The challenge of psychological processes in language acquisition: A systematic review

References

• Altmann, G. T. M. (2006). History of psycholinguistics. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd) ed., pp. 257–15). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (2000). Learning and memory: An integrated approach (2nd) ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Banaruee, H., Khoshsima, H., Khatin-Zadeh, O., Askari, A., & Besson, M. (2017). Suppression of semantic features in metaphor comprehension. Cogent Psychology, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1409323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoncini, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Blumstein, S. E., & Mehler, J. (1987). Discrimination in neonates of very short CVs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1997). Intentionality is the basis for the social foundations of language development. In Paper presented at the symposium on social foundations of language development: theoretical issues, biennial meeting of the society for research on. Child Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. N., & Bonvillian, J. D. (2005). Theoretical approaches to language acquisition. In B. Gleason (Ed.), The development of language (6th) ed., pp. 230–291). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2002). Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multi word sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(21), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002061
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L., & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58(2), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1982.0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17/2(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x
   Google Scholar
• Chater, N., Tennebaum, J. B., & Yuil, A. (2006). Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(7), 287–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 65–110). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition, 64(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00010-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (2001). Emergent categories in first language acquisition. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 379–405). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V., & Wong, A. D. W. (2002). Pragmatic directions about language use: Words and word meanings. Language in Society, 31, 181–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (2003). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (5th) ed., Vol. 508, pp. 631 22664 8). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007, 0/1). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition R, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science, 208(4448), 1174–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCasper, A. J., & Spence, M. J. (1986). Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(86)90025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wolf, T., & Holvoet, T. (2005). Emergence versus self-organization: Different concepts but promising when combined. In Research Review. In S. A. Brueckner, G. D. M. Serugendo, A. Karageorgos, & R. Nagpal (Eds.), Engineering self-organising systems: Methodologies and applications (pp. 5). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA Review, 19, 42–68. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, Peter, W., Vigorito, J., Jusczyk, Peter, W., Vigorito, J., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 209(4461), 1140–1141. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7403875
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2007). The associative-cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77–95). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learnt-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 382-415). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics-Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27/4(5), 58–89.
   Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (2001). Connectionism and language acquisition. In M. Tomasello & E. Bates (Eds.), Language development: The essential readings (pp. 295–306). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, K. G., Evans, J. L., Alibabli, M. W., & Saffran, J. R. (2007). Can. infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Psychological Science, 18(3), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01885.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. L. (2007). The emergence of language: A dynamical systems account. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 128–147). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Farsani, D. (2022). The name game: The role of cultural affordances in learning probability. For the Learning of Mathematics, 42(2), 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, H. M., MacWhinney, B., & Sacco, K. (2002). Sentence processing in children with early unilateral brain injury. Brain and Language, 83(2), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00037-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A. (1992). Meaningful melodies in mothers’ speech to infants. In H. Papousek, U. Jürgens, & M. Papousek (Eds.), Nonverbal communication: Comparative and developmental approaches (pp. 262–282). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., & Mazzie, C. (1991). Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., & Yu, A. C. L. (Eds.). (2006). ‘Exemplar-based models in linguistics’, Special Issue. Linguistic Review.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1992). On the adequacy of the Competition Model. Language, 68(4), 812–830. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0024
   Google Scholar
• Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Two-year-olds use primary sentence accent to learn new words. Journal of Child Language, 34(3), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000907008021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., Eds. (2008). Current emergentist and nativist perspectives on second language acquisition”, Special Issue. In Lingua 118/4.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, M. L., & Lewis, M. D. (2005). The importance of dynamic systems approaches for understanding development. Developmental Review, 2(5), 2.4 7–5 I. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193–1.23. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr207oa
   Google Scholar
