Empowering public participation in assessing the indicators of aesthetic value for historical landscape: a case study on Melaka, Malaysia

References

• Acar, C., & Sakıcı, Ç. (2008). Assessing landscape perception of urban rocky habitats. Building and Environment, 43(6), 1153–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad Nia, H., & Atun, R. A. (2016). Aesthetic design thinking model for urban environments: A survey based on a review of the literature. Urban Design International, 21(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpınar, A. (2021). How perceived sensory dimensions of urban green spaces are associated with teenagers’ perceived restoration, stress, and mental health? Landscape and Urban Planning, 214(July), 104185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104185
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, D. J. (2007). Stakeholders or subject matter experts, who should be consulted? Energy Policy, 35(4), 2336–2346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arriaza, M., Cañas-Ortega, J. F., Cañas-Madueño, J. A., & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asim, F., Chani, P. S., Shree, V., & Rai, S. (2023). Restoring the mind: A neuropsychological investigation of university campus built environment aspects for student well-being. Building and Environment, 244(September), 110810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110810
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, N., Wallner, A., & Hunziker, M. (2009). The change of European landscapes: Human-nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9), 2910–2920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. J., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H. (2018). Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management, 61(4), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerke, T., Østdahl, T., Thrane, C., & Strumse, E. (2006). Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 5(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Bockstaller, C., & Girardin, P. (2003). How to validate environmental indicators. Agricultural Systems, 76(2), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., Keane, T., & Kaplan, S. (1986). Aesthetics and management: Bridging the gap. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(86)90002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush, R., Chenoweth, R. E., & Barman, T. (2000). Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47(1–2), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00073-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, A. (2002). Allen Carlson’s Aesthetics and the Environment (Routledge, 2000). Philosophy & Geography, 5(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770220152425
   Google Scholar
• Cerasi, M. (2005). The urban and architectural evolution of the Istanbul Divanyolu: Urban aesthetics and ideology in ottoman town building. Muqarnas Online, 22(1), 189–232. https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993-90000089
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Adimo, O. A., & Bao, Z. (2009). Assessment of aesthetic quality and multiple functions of urban green space from the users’ perspective: The case of Hangzhou Flower Garden, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. (2009). Decode the city: A methodological study responding to the new trend of city “re-image” Montreal as a case. School of Urban Planning McGill University Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Gu, W., Liu, T., Yuan, L., & Zeng, M. (2017). Increasing the use of urban greenways in developing countries: A case study on Wutong greenway in Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(6), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental Identity: A Conceptual and an Operational Definition. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3644.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Coughlin, R. E., Dunlap, R. E., Kaplan, R., Sims, W. R., Steinitz, C., & Vaux, H. (1982). Assessing aesthetic attributes in planning water resource projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 3(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(82)80048-6
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., & Santo-Tomás Muro, R. (2023). Stewardship and green infrastructure in England. Planning perspectives informed through an investigation of urban green infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2197557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, A., Jones, M., O’Mahony, T., & Byrne, G. (2007). Selecting environmental indicator for use in strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dramstad, W., Fjellstad, W., Strand, G.-H., Mathiesen, H., Engan, G., & Stokland, J. (2002). Development and implementation of the Norwegian monitoring programme for agricultural landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 64(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Metwally, Y., Khalifa, M., & Elshater, A. (2021). Quantitative study for applying prospect-refuge theory on perceived safety in Al-Azhar Park, Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(4), 4247–4260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enserink, M., Etteger, R. V., Brink, A. V. D., & Stremke, S. (2022). To support or oppose renewable energy projects ? A systematic literature review on the factors influencing landscape design and social acceptance. Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Ode, Å., & Velarde, M. D. (2009). The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9(5), 933–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Martín, M., Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2018). Dimensions of landscape stewardship across Europe: Landscape values, place attachment, awareness, and personal responsibility. Sustainability, 10(1), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girardin, P., Bockstaller, C., & Werf, H. V. d (1999). Indicators: tools to evaluate the environmental impacts of farming systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 13(4), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v13n04_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottwald, S., & Stedman, R. C. (2020). Preserving ones meaningful place or not? Understanding environmental stewardship behaviour in river landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 198(February), 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103778
   Google Scholar
• Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3–4), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, W. T. D., & Born, R. J. G. V. D. (2003). Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: An exploration in The Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(3), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00184-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, F. A., Randrup, T. B., & Sang, Å. O. (2020). Challenges to implementing the urban ecosystem service concept in green infrastructure planning: A view from practitioners in Swedish municipalities. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00054-3
   Google Scholar
• Hak, T., Kovanda, J., & Weinzettel, J. (2012). A method to assess the relevance of sustainability indicators: Application to the indicator set of the Czech Republic’s sustainable development strategy. Ecological Indicators, 17, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hami, A., & Abdi, B. (2021). Students’ landscaping preferences for open spaces for their campus environment. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X19887207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedblom, M., Hedenås, H., Blicharska, M., Adler, S., Knez, I., Mikusiński, G., Svensson, J., Sandström, S., Sandström, P., & Wardle, D. A. (2020). Landscape perception: Linking physical monitoring data to perceived landscape properties. Landscape Research, 45(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2019.1611751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., & Barnes, G. J. (1999). Tranquility and preference revisited. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., & Bryce, A. G. (2007). Environment and behavior in within-forest settings. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 39(6), 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298796
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R., & Leverich, O. L. (2003). Searching for legibility. Environment and Behavior, 35(4), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley, P. (2011). Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics’ preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecological Economics, 72, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley, P., Donoghue, C. O., & Hynes, S. (2012). Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Wang, H., Shan, L., & Xiao, F. (2021). Constructing and optimising urban ecological network in the context of rapid urbanisation for improving landscape connectivity. Ecological Indicators, 132, 108319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108319
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (1993). The view from the Verandah: Prospect, refuge and leisure. Australian Geographical Studies, 31(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8470.1993.tb00652.x
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, R., Mamassis, N., Efstratiadis, A., & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2022). Reversing visibility analysis: Towards an accelerated a priori assessment of landscape impacts of renewable energy projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaal, Z., & Abdullah, J. (2012). User’s preferences of highway landscapes in Malaysia: A review and analysis of the literature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.029
   Google Scholar
• Jerrentrup, M. T., & Nnanna, N. (2023). Symbolic representations social media and photography in Nigeria. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2190240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., He, J., Chen, J., Larsen, L., & Wang, H. (2021). Perceived green at speed: A simulated driving experiment raises new questions for attention restoration theory and stress reduction theory. Environment and Behavior, 53(3), 296–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916520947111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children’s affiliation with nature. Developmental Review, 17(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1996.0430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Brown, T. (1989). Environmental preference: A comparison of four domains of predictors. Environment and Behavior, 21(5), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916589215001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning. Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01533.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasov, O., Vieira, A. A. B., Külvik, M., & Chervanyov, I. (2020). Landscape coherence revisited: GIS-based mapping in relation to scenic values and preferences estimated with geolocated social media data. Ecological Indicators, 111, 105973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, A. R., Bradley, G. a., Petrich, C. H., Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Simpson-Colebank, D. (2008). Public perception as support for scenic quality regulation in a nationally treasured landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, R. (2017). Evaluations of landscape preference, complexity, and coherence for designed digital landscape models. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurie, M. (1979). A history of aesthetic conservation in California. Landscape Planning, 6(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(79)90002-9
   Google Scholar
• Leitão, A. B., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Nassauer, J. I. (2020). Cues to care: A systematic analytical review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, 103821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Sahari, F. (2022). The application of regional culture in urban public space design. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2116773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litton, R. B. (Ed.). (1972). Aesthetic dimensions of the landscape. John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Hu, X., Song, Z., & Yuan, X. (2023). Identifying the integrated visual characteristics of greenway landscape: A focus on human perception. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99(September), 104937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104937
   Google Scholar
• Lothian, A. (1999). Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, B., Hauer, R. J., Xu, C., & Li, W. (2021). Visualising evaluation model of human perceptions and characteristic ­indicators of landscape visual quality in urban green spaces by using nomograms. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 65(August), 127314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127314
