An empirical analysis of Pakistan’s bilateral trade and trade potential with China: A gravity model approach

References

• Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2001). Border, trade and welfare. Boston College Working Paper 508, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2002). On the endogeneity of international trade flows and free trade agreements. Manuscript March 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 474–481. doi:10.2307/1925976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition and the factor—Proportions theory in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143–153. doi:10.2307/1928061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. (1990). The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Economic Journal, 100, 1216–1229. doi:10.2307/2233969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Econometric Studies, 47(1), 239–253. doi:10.2307/2297111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodzicki, T., Ciołek, D., & Śledziewska, K. (2017). What really determines Polish exports? The semi-mixed effects gravity model for Poland. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(39), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bun, M. J. G., & Klaassen, F. J. G. M. (2007). The Euro effect on trade is not as large as commonly thought. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 473–496. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrere, C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, 50(2), 223–247. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyrus, T. (2011). Cultural proximity and bilateral trade in the European Union. Retrieved from http://www.euce.org/eusa/2011/papers/12d_cyrus.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, A. V. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In J. A. Frankel (Ed.), The regionalization of the world economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disdier, A. C., & Head, K. (2003). Exaggerated reports on the death of distance. Mineo: Lessons from a Meta-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2011). ‘Econometrics for grumblers: A new look at the literature on cross-country growth empirics’. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(1), 109–155. doi:10.1111/joes.2011.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, D. R. (2007). Caribbean regionalism and the expectation of increased trade: Insights from a time-series gravity model. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 16(1), 117–136. doi:10.1080/09638190601165830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfahani, M. N., & Rasoulinezhad, E. (2017). Iran’s trade policy of Asianization and de-Europeanization under sanctions. Journal of Economic Studies, 44(4), 552–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenett, S., & Keller, W. (2002). On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 281–316. doi:10.1086/338746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. S., & Lambert, D. M. (2008). Do regional trade agreements increase members’ agricultural trade? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(3), 765–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market structure and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2014). A new perspective of the China-ASEAN free trade area and the story of top ten products. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(18), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2015a). Pakistan China free trade agreement (PCFTA) treaty model: Capability, prospects and disputes. Academic Research International, 6(3), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2015b). Rising trend in import and exports of Pakistan FTA partners in recent years. Academic Research International, 6(4), 320–331.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2017a). Determinants of exports competitiveness: An empirical analysis through revealed comparative advantage of external sector of Pakistan. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 6(3), 623–633.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2017b). The gravity behind South Korea’s international trade: A panel data approach. The Myanmar Journal, 4(2), 76–89.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., & Arshad, H. (2015). One belt one road: Does China-Pakistan Economic Corridor benefit for Pakistan’s economy? Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(24), 200–207.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Ayaz, M., & Ali, F. (2016). The role of charismatic world trade organization and the expansion of free international trade. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 2(3), 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Hao, H., & Arshad, H. (2017). SWOT analysis of Pakistan–China free trade agreement: PROS and CONS. International Journal of Asian Social Sciences, 7(1), 45–53. doi:10.18488/journal.1
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Shahriar, S., & Ali, F. (2018). South Korea’s potential export flow: A panel gravity approach. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 8(4), 124–139.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Shahriar, S., & Arshad, H. (2018). A panel data analysis of China’s trade pattern with OPEC members: Gravity model approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(1), 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Xuan, L., & Arshad, H. (2016). Deltoid analysis of Pakistan-ASEAN-China free trade agreements and opportunity for Pakistan. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 6(5), 228–237. doi:10.18488/journal.aefr/2016.6.5/102.5.228.237
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., & Arshad, H. (2018). Competitiveness of Pakistani rice in international market and export potential with global world: A panel gravity approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1486690
   Google Scholar
• Jong, G. D., Hugh, G., Warren, W., & Jenny, W. (2002). Study on ideas on a new national freight model system for Sweden. Norway: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kandogan, Y. (2005). Evidence for the natural trade partners theory from the Euro-Mediterranean region. Working Paper Series No. 2005-01.University of Michigan-Flint School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & Fratianni, M. (2006). International trade, OECD membership, and religion. Open Economic Review, 17(4–5), 493–508. doi:10.1007/s11079-006-0361-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepaptsoglou, K., Karlaftis, M. G., & Tsamboulas, D. (2010). The gravity model specification for modelling international trade flows and free trade agreements effects. The Open Economics Journal, 3, 1–13. doi:10.2174/1874919401003010001
   Google Scholar
• Kucera, D., & Sarna, R. (2006). Trade union rights, democracy, and exports: A gravity model approach. Review of International Economics, 14(5), 859–882. doi:10.1111/roie.2006.14.issue-5
   Google Scholar
• Leamer, E. E. (1974). The commodity composition of international trade in manufactures: An empirical analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 26(3), 350-374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnemann, H. (1966). Modeling international trade flows: An econometric approach. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, et al (2005). Transport costs and trade: Empirical evidence for Latin American imports from the European Union. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 14(3), 353–371. doi:10.1080/09638190500212121
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Zarzaso, I. (2003). Gravity model: An application to trade between regional blocs. Atlantic Economic Journal, 31(2), 174–187. doi:10.1007/BF02319869
   Google Scholar
• Melitz, J. (2007). North, South and distance in the gravity model. European Economic Review, 51(4), 971–991. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscone, F., & Tosetti, E. (2009). A review and comparison of tests of cross-section independence in Panels. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 23(3), pp.528–561. doi:10.1111/joes.2009.23.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papazoglou, C. (2007a). Greece’s potential trade flows: A gravity model approach. International Advances in Economic Research, 13(4), 403–414. doi:10.1007/s11294-007-9107-x
   Google Scholar
• Papazoglou, C. (2007b). Greece’s potential trade flows: A gravity model approach. International Advances in Economic Research, 13(4), 403–414. doi:10.1007/s11294-007-9107-x
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004), General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240, Retrieved from: http://repec.iza.org/dp1240.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robert, B., Felix, B., Jared, G., Wayne, C., & Paul G. (2015). Exploring the links between bilateral and regional trade agreements and merchandise trade. Asian and Pacific Policy Studies, 2(3), 467–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, J. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–658. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloaga, I., & Winters, A. (2001). Regionalism in the Nineties: What effect on trade? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 1–29. doi:10.1016/S1062-9408(01)00042-0
   Google Scholar
• Tang, D. (2005). Effects of the regional trading arrangements on trade: Evidence from the NAFTA, ANZCER and ASEAN countries, 1989–2000. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 14(2), 241–265. doi:10.1080/09638190500093562
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, M., & Zhang, Z. (2005). Study of the measurement and determinants of intra-industry trade in East Asia. Asian Economic Journal, 19(2), 231–247. doi:10.1111/asej.2005.19.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Tzouvelekas, V. (2007). Accounting for pairwise heterogeneity in bilateral trade flows: A stochastic varying coefficient gravity model. Applied Economic Letters, 14(12), 927–930. doi:10.1080/13504850600705919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2005). Global Economic Prospects. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, H. (2015). Spotlight: China South Korea to deepen economics ties with FTA implementation. Available from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-12/19/c_134933148.htm
   Google Scholar
• Xin, Q., Irshad, M. S., & Hao, H. (2014). Boon or bane: Assessing the environment of China’s free trade agreements with other nations. International Journal of Business and Management Review, Vol. 2(No.5), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Xuegang, C., Zhaoping, Y., & Xuling, L. (2008). Empirical analysis of Xinjiang’s bilateral trade: Gravity model approach. Chinese Geographical Science, Vol. 18(No. 1), pp. 9–16. doi:10.1007/s11769-008-0009-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar