Evaluating the performance of university course units using data envelopment analysis

References

• Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2011). Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert‐like thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1289–1312.10.1080/09500693.2010.512369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwadood, Z., Noor, N. M., & Kamarudin, M. F. (2011, September 25–28). Performance measure of academic departments using data envelopment analysis. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE Symposium on Business Engineering and Industrial Applications, Langkawi, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Barnetson, B., & Cutright, M. (2000). Performance indicators as conceptual technologies. Higher Education, 40, 277–292.10.1023/A:1004066415147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, C. P., & Weber, L. W. (2009). Productivity growth and biased technological change in UK airports. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45, 642–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, J. E. M. (1995). Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 441–452.10.1057/jors.1995.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, W. E. (2004). Quantitative research on teaching methods in tertiary education. In W. E. Becker & M. L. Andrews (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 265–309). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beran, T., & Violato, C. (2005). Ratings of university teacher instruction: How much do student and course characteristics really matter? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 593–601.10.1080/02602930500260688
   Google Scholar
• Bessent, A., Bessent, W., Elam, J., & Clark, T. (1988). Efficiency frontier determination by constrained facet analysis. Operations Research, 36, 785–796.10.1287/opre.36.5.785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggeri, L., & Bini, M. (2001). Evaluation at university and state level in Italy: Need for a system of evaluation and indicators. Tertiary Education and Management, 7, 149–162.10.1080/13583883.2001.9967048
   Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, S., & Fortenberry, N. L. (2005). Final report: Measuring student and faculty engagement in engineering education (CASEE Report 5902001-2005-0705). Washington, DC: The National Academy of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Bobe, B. (2009, July 5–7). Evaluating the efficiencies of university faculties: Adjusted data envelopment analysis. Paper presented at the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ) Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1991). Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 52, 1–15.10.1016/0377-2217(91)90331-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockx, B., Spooren, P., & Mortelmans, D. (2011). Taking the grading leniency story to the edge. The influence of student, teacher and course characteristics on student evaluations of teaching in higher education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23, 289–306.10.1007/s11092-011-9126-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crumbley, L., Henry, B. K., & Kratchman, S. H. (2001). Student’s perceptions of the evaluation of college teaching. Quality Assurance in Education, 9, 197–207.10.1108/EUM0000000006158
   Google Scholar
• Duke University. (2011). International credentials guide 2011–2012. Durham, NC: Graduate School, Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, J. (2006, November 2–3). Measuring and explaining economic students learning efficiency. Paper presented at the 25th Arne Ryde Symposium, Lund University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• El-Mahgary, S. (1995). Data envelopment analysis. OR Insight, 8, 15–22.10.1057/ori.1995.21
   Google Scholar
• El-Mahgary, S., & Lahdelma, R. (1995). Data envelopment analysis: Visualizing the results. European Journal of Operational Research, 83, 700–710.10.1016/0377-2217(94)00303-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Mahgary, S., & Soisalon-Soininen, S. (2007, September 3–7). A two-phased visual query interface for relational databases. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Database and Expert System Applications (DEXA), Regensburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 151–157.10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Hanke, M., & Leopoldseder, T. (1998). Comparing the efficiency of Austrian universities: A data envelopment analysis application. Tertiary Education and Management, 4, 191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. (1999, May). Evaluating the evaluators. Opening keynote at the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Johnes, J. (2006a). Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK universities 1993. European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 443–456.10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnes, J. (2006b). Measuring efficiency: A comparison of multilevel modelling and data envelopment analysis in the context of higher education. Bulletin of Economic Research, 58, 75–104.10.1111/boer.2006.58.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Köksal, G., & Nalçaci, B. (2006). The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A data envelopment analysis. Higher Education, 51, 173–189.10.1007/s10734-004-6380-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, W.-H., & Fu, T.-T. (2012). Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators. Omega, 40, 541–549.10.1016/j.omega.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, A. (1982). Institutional performance in higher education: The efficiency dimension. Review of Educational Research, 52, 175–199.10.3102/00346543052002175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longden, B. (2006). Interpreting student early departure from higher education through the lens of cultural capital. Tertiary Education and Management, 10, 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudvand, R., & Hassani, H. (2009). Two new confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation in a normal distribution. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36, 429–442.10.1080/02664760802474249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maingot, M., & Zeghal, D. (2008). An analysis of voluntary disclosure of performance indicators by Canadian universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 14, 269–283.10.1080/13583880802481666
   Google Scholar
• Martín, E. (2007). Efficiency and quality in the current higher education context in Europe: An application of the data envelopment analysis methodology to performance assessment of departments within the University of Zaragoza. Quality in Higher Education, 12, 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Metters, R. D., Vargas, V. A., & Whybark, D. C. (2001). An investigation of the sensitivity of DEA to data errors. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 41, 163–171.10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00050-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad Ishak, M. I., Suhaida, M. S., & Yuzainee, M. Y. (2009, April 14–17). Performance measurement indicators for academic staff in Malaysia private higher education institutions: A case study in uniten. Paper presented at the Performance Measurement Association Conference, University of Otago, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Murillo-Zamorano, L. R. (2004). Economic efficiency and frontier techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18, 33–77.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2004.00215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, M., & Stroker, B. (1991). Data envelopment analysis—The assessment of performance. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, M. C. A., & Thanassoulis, E. (2006). Zero weights and non-zero slacks: Different solutions to the same problem. Annals of Operations Research, 145, 129–147.10.1007/s10479-006-0029-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkka, A., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Adult students’ achievement goal orientations and evaluations of the learning environment: A person-centred longitudinal analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 297–322.10.1080/13803611.2013.767741
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129–150.10.1080/03075079112331382944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J., & Seol, I. (2010). Course evaluation validation using data envelopment analysis. The Accounting Educator’s Journal, 20, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrico, C. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2000). Using data envelopment analysis for planning in UK universities—An institutional perspective. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 789–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2001). The impact of performance indicators on the work of university academics: Evidence from Australian universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 55, 42–61.10.1111/hequ.2001.55.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P. (1997). Developing education students’ conceptions of the learning process in different learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 7, 277–292.10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00029-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeremes, N., & Halkos, G. (2010). A DEA approach for measuring university departments’ efficiency. MPRA Paper 24029. University Library of Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. (1993). Grade adjustment methods. Review of Educational Research, 63, 151–165.10.3102/00346543063002151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar