at the IGEL Congerence, Stavanger, Norway, July 27, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O. (in preparation). Exploring transformative reading experiences: A descriptive phenomenological study.
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O., Hakemulder, F., & Hoeken, H. (IN Preparation). Transformative reading: An empirical model.
   Google Scholar
• Fialho, O., Zyngier, S., & Miall, D. (2011). Interpretation and experience: Two pedagogical interventions observed. English in Education, 45(3), 236–253. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.2011.01103.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, S. (1970). Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics. New Literary History, 2(1), 123–162. doi:10.2307/468593
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. E. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, J. (1990). Read for your life: Literature as a life support system. Markham, Ont.: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.
   Google Scholar
• Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C, & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M.C., & Brock,T.C. (2002). In the mind’s eye:Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 38(2), 247–266. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, F., Fialho, O., & Bal, M. (2016). Learning from literature: Empirical research on readers in schools and at the workplace. In M. Burke, O. Fialho, & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Scientific approaches to literature in learning environments (pp. 19–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, F., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., Brokerhof, Schrijvers, M., Koek, I., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (in press). Wat kan je doen met literatuur? Zelfinzicht en mensenkennis door lezen en groepsactiviteiten in onderwijs en op de werkvloer. Amsterdam: Stichting Lezen
   Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, J. (2000). The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, J. (2001). How to make alle menschen brüder: Literature in a multicultural and multiform society. In A. G. Ed (Ed.), Dick Schram, psychology and sociology of literature (pp. 225–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, J. (2008). Imagining what could happen: Effects of taking the role of a character on social cognition. In S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, & A. Chesnokova (Eds.), Auracher, directions in empirical literary studies (pp. 139–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. In Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(2-3): 61–83. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.6.493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, N. (1975). Five readers reading. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, N. N., & Schwartz, M. (1975). The delphi seminar. College English, 36, 789–800. doi:10.2307/375176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. (2014). Towards a new, dynamic concept of health its operationalisation and use in public health and healthcare, and in evaluating health effects of food (PhD Dissertation). Maastricht: Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1980). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In R. Jakobson & E. T. Sebeok (Eds.), Style in Language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. (2012). Transportation into astory increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 150–155. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. doi:10.1037/a0027525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi:10.1126/science.1239918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneepkens, E. W., & Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 23, 125–138. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(94)00021-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, E. (2016a). Reading suffering: An empirical enquiry into empathic and reflective responses to literary narratives. PhD Dissertation. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, E. M. (2016b). Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 82–98. doi:10.1037/aca0000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krijnen, A. F. (2007). There Is More (s) in Television. Studying the relationship between television and moral imagination. PhD Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0467B
   Google Scholar
• Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25(2), 171–203. doi:10.1215/03335372-25-2-171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, K. (2014). Presence and prediction: The embodied reader’s cascades of cognition. Style, 48(3), 367–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmičová, A. (2014). literary narrative and mental imagery: A view from embodied cognition. Style, 48(3), 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longden, E., Davis, P., Billington, J., Lampropoulou, S., Farrington, G., Magee, F., … Corcoran, R. (2015). Shared reading: Assessing the intrinsic value of a literature-based health intervention. Medical Humanities, 41, 113–120. doi:10.1136/medhum-2015-010704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. (1948). Der junge Hegel: Über die Beziehungen von Dialektik und Ökonomie. Luchterhand: Europa Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness. R. Livingstone, Trans..MIT Press Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Mar, R., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., Dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: The social abilities of fiction and non-fiction readers. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694–712. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. London and New York: Routledge. T. C. Smith, Trans.
   Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S. (1989). Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition & Emotion, 3(1), 55. doi:10.1080/02699938908415236
   Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S. (2006). Literary reading: Empirical & theoretical studies. New York, NY: P. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding: Defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(1), 37–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121–122. doi:10.1080/01638539909545076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2002). A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30(4), 221. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2016). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. doi:10.1037/aca0000089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (1994). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics: Journal for Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts, 23(1–2), 53–74. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101–117. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(1), 29–33. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000029
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2001). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61, 984–1004. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osen, D. (2002). The book that changed my life. New York: Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, B., Walls, M., Burgess, Z., & Stough, C. (2001). Emotional intelligence and effective leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(1), 5–10. doi:10.1108/01437730110380174
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, P. J. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Radway, J. A. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, D., Reinecke, L., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2014). Media entertainment and well-being linking hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experience to media-induced recovery and vitality. Journal of Communication, 64, 456–478. doi:10.1111/jcom.2014.64.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffaterre, M. (1959). Criteria for Style Analysis. Word, 15, 154–174. doi:10.1080/00437956.1959.11659690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1938–1995). In literature as exploration. New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, N. (1995). Speaking of reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. S., McKechnie, L., & Rothbauer, P. M. (2006). Reading matters: What the research reveals about reading, libraries, and community. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, M. (2019). The Story, The Self, The Other: Developing Insight Into Human Nature in the Literature Classroom. PhD Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). The impact of literature education on students’ perceptions of self and others: Exploring personal and social learning experiences in relation to teacher approach. Contribution to a special issue The role of writing in literature education, edited by Tanja Janssen and Irene Pieper In L1 - educational studies in language and literature 16 (pp. 1–37). doi: 10.17239/L1ESLL-2016.16.04.01
   Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2019a). Gaining insight into human nature: A review of literature classroom intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 3–45. doi:10.3102/0034654318812914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2019b). Toward the validation of a literature classroom intervention to foster adolescents' insights into human nature: an iterative design process. Contribution to the special issue Systematically designed literature classroom interventions: Design principles, development and implementation, edited by Marloes Schrijvers, Karen Murphy, and Gert Rijlaarsdam. In L1 - educational studies in language and literature. doi:10.17239/L1ESLL-2016.16.04.01
   Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., De Maeyer, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2019c). Transformative dialogic literature teaching fosters adolescents’ insight into human nature. Learning and Instruction, 63, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (in preparation). Effects of Dialogic Literature Lessons on 10th Grade Students’ Insights in Self and Others.
   Google Scholar
• Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (2011). Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers’ experience of coleridge’s the rime of the ancient mariner. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 258–268. doi:10.1037/a0021999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyne, J., & Usherwood, B. (2001). Checking the books: The value and impact of public library book reading. Sheffield: Centre for the Public Library and Information in Society, Department of Information Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Trotsky, L. (1923). Literature and revolution. New York: International Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Trounstine, J., & Waxler, R. P. (2005). Finding a voice: The practice of changing lives through literature. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, O. (1891–1993). The picture of dorian gray. Clayton, Delaware: Prestwick House Library Touchstone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. (2016). You gotta BE the book: Teaching engaged and reflective reading with adolescents (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Hofer, M., & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38, 406–428. doi:10.1111/hcre.2012.38.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyngier, S. (1994). At the Crosswords of Language and Literature. Ph.D. Dissertation. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar