The making of a makerspace in Ethiopia: A study of legitimacy using Actor-Network Theory

References

• Allen, L., Mesfin, H. M., Alemu, S., & Corsini, L. (2020). Making health innovation more inclusive in Ethiopia. Gates Open Res, 4, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ambole, A. (2020). Rethinking design making and design thinking in Africa. Design and Culture, 12(3), 331–350. doi:10.1080/17547075.2020.1788257
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1994). Shaping technology / building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Molina, J.-L. (2005). Toward ethical guidelines for network research in organizations. Social Networks, 27(2), 107–117. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D. (2005). Organisational legitimacy, capacity and capacity development. (Discussion paper No. 58A). Maastricht: European Centre for Development Policy Management.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information: A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–41. doi:10.1080/00014788.1998.9729564
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
   Google Scholar
• Castelló, I., Etter, M., & Nielsen, F. Å. (2016). Strategies of legitimacy through social media: The networked strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 402–432. doi:10.1111/joms.12145
   Google Scholar
• Corsini, L., Aranda-Jan, C. B., & Moultrie, J. (2019). Using digital fabrication tools to provide humanitarian and development aid in low-resource settings. Technology in Society, 58, 101117. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Corsini, L., Dammicco, V., Bowker-Lonnecker, L., & Blythe, R. (2020). The Maker movement and its impact in the fight against COVID-19 [Working Paper]. University of Cambridge: Centre for Technology Management. doi:10.17863/CAM.60248
   Google Scholar
• Corsini, L., & Moultrie, J. (2018). The role of makerspaces for crisis-affected communities: Benefits and challenges. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1344465
   Google Scholar
• Corsini, L., & Moultrie, J. (2020). Humanitarian makerspaces in crisis-affected communities. AI EDAM, 1–13. doi:10.1017/S0890060420000098
   Google Scholar
• Coulon, F. (2005). The use of Social Network analysis in innovation research: A literature review. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• de Beer, J., Armstrong, C., Ellis, M., & Kraemer-Mbula, E. (2017). A scan of South Africa’s maker movement (Working Paper 9, p. 45). Open AIR. WP-9-A-Scan-of-South-Africas-Maker-Movement.pdf (openair.africa)
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J. W., Plunkett Tost, L., & Suchman, M. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 49–77). SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781849200387.n2
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in Organizational institutionalism. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.4135/9781849200387.n2
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in Organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Google Scholar
• Dlodlo, N., & Beyers, R. (2009). Experiences of South African high school girls in a fab lab environment. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 37, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fablabs.io. (2020). Labs Map | FabLabs. FabLabs.Io - The Fab Lab Network. Retrieved from https://www.fablabs.io/labs/map
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). Truth and power: An interview with Michel Foucault. Critique of Anthropology, 4(13–14), 131–137. doi:10.1177/0308275X7900401311
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692–710.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Rappa, M. A. (1994). A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organization Science, 5(3), 344–362.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N. (2012). How to make almost anything: The digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Affairs (council. on Foreign Relations), 91, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N., Gershenfeld, A., & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (2017). Designing reality: How to survive and thrive in the Third industrial revolution. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hennelly, P. A., Srai, J. S., Graham, G., Meriton, R., & Kumar, M. (2019). Do makerspaces represent scalable production models of community-based redistributed manufacturing? Production Planning & Control, 30(7), 540–554.
   Google Scholar
• Irie, N. R., Hsu, Y-C., & Ching, Y-H. (2019). Makerspaces in diverse places: A comparative analysis of distinctive national discourses surrounding the maker movement and education in four countries. TechTrends, 63(4), 397–407. doi:10.1007/s11528-018-0355-9
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D. (1985). The political economies of associations. Research in Political Sociology, 1, 211–242.
   Google Scholar
• Kostakis, V., Niaros, V., & Giotitsas, C. (2015). Production and governance in hackerspaces: A manifestation of commons-based peer production in the physical realm? International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(5), 555–573. doi:10.1177/1367877913519310
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Armstrong, C. (2017). The maker movement in Gauteng Province, South Africa. South Africa, 47, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lashitew, A., & Tulder, R. (2017). Inclusive business in Africa: Priorities, strategies and challenges. In Entrepreneurship in Africa (pp. 71–94). Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/9789004351615_005
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An Introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1984). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 234–263.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B. (2008). Power, institutions and organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational institutionalism (pp. 170–197). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lindtner, S., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2016). Reconstituting the Utopian vision of making: HCI after technosolutionism. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1390–1402). doi:10.1145/2858036.2858506
   Google Scholar
• Littlewood, D. C., & Kiyumbu, W. (2018). “Hub” organisations in Kenya: What are they? What do they do? And what is their potential? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 276–285. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.031
   Google Scholar
• Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. doi:10.3102/0013189X017002013
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Google Scholar
• Mower, S., Allen, L., Alemu, S., Weletaw, Y., & L'Heureux, A. (2019). Co-creating a maker space in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, Gates Open Research.
   Google Scholar
• Nkoudou, T. H. M. (2017). Benefits and the hidden face of the maker movement: Thoughts on its appropriation in African context | Os benefícios e a face oculta do movimento maker: Reflexões sobre sua apropriação no contexto africano. Liinc Em Revista, 13(1), Article 1. doi:10.18617/liinc.v13i1.3774
   Google Scholar
• Okpala, H. N. (2016). Making a makerspace case for academic libraries in Nigeria. New Library World, 117(9/10), 568–586. doi:10.1108/NLW-05-2016-0038
   Google Scholar
• Oladele-Emmanuel, B. D., Rejeb, H. B., & Redlich, T. (2018). Strategic Management: SWOT Analysis of the African Digital Fabrication Laboratories. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436269.
   Google Scholar
• Özman, M. (2017). Strategic Management of innovation networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Illinois: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Halverson, E. R., & Kafai, Y. B. (2016). Makeology: Makers as learners (Vol. 2). Berkley: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, C., Museum, A., Osseo-Asare, D., & M’Rithaa, M. K. (2019). Crafting spaces between design and futures: The case of the Agbogbloshie Makerspace Platform, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Schonwetter, T., & Wiele, B. V. (2018). 3D printing: Enabler of social entrepreneurship in Africa? The roles of FabLabs and low-cost 3D printers. D Printing, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Seo-Zindy, R., & Heeks, R. (2017). Researching the emergence of 3D printing, makerspaces, hackerspaces and FabLabs in the global south: A scoping review and research agenda on digital innovation and fabrication networks. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 80(1), 1–24. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00589.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2017). Social innovation, democracy and makerspaces. SPRU Working Paper Series (SWPS 2017-10). University of Sussex. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.30640.35843
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Hielscher, S., Dickel, S., Söderberg, J., & van Oost, E. (2013). Grassroots digital fabrication and makerspaces: Reconfiguring, relocating and recalibrating innovation? University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Soublière, J.-F., & Gehman, J. (2016). Legitimacy spillovers and piggybacking: The collective Legitimation of New ventures and fields. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 12630. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2016.12630abstract
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, `translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1988). Constructing an institutional approach ecology: Notes on the structural dynamics of organisational communities. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. doi:10.2307/258788
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (n.d.). Overview: Ethiopia [Text/HTML]. World Bank. Retrieved November 28, 2020, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ethiopia/overview
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. doi:10.2307/4134387
   Google Scholar