Modeling Disruptions to Sex Trafficking Networks with Other Forced Illegal Activities

References

• Barnard, A. M. (2014). The second chance they deserve: Vacating convictions of sex trafficking victims. Columbia Law Review, 114(6), 1463–1502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, K., Maass, K. L., Sharkey, T. C., Song, Y., & Martin, L. (2023). Expanding our understanding of traffickers and their operations: A review of the literature and path forward. Forthcoming in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231210937
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Box, G. E. (1979). Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In R.L Launer & G.N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Robustness in statistics (pp. 201–236). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H. (2015). Introduction: How to situate and define action research. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research (Third Edition ed., pp. 1–12). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, B. L., Mentz, G., Jensen, M., Jacobs, B., Saylor, K. M., Rowe, Z., Israel, B. A., & Lachance, L. (2020). Success in long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships: A scoping literature review. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119882989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulkins, J. P., Kammer-Kerwick, M., Konrad, R., Maass, K. L., Martin, L., & Sharkey, T. C. (2019). A call to the engineering community to address human trafficking. The Bridge, 49(3), 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Cockbain, E. (2018). Offender and victim networks in human trafficking. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coxen, J., Castro, V., Carr, B., Bredin, G., & Guikema, S. (2023, February 19). COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on online sex advertising and sex trafficking Journal of Human Trafficking. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2023.2215362
   Google Scholar
• Dank, M. L., Khan, B., Downey, P. M., Kotonias, C., Mayer, D., Owens, C., Pacific, L., & Yu, L. (2014). Estimating the size and structure of the underground commercial sex economy in eight major US cities. Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Devaney, S. (2022). Justice for all? Impeding the villainization of human trafficking victims via the expansion of vacatur laws. Pepperdine Law Review, 49, 241–248. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol49/iss1/5
   Google Scholar
• Dimas, G. L., Konrad, R. A., Maass, K. L., Trapp, A. C., & Kuo, Y.-H. (2022). Operations research and analytics to combat human trafficking: A systematic review of academic literature. PLoS One, 17(8), e0273708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubrawski, A., Miller, K., Barnes, M., Boecking, B., & Kennedy, E. (2015). Leveraging publicly available data to discern patterns of human-trafficking activity. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2015.1015342
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A., & Bright, K. (2016). Human trafficking. In B. H. Huebner & T. S. Bynum(Eds.), The handbook of measurement issues in criminology and criminal justice (First ed.,) (pp. 111–130). John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A., & de Vries, I. (2019). Measuring the nature and prevalence of human trafficking. In J. Winterdyk & J. Jones (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of human trafficking (pp. 147–162). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Gerassi, L., Edmond, T., & Nichols, A. (2017). Design strategies from sexual exploitation and sex work studies among women and girls: Methodological considerations in a hidden and vulnerable population. Action Research, 15(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750316630387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horning, A., Thomas, C., Marcus, A., & Sriken, J. (2020). Risky business: Harlem pimps’ work decisions and economic returns. Deviant Behavior, 41(2), 160–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2018.1556863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B., & Richard, S. (2016). National survivor network members survey: Impact of criminal arrest and detention on survivors of human trafficking. National Survivor Network.
   Google Scholar
• Keskin, B. B., Bott, G. J., & Freeman, N. K. (2021). Cracking sex trafficking: Data analysis, pattern recognition, and path prediction. Production and Operations Management, 30(4), 1110–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, R., Maass, K. L., Dimas, G. L., & Trapp, A. C. (2023). Perspectives on how to conduct responsible anti-human trafficking research in operations and analytics. European Journal of Operational Research, 309(1), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmas, D., Melander, C., Singerhouse, E., Sharkey, L., Barrick, K., Maass, K. L., & Martin, T. C. (2023). A transdisciplinary approach for generating synthetic but realistic domestic sex trafficking networks. Forthcoming in IISE Transactions, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2023.2169418
   Google Scholar
• Kosmas, D., Sharkey, T. C., Mitchell, J. E., Maass, K. L., & Martin, L. (2022). Multi-period max flow network interdiction with restructuring for disrupting domestic sex trafficking networks. Forthcoming in Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-05087-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., Gupta, M., Maass, K. L., Melander, C., Singerhouse, E., Barrick, K., Samad, T., Sharkey, T. C., Ayler, T., Forliti, T., Friedman, J., Nelson, C., & Sortillion, D. (2022). Learning each other’s language and building trust: Community-engaged transdisciplinary team building for research on human trafficking operations and disruption. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221101966. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221101966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., & Lotspeich, R. (2014). A benefit-cost framework for early intervention to prevent sex trading. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(1), 43–87. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2013-0021
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L., Melander, C., Fritz Fogel, K., Saito, B., Garnett McKenzie, M., & Park, R. (2018). Safe harbor for all: Results from a statewide strategic planning process in Minnesota. https://uroc.umn.edu/research/safe-harbor-all-strategic-planning-process
   Google Scholar
• Mayorga, M., Tateosian, L., Velasquez, G., Amindarbari, R., & Caltagirone, S. (2019). Countering human trafficking using ISE/OR techniques. In H.B. Nembhard, E.A. Cudney, & K.M. Coperich (Eds.), Emerging frontiers in industrial and systems engineering (pp. 237–257). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, K. (2019). A path to protection: Collateral crime vacatur for wisconsin’s victims of sex trafficking. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3457956
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-López, S. (2020). Telling victims from criminals: Human trafficking for the purposes of criminal exploitation. In J. Winterdyk & J. Jones Q11 (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Human Trafficking (pp. 303–318). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Roe-Sepowitz, D. (2019). Child sex trafficking survivor roundtable. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs AMBER Alert Training and Technical Assistance Program. https://socialwork.asu.edu/sites/default/files/2022-10/2019_aattap_cst_roundtable_final_report_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roe-Sepowitz, D., Greene, E., Bruist, K., Dirks, S., Walters, J., Gallagher, J., Bracy, K., Hogan, K., Lul, B., Byun, J., & Duffield, V.(2020). Trick roll study: Forced criminality in sex trafficking situations.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A. (2018). Human trafficking: A research synthesis on human-trafficking literature in academic journals from 2000–2014. Journal of Human Trafficking, 4(2), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2017.1292377
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, T. C., Maass, K., Song, Y., Barrick, K. L., Farrell, A., & Martin, L. (2021). Better together: A transdisciplinary approach to disrupt human trafficking. ISE Magzine, 51(11), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.c4eb821a
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. C. & Song, Y. (2020). A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(3), 797–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobey, M., Li, R., Özaltın, O. Y., Mayorga, M. E., & Caltagirone, S. (2022). Interpretable models for the automated detection of human trafficking in illicit massage businesses. IISE Transactions, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2022.2113187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, N., Muhammad, M., Sanchez-Youngman, S., Rodriguez Espinosa, P., Avila, M., Baker, E. A., Barnett, S., Belone, L., Golub, M., Lucero, J., Mahdi, I., Noyes, E., Nguyen, T., Roubideaux, Y., Sigo, R., & Duran, B. (2019). Power dynamics in community-based participatory research: A multiple–case study analysis of partnering contexts, histories, and practices. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1_suppl), 19S–32S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119852998
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walton, S. E. (2020). Protecting sex trafficking victims through expungement and vacatur statutes: Will Virginia join the rest of the nation?. Journal of Global Justice and Public Policy, 6, 95. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409345
   Google Scholar
• White, A., Guikema, S., & Carr, B. (2021). Why are you here? Modeling illicit massage business location characteristics with machine learning. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2021.1982238
   Google Scholar
• Xie, X., & Aros‐Vera, F. (2022). An interdependent network interdiction model for disrupting sex trafficking networks. Production and Operations Management, 31(6), 2695–2713. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. X. (2009). Beyond the Natasha story: A review and critique of current research on sex trafficking. Global Crime, 10(3), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440570903079899
   Google Scholar