1,607
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Comparison of complications after transfemoral coronary angiography between mechanical and manual closure techniques

& ORCID Icon | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1362185 | Received 11 Jun 2017, Accepted 27 Jul 2017, Published online: 11 Aug 2017

References

  • Ando, G., & Capodanno, D. (2016). Radial access reduces mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Results from an updated trial sequential analysis of randomized Trials. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 9, 660–670. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.008
  • Ando, G., Cortese, B., Frigoli, E., Ganor, A., Garducci, S., Briguori, C., … Rubartelli, P. (2015). Acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale of the AKI-MATRIX sub-study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 86, 950–957. doi:10.1002/ccd.25932
  • Caputo, R. P., Tremmel, J. A., Rao, S., Gilchrist, I. C., Pyne, C., Pancholy, S., … Frasier, D. (2011). Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: Executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 78, 823–839. doi:10.1002/ccd.23052
  • Gregory, D., Midodzi, W., & Pearce, N. (2013). Complications with Angio-Seal™ vascular closure devices compared with manual compression after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 26, 630–638. doi:10.1111/joic.12070
  • Holm, N. R., Sindberg, B., Schou, M., Maeng, M., Kaltoft, A., Bøttcher, M., … Lassen, J. F. (2014). Randomized comparison of manual compression and FemoSeal vascular closure device for closure after femoral artery access coronary angiography: The closure devices used in everyday practice (CLOSE-UP) study. EuroIntervention, 10, 183–190. doi:10.4244/eijv10i2a31
  • Kandarpa, K., Machan, L., & Durham, J. (2016). Handbook of interventional radiologic procedures (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
  • Larsen, E. N., Hansen, C. B., Thayssen, P., & Jensen, L. O. (2014). Immediate mobilization after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention following hemostasis with the AngioSeal vascular closure device (the MOBS study). European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 13, 466–472. doi:10.1177/1474515113516702
  • Matte, R., Hilário, T., Reich, R., Aliti, G., & Rabelo-Silva, E. (2016). Reducing bed rest time from five to three hours does not increase complications after cardiac catheterization: The THREE CATH Trial. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 24. doi:10.1590/1518-8345.0725.2796
  • Mohammady, M., Heidari, K., Sari, A. A., Zolfaghari, M., & Janani, L. (2014). Early ambulation after diagnostic transfemoral catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.018
  • Schulz-Schüpke, S., Helde, S., Gewalt, S., Ibrahim, T., Linhardt, M., Haas, K., … Kastrati, A. (2014). Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture. Jama, 312, 1981–1987. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15305
  • Sindberg, B., Schou, M., Hansen, L., Christiansen, K., Jørgensen, K., Søltoft, M., … Lassen, J. F. (2014). Pain and discomfort in closure of femoral access coronary angiography. The Closure devices used in everyday practice (CLOSE-UP) pain sub study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 13, 221–226. doi:10.1177/1474515113482809