Supply Chains and Unfree Labor: Regulatory Failure in the Case of Samsung Electronics in Slovakia

References

• Andrijasevic, R. (2010). Migration, agency and citizenship in sex trafficking. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andrijasevic, R., & Sacchetto, D. (2017). ‘Disappearing workers’: Foxconn in Europe and the changing role of temporary work agencies. Work, Employment and Society, 31(1), 54–70. doi:10.1177/0950017015622918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azmeh, S., & Nadvi, K. (2013). ‘Greater Chinese’ global production networks in the Middle East: The rise of the Jordanian garment industry. Development and Change, 44(6), 1317–1340. doi:10.1111/dech.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrientos, S. (2013). ‘Labour chains’: Analysing the role of labour contractors in global production networks. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(8), 1058–1071. doi:10.1080/00220388.2013.780040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, J. (2015). ‘Looking back, looking forward’: The UN trafficking protocol at fifteen. Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Blackett, A. (2001). Global governance, legal pluralism and the decentered state: A labor law critique of codes of corporate conduct. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 8(2), 401–447.
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, S., & Plank, L. (2010). Under pressure: Working conditions and economic development in ICT production in Central and Eastern Europe. Berlin, Germany: World Economy, Ecology and Development (WEED)
   Google Scholar
• Brhane, M. O. (2015). Trafficking in persons for ransom and the need to expand the interpretation of article 3 of the UN trafficking protocol. Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 120–141.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. (2016). Decent labour standards in corporate supply chains: The immokalee workers model. In J. Howe & R. Owens (Eds.), Temporary labour migration in the global era (pp. 351–376). Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Calvao, F. (2016). Unfree labour. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 45, 451–467. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100307
   Google Scholar
• Chantavanich, S., Laodumrongchai, L., & Stringer, C. (2016). Under the shadow: Forced labour among sea fishers in Thailand. Marine Policy, 68, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (2016). The good, the bad, the ugly: Human rights violators in comparative perspective. Journal of Human Trafficking, 2(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/23322705.2016.1136166
   Google Scholar
• Chudžíková, A. H., & Bargerová, Z. (2018). Victims of labour exploitation or ‘illegal’ migrants? Ukrainian workers’ labour rights protection in Slovakia. Bratislava, Slovakia: Centre for the Research of Ethnicity and Culture (CVEK).
   Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., Jones, K., & Ward, K. (2010). The business of temporary staffing: A developing research agenda. Geography Compass, 4(8), 1055–1068. doi:10.1111/geco.2010.4.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., & Wylie, G. (2011). Defining trafficking/denying justice? Forced labour in ireland and the consequences of trafficking discourse. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(9), 1513–1526. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2011.623625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feasley, A. (2016). Eliminating corporate exploitation: Examining accountability regimes as means to eradicate forced labor from supply chains. Journal of Human Trafficking, 2(1), 15–31. doi:10.1080/23322705.2016.1137194
   Google Scholar
• Fudge, J. (2012-13). Precarious migrant status and precarious employment: The paradox of international rights for migrant workers. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 34, 95–131.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A. (2001). Human rights and the new UN protocols on trafficking and migrant smuggling: A preliminary analysis. Human Rights Quarterly, 23(4), 975–1004. doi:10.1353/hrq.2001.0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A. (2015). Two cheers for the trafficking protocol. Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 14–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mera, L. (2017). The global governance of trafficking in persons: Toward a transnational regime complex. Journal of Human Trafficking, 3(4), 303–326. doi:10.1080/23322705.2016.1278344
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. (2017). Regulating the human supply chain. Iowa Law Review, 102(445), 445–503.
   Google Scholar
• Grupo Davida. (2015). Trafficking as a floating signifier: The view from Brazil. Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, L., & Novitz, T. (2013). Workers without Footprints: The legal fiction of migrant workers as posted workers. In B. Ryan (Ed.), Labour migration in hard times: Reforming labour market regulation? (pp. 99–118). Liverpool, UK: Institute of Employment Rights.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. (2016). Report IV: Decent work in global supply chains, ILC, 105th session Geneva. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/ilc/ILCSessions/105/reports/reports-to-the-conference/WCMS_468097/lang–en/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jahnsen, S., & Skilbrei, M.-L. (2015). From Palermo to the streets of Oslo: Pros and cons of the trafficking framework. Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 156–160.
   Google Scholar
• Kangaspunta, K. (2015). Was trafficking in persons really criminalised? Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 80–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kempadoo, K. (2015). The modern-day white (wo) man’s burden: Trends in anti-trafficking and anti-slavery campaigns. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1(1), 8–20. doi:10.1080/23322705.2015.1006120
   Google Scholar
• Kempadoo, K., Sanghera, J., & Pattanaik, B. (2015). Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered: New perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights (2nd ed.). New York,NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kotiswaran, P. (2015). Protocol at the Crossroads: Rethinking anti-trafficking law from an Indian labour law perspective. Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mai, N. (2016). ‘Too much suffering’: Understanding the interplay between migration, bounded exploitation and trafficking through nigerian sex workers’ experiences. Sociological Research Online, 21(4), 1–14. doi:10.5153/sro.4158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, E., & Olden, A. (2015). The role of trade unions in reducing migrant workers’ vulnerability to forced labour and human trafficking in the greater mekong subregion. Anti-Trafficking Review, 5, 111–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F., & Phillips, N. (2017). Outsourcing governance: States and the politics of a ‘global value chain world’. New Political Economy, 22(2), 134–152. doi:10.1080/13563467.2016.1273341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, S. (2013). Many chains to break: The multi-dimensional concept of slave labour in Brasil. Antipode, 45(4), 1005–1028. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novitz, T. (2018). Collective bargaining and social dumping in posting and procurement: What might come from recent court of justice case law and the proposed reform of the posted workers directive? In Sanchez-Graells (Ed.), Smart public procurement and labour standards: Pushing the discussion after RegioPost (pp. 215–241). Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR, (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/GuidingprinciplesBusinesshr_eN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, C. (2015). The trafficking protocol has advanced the global movement against human exploitation: The case of the United Kingdom. Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 150–155.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., & Mieres, F. (2015). The governance of forced labour in the global economy. Globalizations, 12(2), 244–260. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.932507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prassl, J. (2015). The concept of the employer. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, J., Purcell, K., & Tailby, S. (2004). Temporary work agencies: Here today, gone tomorrow? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(4), 705–725. doi:10.1111/bjir.2004.42.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, M. (2017). Constrained labour as instituted process. Transnational contract work and circular migration in late capitalism. European Journal of Sociology, 58(1), 171–204. doi:10.1017/S0003975617000054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, H. (2012). A Labor Paradigm for Human Trafficking. UCLA Law Review, 60, 76–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, K., & McGrath, S. (2017). Temporary migration, precarious employment and unfree labour relations: Exploring the ‘continuum of exploitation’ in Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker Program. Geoforum, 78, 199–208. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2011). Convergences and divergences in international legal norms on migrant labor. Comparative and Labour Law Policy Journal, 32, 404–441.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, B., & Hassel, A. (2016). Posting, subcontracting and low-wage employment in the German meat industry. Transfer, 22(2), 163–178. doi:10.1177/1024258916636012
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, I. (2015). The political economy of borders in a ‘borderless’ European labour market. Journal of Common Market Studies, 35(6), 1370–1385. doi:10.1111/jcms.12256
   Google Scholar
• Wijers, M. (2015). Purity, victimhood and agency: Fifteen years of the UN trafficking protocol. Anti-Trafficking Review, 4, 56–79.
   Google Scholar