304
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mixing realities: reflections on presence and embodiment in intermedial performance design of Blue Hour VR

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bakk, Á. K. 2019. “Performativity and Worldmaking.” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies 17 (1) (October 1): 169–178.
  • Bay-Cheng, Sarah, Chiel Kattenbelt, Andy Lavender, and Robin Nelson, eds. 2010. Mapping Intermediality in Performance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Bertinetto, A. 2011. “Improvisation and Artistic Creativity.” Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 3: 81–103.
  • Biocca, Frank, and Mark R. Levy, eds. 1995. Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. LEA’s Communication Series. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Chapple, Freda, and Chiel Kattenbelt, eds. 2006. Intermediality in Theatre and Performance. 1st ed. Themes in Theatre 2. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hannah, Dorita, and Olav Harsløf, eds. 2008. Performance Design. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.
  • Kang, L., S. J. Jackson, and P. Sengers. 2018. “Intermodulation: Improvisation and Collaborative Art Practice for HCI.” In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 160:1–160:13. CHI ‘18. New York: ACM.
  • Kattenbelt, C. 2008. “Intermediality in Theatre and Performance: Definitions, Perceptions and Medial Relationships.” Culture, Language and Representation VI: 19–29.
  • Kilteni, K., R. Groten, and M. Slater. 2012. “The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 21 (4): 373–387.
  • King, A. F. 2018. “Moving Masks and Mobile Monkeys: The Technodramaturgy of Augmented Reality Puppets.” Theatre and Performance Design 4 (4): 324–341.
  • Lee, K. M. 2004. “Presence, Explicated.” Communication Theory 14 (1): 27–50.
  • Machon, J. 2013. Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mancewicz, A. 2014. Intermedial Shakespeares on European Stages. Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • McKinney, Joslin, and Scott Palmer, eds. 2017. Scenography Expanded: An Introduction to Contemporary Performance Design. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
  • Milgram, P., and F. Kishino. 1994. “A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays.” IEICE Transactions on Information Systems E77-D, no. 12.
  • Noë, A. 2012. Varieties of Presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Núñez-Pacheco, C. 2018. “Reflection through Inner Presence: A Sensitising Concept for Design.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2 (1): 5.
  • Power, C. 2008. Presence in Play. A Critique of Theories of Presence in the Theatre. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Roberts-Smith, J., and P. Cegys. 2019. “Relational Scenography: Collaborative Scenographic Practices for Restorative Justice in Virtual Reality.” Paper presented at the PQ Talks as part of the Prague Quadrennial of Performance Design and Space, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Segura, E. M., L. T. Vidal, and A. Rostami. 2016. “Bodystorming for Movement-Based Interaction Design.” Human Technology 12 (2): 193–251.
  • Slater, M. 2018. “Immersion and the Illusion of Presence in Virtual Reality.” British Journal of Psychology 109 (3): 431–433.
  • Speicher, M., B. D. Hall, and M. Nebeling. 2019. “What Is Mixed Reality?” In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 537:1–537:15. CHI ‘19. New York: ACM.
  • Uricchio, W. 2018. VR: Between Hope, Hype, and Humbug. Los Angeles Review of Books. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/vr-between-hope-hype-and-humbug/
  • Weijdom, J. 2016. Mixed Reality and the Theatre of the Future. Brussels: IETM. https://www.ietm.org/en/publications/fresh-perspectives-6-mixed-reality-and-the-theatre-of-the-future
  • Wendrich, R. 2016. “Hybrid Design Tools for Conceptual Design and Design Engineering Processes: Bridging the Design Gap: Towards an Intuitive Design Tool.” PhD diss., University of Twente in Enschede, Netherlands.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.