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, A., Fernandes, C., Gonçalves, J. F., & Farinha-Marques, P. (2023). Optimising a landscape visual quality protocol. A Method for reducing respondent fatigue and obtaining site-specific indicators. MethodsX, 11(August), 102455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102455
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakarmi, G., Strager, M. P., Yuill, C., Moreira, J. C., Burns, R. C., & Butler, P. (2023). Assessing public preferences of landscape and landscape attributes: A case study of the proposed Appalachian Geopark project in West Virginia, USA. Geoheritage, 15(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00851-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L., & Cubukcu, E. (2011). Evaluative appraisals of environmental mystery and surprise. Environment and Behavior, 43(3), 387–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510364500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L., Julian, D., Buchman, S., Humphreys, D., & Mrohaly, M. (1983). The emotional quality of scenes and observation points: A look at prospect and refuge. Landscape Planning, 10(4), 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(83)90041-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassauer, J. I. (1992). The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology, 6(4), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natori, Y., & Chenoweth, R. (2008). Differences in rural landscape perceptions and preferences between farmers and naturalists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negev, M. (2012). Knowledge, data and interests: Challenges in participation of diverse stakeholders in HIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, C. F. (2020). Perception and evaluation of buildings: The effects of style and frequency of exposure. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.324
   Google Scholar
• Nia, H. A. N. (2021). The role of urban aesthetics on enhancing vitality of urban spaces. Khulna University Studies, 18, 59–77.https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2021.18.02.2112-E
   Google Scholar
• Nüsser, M. (2001). Understanding cultural landscape transformation: A re-photographic survey in Chitral, eastern Hindukush, Pakistan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3–4), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00207-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode Sang, Å., & Tveit, M. S. (2012). Perceptions of stewardship in Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Land Use Policy, 31, 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode Sang, Å., Thorpert, P., & Fransson, A. M. (2022). Planning, designing, and managing green roofs and green walls for public health – An ecosystem services approach. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.804500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode, Å., Hagerhall, C. M., & Sang, N. (2010). Analysing visual landscape complexity: Theory and application. Landscape Research, 35(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390903414935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode, Å., Tveit, M. S., & Fry, G. (2008). Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701773854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogborn, M. (1996). History, memory and the politics of landscape and space: Work in historical geography from autumn 1994 to autumn 1995. Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, F. (2010). Conceptual modelling of landscape complexity. Landscape Research, 35(5), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2010.504913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, S., & Domon, G. (2001). Trends in rural landscape development and sociodemographic recomposition in southern Quebec (Canada). Landscape and Urban Planning, 55(4), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00154-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, S., & Domon, G. (2003). Changing ruralities, changing landscapes: Exploring social recomposition using a multi-scale approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, R., & Daniel, T. C. (2002). Good looking: In defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00051-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimoljinda, T., & Siriprasertchok, R. (2017). Failure of public participation for sustainable development: A case study of a NGO’s development projects in Chonburi province. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.016
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32(5), 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provins, A., Pearce, D., Ozdemiroglu, E., Mourato, S., & Morse-Jones, S. (2008). Valuation of the historic environment: The scope for using economic valuation evidence in the appraisal of heritage-related projects. Progress in Planning, 69(4), 131–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, A. T., & Lamb, R. J. (2006). Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00073-5
   Google Scholar
• Qi, Z., Duan, J., Su, H., Fan, Z., & Lan, W. (2023). Using crowdsourcing images to assess visual quality of urban landscapes: A case study of Xiamen Island. Ecological Indicators, 154(July), 110793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110793
   Google Scholar
• Rangel-Buitrago, N., Correa, I. D., Anfuso, G., Ergin, A., & Williams, A. T. (2012). Assessing and managing scenery of the Caribbean Coast of Colombia. Tourism Management, 35, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosley, M. S. F. (2013). Indicator validation in landscape visual quality assessment based on experts and stakeholders perception. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Rosley, M. S. F. (2019). The image and identity of Muar as the Modern Royal Town of the Johor Sultanate, Malaysia: From the perspective of place identity. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/25025/
   Google Scholar
• Rosley, M. S. F., Lamit, H., & Abdul, S. R. (2013). Perceiving the aesthetic value of the rural landscape through valid indicators. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.362
   Google Scholar
• Rotherham, I. D. (2007). The implications of perceptions and cultural knowledge loss for the management of wooded landscapes: A UK case-study. Forest Ecology and Management, 249(1–2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1989). The genesis of historic landscape conservation in Australia. Landscape Planning, 17(4),305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(89)90084-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. L. (2002). Preserving rural character in New England: Local residents’ perceptions of alternative residential development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00066-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargentis, G. F., Siamparina, P., Sakki, G. K., Efstratiadis, A., Chiotinis, M., & Koutsoyiannis, D. (2021). Agricultural land or photovoltaic parks? The water—energy—food nexus and land development perspectives in the Thessaly plain, Greece. Sustainability, 13(16), 8935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharafatmandrad, M., & Khosravi Mashizi, A. (2021). Temporal and spatial assessment of supply and demand of the water-yield ecosystem service for water scarcity management in arid to semi-arid ecosystems. Water Resources Management, 35(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02706-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, H., Luo, J., Liu, Q., & Lan, Y. (2023). Landscape design intensity and its associated complexity of forest landscapes in relation to preference and eye movements. Forests, 14(4), 761. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (2007). The philosophy of landscape. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407084465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solehin, M., Rosley, F., Rafida, S., & Rahman, A. (2014). Biophilia theory revisited: Experts and non-experts perception on aesthetic quality of ecological landscape. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.068
   Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E. (2004). Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E. (2007). Mystery of environmental mystery: Effects of light, occlusion, and depth of view. Environment and Behavior, 39(2), 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506288053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E.III. (2002). Entropy, visual diversity, and preference. The Journal of General Psychology, 129(3), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209602100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, R. C., Lathrop, R. C., Clark, B., Ejsmont-Karabin, J., Kasprzak, P., Nielsen, K., Osgood, D., Powell, M., Ventelä, A. M., Webster, K. E., & Zhukova, A. (2007). Perceived environmental quality and place attachment in North American and European temperate lake districts. Lake and Reservoir Management, 23(4), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/07438140709354022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen Jacobsen, J. K. (2007). Use of landscape perception methods in tourism studies: A review of photo-based ­research approaches. Tourism Geographies, 9(3), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616680701422871
   Google Scholar
• Suckall, N., Fraser, E. D. G., Cooper, T., & Quinn, C. (2009). Visitor perceptions of rural landscapes: a case study in the Peak District National Park, England. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbalds, F. (2001). Making people friendly towns: Improving the public environment in towns and cities. Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tveit, M., Ode, Å., & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390600783269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen, L., Mäkinen, K., & Schipperijn, J. (2007). Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzoulas, K., & James, P. (2010). Peoples’ use of, and concerns about, green space networks: A case study of Birchwood, Warrington New Town, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581135001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9
   Google Scholar
• Villagra Islas, P., & Gastón Vergara, D. (2012). Perceived visual landscape changes in a fire prone environment: A multi-method approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Foley, K. (2023). Promoting climate-resilient cities: Developing an attitudinal analytical framework for understanding the relationship between humans and blue-green infrastructure. Environmental Science & Policy, 146(May), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Browning, M. H. E. M., Kee, F., & Hunter, R. F. (2023). Exploring mechanistic pathways linking urban green and blue space to mental well-being before and after urban regeneration of a greenway: Evidence from the Connswater Community Greenway, Belfast, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 235(March), 104739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104739
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A. B., Christensen, A. P., Coburn, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2021). Psychological responses to buildings and natural landscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77(August), 101676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101676
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. C., & Baldwin, E. D. (2012). Historic preservation, significance, and age value: A Comparative phenomenology of historic Charleston and the nearby new-urbanist community of I’On. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenakis, I., Arnellos, A., & Darzentas, J. (2012). The functional role of emotions in aesthetic judgment. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, Y. C., Usman, M. S., Tahir, M. M., & Zainal Abidin, I. (2007, August 24–26). Assessment of Perbadanan Putrajaya Office ground based on urban open space design guideline. In Proceeding of the 3rd WSEAS International Conference on Energy, Environment, Sustainable Development and Landscaping, Greece (pp. 331–337).
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, B. (2006). Reclaiming cultural heritage in Singapore. Urban Affairs Review, 41(6), 830–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406289187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Li, Y., Cheng, J., Qin, Y., Shen, G., Li, B., Yang, H., & Li, S. (2023). Understanding the aesthetic perceptions and image impressions experienced by tourists walking along tourism trails through continuous cityscapes in Macau. Journal of Transport Geography, 112, 103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., Teng, R., Wang, C., Wang, Y., He, J., & Yu, F. (2023). Key environmental factors affecting perceptions of security of night-time walking in neighbourhood streets: A discussion based on fear heat maps. Journal of Transport & Health, 32, 101636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar