A Christian Ontology of Genetic Disease and Disorder

REFERENCES

• Andrews, E.L. (1995, May 13). Religious leaders prepare to fight patents on genes. New York Times,
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas, T. (1964–1981) [1265–1274]. Summa theologiae. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine. (1982) [401]. The literal meaning of genesis (vol. 19, J.H. Taylor, Trans.). New York, NY: Newman Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, K. (2009). Church dogmatics (Study ed.). London, UK: T & T Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilay, J.M. (Judge). (2003). Opinion. In 96–10–02291. New York, NY: United States Court of International Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Billings, J.T. (2007). Calvin, participation, and the gift: The activity of believers in union with Christ. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., Brock, D.W., Daniels, N., & Wikler, D. (2000). From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bynum, C.W. (1995). The resurrection of the body in western Christianity, 200–1336. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvin, J. (1960). Institutes of the Christian religion. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camosy, C. (2013). Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: A brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39 (5), 296–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childress, K.D. (2003). Genetics, disability, and ethics: Could applied technologies lead to a new eugenics? Journal of Women and Religion, 19(20), 157–178.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, W. (2000, June 20). Text of the White House statements on the Human Genome Project. New York Times, paragraph 8. Retrieved from http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/science/062700sci-genome-text.html
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1986) The blind watchmaker. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eiesland, N.L. (1994). The disabled God: Toward a liberatory theology of disability. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, H.T. , Jr. (1974). The disease of masturbation: Values and the concept of disease. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 48(2), 234–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engelhardt, H.T. Jr. (1996). The foundations of bioethics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J.F. (1979). Humanhood: Essays in biomedical ethics. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gaukroger, S. (2001) Francis Bacon and the transformation of early–modern philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gestrich, C. (1997). The return of splendor in the world: the Christian doctrine of sin and forgiveness. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, W. (1992). A vision of the grail. In D.J. Kevles & L.E. Hood (Eds.), The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the human genome project (p. x). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilkey, L. (1985). Maker of heaven and earth: The Christian doctrine of creation in the light of modern knowledge. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. (1999). Seduced by science: How American religion has lost its way. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory of Nazianzus. (1954) [383]. Letter to Cledonius against Apollinaris. In E.R. Hardy (Ed.), Christology of the later Fathers. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory of Nyssa. (2005) [380–383]. The life of Saint Macrina. (Trans. Kevin Corrigan). Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, J.M. (1981). Ethics from a theocentric perspective (vol. 19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanby, M. (2013). No God, no science? Theology, cosmology, biology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hefner, P. (2004). The necessity for a theology of disease. Zygon, 39(2), 487–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevles, D.J. (1992). Out of eugenics: The historical politics of the human genome. In D.J. Kevles & L. Hood (Eds.), The code of codes: Scientific and social issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
   Google Scholar
• King, Jr., N. (2003, January 20). Fans howl in protest as judge decides X-Men aren't human: Marvel fought to have characters ruled nonhuman to win lower tariff on toys. Wall Street Journal,
   Google Scholar
• Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (1985). Should the baby live? The problem of handicapped infants. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebacqz, K. (2011). Dignity and enhancement in the Holy City. In Ronald Cole-Turner (Ed.), Transhumanism and transcendence: Christian hope in an age of technological enhancement. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, M. (1959) [1528]. Sermons I (vol. 19): Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, H., & Davies, B. (2008). On Aquinas. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, I.A. (2008). Fallen or unfallen? Christ's human nature and the ontology of human sinfulness. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 10(4), 399–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrmann, M. (1995) Medicine as ministry. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moltmann, J. (1974). The crucified God: The cross of Christ as the foundation and criticism of Christian theology. London, UK: SCM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M.S. (2004). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Ottati, D.F. (2013). Theology for liberal protestants: God the creator. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Pannenberg, W. (2004). Systematic theology. London, UK: T & T Clark International.
   Google Scholar
• Presbyterian Church USA (PCUSA). (1978). Our confessional heritage: Confessions of the reformed tradition with a contemporary declaration of faith. Atlanta, GA: Materials Distribution Service of the PCUSA.
   Google Scholar
• Reinders, H.S. (2013). Understanding humanity and disability: Probing an ecological perspective. Studies in Christian Ethics, 26(1), 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T.E. (2008). Vulnerable communion: A theology of disability and hospitality. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiermacher, F. (1928). The Christian faith. Edinburgh, UK: T&T Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, J.L. (2008). Disability bioethics: Moral bodies, moral difference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shuman, J.J., & Meador, K.G. (2003). Heal thyself: Spirituality, medicine, and the distortion of Christianity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1979). Practical ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swinton, J. (2004). Critical reflections on Stanley Hauerwas’ theology of disability: Disabling society, enabling theology. New York, NY: Haworth Pastoral Press
   Google Scholar
• Thatamanil, J.J. (2006). The immanent divine: God, creation, and the human predicament. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tillich, P. (1951). Systematic theology (vol. 19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Tillich, P. (1957). Systematic theology (vol. 19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Tillich, P. (1963). Systematic theology (vol. 19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• United Methodist Church. (1992). The book of resolutions. Nashville, TN: United Methodist Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, A. (2007). Theology and Down syndrome: Reimagining disability in late modernity. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
   Google Scholar