Using short stories vs. video clips to improve upper intermediate EFL students’ sociopragmatic knowledge: Speech acts in focus

References

• Abrams, Z. I. (2014). Using film to provide a context for teaching L2 pragmatics. System, 46(10), 55–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcon-Soler, E. (2015). Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System, 48, 62-74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem. In J. A. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart, (Eds.), Reading in a Foreign Language, (pp. 1-27). London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Allami, H. (2012). A socio-pragmatic study of the offer speech act in Persian. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 110–129. Doi:10.22111/IJALS.2012.1346
   Google Scholar
• Allami, H., & Boustani, N. (2017). Pragmatic awareness of suggestions: From (im)polite mannerism to attitudinal appropriateness. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(2), 112–132. Doi:10.22055/RALS.2017.12614
   Google Scholar
• Allan, D. (2004). Oxford placement test 2: Test pack. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, K. (1998). Meaning and Speech Acts: Monash University. Retrieved from URL http:users.monash.edu.au/~kallan/papers/Speechatcs.html
   Google Scholar
• Altikriti, S. F. (2011). Speech Act Analysis to Short Stories. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.6.1374-1384
   Google Scholar
• Alver-Yücel, Ö. (2017). The effects of viewing pre-selected video clips on low-level Turkish EFL learners’ use of speech acts (Doctoral dissertation, Bilkent University).
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagherkazemi, M. (2014). Short-term and long-term impact of video-driven metapragmatic awareness raising on speech act production: A case of Iranian Interme-diate EFL learners. Journal of Language and Translation, 4(2), 25–36. http://ttlt.azad.ac.ir/article_515889_0e9b98ad9aa6cf3233dcdb6809a250fb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996). Pragmatics and language teaching: Bringing pragmatics and pedagogy together. In L.Bouton(Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp.21-39), Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Divisionof English as an International Language.
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13–32). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi‐Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(4), 677–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., Dörnyei, Z., & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berado, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The reading matrix, 6(2).
   Google Scholar
• Birner, B. J. (2012). Introduction to pragmatics (Vol. 38). John Wiley &Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botana, G. P. (2013). The role of task-essentialness and explicit information in processing instruction ( Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park).
   Google Scholar
• Boxer, D., & Pickering, L. (1995). Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. ELT Journal,49(1), 44-58.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L. (2002). Qualitative approaches to investigating self-regulated learning: Contributions and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3701_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, S.-Y. (2011). Pursuing a response in office hour interactions between US college students and international teaching assistants. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3316–3330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. (2001). Introducing PITs and PETs: Technologies affecting privacy. Privacy Law & Policy Reporter, 7(9), 181–183. http://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/PITsPETs.html
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutting, J. (2005). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cuza, A., & Czerwionka, L. (2017). A pragmatic analysis of L2 Spanish requests: Acquisition in three situational contexts during short-term study abroad. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(3), 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalos, K., & Ling, J. J. (2005). Authentic text or adapted text-that is the question. Hostterminen:Malmo hogskola.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar.In C. Doughty& J.Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, (pp.42–63). Cambridge,England:Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second‐language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(S1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delen, B., & Tavil, Z. M. (2010). Evaluation of four coursebooks in terms of three speech acts: Requests, refusals and complaints. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 692–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.219
   Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, A., & Arabmofrad, A. (2018). The impact of instruction on the pragmatic comprehension of speech acts of apology, request, and refusal among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. English Teaching & Learning, 42(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-018-0004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z. (2015). The effect of consciousness-raising instruction on the pragmatic development of apology and request. TESL-EJ, 18(4), n4. http://teslej.org/wordpress/issues/volume 18/ej72/
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Seidi, N. (2015). Iranian EFL learners request strategies preferences across proficiency levels and gender. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(4), 65–73. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/63
   Google Scholar
• Ebsworth, M. E., Bodman, J. W., & Carpenter, M. (1995). Cross-cultural realization of greetings in American English. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language (pp. 89–107). Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• El Okda, M. (2011). Developing pragmatic competence: Challenges and solutions. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 13(2), 169–198. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289473275_Developing_pragmatic_competence_Challenges_and_solutions
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (1994).Introduction: Implicit and explicit learning of languages-an overview.In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1-31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. Tesol Quarterly, 27(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Disentangling focus on form. A response to Sheen and O’Neill (2005). Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, X. (2016). On aesthetic and cultural issues in pragmatic translation: Based on the translation of brand names and brand slogans. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task‐based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 605–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. A. (2011). language socialization and language revitalization.In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., Schieffelin B., (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 631–647). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimori, J., & Houck, N. (2004). Practical criteria for teaching speech acts. Language Teacher-Kyoto-Jalt, 28(5), 3–8. https://jalt-publications.org/tlt/articles/711-practical-criteria-teaching-speech-acts
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, D., & Miller, L. (1999). Establishing self-access from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosn, I. K. (1998). Whole language, learning styles, and multiple intelligences in EFL: Adapting Traditional Texts to Meet All Learner's Needs. MEXTESOL,11.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosn, I. K. (2002). Four good reasons to use literature in primary school ELT. ELT Journal, 56(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.2.172
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, L., & Starks, D. (2001). Screening appropriate teaching materials Closings from textbooks and television soap operas. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.39.1.39
   Google Scholar
• Hill, T. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University).
   Google Scholar
• Hulford, J. R., & Heasley, B. (1983). Semantic: A Coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. H., & De Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11(97–112). https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.428191
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request strategies: Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners and Australian native speakers. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n1p46
   Google Scholar
• Jebahi, K. (2011). Tunisian university students’ choice of apology strategies in a discourse completion task. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M. (2011). New approaches to exploiting film in the foreign language classroom. L2 Journal, 3(2), 232-249. https://doi.org/10.5070/L23210005
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190056
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Koulopoulos, T. M., & Frappaolo, C. (1999). Smart things to know about knowledge management. Capstone US.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, C. (2005). Language and content in bilingual education. Linguistics and Education, 16(2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2006). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of EFL learners. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp.413-468). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Maeshiba, N., Kasper, G., & Ross, S. (1996). Transfer and proficiency in interlanguage apologizing. In S. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenge to communication in a second language (pp. 155–187). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A., & Fukuya, Y. J. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33(3), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mudzakir, A. (2013). A speech act analysis of direct utterances on short story Mr. Know All. (Doctoral dissertation,UniversitasMuhammadiyah Surakarta).
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, A., Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S. (2011). Introducing pragmatics in use. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pardede, P. (2011). Using short stories to teach language skills. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 1(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v1i1.49
   Google Scholar
• Pathan, H. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of Pakistani university students’ motivation for learning English (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow).
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.2.144
   Google Scholar
• Pienemann, M. (1985).Learnability and syllabus. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon,Avon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi Domakani, M., Hashemian, M., & Mansoori, S. (2013). Pragmatic awareness of the request speech act in English as an additional language: Monolinguals or bilinguals? Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 88–110. http://rals.scu.ac.ir/article_10471.html
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, R. A., Vethamani, M. E., & Rahman, S. B. A. (2010). Approaches employed by teachers in teaching literature to less proficient students in form 1 and form 2. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p87
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., Plat, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, W. E. (1987). The meaning of grammatical consciousness‐raising. World Englishes, 6(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1987.tb00201.x
   Google Scholar
• Saidi, A. A., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2012). The influence of gender on Omani college students’ English language learning strategies, comprehension and motivation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(4), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.4p.230
   Google Scholar
• Santoso, I., Tuckyta, E., Sujatna, S., & Mahdi, S. (2014). Speech act on short stories; A pragmatic study. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 19(1), 108–118. http://www.tijoss.com/TIJOSS19thVolume.html
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, G. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development: The study abroad context. International Continuum Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu: Universityof Hawai'i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (2005). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). From input to intake: On argumentation in second language acquisition. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 394–403). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Sharwood,S. M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases.
   Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M., Ahmadi, S. D., & Mehrdad, A. G. (2016). The effect of using video games on EFL learners’ acquisition of speech acts of apology and request. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(5), 1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0605.16
   Google Scholar
• Shrestah, P. N. (2008). Using stories with young learners. In M. Krzanowski (Ed.), Current developments in English for academic, specific and occupational purposes (231-235). UK: Garnet publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Soler, E. A. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Stempleski, S. (1987). Short Takes: Using Authentic Video in the English Class.In Annual Meeting of the International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, Belgica. (pp.17)
   Google Scholar
• Stempleski, S. (1992). Teaching communication skills with authentic video. In S. Stempleski & P. Arcadio (Eds.), Video in Second Language Teaching: Using, Selecting, and Producing Video for the Classroom (pp. 7–24). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL).
   Google Scholar
• Susanti, E., Juarni, J., & Sobari, T. (2019). Application of ICT based contextual approach to improve writing short story skill and learning interest of senior high school students. JLER (Journal of Language Education Research), 1(3). https://www.journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/jler/article/view/2597
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. (2006). Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English. Pragmatics, 16(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.16.4.05tag
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171–199). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1994). Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timpe, V. (2013). Assessing intercultural language learning. The dependence of receptive socio-pragmatic competence and discourse competence on learning opportunities and input. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). Differentiating instruction. Adolescent literacy research and practice, 228
   Google Scholar
• Trosborg, A. (2003). The teaching of business pragmatics. In A. Martinez-Flor, E. Uso & A. Fernandez (Eds.), Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 247–281). Castello: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
   Google Scholar
• Trosborg, A. (Ed.). (2010). Pragmatics across languages and cultures. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching listening. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Van Patten, B., & Benati, A. G. (2010). Key terms in second language acquisition. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp.5–31). Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011979
   Google Scholar
• Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: how likely? Tesl-Ej, 8(2), 1-18. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/LEARNING-PRAGMATICS-FROM-ESL-%26-EFL-TEXTBOOKS%3A-HOW-Vellenga/1efec8f17dafd7155caeb6dc09a94188cfa50df0
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2014). Humor in British academic lectures and Chinese students’ perceptions of it. Journal of Pragmatics, 68, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, A. (2009). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, C. (2013). Teaching pragmatics to international students in private language schools in the UK. Contemporary English Teaching and Learning in Non-English-Speaking Countries, 2(2), 27–41. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Teaching-Pragmatics-to-International-Students-in-in-Webb/aef51dae5d8a04799c8348dc6664f05c077dc81a
   Google Scholar
• Weigand, E. (2010). Dialogue: The mixed game (Vol. 10). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, B. D. (1993). Distance education: A practical guide.Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Woodfield, H. (2008). Interlanguage requests: A contrastive study. In M. Putz & J. N. Aerselaer (Eds.), Developing contrastive pragmatics and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 231–264). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q. (2015). An investigation of the non-English majors’ pragmatic competence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.16
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2010). Pragmatic challenges for second language learners. In A.Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures (pp. 287–308). (Handbook of Pragmatics). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214444.2.287
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, N. A. A., & Farrah, M. A. (2016). Using short stories in the EFL classroom. IUG Journal of Humanities Research, 24(1), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.12816/0023933
   Google Scholar