• Jay, T. B. (2003). The psychology of language. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Juffs, & DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Psycholinguistics. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science, iii (pp. 1022–1028). Nature Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self~organization of Brain and behavior. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khatin-Zadeh, O., Banaruee, H., & Yazdani-Fazlabadi, B. (2019). Suppression in metaphor comprehension: a perspective from distributed models of conceptual representation. NeuroQuantology, 17(2), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2019.17.02.1919
   Google Scholar
• Khoshsima, H., & Banaruee, H. (2017). L1 interfering and L2 developmental writing errors among Iranian EFL learners. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.802945
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2014). A course in phoenetics. Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., Mikesell, L., Joaquin, A., Mates, A., & Schumann, J. 2009. The interactional instinct. the evolution and acquisition of language. In E. H. Lenneberg, (Ed.), The biological foundations of la.nguage Wiley: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. L. (1993). The child’s path to spoken language. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In Ed B. Macwhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language acquisition (pp. 69–90). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2004). New directions in the competition model. In M. Tomasello & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature–nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth bates (pp. 81–110). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In E. In]. Kroll & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2006). Emergentism: Use of ten with care. Applied Linguistics, 27/4(72), 9–40.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2008). A Unified Model. In N. C. Ellis & P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 341–371). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Bates, E. (1985). The development of sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90007-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, J., Bertoncini, J., Barrière, M., & Jassik-Gerschenfeld, D. (1978). Infant recognition of mother’s voice. Perception, 7(5), 491–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meints, K., Plunkett, K., & Harris, P. L. (1999). When does an ostrich become a bird? The role of typicality in early word comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), ±1078. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.35.4.1072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, A. R. (1971). Consonant cue perception by 20 and 24-week-old infants. Child Development, 42(3), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, C., Cooper, R. P., & Fifer, W. P. (1993). Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development, 16(4), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(93)80007-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, P. A. (1972). The discrimination of speech and nonspeech stimuli in early infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(72)90066-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, A., Vallacher, R. R., & Zochowski, M. (2005). The emergence of personality: Dynamic foundations of individual variation. Developmental Review, 2(5), 3, 51–58 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.004
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W. (2008). The emergentist program. Lingua, 118(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood [La formation du symbole chez l’enfant] C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson Translated by
   Google Scholar
• Piazza, E. A., Iordan, M. C., & Lew-Williams, C. (2017). Mothers consistently alter their unique vocal fingerprints when communicating with infants. Current Biology: CB, 27(20), 3162–3167.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2004). Why nature & nurture won’t go away. Daedalus, 133(4), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza-Pust, C. (2008). Dynamic systems theory and universal grammar: Holding up a turbulent mirror to development in grammars. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 250–269. 2.50-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermuller, F. (2002). The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., & Thiessen, E. D. (2007). Domain-general learning capacities. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 68–86). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shvachkin, N. K. (1973). The development of phonemic perception in early childhood. In C.A. Ferguson and D.I Slobin (Eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–208). Holt Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, II (pp. 1157–1249). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking. J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson,Eds. In Rethinking linguistic relativity. current anthropology. Cambridge University Press (Vol. 32, pp. 613–623) 1991 https://doi.org/10.1086/204009
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B., & Samuelson, L. K. (2003). Different is good: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory are complementary emergentist approaches to development. Developmental Science, 6(4), 434–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southgate, V., & Meints, K. (2001). Typicality, naming, and category membership in young children. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M. J., & DeCasper, A. J. (1987). Prenatal experience with low-frequency maternal-voice sounds influences neonatal perception of maternal voice samples. Infant Behavior and Development, 10(2), 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(2), 207–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, A. (1999). Varieties of emergentism. Evolution and Cognition, 5(1), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., & Bates, E. (2003). Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different? Developmental Science, 6(4), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), r56–63. 4/4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141–178). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (1999). The dynamics of self-regulation. In Research Series. In J. Wyer (Ed.), Perspectives on Behavioral Self-Regulation (pp. 241–259).
   Google Scholar
• van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). The dynamics of scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspoor, M., De Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.). (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (Vol. 29). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation: An organismicdevelopmental approach to language and the expression of thought. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (2007). Linguistic theory, Universal Grammar, and second language acquisition. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 3 7–5 5). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar