References
- Abbasi Bagherianpoor, A., Hosseini, F., & Rohani, G. H. R. (2015). Investigation the role of causativization in overpassivization of un-accusative verbs by Iranian English majors. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 7(3), 1–23. doi: 10.22099/JTLS.2015.3587
- Abbasi Bagherianpour, A., Sahragard, R., & Sadighi, F. (2010). The role of conceptualizable agent in overpassivization of English un-accusatives in Iranian English majors. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2, 141–162.
- Allan, D. (2001). Oxford placement test 1. Oxford University Press.
- Allen, S. E. M. (2015). Argument structure. In E. Bavin & L. Naigles (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Child Language (2nd ed., pp. 271–297). Cambridge University Press.
- Can, A. (2009). Acquisition of English ergative verbs by Turkish students: Yesterday and today. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2832–2837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.504
- Dehghan, F., & Rezvani, R. (2016). Transfer at the level of argument structure or morphology: a comparative study of English and Persian unaccusative and unergative verbs. Topics in linguistics, 17(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/topling-2016-0008
- Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the Classroom. Basil Blackwell.
- Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in second language acquisition, 28(2), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141
- Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. MITP.
- Harley, H. (2006). English words: A linguistic introduction. Blackwell Publishers.
- Hejazian Yazdi, S. S., & Rezai, M. J. (2015). Language learnability of the argument structures of English transitivity constructions by EFL Learners. International Journal of English and Education., 4(3), 506–528.
- Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language–brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.
- Ju, M. K. (2000). Overpassivization errors by second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 85-111.
- Juffs, A. (1998). The acquisition of semantics-syntax correspondences and verb frequencies in ESL materials. Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 93–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889800200202
- Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85(2–3), 211–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-W
- Krashen, S. (1985). The input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman.
- Larson, R. K. (1988). Clause structure. In E. V. Gelderen (Ed.), Clause structure: key topics in syntax (pp. 1–203). Cambridge University Press.
- Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign acquisition (pp. 259–278). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
- Moore, M. M. P. (1993). Second language acquisition of lexically constrained transitivity alternations: Acquisition of the causative alternation by second language learners of English [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. University of South Carolina.
- Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press.
- Rappaport, M., & Levin, B. (1988). What to do with theta-roles. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Thematic relations (pp. 7–36). Academic Press.
- Rezai, M. J., & Ariamanesh, A. A. (2012). Acquisition of English un-ergative and un-accusative structures by Persian EFL learners. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 4(2), 53–85.
- Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
- Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). London, UK: Routledge.
- Viau, J., & Bunger., A. (2016). Argument Structure [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] University of Delaware.
- Zubizarreta, M. L. (1987). Levels of representation in the lexicon and in syntax. Foris.