Advanced search
Publication Cover
Cogent Arts & Humanities Volume 11, 2024 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
249
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Literature, Linguistics & Criticism

Big claims, low outcomes: fact checking ChatGPT’s efficacy in handling linguistic creativity and ambiguity

Md. Tauseef Qamara School of Advanced Sciences and Languages, VIT Bhopal University, Kothrikalan, Sehore, MP, IndiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-4699View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Juhi Yasmeena School of Advanced Sciences and Languages, VIT Bhopal University, Kothrikalan, Sehore, MP, IndiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-4435View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Sanket Kumar Pathakb Mihup Communications Pvt. Ltd, Kolkata, IndiaView further author information
,
Shahab Saquib Sohailc School of Computing Science and Engineering, VIT Bhopal University, Kothrikalan, Sehore, MP, IndiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5944-7371View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Dag Øivind Madsend USN School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway,Hønefoss, NorwayCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-3332View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Mithila Rangarajane Department of English, School of Literature and Languages, St. Joseph’s University, Bengaluru, IndiaView further author information
Article: 2353984 | Received 17 Feb 2024, Accepted 07 May 2024, Published online: 18 Jun 2024

References

  • Anas, M., Saiyeda, A., Sohail, S. S., Cambria, E., & Hussain, A. (2024). Can generative AI models extract deeper sentiments as compared to traditional deep learning algorithms? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 39(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2024.3374582
  • Blodgett, S. L., Barocas, S., Daumé, H., III, & Wallach, H. (2020). Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2020 July. pp. 5454–5476.
  • Borji, A. (2023). A categorical archive of ChatGPT failures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03494.
  • Cai, Z. G., Haslett, D. A., Duan, X., Wang, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2023). Does ChatGPT resemble humans in language use?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08014.
  • Farhat, F.,Sohail, S. S., &Madsen, D. (2023). How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analyses. Cogent Engineering. 2023 Dec. Cogent Engineering, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2222988.
  • Farhat, F., Chaudhry, B. M., Nadeem, M., Sohail, S. S., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2024). Evaluating large language models for the national premedical exam in India: Comparative analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard. JMIR Medical Education, 10(e51523), 01–12. https://doi.org/10.2196/51523.
  • Farhat, F. (2023). ChatGPT as a complementary mental health resource: A boon or a bane. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 52(2024), 1111–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03326-7.
  • Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2014). An introduction to language. An introduction to language. Wadsworth.
  • Kathpalia, S. S. (2018). Neologisms: Word creation processes in Hindi-English code-mixed words. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English, 39(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00002.kat
  • Lu, Q., Qiu, B., Ding, L., Xie, L., & Tao, D. (2023). Error analysis prompting enables human-like translation evaluation in large language models: A case study on chatgpt. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0255.v1
  • McCabe, A. (1992). Language games to play with your child. Da Capo Lifelong Books. Insight Books Plenum Press.
  • Ortega-Martín, M., García-Sierra, Ó., Ardoiz, A., Álvarez, J., Armenteros, J. C., & Alonso, A. (2023). Linguistic ambiguity analysis in ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06426.
  • Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. (2023). Oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com dictionary. Retrieved Jun 14, 2023, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/ambiguity?q=ambiguity
  • Peng, K., Ding, L., Zhong, Q., Shen, L., Liu, X., Zhang, M., Ouyang, Y., & Tao, D. (2023). Towards making the most of chatgpt for machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13780.
  • Qamar, M. T., Yasmeen, J., Zeeshan, M. A., & Pathak, S. (2022). Coroneologisms and word formation processes in Hindi-English codemixed words. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 12(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.12.1.59-89
  • Sag, I. A., Baldwin, T., Bond, F., Copestake, A., & Flickinger, D. (2002). Multiword expressions: A pain in the neck for NLP. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: Third International Conference, CICLing 2002 Mexico, 2002 Proceedings 3 (pp. 1-15). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3‐540‐45715‐1_1
  • Sohail, S. S., Farhat, F., Himeur, Y., Nadeem, M., Madsen, D. Ø., Singh, Y., Atalla, S., & Mansoor, W. (2023). Decoding ChatGPT: A taxonomy of existing research, current challenges, and possible future directions. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 35(8), 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101675
  • Sohail, S. S. (2024). A promising start and not a panacea: ChatGPT’s early impact and potential in medical science and biomedical engineering research. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 52(5), 1131–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03335-6
  • Yule, G. (2010). The study of language. Cambridge university press.
  • Zhong, Q., Ding, L., Liu, J., Du, B., & Tao, D. (2023). Can chatgpt understand too? A comparative study on chatgpt and fine-tuned bert. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10198.
Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.