Impact of CEO’s characteristics on investment decisions of Indian listed firms: Does crisis make any difference?

References

• Aivazian, V. A., Ying, G., & Qui, J. (2005). The impact of leverage on firm investment: Canadian evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 277–291.10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00062-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 837–853.10.2307/1556413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Elston, J. A. (2002). Does firm size matter? Evidence on the impact of liquidity constraints on firm investment behaviour in Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, H. K., & Nofsinger, J. R. (2002). Psychological biases of investors. Financial Services Review, 11(2), 97.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1–32.10.1111/1540-6261.00414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2013). Behavioral corporate finance: An updated survey. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 2(A), 357–424.
   Google Scholar
• Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053–1128.10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01027-6
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. H. (1970). Sociometric location and innovativeness: Reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 267–282.10.2307/2093205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2003). Emerging market finance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10, 3–55.10.1016/S0927-5398(02)00054-3
   Google Scholar
• Ben Mohamed, E., Fairchild, R., & Bouri, A. (2014). Investment cash flow sensitivity under managerial optimism: New evidence from NYSE panel data firms. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 19(36), 11–18.10.1016/j.jefas.2014.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.10.1162/003355303322552775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, A., & Brooks, M. (2008). Behavioral finance: Theories and evidence. The Research Foundation of CFA Institute Literature Review, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Calomiris, C. W., Orphanides, O., & Sharpe, S. A. (1994, July 1). Leverage as a state variable for employment, inventory accumulation, and fixed investment (Working Paper No. w4800). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. E., & Guariglia, A. (2008). Cash flow, investment, and investment opportunities: New tests using UK panel data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1894–1906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. J., & Chen, S. J. (2012). Investment-cash flow sensitivity cannot be a good measure of financial constraints: Evidence from the time series. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(2), 393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollinger, M. J. (1984). Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 351–368.10.2307/255929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, J., & Rosen, H. S. (1983). Agency, delayed compensation, and the structure of executive remuneration. Journal of Finance, 38(5), 1489–1505.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03836.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild, R. (2005). Behavioral finance in a principal-agent model of capital budgeting. Icfai Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2(1), 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild, R. (2007). Managerial overconfidence, agency problems, financing decision and firm performance. Working Paper Series. UK: School of Management, University of Bath.
   Google Scholar
• Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., & Peterson, B. C. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988(1), 141–206.10.2307/2534426
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St Paul: West Publishing Company, Minneapolis, 22(2), 221–224.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Q., & Liu, X. (2015). Monetary policy and dynamic adjustment of corporate investment: A policy transmission channel perspective. China Journal of Accounting Research, 8(2), 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz, M. A., & Boyd, B. K. (2011). CEO outside directorships and firm performance: A reconciliation of agency and embeddedness views. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 335–352.10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R., & Murphy, K. J. (1992). Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 468–505.10.1086/261826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Puri, M. (2013). Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 103–121.10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, J. P., & Smith, K. G. (1991). Management and organizational change: A note on the railroad industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 557–562.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guariglia, A. (2008). Internal financial constraints, external financial constraints, and investment choice: Evidence from a panel of UK firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1795–1809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunz, H. P., & Jalland, R. M. (1996). Managerial careers and business strategies. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 718–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 401–418.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.10.1002/smj.v31:11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin, S., & Weisbach, M. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20, 101–112.10.2307/3665716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, D. (1993). Managerial reputation and corporate investment decisions. Financial Management, 22(2), 145–160.10.2307/3665866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, D., & Thakor, A. V. (1992). Managerial conservatism, project choice, and debt. Review of Financial Studies, 5(3), 437–470.10.1093/rfs/5.3.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B., & Costa, J. R. I. (1986). Managerial incentives and capital management. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 835–860.10.2307/1884180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmström, B. (1999). Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Review of Economic studies, 66(1), 169–182.10.1111/roes.1999.66.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., & Liu, Y. J. (2015). Valuing diversity: CEOs’ career experiences and corporate investment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 11–31.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Cava, G. (2005, December). Financial constraints, the user cost of capital and corporate investment in Australia. Research Discussion Paper. UK: Reserve Bank of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., Low, A., & Makhija, A. K. (2014). Career concerns and the busy life of the young CEO. Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2011-03-004.
   Google Scholar
• López-Gutiérrez, C., Sanfilippo-Azofra, S., & Torre-Olmo, B. (2015). Investment decisions of companies in financial distress. Business Research Quarterly, 18(3), 174–187.
   Google Scholar
• Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005a). Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, 11(5), 649–659.10.1111/eufm.2005.11.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005b). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, P. J., Tomkins, C., Weir, C., & Hobson, D. (2000). CEO age and top executive pay: A UK empirical study. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(3), 173–187.10.1023/A:1026755428942
   Google Scholar
• Mezghanni, B. S. (2010). How CEO attributes affect firm R&D spending? New evidence from a panel of French firms. Crises et nouvelles problématiques de la Valeur, Nice, France, CD-ROM, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1991). Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 37(1), 34–52.10.1287/mnsc.37.1.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (2001). Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8), 725–745.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinsky, A. (2016). Cultural differences are more complicated than what country you’re from. Harvard Business Review Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/01/cultural-differences-are-more-complicated-than-what-country-youre-from
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. (2007). Discussion of rational and psychological decision-making the-ories and models: The search for a cultural-ethical decision-making model. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(2), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C., & Stole, L. (1996). Impetuous youngsters and jaded old-timers: Acquiring a reputation for learning. Journal of Political Economy, 104(6), 1105–1134.10.1086/262055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajakumar, J. D. (2005). Corporate financing and investment behavior in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(38), 4159–4165.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, O. C., Wu, P., & Chadwick, K. (2009). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance: The role of CEO position tenure and industry tenure. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(5), 1078–1095.10.1080/09585190902850281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, J. R. (2003). Behavioral finance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(4), 429–437.10.1016/S0927-538X(03)00048-9
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. B., & Rosenberg, I. (2006). Nutrition and aging: Changes in the regulation of energy metabolism with aging. Physiological Reviews, 86(2), 651–667.10.1152/physrev.00019.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review, 80, 465–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Struefert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Serfling, M. A. (2014). CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 251–273.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokuoka, K. (2012, March). Does the business environment affect corporate investment in India? Working Paper, No. WP12/70. International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, N. H., & Le, C. D. (2017). Financial conditions and corporate investment: Evidence from Vietnam. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(2), 183–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virany, B., Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1992). Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 3(1), 72–91.10.1287/orsc.3.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwiebel, J. (1995). Corporate conservatism and relative compensation. Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 1–25.10.1086/261973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar