Vanier & L’Arche: Defying the Tyranny of Distance

References

• Aguas, J. J. S. (2009). The Notions of the Human Person and Human Dignity in Aquinas and Wojtyla. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 40–60. Retrieved from http://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_5/aguas_june2009.pdf. doi:10.25138/3.1.a.4
   Google Scholar
• Allier, H. (1982). A place for human growth. In J. Vanier (Ed.), The challenge of L’Arche (pp. 51–69). London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (1925). Ethica Eudemia. (J. Solomon, Trans.). In W. D. Ross (Ed.). The works of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2001a). On the parts of the animals. (W. Ogle, Trans.). In R. McKeon, (Ed.). The basic works of Aristotle. London: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2001b). Politics. (B. Jowett, Trans.). In R. McKeon (Ed.). The basic works of Aristotle. London: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Blainey, G. (1966/2001). The tyranny of distance: How distance shaped Australia’s future. Melbourne, Australia: Pan Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bowne, B. P. (1908). Personalism. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brightman, E. S. (1950). Personalism (including personal idealism) In V. Ferm (Ed.), A history of philosophical systems (pp.340-352). New York, NY: The Philosophical Library.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (2017). I and thou. (R. Gregor-Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buford, T. (2011). Personalism. In Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/personal/
   Google Scholar
• Burgos, J. M. (2012). Introduction to personalism. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldecott, S. (2001). Catholic social teaching. London: CTS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero, M. T. (1928). De Officiis. London: William Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B. (1974). Enough room for joy: Jean Vanier’s L’Arche, a message for our time. Essex, UK; Darton, Longman & Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B. (2006). Enough room for joy: The early days of Jean Vanier’s L’Arche. New York, NY: Blue Bridge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (1973). L’Arche journal: A family’s experience in Jean Vanier’s Community. Toronto, CA: Griffin House.
   Google Scholar
• Coogan, M. (Ed.). (2010). The Oxford annotated bible, new revised standard version with the apocrypha. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deweer, D. (2013). The political theory of personalism: Maritain and Mounier on personhood and citizenship. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 74(2), 108–126. doi:10.1080/21692327.2013.809869
   Google Scholar
• Downey, M. (1986). A blessed weakness: The spirit of Jean Vanier and L’Arche. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, E., & McVilly, K. (2004). Friendships activities of adults with intellectual disabilities in supported accommodation in Northern England. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(3), 191–197. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, B. (1992). The Role of Jacques Maritain and Emmanuel Mounier in the Creation of French Personalism. The Personalist Forum, 8(1), 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Greig, J. (2017). The Slow Journey towards Beatitude: Disability in L’Arche, and staying human in high-speed society. Journal of Moral Theology, 6(2), 180–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gueye, C. H. (2011). Ethical personalism. Frankfurt: Ontos, Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hauerwas, S., & Vanier, J. (2008). Living gently in a violent world: A prophetic witness of weakness. (Resources for Reconciliation). Downers Grove, II: InterVarsity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. W. (2016). Jean Vanier: logician of the heart. Collegeville, MN: St. John’s Abbey.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, A. (1927). The philosophy of personalism. New York, NY: The Abingdon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. E. (2003). The new rights of man. London: Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Macmurray, J. (1961). Persons in relation. New York, NY: Harper & Bros.
   Google Scholar
• Macmurray, J. (1969). Self as agent. London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Marcel, G. (1949). Being and Having. Glasgow: The University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcel, G. (1951). Homo Viator. Introduction to a metaphysics of hope. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Company.
   Google Scholar
• Marcel, G. (1963). The existential background of human dignity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcel, G. (1971). En chemin: Vers quel eveil? Paris, Fr: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Marcel, G. (1984). An autobiographical essay. In P. A. Schilpp & L. E. Hahn. (Eds.). The philosophy of Gabriel Marcel (pp. 3–70).LaSalle, Ill: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Marcel, G. (1997). Le Mystere de l’Etre. Paris: Association Presence de Gabriel Marcel.
   Google Scholar
• Maritain, J. (1966). The person and the common good. (J. J. Fitzgerald, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maritain, J. (2011). Christianity & democracy, the rights of man and natural law. (D. Gallagher, Trans.). San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maritain, J. (1942). Les droits de l’homme et la loi naturelle. Retrieved from https://fr.unesco.org/courier/2018-4/droits-lhomme-loi-naturelle
   Google Scholar
• Markova, A. (n.d). The concept of dignity in the capability approach: A personalist perspective. Retrieved from http://eprints.nbu.bg/1084/1/The__Concept__of__Dignity_in_capability_Approach_a______Personalistic_Perspective_%282%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCauliff, C. M. A. (2009). Cognition and consensus in the natural law trading an in neuroscience: Jacques Maritain and the Universal Declaration of human rights. Villanova Law Review, 54, 435–477.
   Google Scholar
• McGlyn, J. (2019). Us’ not ‘Them’: Disability and Catholic theology and social teaching. Alexandria: Office for Social Justice.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, R., Gilfillan, G., & Gordon, J. (2013). Deep and persistent disadvantage in Australia. Canberra: Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Mosteller, S. (1982). Living with. In J. Vanier (Ed.), The challenge of L’Arche (pp. 11–24). London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Mounier, E. (1952a). Be not afraid, a denunciation of despair. (C. Rowland, Trans.). London: University of Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Mounier, E. (1952b). Personalism. (P. Mairet, Trans.). Notre Dame, In: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mounier, E. (1962). Oeuvres: Tomes III (1944–1950). Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, B. (2017). Yours is a straight line … ours is a circle. In M. Neale (Ed.), Songlines: Tracking the seven sisters (pp. 128–131). Canberra: National Museum of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Nouwen, H. (1997). Adam: God’s beloved. New York, NY: Orbis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, M. (1998). The Judeo-Christian foundation of human dignity, personal liberty and the concept of the person. Journal of Markets and Morals, Action Institute. Retrieved from https://acton.org/node/6500.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, V. I. (1965). Pastoral constitution on the Church in the modern world: Gaudium et spes. Retrieved from http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J. P. (1968). Being & nothingness. New York, NY: Pocket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scheler, M. (1973). Formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values: A new attempt toward a foundation of an ethical personalism. (M. S. Frings and R. L. Funk, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigmund, P. E. (1987). Maritain on politics. In D. W. Hudson & M. J. M. Macon. (Eds.), Understanding Maritain: Philosopher and Friend (pp. 153–170).Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P., & Regan, T. (1989). Animal rights and human obligations. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Spaemann, R. (1996). Personen: Versuche über den Unterschied zwischen ‘etwas’ und ‘jemand, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. (See especially chapter 18 entitled “Sind alle Menschen Personen?”, 252–264.
   Google Scholar
• Spink, K. (1990). Jean Vanier & L’Arche: A communion of love. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Stiker, H. (1997). A history of disability. (W. Sayers, Trans.). Anne Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sulmasy, D. P. (2007). Human dignity and human worth. In J. Malpas & N. Lickiss. (Eds.), Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation (pp. 9–19). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sulmasy, D. P. (2013). The varieties of human dignity: A logical and conceptual analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 16(4), 937–944. doi:10.1007/s11019-012-9400-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetman, B. (2008). The vision of Gabriel Marcel. Amsterdam: Rodopi Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetman, B. (2016). The uniqueness and continued relevance of Gabriel Marcel. Studia Humana, 5(2), 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Treanor, D. Interview with L’Arche Assistants. Trosly-Breuil.
   Google Scholar
• Treanor, D., & Duke, Z. (2016). L’Arche: A service provider or a centre for living spirituality? Paper presented at the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 15^th World Congress, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (1969). In weakness, strength: The spiritual sources of Georges P. Vanier, 19th Governor-General of Canada. Toronto, Canada: Griffin House.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (1970). Tears of silence. Toronto, Canada: Griffin House.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (1971). Eruption to hope. Toronto, Canada: Griffin House.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (1982). The challenge of L’Arche. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (1985). Man and woman: He made them. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (1995). An ark for the poor: The story of L’Arche. Ottawa, Canada: Novalis.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (1999). Becoming human. Toronto, Canada: House of Annasi Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (2007). Our life together: A memoir in letters. Toronto, Canada: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Vanier, J. (2017). Interview by David Treanor. Trosly-Breuil.
   Google Scholar
• Verdonschot, M. M. L., de Witte, L. P., Reichrath, E., Buntinx, W. H. E., & Curfs, L. M. G. (2009). Community participation of people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(4), 303–318. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01144.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, B. (2018). Welcome as a way of life: A practical theology of Jean Vanier. Eugene, Or, USA: Cascade Books.
   Google Scholar
• Warnock, M. (1971). The philosophy of Sartre. London: Hutchinson & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, W. (1976). Song of myself. In M. Crowley (Ed.), Leaves of grass (p. 49). Haemondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. D., & Olof Bengtsson, J. O. (2018). Personalism. In E. N. Azlta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/personalism/.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, D. (1960). Emmanuel Mounier: A Catholic of the left. Review of Politics, 22(3), 324–344.
   Google Scholar